Interpersonal distance perception during the normalization of an pandemic situation: Effects of mask-wearing and vaccination

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of anti-pandemic measures, including wearing a face mask and receiving vaccinations, on interpersonal distance (IPD) during the normalization stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual reality (VR) technology was used to simulate the experimental environment and a confederate in different conditions. Thirty-one participants were asked to approach the virtual confederate, who could exhibit three vaccination states and two mask-wearing conditions, actively and passively in both indoor and outdoor environments. ANOVA results showed that the participants kept a smaller IPD from the confederate wearing a face mask (IPD = 125.6 cm) than from the one without a face mask (IPD = 154.2 cm). The effects of vaccination states were significant, with the largest distance for an unvaccinated confederate (IPD = 182.3 cm) and the smallest distance for the confederate who had received a booster vaccine (IPD = 111.5 cm). Significant effects of environment were also found, with the participants maintaining a larger IPD in an outdoor environment (IPD = 143.4 cm) than in an indoor room (IPD = 136.4 cm). Additionally, the IPD collected when the participants were passively approached (IPD = 149.6 cm) was significantly larger than that obtained when they actively approached the confederate (IPD = 130.3 cm). Moreover, when the participants faced a confederate who had received a booster vaccine and wore a mask, the IPD was not significantly different from that collected before the COVID-19 pandemic in both the active and passive patterns. These findings help us to better understand the nature of IPD and human behaviors during the normalization stage of the pandemic and provide scientific suggestions for policymakers to develop pandemic-prevention measures.

Keywords

COVID-19 / face mask / social distance / vaccination / VR technology

References

[1] Abney, K. (2018). “Containing” tuberculosis, perpetuating stigma: The materiality of N95 respirator masks. Anthropology Southern Africa, 41(4), 270–283.

[2] Adams, L., & Zuckerman, D. (1991). The effect of lighting conditions on personal space requirements. The Journal of General Psychology, 118(4), 335–340.

[3] Calbi, M., Langiulli, N., Ferroni, F., Montalti, M., Kolesnikov, A., Gallese, V., & Umiltà, M. A. (2021). The consequences of COVID-19 on social interactions: An online study on face covering. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2601.

[4] Cartaud, A., Ott, L., Iachini, T., Honoré, J., & Coello, Y. (2020). The influence of facial expression at perceptual threshold on electrodermal activity and social comfort distance. Psychophysiology, 57(9), e13600.

[5] Cartaud, A., Quesque, F., & Coello, Y. (2020). Wearing a face mask against Covid-19 results in a reduction of social distancing. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243023.

[6] Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 533–534.

[7] Doroftei, B., Ciobica, A., Ilie, O.-D., Maftei, R., & Ilea, C. (2021). Mini-review discussing the reliability and efficiency of COVID-19 vaccines. Diagnostics (Basel), 11(4), 579.

[8] Ebrahimi, O. V., Hoffart, A., & Johnson, S. U. (2021). Viral mitigation and the COVID-19 pandemic: Factors associated with adherence to social distancing protocols and hygienic behaviour. Psychology & Health, 38(3), 283–306.

[9] Fairlamb, S., & Courtney, E. (2022). An existential perspective on interpersonal closeness and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology & Health. Advance online publication.

[10] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

[11] Fini, C., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Contextual modulation of preferred social distance during the Covid-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23726.

[12] Gao, X., Wei, J., Lei, H., Xu, P., Cowling, B. J., & Li, Y. (2016). Building ventilation as an effective disease intervention strategy in a dense indoor contact network in an Ideal City. PLoS One, 11(9), e0162481.

[13] Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension (1st ed.). Doubleday & Co.

[14] Han, M., Wang, X. M., & Kuai, S. G. (2023). Social rather than physical crowding reduces the required interpersonal distance in virtual environments. PsyCh Journal, 12(1), 34–43.

[15] Hayduk, L. A. (1981). The shape of personal space: An experimental investigation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences Du Comportement, 13(1), 87–93.

[16] Hecht, H., Welsch, R., Viehoff, J., & Longo, M. R. (2019). The shape of personal space. Acta Psychologica, 193, 113–122.

[17] Hsieh, M.-C., & Lee, Y.-C. (2021). A comparison study on interpersonal space before and during COVID-19 in male adults. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 168, S207.

[18] Huang, B., Wang, J., Cai, J., Yao, S., Chan, P. K. S., Tam, T. H., Hong, Y.-Y., Ruktanonchai, C. W., Carioli, A., Floyd, J. R., Ruktanonchai, N. W., Yang, W., Li, Z., Tatem, A. J., & Lai, S. (2021). Integrated vaccination and physical distancing interventions to prevent future COVID-19 waves in Chinese cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 695–705.

[19] Huang, X., & Izumi, S.-I. (2021). Neural alterations in interpersonal distance (IPD) cognition and its correlation with IPD behavior: A systematic review. Brain Sciences, 11(8), 1015.

[20] Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2014). Body space in social interactions: A comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PLoS One, 9(11), e111511.

[21] Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164.

[22] Khosronejad, A., Santoni, C., Flora, K., Zhang, Z., Kang, S., Payabvash, S., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2020). Fluid dynamics simulations show that facial masks can suppress the spread of COVID-19 in indoor environments. AIP Advances, 10(12), 125109.

