Even though in physics “time” is considered to be continuous, how the brain and mind deal with time might be different. It has been proposed that in cognition, time windows provide logistic platforms for information processing, such as the low-frequency 3-s time window. The following series of behavioral experiments may shed light on the dynamics within such a time window. Using a duration reproduction paradigm, we first replicated a pattern of reproduced duration observed in a previous single-case study. Specifically, the reproduction increases as the pause between standard duration and reproduction increases, but only within the time window of some 3 s; when the pause goes beyond 4 s, the reproduction reaches a plateau of a subjective set-point. This increasing phase is named the “temporal transition zone.” Three more experiments were performed to test the features of the transition zone as a low-frequency time window. It is also observed with different standard durations (2, 3, 4.5 s, in Experiment 2), and even when the frequency of the auditory stimuli was different in standard and reproduction (300 Hz in standard duration and 400 Hz in reproduction, in Experiment 4). The transition zone was observed only with pause durations of 2 to 3 s; when the shortest pause duration was 5 s, the transition zone was no longer observed, and the reproduction was stable at the subjective set-point (in Experiment 3). Taken together, we suggest that the temporal transition zone indicates a pre-semantic logistic platform to organize and process the information flow; in such a time window of some 3 seconds, the identity of an ongoing event is substantiated, building the “subjective present.”
| [1] |
Bao, Y., Pöppel, E., Wang, L., Lin, X., Yang, T., Avram, M., Blautzik, J., Paolini, M., Silveira, S., Vedder, A., Zaytseva, Y., & Zhou, B. (2015). Synchronization as a biological, psychological and social mechanism to create common time: A theoretical frame and a single case study. PsyCh Journal, 4(4), 243–254.
|
| [2] |
Bao, Y., Zhang, D., Zhao, C., Pöppel, E., & Zabotkina, V. (2022). An aesthetic frame for three modes of knowing. PsyCh Journal, 11(5), 636–644.
|
| [3] |
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C. (2007). What's new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36(14), 1–16.
|
| [4] |
Mu, N., Zhang, D., & Zhao, C. (2023). Temporal reproduction: A paradigm indicating a 3-s time window. PsyCh Journal, 12(4), 535–536.
|
| [5] |
Newton, I. (1969). In R. Thorp (Ed.), Trans. Original work published 1686 Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Dawsons of Pall Mall.
|
| [6] |
Pöppel, E. (1972). Oscillations as possible basis for time perception. Studium Generale, 24, 85–107. Reprint in: J.T. Fraser et al. (Ed.): “The study of time”, Springer, Berlin (1972) 219–241.
|
| [7] |
Pöppel, E. (1973). Influence of pause duration on the reproduction of a 2-second interval. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2(5), 291–292.
|
| [8] |
Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 56–61.
|
| [9] |
Pöppel, E. (2009). Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B., 364, 1887–1896.
|
| [10] |
Pöppel, E., & Bao, Y. (2014). Temporal windows as a bridge from objective to subjective time. In V. Arstila & D. Lloyd (Eds.), Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality (pp. 241–261). Boston Review.
|
| [11] |
Rattat, A. C., & Droit-Volet, S. (2012). What is the best and easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks. Behaviour Research Methods, 44(1), 67–80.
|
| [12] |
Szelag, E., Kowalska, J., Galkowski, T., & Pöppel, E. (2004). Temporal processing deficits in high-functioning children with autism. British Journal of Psychology, 95(3), 269–282.
|
| [13] |
Szelag, E., Kowalska, J., Rymarczyk, K., & Pöppel, E. (2002). Duration processing in children as determined by time reproduction: Implications for a few seconds temporal window. Acta Psychologica, 110(1), 1–19.
|
| [14] |
Ulbrich, P., Churan, J., Fink, M., & Wittmann, M. (2007). Temporal reproduction: Further evidence for two processes. Acta Psychologica, 125(1), 51–65.
|
| [15] |
Wang, L., Lin, X., Zhou, B., Pöppel, E., & Bao, Y. (2015). Subjective present: A window of temporal integration indexed by mismatch negativity. Cognitive Processing, 8, 131–135.
|
| [16] |
Yu, X., & Bao, Y. (2020). The three second time window in poems and language processing in general: Complementarity of discrete timing and temporal continuity. PsyCh Journal, 9(4), 429–443.
|
| [17] |
Zhao, C., & Bao, Y. (2023). Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory oddball detection: An MEG study. PsyCh Journal, 12(5), 749–751.
|
| [18] |
Zhao, C., Enriquez, P., Izadifar, M., Pöppel, E., Bao, Y., & Zabotkina, V. (2022). Complementarity of mental content and logistic algorithms in a taxonomy of cognitive functions. PsyCh Journal, 11(6), 973–979.
|
| [19] |
Zhao, C., Zhang, D., & Bao, Y. (2018). A time window of 3 s in the aesthetic appreciation of poems. PsyCh Journal, 7(1), 51–52.
|
| [20] |
Zhou, B., Pöppel, E., & Bao, Y. (2014). In the jungle of time: The concept of identity as a way out. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 844.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
