Responsiveness of functional performance and muscle strength, power, and size to resistance training: A systematic review

Abstract

There is a recent and growing interest in assessing differential responders to resistance training (RT) for diverse outcomes. Thus, the individual ability to respond to an intervention for a specific measurement, called responsiveness, remains to be better understood. Thus, the current study aimed to summarize the available information about the effects of RT on functional performance and muscle strength, power, and size in healthy adults, through the prevalence rate in different responsiveness classifications models. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42021265378). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were systematically searched in October 2023. A total of 13 studies were included, totaling 921 subjects. Only two studies presented a low risk of bias. Regarding the effectiveness of RT, the prevalence rate for non-responders ranged from 0% to 44% for muscle strength, from 0% to 84% for muscle size, and from 0% to 42% for functional performance, while for muscle power, the only study found showed a responsiveness rate of 37%. In conclusion, a wide range of differential responders is described for all variables investigated. However, the evidence summarized in this systematic review suggested some caution while interpreting the findings, since the body of evidence found seems to be incipient, and widely heterogeneous in methodological and statistical aspects.

Keywords

Strength training / Heterogeneity / Muscle strength / Skeletal muscle / Functional performance / Inter-individual variation / Biological individuality

References

1	M.L. Pollock, G.A. Gaesser, J.D. Butcher, et al.. The recommended quantity. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness,flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30 (6) (1998), pp. 975-991, 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032.
2	W.J. Chodzko-Zajko, D.N. Proctor, M.A. Fiatarone Singh, et al.. Exercise. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 41 (7) (2009), pp. 1510-1530, 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95c.
3	American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 41 (3) (2009), pp. 687-708, 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.
4	C.E. Garber, B. Blissmer, M.R. Deschenes, et al.. Quantity. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal,neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 43 (7) (2011), pp. 1334-1359, 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
5	R.S. Lloyd, A.D. Faigenbaum, M.H. Stone, et al.. Position statement on youth resistance training: the. Position statement on youth resistance training: the2014 international consensus. Br J Sports Med, 48 (7)(2014), pp. 498-505, 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952.
6	M.S. Fragala, E.L. Cadore, S. Dorgo, et al.. Resistance training for older adults. J Strength Condit Res. Resistance training for older adults. J Strength Condit Res, 33 (8) (2019), pp. 2019-2052, 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003230.
7	P. Androulakis-Korakakis, J.P. Fisher, J. Steele. The minimum effective training dose required to increase 1RM strength in resistance-trained men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med, 50 (4) (2020), pp. 751-765, 10.1007/s40279-019-01236-0.
8	B. Schoenfeld, J. Fisher, J. Grgic, et al.. Resistance training recommendations to maximize muscle hypertrophy in an athletic population: position stand of the IUSCA. Int J Strength Cond. Resistance training recommendations to maximize muscle hypertrophy in an athletic population: position stand of the IUSCA. Int J Strength Cond, 1 (1) (2021), pp. 1-30, 10.47206/ijsc.v1i1.81.
9	J.P. Ahtiainen, S. Walker, H. Peltonen, et al.. Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength. Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages. Age, 38 (1) (2016), p. 10, 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1.
10.	M.J. Hubal, H. Gordish-Dressman, P.D. Thompson, et al.. Variability in muscle size. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 37 (6) (2005), pp. 964-972, 10.1016/s0162-0908(08)70354-4.
11.	T.A.Churchward-Venne, M. Tieland, L.B. Verdijk, et al. There are no nonresponders to resistance-type exercise training in older men and women. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 16 (5)(2015), pp. 400-411, 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071.
12.	J.M. Radnor, R.S. Lloyd, J.L. Oliver. Individual response to different forms of resistance training in school-aged boys. J Strength Condit Res, 31 (3) (2017), pp. 787-797, 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001527.
13.	H.L. Vellers, S.R. Kleeberger, J.T. Lightfoot. Inter-individual variation in adaptations to endurance and resistance exercise training: genetic approaches towards understanding a complex phenotype. Mamm Genome, 29 (1-2) (2018), pp. 48-62, 10.1007/s00335-017-9732-5.
14.	Ahmetov II, E.S. Egorova, L.J. Gabdrakhmanova, O.N. Fedotovskaya. Genes and athletic performance: an update. Med Sport Sci, 61 (2016), pp. 41-54, 10.1159/000445240.
