Synthetic Receptors Decorated on Nanoparticles for Selective and Sensitive Glyphosate Detection

Ilgım Gokturk, Mamajan Ovezova, Gaye Ezgi Yilmaz, Deniz Turkmen, Fatma Yilmaz, Adil Denizli

Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 0.

Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 0. DOI: 10.1007/s13320-025-0737-5
Regular

Synthetic Receptors Decorated on Nanoparticles for Selective and Sensitive Glyphosate Detection

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Herein, an innovative glyphosate imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacroyl-(L)-phenylalanine methyl ester nanoparticles (MIP@NPs) based plasmonic nanosensor featured with high sensitivity and selectivity was constructed by using the molecular imprinting technique and used for real-time glyphosate detection. The characterization of nanoparticles was performed by the nano Zetasizer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while nanosensors were characterized by the Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflection (FTIR-ATR) and contact angle measurement. Control experiments were conducted to evaluate the imprinting efficiency on the signal response using a non-imprinted surface plasmon resonance (NIP SPR) nanosensor prepared without adding glyphosate pesticide into the polymerization mixture. The MIP@NPs integrated molecularly imprinted surface plasmon resonance (MIP SPR) nanosensor having synthetic molecular recognition elements yielded a novel biosensing platform for label-free detection and real-time monitoring of glyphosate pesticide. The MIP SPR nanosensor detected the target glyphosate molecule 4.950 times more selectively than the competitor molecule malathion while 3.918 times more selectively than the competitor molecule malaoxon. In addition, the imprinting efficiency factor was found to be 6.76, indicating that the molecular imprinting process was successful. In addition, the imprinting factor was found to be 6.76. Kinetic studies and adsorption characteristics of glycosate adsorption were carried out to assess adsorption dynamics. The linear concentration range for glyphosate detection was 0.001 ppm–10.000 ppm of pesticide, and the detection limit was found to be 0.120 ppb. Studies on the repeatability of the MIP SPR nanosensor revealed that even after five cycles, the signal response for glyphosate detection did not change significantly with relative standard deviation, RSD<1.5 value. The artificial urine selected as the real sample was spiked with glyphosate at a final concentration of 10.000 ppm to evaluate the matrix effect, and the glyphosate amount was reported.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ilgım Gokturk, Mamajan Ovezova, Gaye Ezgi Yilmaz, Deniz Turkmen, Fatma Yilmaz, Adil Denizli. Synthetic Receptors Decorated on Nanoparticles for Selective and Sensitive Glyphosate Detection. Photonic Sensors, 2025, 15(3): 0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13320-025-0737-5

