Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories

Abstract

An important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failure. Many physiologists have looked for evidence to support their favourite theory even though the induction logic problem does not allow to prove whether truth is discovered; however, it is possible to prove that it does not occur. When some researchers fail to test their hypotheses, they use relativism to bring up their theories again. Noakes and his colleagues have based their theory on relativism, because it is impossible to refute by empirical observation. It also doesn't explain all phenomena that the oldest Hill's theory is able to explain. Noakes's theory isn't more accurate in its previsions. Noakes did not check whether the oxygen uptake plateau occurs in suitable tests to measure on the mouth what happens in the muscles. Finally, it doesn't propose new tests for the encephalon role during maximal effort, as that is expected in scientific work. For all of these reasons, it is possible to conclude there are no advantages in switching to the “Central Governor” theory.

Keywords

Epistemological problem / V̇O₂ plateau / Positivism / Scientific revolutions and philosophy of science

References

[[1]] T.D. Noakes. Maximal oxygen uptake: “classical” versus “contemporany” viewpoints: a rebuttal. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30 (9) ( 1998), pp. 1381-1398. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199809000-00007

[[2]] D.R. Bassett, E.T. Howley. Maximal oxygen uptake: “Classical” versus “contemporary” viewpoints. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 29 (5) ( 1997), pp. 591-603. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199705000-00002

[[3]] T.D. Noakes. Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or endurance athletic performance. Scand. J Med Sci Sports, 10 (3) ( 2000), pp. 123-145. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010003123.x

[[4]] D.R. Bassett Jr., E. T. Howley. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32 (1) ( 2000), pp. 70-84. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012

[[5]] U. Bergh, B. Ekblom, P.O. Astrand. Maximal oxygen uptake “classical” versus “contemporary” viewpoints. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32 (1) ( 2000), pp. 83-88. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00013

[[6]] R.J. Shephard. Is it time to retire the ‘central governor. Sports Med, 39 (9) ( 2009), pp. 709-721. DOI: 10.2165/11315130-000000000-00000

[[7]] F.O. Pires. Thomas Kuhn’s ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ applied to exercise science paradigm shifts: example including the Central Governor Model. Br J Sports Med, 47 (11) ( 2013), pp. 721-722. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091333

[[8]] R.A. Robergs. Lessons from Popper for science, paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions and exercise physiology. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 3 (1) ( 2017), Article e000226. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000226

[[9]] K. Popper. A suvey of some fundamental problems. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 3-27

[[10]] F.O. Pires. Lessons from a broad view of science: a response to Dr Robergs’ article. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 4 (1) ( 2018), Article e000353. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000353

[[11]] T.D. Noakes. Response to: lessons from Popper for science, paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions and exercise physiology. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 4 (1) ( 2018). DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000277

[[12]] T.S. Kuhn. Logic of discovery of psychology of research?. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, London, England, UK ( 1970), pp. 1-24

[[13]] F.A.M. S. Pompeu. A little bit more about Popper’s philosophy. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 4 (1) ( 2018), Article e000401. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000401

[[14]] K.R. Popper. On the sources of knowledge and of ignorance. K.R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 31-58

[[15]] K. Popper. Books and thoughts:eurpe's first publication. K. Popper (Ed.), In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Routledge, London and New York ( 2000), pp. 99-116

[[16]] K. Popper. On culture clash. K. Popper ( Ed.), In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Routledge, London and New York ( 2000), pp. 117-125

[[17]] T. Ferris. The Science of Liberty. HarperCollins e-books, New York ( 2010), p. 16

[[18]] P. Kitcher. Science in a Democratic Society. Prometeus Books, New York ( 2011), p. 85

[[19]] K. Popper. On the sources of knowledge and of ignorance. K. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations: The Grow of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 3-40

[[20]] K. Popper. Preface of the first English edition 1959. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002). xxvi

[[21]] K. Popper.Science conjecture and refutations. Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Grow of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 43-86