15.	T.N. Mann, R.P. Lamberts, M.I. Lambert. High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med, 44 (8) (2014), pp. 1113-1124, 10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3.
16.	M.D. Roberts, M.A. Romero, C.B. Mobley, et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume and myozenin-1 protein differences exist between high versus low anabolic responders to resistance training. PeerJ, 6 (7) (2018), p. e5338, 10.7717/peerj.5338.
17.	M.J. Stec, N.A. Kelly, G.M. Many, S.T. Windham, S.C. Tuggle, M.M. Bamman. Ribosome biogenesis may augment resistance training-induced myofiber hypertrophy and is required for myotube growth in vitro. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 310 (8) (2016), pp. E652-E661, 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2015.
18.	C.T. Haun, C.G. Vann, C.B. Mobley, et al.Pre-training skeletal muscle fiber size and predominant fiber type best predict hypertrophic responses to 6 weeks of resistance training in previously trained young men. Front Physiol, 10 (2019), pp. 1-17, 10.3389/fphys.2019.00297.
19.	S. Mosole, K. Rossini, H. Kern, et al.Reinnervation of vastus lateralis is increased significantly in seniors (70-years old) with a lifelong history of high-level exercise. Eur J Transl Myol, 32 (1)(2022), p. 10420, 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10420.
20.	N.B.McKinnon, D.M. Connelly, C.L. Rice, S.W. Hunter, T.J. Doherty. Neuromuscular contributions to the age-related reduction in muscle power: mechanisms and potential role of high velocity power training. Ageing Res Rev, 35 (2017), pp. 147-154, 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.003.
21.	B.J. Schoenfeld, J. Grgic, D. Ogborn, J.W. Krieger. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Condit Res, 31 (12) (2017), pp. 3508-3523, 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002200.
22.	R. Ross, B.H. Goodpaster, L.G. Koch, et al. Precision exercise medicine: understanding exercise response variability. Br J Sports Med, 53 (18) (2019), pp. 1141-1153, 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100328.
23.	S.J. Dankel, J.P. Loenneke. A method to stop analyzing random error and start analyzing differential responders to exercise. Sports Med, 50 (2019), pp. 231-238, 10.1007/s40279-019-01147-0.
24.	T.J. Hrubeniuk, J.T. Bonafiglia, D.R. Bouchard, B.J. Gurd, M. Sénéchal. Directions for exercise treatment response heterogeneity and individual response research. Int J Sports Med, 43 (1) (2021), pp. 11-22, 10.1055/a-1548-7026.
25.	J.T. Bonafiglia, N. Preobrazenski, B.J. Gurd.A systematic review examining the approaches used to estimate interindividual differences in trainability and classify individual responses to exercise training. Front Physiol, 12 (2021), Article 665044, 10.3389/fphys.2021.665044.
26.	S.J. Dankel, Z.W. Bell, R.W. Spitz, et al. Assessing differential responders and mean changes in muscle size, strength,the crossover effect to 2 distinct resistance training protocols. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol, 45 (5) (2020), pp. 463-470, 10.1139/apnm-2019-0470.
27.	G. Atkinson, A.M. Batterham. True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol, 100 (6) (2015), pp. 577-588, 10.1113/EP085070.
28.	P.A. Swinton, B.S. Hemingway, B. Saunders, B. Gualano, E. Dolan.A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Front Nutr, 5 (2018), p. 41, 10.3389/fnut.2018.00041.
29.	M.J. Page, D. Moher, P.M. Bossuyt, et al. PRISMA2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 29 (2021), p. n160, 10.1136/bmj.n160.
30.	M. Ouzzani, H. Hammady, Z. Fedorowicz, A. Elmagarmid. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 5 (1) (2016), p. 210, 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
31.	T. Greenhalgh, R. Peacock. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ, 331 (7524) (2005), pp. 1064-1065, 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
32.	N.R. Haddaway, M.J. Page, C.C. Pritchard, L.A. McGuinness. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev, 18 (2)(2022), Article e1230, 10.1002/cl2.1230.
33.	J.A.C. Sterne, J. Savović M.J. Page, et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 28 (2019), p. l4898, 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
34.	L.A. McGuinness, J.P.T. Higgins. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods, 12 (1) (2021), pp. 55-61, 10.1002/jrsm.1411.
35.	B.J. Schoenfeld, D. Ogborn, J.W. Krieger. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci, 35 (11) (2017), pp. 1073-1082, 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197.
36.	V. Angleri, C. Ugrinowitsch, C.A. Libardi. Individual muscle adaptations in different resistance training systems in well-trained men. Int J Sports Med, 43 (1) (2021), pp. 55-60, 10.1055/a-1493-3121.
37.	P. Garcia, D. da C. Nascimento, R.A. Tibana, M.M. Barboza, J.M. Willardson, J. Prestes. Comparison between the multiple-set plus 2 weeks of tri-set and traditional multiple-set method on strength and body composition in trained women: a pilot study. Clin Physiol Funct Imag, 36 (1) (2016), pp. 47-52, 10.1111/cpf.12192.
38.	D. Hammarström, S. Øfsteng, L. Koll, et al.. Benefits of higher resistance-training volume depends on ribosome biogenesis. J Physiol, 598 (3) (2020), pp. 543-565. https://10.1113/JP278455.