References

[[1]]
Guan J, Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Deng H, Xu J, et al.. Employing a fluorescent and colorimetric picolyl-functionalized rhodamine for the detection of glyphosate pesticide. Talanta, 2021, 224: 121834.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[2]]
Peruzzo P J, Porta A A, Ronco A E. Levels of glyphosate in surface waters, sediments and soils associated with direct sowing soybean cultivation in north pampasic region of Argentina. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 156(1): 61-66.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[3]]
Sviridov A V, Shushkova T V, Ermakova I T, Ivanova E V, Epiktetov D O, Leontievsky A A. Microbial degradation of glyphosate herbicides. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2015, 51: 188-195.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[4]]
Chang Y C, Lin Y S, Xiao G T, Chiu T C, Hu C C. A highly selective and sensitive nanosensor for the detection of glyphosate. Talanta, 2016, 161: 94-98.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[5]]
Van Bruggen A H C, He M M, Shin K, Mai V, Jeong K C, Finckh M R, et al.. Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616: 255-268.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[6]]
Valle A L, Mello F C C, Alves-Balvedi R P, Rodrigues L P, Goulart L R. Glyphosate detection: methods, needs and challenges. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2019, 17: 291-317.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[7]]
Zúñiga K, Rebollar G, Avelar M, Campos-Terán J, Torres E. Nanomaterial-based sensors for the detection of glyphosate. Water, 2022, 14(15): 1-40.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[8]]
Gomez-Caballero A, Diaz-Diaz G, Bengoetxea O, Quintela A, Unceta N, Goicolea M A, et al.. Water compatible stir-bar devices imprinted with underivatised glyphosate for selective sample clean-up. Journal of Chromatography A, 2016, 1451: 23-32.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[9]]
Ding S, Lyu Z, Li S, Ruan X, Fei M, Zhou Y, et al.. Molecularly imprinted polypyrrole nanotubes based electrochemical sensor for glyphosate detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2021, 191: 113434.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[10]]
Koskinen W C, Marek L J, Hall K E. Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, plant materials and soil. Pest Management Science, 2016, 72(3): 423-432.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[11]]
Liao Y, Berthion J M, Colet I, Merlo M, Nougadère A, Hu R. Validation and application of analytical method for glyphosate and glufosinate in foods by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 2018, 1549: 31-38.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[12]]
Stalikas C D, Konidari C N. Analytical methods to determine phosphonic and amino acid group-containing pesticides. Journal of Chromatography A, 2001, 907(1–2): 1-19.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[13]]
Motojyuku M, Saito T, Akieda K, Otsuka H, Yamamoto I, Inokuchi S. Determination of glyphosate, glyphosate metabolites, and glufosinate in human serum by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B, 2008, 875(2): 509-514.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[14]]
Hu J Y, Chen C L, Li Z. A simple method for the determination of glyphosate residues in soil by capillary gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 63: 71-375.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[15]]
Corbera M, Hidalgo M, Salvadó V, Wieczorek P P. Determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in natural water using the capillary electrophoresis combined with enrichment step. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2005, 540(1): 3-7.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[16]]
Waiman C V, Avena M J, Garrido M, Band B F, Zanini G P. A simple and rapid spectrophotometric method to quantify the herbicide glyphosate in aqueous media. Application to adsorption isotherms on soils and goethite. Geoderma, 2012, 170: 154-158.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[17]]
Rubio F, Veldhuis L J, Clegg B S, Fleeker J R, Hall J C. Comparison of a direct ELISA and an HPLC method for glyphosate determinations in water. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(3): 691-696.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[18]]
Chergui S, Rhili K, Abrego-Martinez J C, Jiménez G C, Siaj M. Selection of highly specific aptamers by graphene oxide-SELEX to ultrasensitive label-free impedimetric biosensor development for glyphosate detection. ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 1(6): 655-663.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[19]]
Philip A, Kumar A R. The performance enhancement of surface plasmon resonance optical sensors using nanomaterials: a review. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2022, 458: 214424.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[20]]
Homola J. Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 377: 528-539.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[21]]
