The ecological validity of traditional standing and novel bicycle balance and agility tests for predicting performance in mountain bikers

K. Buchholtz, M. Lambert, T.L. Burgess

Sports Medicine and Health Science ›› 2022, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 287-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.10.003
Original article

The ecological validity of traditional standing and novel bicycle balance and agility tests for predicting performance in mountain bikers

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Falls are a common mechanism of injury in mountain biking and may be related to a loss of control of the bicycle. Traditionally, the components of bicycle control (balance and agility) are measured in standing and running, which may not reflect the skills required in mountain biking. In this paper, we present the validity of both traditional standing and novel bicycle-specific balance tests in mountain bikers. Twenty-nine male and female participants completed indoor laboratory tests and an outdoor downhill trail. Participants completed single-leg stance balance, Y-balance test, one static and four dynamic bicycle-specific balance tests, a bicycle agility test, and an outdoor downhill trail. Single-leg stance balance and Y-balance tests with eyes open had poor validity when associated with bicycle control. The static (r ​= ​−0.57, p = 0.001) and four dynamic bicycle balance tests (r ​= ​−0.51 to −0.78, p = 0.005 to 0.0001), and the bicycle agility test (r ​= ​0.87, p < 0.0001) had moderate to strong relationships with the outdoor downhill run. Single-leg stance balance and Y-balance tests with eyes open are not valid measures of performance on a mountain bike, and should not be used to assess these populations. Our novel bicycle balance tests have adequate validity to be used as measures of performance in mountain bikers.

Keywords

Bicycling / Control / Proprioception

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
K. Buchholtz, M. Lambert, T.L. Burgess. The ecological validity of traditional standing and novel bicycle balance and agility tests for predicting performance in mountain bikers. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2022, 4(4): 287‒292 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2022.10.003

References

[[1]]
T Chow, R Kronisch. Mechanisms of injury in competitive off-road bicycling. Wilderness Environ Med, 13 (1) ( 2002), pp. 27-30, DOI: 10.1580/1080-6032(2002)013[0027:moiico]2.0.co;2
[[2]]
B Fonda, N Sarabon, FX Li. Bicycle rider control skills: expertise and assessment. J Sports Sci, 35 (14) ( 2017), pp. 1383-1391, DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1039049
[[3]]
M Wierda, KA Brookhuis. Analysis of cycling skill: a cognitive approach. Appl Cognit Psychol, 5 ( 1991), pp. 113-122, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350050205
[[4]]
BA Springer, R Marin, T Cyhan, H Roberts, NW Gill. Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 30 (1) ( 2007), pp. 8-15, DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200704000-00003
[[5]]
MA Raya, RS Gailey, IA Gaunaurd, et al.. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: edgren side step test, T-test, and Illinois agility test. J Rehabil Res Dev, 50 (7) ( 2013), pp. 951-960, DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096
[[6]]
NJ Chimera, M Warren. Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport. World J Orthoped, 7 (4) ( 2016), pp. 202-217, DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202
[[7]]
A Neil, J Alonso, A Burnam, et al.. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res, 11 (3) ( 2002), pp. 193-205, DOI: 10.1023/a:1015291021312
[[8]]
MA Schmuckler. What Is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2 (4) ( 2001), pp. 419-436, DOI: 10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02
[[9]]
S. Kieffer, U.B. Sangiorgi, J. Vanderdonckt. ECOVAL: a framework for increasing the ecological validity in usability testing. Proceedings of 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (January 5- 8, 2015). Kauai, HI, USA. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2015.61
[[10]]
M Magal, D Riebe. New preparticipation health screening recommendations: what exercise professionals need to know. ACSM’s Health & Fit J, 20 (3) ( 2016), pp. 22-27, DOI: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000202
[[11]]
K. Buchholtz, MI. Lambert, TL. Burgess. Balance and Agility in Mountain Bikers: A Reliability and Validity Study on Skills Affecting Control in Mountain Biking. PhD thesis. University of Cape Town ( 2021). Accessed on May 20, 2022. net/11427/36688
[[12]]
K Buchholtz, T Burgess. An evaluation of bicycle-specific agility and reaction times in mountain bikers and road cyclists. S Afr J Sports Med, 32 (1) ( 2020), pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.17159/2078-516x/2020/v32i1a8576
[[13]]
P Plisky, P Gorman, R Butler, KB Kiesel, FB Underwood, B Elkins. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther, 4 (2) ( 2009), pp. 92-99
[[14]]
SM Cain, JA Ashton-Miller, NC Perkins.On the skill of balancing while riding a bicycle. PLoS One, 11 (2) ( 2016), p. e0149340, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149340
[[15]]
C Burdon, K Hiraiwa, J Park, et al.. Performance on a physical employment standard assessment is significantly improved with familiarisation. Proceeding of 3rd International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance (August 18-21, 2014). Boston, MA, USA
[[16]]
R Barley. Why familiarise?. Soc Res Update (62) ( 2011), pp. 1-4
[[17]]
FM Impellizzeri, SM Marcora. Test validation in sport physiology: lessons learned from clinimetrics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 4 (2) ( 2009), pp. 269-277, DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.4.2.269
[[18]]
A Lion, GC Gauchard, D Deviterne, PP Perrin. Differentiated influence of off-road and on-road cycling practice on balance control and the related-neurosensory organization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 19 (4) ( 2009), pp. 623-630, DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.008
[[19]]
J.D.G. Kooijman, A.L. Schwab, J.K. Moore.Some observations on human control of a bicycle. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference ( 30 August- 2 September, 2009). San Diego, CA, USA. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2009-86959
[[20]]
J Simonek, P Horicka, J Hianik. Differences in pre-planned agility and reactive agility performance in sport games. Acta Gymnica, 46 (2) ( 2016), pp. 68-73, DOI: 10.1080/02640410802428071
[[21]]
GA Fava, E Tomba, N Sonino. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int J Clin Pract, 66 (1) ( 2012), pp. 11-15, DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02825.x11

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge Mr Charlie Fethney for his data capturing assistance, and A/Prof Jeroen Swart and Dr Mike Posthumus for their professional input on the development of the dynamic bicycle balance tests.

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/