Preoperative planning and breast implant selection for volume difference management in asymmetrical breasts

Umar Daraz Khan

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 108 -15.

PDF
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :108 -15. DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2017.36
Original Article
Original Article
Preoperative planning and breast implant selection for volume difference management in asymmetrical breasts
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: To assess volume management in patients presenting with breast asymmetry and ptosis.

Methods: Retrospectively collected data was analysed. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A included patients who had volumetric difference alone and had different size implants alone. Group B included patients who had volumetric difference with breast ptosis requiring mastopexy with different size implants. Group C included patients who presented with breast asymmetry with ptosis and had same size implants on both sides with different volume breast reduction.

Results: Subgroup A1 included 145 patients who had larger implants placed on right side. Subgroup A2 included 95 patients who had larger implants on the left side. Subgroup B1 included 7 patients who had larger implants on the right. Subgroup B2 included 13 patients who had larger implant on the left side. Subgroup C1 included 7 patients who had larger reduction on right side. Subgroup C2 included 11 patients who had larger reduction on left.

Conclusion: When different volume implants are used, the vast majority of the patients do not require a volume difference of more than 60 mL. When the breast is larger on the right then larger mean volumes are used on left side to offset the larger right breast.

Keywords

Breast ptosis / breast asymmetries / muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation / muscle splitting mastopexy / multiplane internal mastopexy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Umar Daraz Khan. Preoperative planning and breast implant selection for volume difference management in asymmetrical breasts. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2017, 4(1): 108-15 DOI:10.20517/2347-9264.2017.36

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Penn J.Breast reduction..Br J Plast Surg1955;7:357-71

[2]

Smith DJJr,Katch VL.Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values..Plast Reconstr Surg1986;78:331-5

[3]

Rohrich RJ,Brown S.Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients..Plast Reconstr Surg2005;115:1039-50

[4]

Khan UD.Breast and chest asymmteries: classification and relative distribution of common asymmteries in patients requesting augmentation mammoplasty..Eur J Plast Surg2011;34:375-85

[5]

Gabriel A,Creasman C,Mordaunt D.Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmteries: 4D photography..Aesthet Surg J2011;31:506-10

[6]

Khan UD.Breast augmentation in asymmetrically placed nipple areolar complex in horizontal axis: lateralization of implant pocket to offset laterlised nipple..Aesthetic Plast Surg2009;33:591-6

[7]

Khan UD.Muscle splitting, subglandular and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplastoies: 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases..Aesthetic Plast Surg2013;37:290-302

[8]

Khan UD.Augmentation mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty: an analysis of 1,406 consecutive cases..Plast Aesthet Res2016;3:26-30

[9]

Steven WG,Freeman ME,Hirsch EM.Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases..Aesthet Surg J2006;26:674-81

[10]

Spear SL,Menon N.One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction..Aesthetic Plast Surg2004;28:259-67

[11]

Hidalgo DA.Preoperative sizing in breast augmentation..Plast Reconstr Surg2010;125:1781-7

[12]

Khan UD.The impact or preoperative breast implant size selection on the 3-year reoipeation rate..Eur J Plast Surg2013;36:503-10

[13]

Tebbets JB.Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support system..Plast Reconstr Surg2005;116:2005-16

[14]

Khan UD.Review of implant sizes in 146 consective asymmetrical augmentation mammoplasties..Eur J Plast Surg2014;37:273-80

[15]

Maxwell GP.Breast asymmetry..Aesthet Surg J2001;21:552-61

[16]

Gallegos ML.A systematic, one-stage approach in the treatment of tuberous breast deformity..Aesthet Surg J1998;18:431-8

[17]

Arco A,Araco F,Castrif,Fillingeri V.Breast asymmetries: a brief review and our experience..Aesthetic Plast Surg2006;30:309-19

[18]

Becker H.Adjustable breast implants provide postoperative versatility..Aesthet Surg J2000;20:332-4

[19]

Gore SM.Perthese implant-identical cohesive-gel sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective report on 200 consecutive cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry..Aesthet Surg J2012;32:310-8

[20]

Yasilda AK,Sirvan SS,Tatlidede HS.Our aurgical approach to treatment of congenital, developmental and acquired breast asymmetries: a review of 30 cases..Aesth Plast Surg2013;37:77-87

PDF

108

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/