Dibekkaya H, Saylan Y, Yılmaz F, Derazshamshir A, Denizli A. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for real-time detection of cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A: Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2016, 53(9): 585-594.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[22]]
Zhu C, Zhang L, Chen C, Zhou J. Determination of bisphenol a using a molecularly imprinted polymer surface plasmon resonance sensor. Analytical Letters, 2015, 48(10): 1537-1550.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[23]]
Saylan Y, Akgönüllü S, Çimen D, Derazshamshir A, Bereli N, Yılmaz F, Denizli A. Development of surface plasmon resonance sensors based on molecularly imprinted nanofilms for sensitive and selective detection of pesticides. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017, 241: 446-454.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[24]]
Aşır S, Uğur B, Jalilzadeh M, Göktürk I, Türkmen D. Development of a plasmonic sensor for a chemotherapeutic agent cabazitaxel. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(1): 492-501.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[25]]
Yılmaz G E, Saylan Y, Göktürk I, Yılmaz F, Denizli A. Selective amplification of plasmonic sensor signal for cortisol detection using gold nanoparticles. Biosensors, 2022, 12(7): 482.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[26]]
Esentürk M K, Akgönüllü S, Yılmaz F, Denizli A. Molecularly imprinted based surface plasmon resonance nanosensors for microalbumin detection. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 2019, 30(8): 646-661.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[27]]
Türkmen D, Bakhshpour M, Göktürk I, Aşır S, Yilmaz F, Denizli A. Selective dopamine detection by SPR sensor signal amplification using gold nanoparticles. New Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 45(39): 18296-18306.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[28]]
Safran V, Göktürk I, Bakhshpour M, Yılmaz F, Denizli A. Development of molecularly imprinted polymer-based optical sensor for the sensitive penicillin G detection in milk. ChemistrySelect, 2021, 6(43): 11865-11875.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[29]]
Çelik O, Saylan Y, Göktürk I, Yılmaz F, Denizli A. A surface plasmon resonance sensor with synthetic receptors decorated on graphene oxide for selective detection of benzylpenicillin. Talanta, 2023, 253: 123939.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[30]]
Gokturk I, Bakhshpour M, Cimen D, Yilmaz F, Bereli N, Denizli A. SPR signal enhancement with silver nanoparticle-assisted plasmonic sensor for selective adenosine detection. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22(15): 14862-14869.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[31]]
Vijayakumar S, Venkatesan S, Lin M C, Vediappen P. Development of optical sensor for the detection of alanine. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2023, 435: 114338.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[32]]
Martins-Gomes C, Silva T L, Andreani T, Silva A M. Glyphosate vs. glyphosate-based herbicides exposure: a review on their toxicity. Journal of Xenobiotics, 2022, 12(1): 21-40.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[33]]
Chutipongtanate S, Thongboonkerd V. Systematic comparisons of artificial urine formulas for in vitro cellular study. Analytical Biochemistry, 2010, 402(1): 110-112.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[34]]
Hammerschmidt R. Glyphosate, glyphosate resistant crops and plant disease: is there a connection?. Outlooks on Pest Management, 2013, 24(5): 201-205.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[35]]
Huang Y, Reddy K N, Thomson S J, Yao H. Assessment of soybean injury from glyphosate using airborne multispectral remote sensing. Pest Management Science, 2015, 71(4): 545-552.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[36]]
Okada E, Pérez D, De Gerónimo E, Aparicio V, Massone H, Costa J L. Non-point source pollution of glyphosate and AMPA in a rural basin from the southeast Pampas, Argentina. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25: 15120-15132.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[37]]
Morshed M M O, Omar D, Mohamad R B, Wahed S B A. Determination of glyphosate through passive and active sampling methods in a treated field atmosphere. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011, 6: 4010-4018
[[38]]
Helander M, Saloniemi I, Omacini M, Druille M, Salminen J P, Saikkonen K. Glyphosate decreases mycorrhizal colonization and affects plant-soil feedback. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642: 285-291.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[39]]
Brovini E M, Cardoso S J, Quadra G R, Vilas-Boas J A, Paranaíba J R, Pereira R d O, et al.. Glyphosate concentrations in global freshwaters: are aquatic organisms at risk?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(43): 60635-60648.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[40]]
