Factors associated with the onset and survival of subsequent primary breast cancer in female non-metastatic breast cancer survivors
Shunshun Liang, Rongwu Xiang, Shubing Jia, Sihan Zhou, Hongmiao Lian, YunChun Hu, Qian Cheng, Mingyi Zhao
Factors associated with the onset and survival of subsequent primary breast cancer in female non-metastatic breast cancer survivors
This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for the onset of subsequent primary breast cancer (SPBC) in women with a previous diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer (BC) and to construct a prognostic prediction model for patients with SPBC. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-17 (SEER-17) database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on women with initial primary early-stage BC from 2004 to 2015. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated to determine the risk of subsequent primary cancer (SPC). A competing risk model was built to identify the risk factors for the onset of SPBC. And risk factors associated with breast cancer-specific mortality in SPBC patients were evaluated and presented in the form of nomogram. Compared with the general population, the overall risk of SPC for all sites was significantly elevated in women with early-stage BC (SIR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.20–1.23), and breast is the most frequent site. Age, race and ethnicity, year of diagnosis, history of other tumors, histological type, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, tumor size, positive lymph nodes numbers and ER status were independent risk factors (p < .05) for the onset of SPBC. A new prognosis nomogram demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation with a C-index of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.859–0.880), and showed favorable consistency and clinical usefulness. The incidence of SPBC and prognosis of patients with SPBC were well estimated based on a large cohort. Our nomogram model had excellent prediction performance and could be a useful tool to predict prognosis.
[1] |
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363-385.
|
[4] |
Cianfrocca M, Goldstein LJ. Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9(6):606-616.
|
[5] |
Ahmad A. Breast cancer statistics: recent trends. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1152:1-7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Mellemkjaer L, Friis S, Olsen JH, et al. Risk of second cancer among women with breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(9):2285-2292.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Molina-Montes E, Requena M, Sánchez-Cantalejo E, et al. Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(1):158-171.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Grantzau T, Overgaard J. Risk of second non-breast cancer among patients treated with and without postoperative radiotherapy for primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies including 522,739 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121(3):402-413.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LA, Scoppa S, Feuer EJ. Multiple cancer prevalence: a growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):566-571.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Wei JL, Jiang YZ, Shao ZM. Survival and chemotherapy-related risk of second primary malignancy in breast cancer patients: a SEER-based study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(8):934-940.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Raymond JS, Hogue CJ. Multiple primary tumours in women following breast cancer, 1973-2000. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(11):1745-1750.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Knight JA, Fan J, Malone KE, et al. Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking in combination: a predictor of contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(5):916-924.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Reiner AS, Lynch CF, Sisti JS, et al. Hormone receptor status of a first primary breast cancer predicts contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study population. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):83.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Reiner AS, Sisti J, John EM, et al. Breast cancer family history and contralateral breast cancer risk in young women: an update from the women's environmental cancer and radiation epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15):1513-1520.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Watt GP, Knight JA, Lin C, et al. Mammographic texture features associated with contralateral breast cancer in the WECARE study. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):146.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Kim BK, Oh SJ, Song JY, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis associated with multiple primary cancers in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(1):62-69.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Katuwal S, Jousilahti P, Pukkala E. Causes of death among women with breast cancer: a follow-up study of 50 481 women with breast cancer in Finland. Int J Cancer. 2021;149:839-845.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, Dematteo RP. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):e173-e180.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Duggan MA, Anderson WF, Altekruse S, Penberthy L, Sherman ME. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program and pathology: toward strengthening the critical relationship. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(12):e94-e102.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):148-158.
|
[21] |
Kim HT. Cumulative incidence in competing risks data and competing risks regression analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(2 Pt 1):559-565.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F. Regression modeling of competing risk using R: an in depth guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(9):1388-1395.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Dignam JJ, Zhang Q, Kocherginsky M. The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(8):2301-2308.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation. 2016;133(6):601-609.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1364-1370.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1377-1384.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565-574.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Van Calster B, Wynants L, Verbeek J, et al. Reporting and interpreting decision curve analysis: a guide for investigators. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):796-804.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Desantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439-448.
|
[30] |
Soerjomataram I, Coebergh JW. Epidemiology of multiple primary cancers. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;471:85-105.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Brenner H, Siegle S, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H. Second primary neoplasms following breast cancer in Saarland, Germany, 1968–1987. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29(10):1410-1414.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Evans HS, Lewis CM, Robinson D, Bell CM, Møller H, Hodgson SV. Incidence of multiple primary cancers in a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southeast England. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(3):435-440.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Ricceri F, Fasanelli F, Giraudo MT, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies in women with breast cancer: results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer. 2015;137(4):940-948.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Levi F, Te VC, Randimbison L, La Vecchia C. Cancer risk in women with previous breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):71-73.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Schaapveld M, Visser O, Louwman MJ, et al. Risk of new primary nonbreast cancers after breast cancer treatment: a Dutch population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1239-1246.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Molina-Montes E, Pollán M, Payer T, Molina E, Dávila-Arias C, Sánchez MJ. Risk of second primary cancer among women with breast cancer: a population-based study in Granada (Spain). Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(2):340-345.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Li Z, Wang K, Shi Y, Zhang X, Wen J. Incidence of second primary malignancy after breast cancer and related risk factors-is breast-conserving surgery safe? A nested case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(2):352-362.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Lee J, Park S, Kim S, et al. Characteristics and survival of breast cancer patients with multiple synchronous or metachronous primary cancers. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(5):1213-1220.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Vanderwalde AM, Hurria A. Second malignancies among elderly survivors of cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1572-1581.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Varghese F, Wong J. Breast cancer in the elderly. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(4):819-833.
|
[41] |
Malik MK, Tartter PI, Belfer R. Undertreated breast cancer in the elderly. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;2013:893104.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Prochazka M, Hall P, Granath F, Czene K. Family history of breast cancer and young age at diagnosis of breast cancer increase risk of second primary malignancies in women: a population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(9):1291-1295.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Lee KD, Chen SC, Chan CH, et al. Increased risk for second primary malignancies in women with breast cancer diagnosed at young age: a population-based study in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(10):2647-2655.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Easton DF. Familial risks of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4(5):179-181.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643-646.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Berrington DGA, Curtis RE, Kry SF, et al. Proportion of second cancers attributable to radiotherapy treatment in adults: a cohort study in the US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(4):353-360.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Reits EA, Hodge JW, Herberts CA, et al. Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy. J Exp Med. 2006;203(5):1259-1271.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Brown LM, Chen BE, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Risk of second non-hematological malignancies among 376,825 breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106(3):439-451.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Travis LB, Wahnefried WD, Allan JM, Wood ME, Ng AK. Aetiology, genetics and prevention of secondary neoplasms in adult cancer survivors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(5):289-301.
|
[50] |
Noone AM, Lund JL, Mariotto A, et al. Comparison of SEER treatment data with Medicare claims. Med Care. 2016;54(9):e55-e64.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |