Enhancing Demodulation Performance of DCM Algorithm in φ-OTDR System Through Temporal Spline Interpolation

Tingyu Wang, Jianzhong Zhang, Zhe Ma, Xiang He, Weizhe Li, Binyuan Yang, Mingjiang Zhang

PDF
Photonic Sensors ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3) : 240308. DOI: 10.1007/s13320-024-0725-1
Regular

Enhancing Demodulation Performance of DCM Algorithm in φ-OTDR System Through Temporal Spline Interpolation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

For expanding the amplitude-frequency response range of the differential cross-phase multiply (DCM) algorithm in the φ-OTDR system, a temporal spline interpolation (TSI) method is proposed to pre-process Rayleigh backscattering (RBS) signals. Through the TSI method, the discrete temporal signals characterizing RBS traces are subjected to interpolation, facilitating a reduction in differential approximation errors. This, in turn, establishes a heightened level of precision in phase demodulation, especially relevant across extensive sensing distances. By comparing the recovered time-domain waveforms and the corresponding power spectral densities without and with the TSI, the above improvement effect has been experimentally validated by utilizing the TSI. The results show that, with the TSI, the amplitude-frequency response range of the DCM algorithm is enlarged by 2.78 times, and the new relationship among f pulse, f, and D under the root mean square error (RMSE) tolerance less than 0.1 can be expressed as 1.9(D+1)ff pulse. This contribution underscores a substantial advancement in the capabilities of the DCM algorithm, holding promise for refined performance in optical fiber sensing applications.

Keywords

φ-OTDR / DCM algorithm / phase demodulation / 3×3 coupler / temporal spline interpolation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tingyu Wang, Jianzhong Zhang, Zhe Ma, Xiang He, Weizhe Li, Binyuan Yang, Mingjiang Zhang. Enhancing Demodulation Performance of DCM Algorithm in φ-OTDR System Through Temporal Spline Interpolation. Photonic Sensors, 2024, 14(3): 240308 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13320-024-0725-1

