Enhancing High-Speed Railway Timetable Resilience: A Two-Level Spatiotemporal Network Model Focused on Disturbance Absorption

Abstract

Enhancing the resilience of train timetables can effectively improve their resistance and recovery capabilities against operational disturbances, thereby ensuring the stable operation of the railway system and the quality of passenger transportation services. This paper defined timetable resilience as three parts: disturbance absorptive capacity, resistance capacity, and post-disturbance recovery capacity. These capacities were quantitatively evaluated using the buffer time of trains, the number of train delays at departures and arrivals, and the duration of delay state. The evaluation metrics of the three resilience capacities and the total travel time of trains were used as the objective to establish a spatiotemporal network model. Utilizing actual operational data from the Beijing–Shanghai high-speed railway in China, the model was validated through a case study. Sensitivity analysis of the model's key parameters was conducted under two experimental scenarios: routine operational disturbances and speed restrictions on specific sections. Results showed that our model can effectively reduce the delay time and the number of delays in both the routine operational disturbance scenario and the 300 km/h speed restriction scenario with a frequent disturbance value of 2 min. Moreover, the model's performance with 3-min frequent disturbance outperformed that with 2-min frequent disturbance in speed restriction at 250 km/h and 200 km/h, yielding a 30% improvement.

References

[1] Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1973, 4: 1-23.

[2] Murray-Tuite P (2006) A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions. In: Winter simulation conference, pp 1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2006.323240

[3] Pagani A, Mosquera G, Alturki A, et al.. Resilience or robustness: identifying topological vulnerabilities in rail networks Roy Soc Open Sci, 2019.

[4] Tang JQ, Xu L, Luo CL, Ng TSA. Multi-disruption resilience assessment of rail transit systems with optimized commuter flows Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2021.

[5] Chen J, Liu J, Peng Q, Yin Y. Resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network: a case study of Chengdu subway Physica A, 2022.

[6] Chen J, Liu J, Peng Q, Yin Y. Strategies to enhance the resilience of an urban rail transit network Transp Res Rec, 2022, 2676: 342-354.

[7] Yin J, Ren X, Liu R, et al.. Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: a hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2022.

[8] Besinovic N, Nassar RF, Szymula C. Resilience assessment of railway networks: combining infrastructure restoration and transport management Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2022.

[9] Ilalokhoin O, Pant R, Hall JW. A model and methodology for resilience assessment of interdependent rail networks—case study of Great Britain's rail network Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2023, 229: 2345.

[10] Bešinović N. Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda Transp Rev, 2020, 40: 457-478.

[11] Polinder G, Breugem T, Dollevoet T, Maroti G. An adjustable robust optimization approach for periodic timetabling Transp Res B-Meth, 2019, 128: 50-68.

[12] Pätzold J. Finding robust periodic timetables by integrating delay management Public Transp, 2021, 13: 349-374.

[13] Solinen E, Palmqvist C. Development of new railway timetabling rules for increased robustness Transp Policy, 2023, 133: 198-208.

[14] Huang P, Wen C, Peng Q, et al.. A data-driven time supplements allocation model for train operations on high-speed railways Int J Rail Transp, 2019, 7: 140-157.

[15] Meng L, Abid MM, Jiang X, et al.. Increasing robustness by reallocating the margins in the timetable J Adv Transp, 2019.

[16] Bešinović N, Quaglietta E, Goverde RMP. Resolving instability in railway timetabling problems Euro J Transp Logist, 2019, 8: 833-861.

[17] Hoegdahl J, Bohlin M. A combined simulation-optimization approach for robust timetabling on main railway lines Transp Sci, 2023, 57: 52-81.

[18] Hogdahl J, Bohlin M, Froidh O. A combined simulation-optimization approach for minimizing travel time and delays in railway timetables Transp Res B-Meth, 2019, 126: 192-212.

[19] Erlandson W, Hall CH, Peterson A, Schmidt C. Meta-heuristic for inserting a robust train path in a non-cyclic timetable Transp Plan Tech, 2023, 46: 842-863.

[20] Liu L, Song S, Wang Z, Zhang Y. Data-driven distributionally robust optimization for railway timetabling problem IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 2024, 21: 810-826.

[21] Liu P, Schmidt M, Kong Q, et al.. A robust and energy-efficient train timetable for the subway system Transp Res C-Emer, 2020.

[22] Restel F, Wolniewicz L, Mikulcic M. Method for designing robust and energy efficient railway schedules Energies, 2021.

[23] Yang H, Ni S, Huo H, et al.. Integrated robust optimization of maintenance windows and train timetables using ADMM-driven and nested simulation heuristic algorithm Transp Res C-Emer, 2024.

[24] Hosseini S, Ivanov D, Dolgui A. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis Transp Res Part E Logis Transport Rev, 2019, 125: 285-307.

Funding

Beijing Jiaotong University(2024XKRC055)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.