39.	39 C.E. Marsh, H.J. Thomas, L.H. Naylor, K.J. Scurrah, D.J. Green. Fitness and strength responses to distinct exercise modes in twins: studies of Twin Responses to Understand Exercise as a THerapy(STRUETH) study. J Physiol, 598 (18) (2020), pp. 3845-3858, 10.1113/JP280048.
40.	R. Ramírez-Vélez, M. Izquierdo, K. Castro-Astudillo, et al.. Weight loss after 12 weeks of exercise and/or nutritional guidance is not obligatory for induced changes in local fat/lean mass indexes in adults with excess of adiposity. Nutrients, 12 (8) (2020), p. 2231, 10.3390/nu12082231.
41.	H.J. Thomas, C.E. Marsh, B.A. Maslen, K.J. Scurrah, L.H. Naylor, D.J. Green. Studies of Twin responses to understand exercise therapy (STRUETH): body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 53 (1) (2021), pp. 58-67, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002461.
42.	P.W.M. Marshall, M. McEwen, D.W. Robbins. Strength and neuromuscular adaptation following one, four, and eight sets of high-intensity resistance exercise in trained males. Eur J Appl Physiol, 111 (12) (2011), pp. 3007-3016, 10.1007/s00421-011-1944-x.
43.	F. Damas, V. Angleri, S.M. Phillips, et al.. Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men. J Appl Physiol(1985), 127 (3) (2019), pp. 806-815, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019.
44.	F. Damas, C. Barcelos, S.R. Nóbrega, et al.. Individual muscle hypertrophy and strength responses to high vs. low resistance training frequencies. J Strength Condit Res, 33 (4) (2019), pp. 897-901, 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864.
45.	L.B.R. Orssatto, E.S. Bezerra, G.I. Zwaal, et al.. Is responsiveness of elderly individuals to resistance training related to habitual nutritional intake? An exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Sport Sci Health, 16 (2) (2020), pp. 355-364, 10.1007/s11332-020-00628-4.
46.	B.L. Tracy, R.M. Enoka. Steadiness training with light loads in the knee extensors of elderly adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 38 (4) (2006), pp. 735-745, 10.1249/01.mss.0000194082.85358.c4.
47.	P. Lopez, R. Radaelli, D.R. Taaffe, et al.. Resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 53 (6) (2021), pp. 1206-1216, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585.
48.	F.L. Orsatti, P.R.P. Nunes, MA. da S. Carneiro, C.L. Orsatti, M.V.C. Souza. Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength responses is associated with training frequency and insulin resistance in postmenopausal women. Exp Gerontol, 163 (2022), Article 111807, 10.1016/j.exger.2022.111807.
49.	S.J. Dankel, S.L. Buckner, M.B. Jessee, et al.. Correlations do not show cause and effect: not even for changes in muscle size and strength. Sports Med, 48 (1) (2018), pp. 1-6, 10.1007/s40279-017-0774-3.
50.	T.J. Carroll, R.D. Herbert, J. Munn, M. Lee, S.C. Gandevia. Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms. J Appl Physiol(1985), 101 (5) (2006), pp. 1514-1522, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00531.2006.
51.	E.A. Chmelo, C.I. Crotts, J.C. Newman, et al.. Heterogeneity of physical function responses to exercise training in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 63 (3) (2015), pp. 462-469, 10.1111/jgs.13322.
52.	T.M. Manini, B.C. Clark. Dynapenia and aging: an update. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 67A (1) (2012), pp. 28-40, 10.1093/gerona/glr010.
53.	J.P. Nunes, F.L.C. Pina, A.S. Ribeiro, et al.. Responsiveness to muscle mass gain following 12 and 24 weeks of resistance training in older women. Aging Clin Exp Res, 33 (4) (2021), pp. 1071-1078, 10.1007/s40520-020-01587-z.
54.	S. Heinitz, T. Hollstein, T. Ando, et al.. Early adaptive thermogenesis is a determinant of weight loss after six weeks of caloric restriction in overweight subjects. Metab, 110 (2020), Article 154303, 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154303.
55.	C. Murphy, K. Koehler. Energy deficiency impairs resistance training gains in lean mass but not strength: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 32 (1) (2021), pp. 125-137, 10.1111/sms.14075.
56.	M.D. Roberts, C.T. Haun, C.B. Mobley, et al.. Physiological differences between low versus high skeletal muscle hypertrophic responders to resistance exercise training: current perspectives and future research directions. Front Physiol, 9 (2018), p. 834, 10.3389/fphys.2018.00834.
57.	L.R. Bell, T.J. Gabbett, G.M. Davis, M.P. Wallen, B.J. O'Brien. Stubborn exercise responders-where to next?. Sports, 10 (6) (2022), p. 95, 10.3390/sports10060095.
58.	T. Lasevicius, C. Ugrinowitsch, B.J. Schoenfeld, et al.. Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Eur J Sport Sci, 18 (6) (2018), pp. 772-780, 10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898.
59.	Bj Schoenfeld, B. Contreras, J. Krieger, et al.. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 51 (1) (2019), pp. 94-103, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764.
60.	B.J. Schoenfeld, J. Grgic, J. Krieger. How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency. J Sports Sci, 37 (11) (2019), pp. 1286-1295, 10.1080/02640414.2018.1555906