Early experiences with the use of Earfold™ for correction of prominent ears

Bernd W. Schuster

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 22

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :22 DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2018.13
Original Article
Original Article
Early experiences with the use of Earfold™ for correction of prominent ears
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: This paper describes the author’s personal experience with using the minimally-invasive Earfold™ implant.

Methods: The author inserted the Earfold™ implant into 19 patients (5 men, 14 women) between November 2016 and June 2018. Bilateral implantation was performed in 14 patients. In 5 cases, implantation was limited to one ear. The author’s main indication for treatment was a helical-mastoid distance of more than 20 mm. Additional antihelixplasty of the upper ear was performed in 4 patients (2 primarily and 2 after explantation). One patient underwent simultaneous treatment of protruding ear lobes.

Results: The overall satisfaction rate was high, with 16 patients (84%) being satisfied or very satisfied. The procedure proved to be rapid with little down-time in the recovery phase. The demand for, and acceptance of the procedure was high. Although surgical otoplasty was always discussed as an alternative, no patient who presented for consultation chose standard otoplasty surgery. Complications occurred in 6 patients and implants were removed in 5 patients, 1 of them completely.

Conclusion: The EarfoldTM procedure is an interesting, minimally-invasive alternative to surgical otoplasty which produces results which patients are pleased with. However, in this early series, the complication rate was high. A hybrid technique might reduce the complications observed.

Keywords

Otoplasty / minimally-invasive surgery / Earfold™ procedure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bernd W. Schuster. Early experiences with the use of Earfold™ for correction of prominent ears. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2018, 5(1): 22 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2018.13

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Fritsch MH.Incisionless otoplasty.Laryngoscope1995;105 Suppl 70:1-11

[2]

Haytoglu S,Bayar Muluk N,Arikan OK.Comparison of two incisionless otoplasty techniques for prominent ears in children.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol2015;79:504-10

[3]

Kang NV.Treatment of prominent ears with an implantable clip system: a pilot study.Aesthet Surg J2016;36:NP100-16 PMCID:PMC5127466

[4]

Pelton AR,Duerig TW.Medical uses of nitinol.Mater Sci Forum2000;327-328:63-70

[5]

Mustarde JC.Cosmetic surgery.II. The correction of prominent ears with buried mattress sutures. Mod Trends Plast Surg1964;16:233-6

[6]

Olivier B,Christian A.Retrospective study of the long-term results of otoplasty using a modified Mustardé (cartilage-sparing) technique.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2009;38:340-7

[7]

Kang NV,Glumicic S,O'Toole G,Sabbagh W.Earfold implantable clip system for correction of prominent ears: analysis of safety in 403 patients.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2018;6:e1623 PMCID:PMC5811290

PDF

122

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/