References

[[1]]
Ajo-Franklin J B, Dou S, Lindsey N J, Monga I, Tracy C, Robertson M, et al.. Distributed acoustic sensing using dark fiber for near-surface characterization and broadband seismic event detection. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 1-14,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[2]]
Lindsey N J, Dawe T C, Ajo-Franklin J B. Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing. Science, 2019, 366(6469): 1103-1107,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[3]]
Bakulin A, Silvestrov I, Pevzner R. Surface seismics with DAS: an emerging alternative to modern point-sensor acquisition. Leading Edge, 2020, 39(11): 808-818,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[4]]
Milne D, Masoudi A, Ferro E, Watson G, Le Pen L. An analysis of railway track behavior based on distributed optical fibre acoustic sensing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 142: 106769,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[5]]
Tejedor J, MacIas-Guarasa J, Martins H F, Martin-Lopez S, Gonzalez-Herraez M. A contextual GMM-HMM smart fiber optic surveillance system for pipeline integrity threat detection. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2019, 37(18): 4514-4522,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[6]]
Hartog A H. . An introduction to distributed Optical fibre sensors, 2017 London Taylor & Francis Group 239-241,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[7]]
Z. Pan, K. Liang, Q. Ye, H. Cai, R. Qu, and Z. Fang, “Phase-sensitive OTDR system based on digital coherent detection,” in 2011 Asia Communications & Photonics Conference & Exhibition, Shanghai, China, 2011, pp. 1–6.
[[8]]
Wang Z, Zhang L, Wang S, Xue N, Peng F, Fan M, et al.. Coherent Φ-OTDR based on I/Q demodulation and homodyne detection. Optics Express, 2016, 24(2): 853-858,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[9]]
Chen D, Liu Q, Fan X, He Z. Distributed fiber-optic acoustic sensor with enhanced response bandwidth and high signal-to-noise ratio. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(10): 2037-2043,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[10]]
Shang Y, Yang Y, Wang C, Liu X, Wang C, Peng G. Optical fiber distributed acoustic sensing based on the self-interference of Rayleigh backscattering. Measurement, 2016, 79: 222-227,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[11]]
Fang G, Xu T, Feng S, Li F. Phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometer based on phase-generated carrier algorithm. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, 33(13): 2811-2816,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[12]]
Lu X, Soto M A, Thomas P J, Kolltveit E. Evaluating phase errors in phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry based on I/Q demodulation. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2020, 38(15): 4133-4141
[[13]]
Masoudi A, Newson T P. Analysis of distributed optical fibre acoustic sensors through numerical modelling. Optics Express, 2017, 25(25): 32021-32040,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[14]]
Chen M, Masoudi A, Brambilla G. Performance analysis of distributed optical fiber acoustic sensors based on φ-OTDR. Optics Express, 2019, 27(7): 9684-9695,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[15]]
Masoudi A, Belal M, Newson T P. A distributed optical fibre dynamic strain sensor based on phase-OTDR. Measurement Science and Technology, 2013, 24(8): 085204,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[16]]
Wang C, Shang Y, Zhao W A, Liu X H, Wang C, Peng G D. Investigation and comparison of φ-OTDR and OTDR-interferometry via phase demodulation. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18(4): 1501-1505,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[17]]
Wang C, Shang Y, Liu X H, Wang C, Yu H H, Jiang D S, et al.. Distributed OTDR-interferometric sensing network with identical ultra-weak fiber Bragg gratings. Optics Express, 2015, 23(22): 29038-29046,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[18]]
Wang C, Shang Y, Liu X H, Wang C, Wang H Z, Peng G D. Interferometric distributed sensing system with phase optical time-domain reflectometry. Photonic Sensors, 2017, 7(2): 157-162,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[19]]
Wang C, Wang C, Shang Y, Liu X H, Peng G D. Distributed acoustic mapping based on interferometry of phase optical time-domain reflectometry. Optics Communications, 2015, 346: 172-177,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[20]]
V. Türker, F. Uyar, T. Kartaloğlu, E. Özbay, and İ. Özdür, “Long-range distributed acoustic sensor based on 3×3 coupler assisted passive demodulation Scheme,” in 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, San Jose, USA, 2022, pp. 1–2.
[[21]]
Li W, Zhang J. Distributed weak fiber Bragg grating vibration sensing system based on 3×3 fiber coupler. Photonic Sensors, 2018, 8(2): 146-156,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[22]]
Zhong X, Gui D, Zhang B, Deng H, Zhao S, Zhang J, Ma M, Xu M. Performance enhancement of phase-demodulation ϕ-OTDR using improved two-path DCM algorithm. Optics Communications, 2021, 482: 126616,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[23]]
Peng Z, Jian J, Wen H, Gribok A, Wang M, Liu H, et al.. Distributed fiber sensor and machine learning data analytics for pipeline protection against extrinsic intrusions and intrinsic corrosions. Optics Express, 2020, 28(19): 27277-27292,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[24]]
Peng Z, Wen H, Jian J, Gribok A, Wang M, Huang S, et al.. Identifications and classifications of human locomotion using Rayleigh-enhanced distributed fiber acoustic sensors with deep neural networks. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 1-11,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[25]]
Shang Y, He Q, Huang S, Wang J, Wang M, Li D, et al.. Inversion method for soil moisture content based on a distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing system. Optical Express, 2023, 31(23): 38878-38890,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[26]]
Fu W, Yi D, Huang Z, Huang C, Geng Y, Li X. Multiple event recognition scheme using variational mode decomposition-based hybrid feature extraction in fiber optic DAS system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(22): 27316-27323,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[27]]
Wang X, Wang C, Zhang F, Jiang S, Sun Z, Zhang H, et al.. Feature fusion-based fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing signal identification method. Measurement Science and Technology, 2023, 34(12): 125141,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[28]]
Lu X, Thomas P J. Phase error evaluation via differentiation and cross-multiplication demodulation in phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry. Photonics, 2023, 10(5): 514,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[29]]
Muanenda Y, Faralli S, Oton C J, Cheng C, Yang M, Di Pasquale F. Dynamic phase extraction in high-SNR DAS based on UWFBGs without phase unwrapping using scalable homodyne demodulation in direct detection. Optics Express, 2019, 27(8): 10644-10658,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[30]]
Wang T, Zhang J, Ma Z, Liu M, He X, Li W, et al.. Comparison of amplitude-frequency response characteristics between DCM and Arctan algorithms in ϕ-OTDR. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2023, 41(20): 6608-6614,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[31]]
Hammer P C. Finite-difference methods for partial differential equations. Technometrics, 1962, 4(1): 143-144,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[32]]
László L. Cubic spline interpolation with quasiminimal B-spline coefficients. Acta Mathematic Hungarica, 2005, 107: 77-87,
CrossRef Google scholar
[[33]]
Hou H S, Andrews H C. Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 1978, 26(6): 508-517,
CrossRef Google scholar
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/