Asnicar D, Cappelli C, Sallehuddin A S, Maznan N A, Marin M G. Effects of glyphosate-based and derived products on sea urchin larval development. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(9): 661.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[41]]
Do M H, Dubreuil B, Peydecastaing J, Vaca-Medina G, Nhu-Trang T T, Jaffrezic-Renault N, et al.. Chitosan-based nanocomposites for glyphosate detection using surface plasmon resonance sensor. Sensors, 2020, 20(20): 5942.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[42]]
Wang S, Yao Y, Zhao J, Han X, Chai C, Dai P. A novel electrochemical sensor for glyphosate detection based on Ti3C2Tx/Cu-BTC nanocomposite. RSC Advances, 2022, 12(9): 5164-5172.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[43]]
Gokila N, Muthumalai K, Haldorai Y, Kumar R T R. Electrochemical non-enzymatic sensor based on Co-H2ABDC metal organic framework for detection of glyphosate. Chemical Physics Letters, 2022, 795: 139481.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[44]]
Wan C Q, Pang Y H, Feng Y W, Shen X F. A ratio fluorescence sensor based on rhodamine B embedded metal-organic framework for glyphosate detection in agri-food products. Food Chemistry, 2022, 394: 133446.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[45]]
Yu J, Lin J, Li J. A photoelectrochemical sensor based on an acetylcholinesterase-CdS/ZnO-modified extended-gate field-effect transistor for glyphosate detection. Analyst, 2021, 146(14): 4595-4604.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[46]]
Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Xu S, Da L, Lin D, Jiang C. Enzyme-free and rapid visual quantitative detection for pesticide residues utilizing portable smartphone integrated paper sensor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 436: 129320.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[47]]
Li M C, Chen K R, Kuo C C, Lin Y X, Su L C. A simple phase-sensitive surface plasmon resonance sensor based on simultaneous polarization measurement strategy. Sensors, 2021, 21(22): 7615.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[48]]
Butmee P, Samphao A, Tumcharern G. Reduced graphene oxide on silver nanoparticle layers-decorated titanium dioxide nanotube arrays as SERS-based sensor for glyphosate direct detection in environmental water and soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 437: 129344.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[49]]
Gholivand M B, Akbari A, Norouzi L. Development of a novel hollow fiber-pencil graphite modified electrochemical sensor for the ultra-trace analysis of glyphosate. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, 2018, 272: 415-424.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[50]]
Thanh C T, Binh N H, Duoc P N D, Thu V T, Van Trinh P, Anh N N, et al.. Electrochemical sensor based on reduced graphene oxide/double-walled carbon nanotubes/octahedral Fe3O4/chitosan composite for glyphosate detection. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2021, 106: 1017-1023.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[51]]
Costa Í A A, Gross M A, Alves E D O, Fonseca F J, Paterno L G. An impedimetric e-tongue based on CeO2-graphene oxide chemical sensors for detection of glyphosate and its potential interferents. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 922: 116719.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[52]]
Sasaki Y, Asano K, Minamiki T, Zhang Z, Takizawa S, Kubota R, et al.. A water-gated organic thin-film transistor for glyphosate detection: a comparative study with fluorescence sensing. Chemistry A European Journal, 2020, 26(64): 14525-14529.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[53]]
Shao Y, Tian R, Duan J, Wang M, Cao J, Cao Z, et al.. A novel fluorescent sensor based on aptamer and qPCR for determination of glyphosate in tap water. Sensors, 2023, 23(2): 649.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[54]]
Mirmohseni A, Farhadi K, Jahangiri S. Application of polydimethylsiloxane/acrylic resins coated quartz crystal nano balance sensor for detection of glyphosate pesticide. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 100(7): 733-745.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[55]]
Ostrovidov S, Ramalingam M, Bae H, Orive G, Fujie T, Hori T, et al.. Molecularly imprinted polymer-based sensors for the detection of skeletal-and cardiac-muscle-related analytes. Sensors, 2023, 23(12): 5625.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[56]]
Sharma V, Kumar A, Saharan S, Semwal S. Graphene/Au/MIP-coated D-shaped optical fiber-based SPR sensor for ethanol detection. Plasmonics, 2023, 18(5): 1639-1649.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[57]]
Gomaa M, Salah A, Fattah G A. Superior enhancement of SPR fiber optic sensor using laser sensitized dip-coated graphene gold nanocomposite probes. Optics and Laser Technology, 2023, 157: 108644.
CrossRef Google scholar
[[58]]
Wang Y, Niu Z, Xu C, Zhan M, Koh K, Niu J, et al.. 2D MOF-enhanced SPR sensing platform: facile and ultrasensitive detection of sulfamethazine via supramolecular probe. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 456: 131642.
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/