How to be a better scientist: Lessons from scientific philosophy, the historical development of science, and past errors within exercise physiology

Abstract

What is science? While a simple question, the answer is complex. Science is a process involving human behaviour, and due to the human influence, science is often not pursued correctly. In fact, one can argue that we still do not know what the “correct” pursuit of science should entail. This is because science remains a work in progress, differs for different questions, and we often are not aware of the mistakes made until years, or decades, later. Such mistakes are common, regardless of the discipline. Within exercise physiology, mistakes have been frequent and led to eventual corrections; the replacement of the post-exercise rate of oxygen consumption (V̇O₂) debt concept with that of excess post-exercise V̇O₂; the invalidation of the cellular production of lactic acid; improvements to maximal heart rate estimation; and on-going debate over the Central Governor Model. Improved training and education in the historical development of science and the contributions from scientific philosophy are important in providing an understanding of science, and more importantly, how to pursue “better” vs. “inferior” forms of science. The writings of Popper and Kuhn are core to enhanced understanding of how to improve the quality of science pursued. Unfortunately, quality education and training in the historical and philosophical development of science remain poor in most countries. Until inadequate educational training is overcome, there is sustained risk for the pursuit of science to remain inadequate, which in turn has a potential widespread detriment to humanity and the planet we live on.

Keywords

Science / Philosophy / Epistemology / Falsification / Theories / Popper / Kuhn

References

[[1]] G. Gaesser, G.A. Brooks. Metabolic bases of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 16 (1) ( 1984), pp. 29-43

[[2]] A.V. Hill, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. QJM: Int J Med, 16 (62) ( 1923), pp. 135-171

[[3]] A.V. Hill, C.N.H. Long, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. - Parts I-III. Proc Royal Society B, 96 (679) ( 1924), pp. 438-475

[[4]] A.V. Hill, C.N.H. Long, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. - Parts IV-VI. Proc Royal Society B, 97 (681) ( 1924), pp. 84-138

[[5]] A.V. Hill, C.N.H. Long, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. - Parts VII-VIII. Proc Royal Society B, 97 (682) ( 1924), pp. 155-176

[[6]] E. Kagereki, J. Gakonyo, H. Simila.Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature. BMC Oral Health, 16 ( 2016), p. 53, DOI: 10.1186/s12903-016-0208-x

[[7]] R.A. Robergs, R. Landwehr.The surprising history of the “HRmax=220-age” equation. JEPonline, 5 (2) ( 2002), pp. 1-10

[[8]] S.M. Fox III, J.P. Naughton, W.L. Haskell. Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Res, 3 ( 1971), pp. 404-432

[[9]] O. Inbar, A. Oten, M. Scheinowitz, et al.. Normal cardiopulmonary responses during incremental exercise in 20-70-yr-old men. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 26 (5) ( 1994), pp. 538-546

[[10]] H. Tanaka, K.G. Monahan, D.S. Seals. Age - predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol, 37 ( 2001), pp. 153-156, DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01054-8

[[11]] M.E. Laski, D.E. Wesson. Lactic acidosis. p. 835-108. T.D. DuBose, L.L. Hamm (Eds.), Acid-base and Electrolyte Disorders: A Companion to Brenner and Rector's the Kidney, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA ( 2002)

[[12]] A. Katz, K. Sahlin. Regulation of lactic acid production during exercise. J Appl Physiol, 65 (2) ( 1988), pp. 509-518, DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.2.509

[[13]] R.A. Robergs, F. Ghiasvand, D. Parker. Biochemistry of exercise-induced metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 287 ( 2004), pp. R502-R516, DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00114.2004

[[14]] T.D. Noakes. Challenging beliefs: ex Africa semper aliquid novi. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 29 ( 1997), pp. 571-590, DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199705000-00001

[[15]] F de Pires. Thomas Kuhn’ s ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ applied to exercise science paradigm shifts: example including the Central Governor Model. Br J Sports Med, 47 ( 2013), pp. 721-722, DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091333

[[16]] R.A. Robergs. Lessons from Popper for science, paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions and exercise physiology. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 3 ( 2017), Article e000226, DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000226

[[17]] Pompeu FAMS. Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories. Sports Medicine and Health Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.10.001.

[[18]] T. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago ( 1962)

[[19]] J.C. Burnham. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), pp. 1323-1329, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100023003

[[20]] Guarding the guardians - research on editorial peer review (Selected proceedings from the first international congress on peer review in biomedical publication). D. Rennie (Ed.), JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), pp. 1311-1441, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1986.03380170107031

[[21]] Editorial peer review in biomedical publication: the first international congress. D. Rennie (Ed.), JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), p. 1317, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100011001

[[22]] D.F. Horrobin. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), pp. 1438-1441, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100162024

[[23]] T.C. Chalmers, C.S. Frank, D. Reitman. Minimizing the three stages of publication bias. JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), pp. 1392-1395, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100104016

[[24]] D.W. Sharp. What can be done and should be done to reduce publication bias. JAMA, 263 (10) ( 1990), pp. 1390-1391, DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100102015

[[25]] R.A. Robergs. A critical review of peer review: the need to scrutinize the “gatekeepers” of research in exercise physiology. JEPonline, 6 (2) ( 2003), pp. i-xiii

[[26]] T. Lewens. The Meaning of Science:An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Basic Books, New York ( 2016)

[[27]] S. Okasha. Philosophy of Science:A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York ( 2002)

[[28]] Aristotle Nichomachean Ethics. Translated and Edited by Crisp R., Cambridge University Press, UK ( 2000)

[[29]] K. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Martino Publishing, Connecticut ( 2014)

[[30]] V. Katch. Burden of disproof. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 18 (5) ( 1986), pp. 593-595

[[31]] S. Fuller.Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science. Icon Books, Cambridge ( 2006)

[[32]] P. Atkins. Conjuring the Universe:The Origins of the Laws of Nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ( 2018)

[[33]] I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ( 1970)

[[34]] K.R. Popper. Normal science and its dangers. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticisms and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ( 1995), pp. 51-58