Qualitative analysis of online discussion boards for male urinary incontinence after prostate treatment

Adrian Fernandez, Behzad Abbasi, Architha Sudhakar, Christine Shieh, Lindsay A. Hampson, Jason L. Lui, Umar Ghaffar, Hiren Patel, Nathan M. Shaw, Benjamin N. Breyer

PDF(543 KB)
PDF(543 KB)
UroPrecision ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 101-107. DOI: 10.1002/uro2.57
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Qualitative analysis of online discussion boards for male urinary incontinence after prostate treatment

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Introduction: Though urinary incontinence (UI) after prostate treatment often contributes to emotional distress and significantly impacts quality of life, many patients do not discuss this condition with their physicians. We analyzed the patient perspective by examining online support group posts to gain insight into specific challenges associated with different UI management methods.

Methods: We examined discussion board threads from multiple patient‐focused forums on experiences of UI due to prostate treatment (threads from January 2016 to January 2022). Principles of grounded theory in thematic analysis were used to analyze the threads.

Results: Three hundred and eighteen posts from 84 unique users were analyzed. Among users, 47 (56%) reported UI following radical prostatectomy (RP), 5 (6%) secondary to radiation therapy (RT), 12 (14%) after a combination of RP and RT, and 20 (24%) were ambiguous. UI management methods included pads/diapers/liners, condom catheters/external clamps, Kegels/pelvic floor physiotherapy, and surgical treatment (artificial urinary sphincter or sling placement). We identified challenges common to all management methods: “requires trial and error,” “physical discomfort,” and “difficult to be in public.” Factors influencing management choices included the ability to “feel normal” and the development of a management routine.

Conclusion: The current study identifies opportunities for improved expectation‐setting and education regarding post‐procedural UI and its management. These findings can serve as a guide for providers to counsel patients on the advantages and disadvantages of UI management devices.

Keywords

artificial urinary sphincter / condom catheter / prostatectomy / prostate cancer / urethral sling / urinary incontinence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Adrian Fernandez, Behzad Abbasi, Architha Sudhakar, Christine Shieh, Lindsay A. Hampson, Jason L. Lui, Umar Ghaffar, Hiren Patel, Nathan M. Shaw, Benjamin N. Breyer. Qualitative analysis of online discussion boards for male urinary incontinence after prostate treatment. UroPrecision, 2024, 2(3): 101‒107 https://doi.org/10.1002/uro2.57

References

[1]
Murphy C , Avery M , Macaulay M , Fader M . Experiences and impact of living with incontinence associated stigma: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS One. 2022; 17 (7): e0270885.
[2]
Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline.
[3]
Tutolo M , Cornu JN , Bauer RM , Ahyai S , Bozzini G , Heesakkers J , et al. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38 (2): 710- 8.
[4]
Smoger SH , Felice TL , Kloecker GH . Urinary incontinence among male veterans receiving care in primary care clinics. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132 (7): 547- 51.
[5]
Chughtai B , Lee R , Sandhu J , Te A , Kaplan S . Conservative treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Rev Urol. 2013; 15 (2): 61- 6.
[6]
Cedars BE , Cohen AJ , Fergus KB , Baradaran N , Ndoye M , Kamal P , et al. Qualitative analysis of the content found in online discussion boards for urethral stricture disease and urethroplasty. Urology. 2019; 130: 155- 61.
[7]
Chapman A , Hadfield M , Chapman C . Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015; 45 (3): 201- 5.
[8]
Bouchard K . Anonymity as a double-edge sword: reflecting on the implications of online qualitative research in studying sensitive topics. Qual Rep. 2016; 21 (1): 59- 67.
[9]
Sharf BF . Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women Health. 1997; 26 (1): 65- 84.
[10]
Hacker EC , Lai LY , Baradaran N , Elaine Allen I , Breyer BN , Copp HL , et al. Patient characteristics associated with sexual interest and activity among adults with spina bifida. Urology. 2024; 185: 143- 9.
[11]
Lai LY , Lopez AD , Copp HL , Baradaran N , Breyer BN , Elaine Allen I , et al. Access and utilization of health care by adults with spina bifida. Urology. 2023; 181: 174- 81.
[12]
Sadighian MJ , Allen IE , Quanstrom K , Breyer BN , Suskind AM , Baradaran N , et al. Caregiver burden among those caring for patients with spina bifida. Urology. 2021; 153: 339- 44.
[13]
Showen A , Copp HL , Allen IE , Baradaran N , Liaw A , Hampson LA . Characteristics associated with depression, anxiety, and social isolation in adults with spina bifida. Urology. 2021; 149: 255- 62.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. UroPrecision published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Higher Education Press.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(543 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/