A simple classification and a simplified treatment’s algorithm for ptotic breasts

Abstract

Aim: Many classifications have been described in the literature for ptotic breasts, focusing on the nipple areola complex position compared to the inframammary fold. These use centimeters and lateral views to illustrate their various grades in a manner always insufficient to propose a clear treatment plan aimed at achieving natural results. We discuss a new dynamic approach to breast ptosis with a complete treatment algorithm.

Methods: Patients were examined in a standing position first with hands down then with hands up. We observed the elevation of the inter-nipple line called the “BK-line” and its relationship to a sternal benchmark that we call the "BK-Point". The "hands-up test" was positive when the line crossed the landmark. The algorithm defines the indication according to this clinical examination and to the patient's wishes. An angle between the nipple, the “BK-point” and the body meridian (called the “BK angle”) was appreciated before and after surgery. This angle should become 90° or more after ptosis treatment.

Results: Three hundred patients were treated for ptotic breasts, including breast reductions, from January 2010 to September 2017. The definitions of “normal” non-ptotic and ptotic breast and the “ideal” breast were reconsidered. The surgical indications were adjusted to the clinical situation and to the patient's wishes, refining the final version of the algorithm.

Conclusion: This new classification is easy, reproducible and efficient. We propose an appropriate algorithm to treat every situation that takes care to consider patient’s wishes and expectations.

Keywords

Breast ptosis / mammoplasty / vertical lift / mastopexy / breast reduction / breast implant / ptosis classification

References

[1] Seshadri KG.Obesity: a Venusian story of Paleolithic proportions..Indian J Endocrinol Metab2012;16:134-5 PMCID:PMC3263182

[2] Zygmont BJ. Venus of Willendorf. Available from: http://smarthistory.org/venus- of-willendorf [Last accessed on 12 Apr 2018].

[3] Dufourmentel C.Chirurgie plastique.1959;ParisFlammarion327-70

[4] Lalardrie JP.Chirurgie plastique du sein.1974;ParisMasson290

[5] Lalardrie JP.Reduction mammoplasty: general approach and basic considerations..Aesthetic Plast Surg1982;6:81-3

[6] Regnault P.Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment..Clin Plast Surg1976;3:193-203

[7] Vandenbussche F.Chirurgie plastique mammaire: indications, possibilités et limites..Lille Med1977;22:572-5

[8] Vandenbussche F.Ptôse mammaire: classification et sommaire des indications chirugricales..Ann Chir Plast Esthét1992;37:218-26

[9] Brink RR.Management of true ptosis of the breast..Plast Reconstr Surg1993;91:657-62

[10] Kirwan L.A classification and algorithm for treatment of breast ptosis..Aesthet Surg J2002;22:355-63

[11] Benelli L.A new periareolar mammaplasty: the "round block" technique..Aesthetic Plast Surg1990;14:93-100

[12] Fogli A.Indications and limitations of breast lifting by peri-areolar approach (round block). Report of 48 cases..Ann Chir Plast Esthet1990;35:459-69

[13] Lassus C.A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty..Plast Reconstr Surg1996;97:373-80

[14] Kotti B.The "Chignon Mastopexy": a double glandular suspended flaps for an auto-augmentation effect..Aesthet Plast Surg2018;42:80-7