[23] Lee, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-L. (2021). Influence of wearing surgical mask on interpersonal space perception between mainland Chinese and Taiwanese people. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 692404.

[24] Lee, Y.-C., Yu, X., & Xiong, W. (2021). A comparative evaluation of the four measurement methods for comfort and reachability distance perceptions. Behavior Research Methods, 1-12, 1766–1777.

[25] Liang, W. N., Yao, J. H., Wu, J., Liu, X., Liu, J., Zhou, L., Chen, C., Wang, G. F., Wu, Z. Y., Yang, W. Z., & Liu, M. (2021). Experience and thinking on the normalization stage of prevention and control of COVID-19 in China. National Medical Journal of China, 101(10), 695–699.

[26] Lisi, M. P., Scattolin, M., Fusaro, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2021). A Bayesian approach to reveal the key role of mask wearing in modulating projected interpersonal distance during the first COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One, 16(8), e0255598.

[27] Mathieu, E., Ritchie, H., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Dattani, S., Beltekian, D., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Published online at Retrieved from:

[28] Mheidly, N., Fares, M. Y., Zalzale, H., & Fares, J. (2020). Effect of face masks on interpersonal communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 582191.

[29] Ministry of Health in Singapore. (2022). Updates on Singapore's COVID-19 Situation. Retrieved from

[30] Morawska, L., & Milton, D. K. (2020). It is time to address airborne transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(9), 2311–2313.

[31] Nishihara, R., & Okubo, M. (2015). A study on personal space in virtual space based on personality. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2183–2190.

[32] Rowe, B. R., Canosa, A., Drouffe, J. M., & Mitchell, J. B. A. (2021). Simple quantitative assessment of the outdoor versus indoor airborne transmission of viruses and COVID-19. Environmental Research, 198, 111189.

[33] Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., di Cola, A. S., & Iachini, T. (2017). The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1232–1240.

[34] Ruggiero, G., Rapuano, M., & Iachini, T. (2019). Perceived temperature modulates peripersonal and interpersonal spaces differently in men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 52–59.

[35] Sallam, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: A concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccine, 9(2), 160.

[36] Silton, N. R., Flannelly, K. J., Milstein, G., & Vaaler, M. L. (2011). Stigma in America: Has anything changed?: Impact of perceptions of mental illness and dangerousness on the desire for social distance: 1996 and 2006. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 361–366.

[37] Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space. Prentice Hall.

[38] Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Pantelidou, G., Rebacz, P., Västfjäll, D., & Tsakiris, M. (2011). I-space: The effects of emotional valence and source of music on interpersonal distance. PLoS One, 6(10), e26083.

[39] Tung, T.-H., Lin, X.-Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, M.-X., & Zhu, J.-S. (2021). Willingness to receive a booster dose of inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in Taizhou, China. Expert Review of Vaccines, 1–7, 261–267.

[40] Vagnoni, E., Lewis, J., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Cardini, F. (2018). Listening to a conversation with aggressive content expands the interpersonal space. PLoS One, 13(3), e0192753.

[41] Wang, C., Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Pan, R., Adamus, K., Wan, X., … Ho, C. (2020). The association between physical and mental health and face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of two countries with different views and practices. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 569981.

[42] Welsch, R., Hecht, H., Chuang, L., & von Castell, C. (2020). Interpersonal distance in the SARS-CoV-2 crisis. Human Factors, 62(7), 1095–1101.

[43] Welsch, R., Wessels, M., Bernhard, C., Thönes, S., & von Castell, C. (2021). Physical distancing and the perception of interpersonal distance in the COVID-19 crisis. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 11485.

[44] Xiong, W., Wang, C., & Yu, X. (2022). The effect of face mask and approach pattern on interpersonal distance in COVID-19 pandemic using VR technology. In International conference on man-machine-environment system engineering, MMESE 2022 (Vol. 941, pp. 92–98). Springer.

[45] Yan, Z.-P., Yang, M., & Lai, C.-L. (2021). COVID-19 vaccines: A review of the safety and efficacy of current clinical trials. Pharmaceuticals, 14(5), 406.

[46] Yang, H., Wu, J., Hu, Z., & Lv, C. (2023). Real-time driver cognitive workload recognition: Attention-enabled learning with multimodal information fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[47] Yu, J., Yang, Z., Wu, Y., Ge, M., Tang, X., & Jiang, H. (2021). Prevalence of and factors associated with depressive symptoms among college students in Wuhan, China during the normalization stage of COVID-19 prevention and control. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 742950.

[48] Yu, X., & Lee, Y.-C. (2020). Investigating the comfort distance of Chinese in eight directions. In International conference on man-machine-environment system engineering, MMESE 2020 (Vol. 576, pp. 461–468). Springer.

[49] Yu, X., Xiong, W., & Lee, Y.-C. (2020). An investigation into interpersonal and Peripersonal spaces of Chinese people for different directions and genders. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 981.

[50] Zhao, X., & Knobel, P. (2021). Face mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparing perceptions in China and three European countries. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(6), 1199–1204.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.