One-stage mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty in layers: outcome analysis of first 50 consecutive cases

Umar Daraz Khan

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 45

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :45 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2018.58
Original Article
Original Article
One-stage mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty in layers: outcome analysis of first 50 consecutive cases
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: The single-stage procedure is a challenging procedure for Plastic Surgeons. The single-stage layered mastopexy with augmentation is a new technique that is aiming to add safety, preserving breast function and to restore normal parameters of breast.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 50 consecutive cases of layered mastopexy with augmentation mammoplasties was performed. All patients had their implants placed in muscle splitting pocket. Incisions for mastopexy were selected on the basis of nipple areolar complex to inframammary crease. Mastopexy is performed using a medially based pedicle, leaving a sufficient tissue covering the implant. Patients were divided into three groups. Group “A” who had periareolar mastopexy, Group “B” had vertical scar mastopexy and Group “C” patients had mastopexy with Wise pattern markings.

Results: Group A comprised 11 patients. The mean age was 28.82 ± 7.01 years, mean preoperative and postoperative nipple areolar complex (NAC) to IMC measurement was recorded in 10 patients with the mean of 7.15 ± 1.98 cm and 8.35 ± 1.18 cm respectively. Mean size of the implant used was 379.55 ± 77.18 cm3. Group B comprised 29 patients. Mean age was 35.17 ± 12.37 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease was 8.53 ± 1.48 cm and 9.72 ± 1.51 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 289.48 ± 109 cm3. Group C had 10 patients. Mean age was 39.60 ± 12.15 years and the mean preoperative and postoperative NAC to IMC crease of 10.11 ± 1.24 cm and 8.75 ± 0.98 cm respectively. The mean implant size used was 287.00 ± 55.08 cm3.

Conclusion: The procedure allows better arterial supply, wider area for venous and lymphatic drainage, better sensory innervation to NAC and maximises lactation potential of the breast.

Keywords

Mastopexy / augmentation mammoplasty / augmentation with mastopexy / muscle split technique / one-stage mastyopexy with augmentation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Umar Daraz Khan. One-stage mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty in layers: outcome analysis of first 50 consecutive cases. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2018, 5(1): 45 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2018.58

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Gonzalez-Ulloa M.Correction of hypertrophy of the breast by exogenous material..Plast Reconstr Surg1960;25:15-26

[2]

Regnault P.The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation..Plast Reconstr Surg1966;37:31-7

[3]

Stevens WG,Stoker DA,Eberlin SA.One-stage augmentation mammoplasty: a review of 1192 simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy procedures in 615 consecutives patients..Aesthet Surg J2014;34:723-32

[4]

Calobrace MB,Cothron KJ.Simultaneous augmentation/mastopexy: a retrospective 5-year review of 332 consecutive cases..Plast Reconstr Surg2013;131:145-56

[5]

Swanson E.Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive of breast augmentation and vertical mammoplasty performed individually and in a combination..Plast Reconstr Surg2013;132:30e-45e

[6]

Spear SL,Menon N.One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction..Aesthetic Plastic Surg2004;28:259-67

[7]

Khan UD.Augmentation mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty: an analysis of 1,406 consecutive cases..Plast Aesthet Research2016;3:26-30

[8]

Khan UD.A long-term review of augmentation mastopexy in muscle splitting biplabe..Plast Aesthet Res2016;3:21-5

[9]

Khan UD.Augmentation Mastopexy in muscle splitting biplane: an outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket..Aesth Plast Surg2010;34:313-21

[10]

Cronin TD.Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In the translation of the Third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, no 66 Excerpta Medica.1964;AmsterdamExcerpta Medica Foundation41-9

[11]

Dempsey WC.Subpectoral implantsin augmentation mammoplasty: a preliminary report..Plast Reconstr Surg1968;42:515

[12]

Tebbet JB.Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types..Plast Reconstr Surg2001;107:1255

[13]

Graf RM,Rippel R,Damasio RC.Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure..Plast Reconstr Surg2003;111:904

[14]

Khan UD.Muscle splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different Plane..Aesth Plast Surg2007;31:553-8

[15]

Spear SL,Clemens MW.Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single Surgeon’s practice..Plast Reconstr Surg2006;118:136S-47Sdiscussion 148S-9S, 150S-1S

[16]

Khan UD.Vertical scar mastopexy with Cat’s tail extension for prevention of skin redundancy: an experience with 17 consecutive cases following mastopexy and mastopexy with breast augmentation..Aesth Plast Surg2012;36:303-7

[17]

Khan UD.Mugea TT.Use of nipple areolar complex to inframammary crease measurements to reduce bottoming out after augmentation mastopexy..Aesthetic Surgery of the Brest2015;1st ed.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag

[18]

Khan UD.Preoperative planning and breast implant selection for volume difference management in asymmetrical breasts..Plast Aesthet Res2017;4:108-15

[19]

Vita RD,Buccheri EM.The balcony technique of breast augmentation and inverted-T mastopexy with an inferior dermoglandular flap..Aesthet Surg J2017;37:1114-23

[20]

Rappaport NH.A simplified technique for deepithelialisztion in patients requiring augmentation mastopexy..Plast Reconstr Surg1982;70:494-5

[21]

Owsley JQ.Simultaneous mastopexy and augmentation for correction of the small, ptotic breast..Ann Plast Surg1979;2:195-200

[22]

Karnes J,Salisbury M,Beckham P.Simultaneous breast augmentation and lift..Aesth Plast Surg2000;24:148-54

PDF

215

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/