[[22]] K. Popper. Corroboration, the weight of evidence and statistical test. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 402-439

[[23]] K. Popper. The problem of the irrefutability of philosophical theories. K. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations: The Grow of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 261-271

[[24]] K. Popper. Knowledge and the shaping of reality. K. Popper ( Ed.), In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Routledge, London and New York ( 2000), pp. 3-29

[[25]] B. Russell. Human Knowledge:It's Scope and Limits. Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2009)

[[26]] E. Morin. Complexity. Int Soc Sci J, 26 (4) ( 1974), pp. 555-582. DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2011.601607

[[27]] K. Popper. Why are the calculi of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality?. K. R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 279-299

[[28]] K. Popper. A note on berkeley as percursor of mach and einstein. K.R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 224-240

[[29]] K. Popper. Corroboration, or how a theory stands up to tests. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 248-282

[[30]] K. Popper. Theories. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 37-56

[[31]] K. Popper. Problem of empirical basis. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 74-94

[[32]] K. Popper. Three requirements for the growth of knowledge. K.R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 326-336

[[33]] K. Popper. On the problem of a theory of scientific method. K.R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 27-36

[[34]] K. Popper. Falseability. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 57-73

[[35]] K. Popper. The history of our time:an optimist view. K.R. Popper (Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 489-505

[[36]] K. Popper. Truth and content:verisimilitude versus probability. K.R. Popper (Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 309-336

[[37]] W. Hatree, A.V. Hill. The regulation of the supply of energy in muscular contraction. J Physiol, 55 (1-2) ( 1921), pp. 133-158. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1921.sp001961

[[38]] A.V. Hill, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid and the supply and utilisation of oxygen. Q J Med, 16 (62) ( 1923), pp. 135-171. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/os-16.62.135

[[39]] A.V. Hill, C.N.H. Long, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen - parts I-III. Proc Roy Soc Lond, 96 (679) ( 1924), pp. 438-475. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1924.0037

[[40]] A.V. Hill, C.N.H. Long, H. Lupton. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen - parts IV-VI. Proc Roy Soc Lond, 97 (681) ( 1924), pp. 84-139. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1924.0045

[[41]] K. Popper. Degrees of testability. K. Popper ( Ed.), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York ( 2002), pp. 95-120

[[42]] T.D. Noakes.Fatigue is a brain-derived emotion that regulates the exercise behaviour to ensure protection of whole body homeostasis. Front Physiol, 3 ( 2012), p. 82. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00082

[[43]] N.C. Spurway, B. Ekblom, T.D. Noakes, et al.. What limits VO2max? A symposium held at the BASES Conference, 6 September 2010. J Sports Sci, 30 (6) ( 2012), pp. 517-531. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2011.642809

[[44]] H.L. Taylor, E. Buskirk, A. Henschel. Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio-respiratory performance. J Appl Physiol, 8 (1) ( 1955), pp. 73-80. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1955.8.1.73

[[45]] G.A. Brooks. Currents concepts in lactate exchange. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 23 (8) ( 1991), pp. 895-906

[[46]] K. Wasserman, W.L. Beaver, B.J. Whipp. Gas exchanges theory and the lactic acidosis (anaerobic) threshold. Circulation, 81 (1 suppl l) ( 1990). II 14 - II 30

[[47]] K. Wasserman, A. Koike. Is the anaerobic threshold truly anaerobic?. Chest, 101 (5 Suppl) ( 1992), pp. 211s-218s. DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.5_supplement.211s

[[48]] B. Saltin, P.O. Astrand. Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes. J Appl Physiol, 23 (3) ( 1967), pp. 353-358. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1967.23.3.353

[[49]] K. Popper. Dialectic explained. K.R. Popper ( Ed.), Conjectures and Refutations:The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, New York, NY, USA ( 2002), pp. 419-435

The author is grateful for Fabiana Eramo's text review.