Improved Function After Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Long-Term Follow-Up

Yangyang Shi , Kaiqiang Sun , Linhui Han , Chen Yan , Jinyu Wang , Jingyun Yang , Yuan Wang , Ximing Xu , Jingchuan Sun , Jiangang Shi

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 416 -426.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) :416 -426. DOI: 10.1111/os.14300
CLINICAL ARTICLE
Improved Function After Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Long-Term Follow-Up
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background: Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) is an emerging surgical approach for treating cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL), yet there is limited data on its long-term efficacy and safety. The present study aimed to analyze the short- and long-term postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes and perioperative complications of ACAF for patients with C-OPLL.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study, with the mean duration of follow-up of at least 24 months. A total of 111 patients with C-OPLL in our institution from June 2017 to June 2019 were assessed preoperatively and at 3 days, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the recovery of neurological function, measured with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The secondary outcomes included pain, Cobb angle, spinal canal invasion rate, and surgery-related complications.

Results: The postoperative JOA score at each follow-up was significantly better than the preoperative JOA score, regardless of preoperative spinal canal invasion rate, K-line, and segment length. The visual analog scale (VAS) score also decreased dramatically 3 days after surgery and was maintained at a low level throughout the follow-up period. Improvements in Cobb angle and invasion rate were observed right after the operation and were maintained for 2 years thereafter.

Conclusions: ACAF could achieve satisfactory recovery of neurological function in C-OPLL patients during a follow-up of 24 months, regardless of preoperative spinal canal invasion rate, preoperative K-line, or surgical segment length.

Keywords

anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion / cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament / surgical outcomes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yangyang Shi, Kaiqiang Sun, Linhui Han, Chen Yan, Jinyu Wang, Jingyun Yang, Yuan Wang, Ximing Xu, Jingchuan Sun, Jiangang Shi. Improved Function After Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Long-Term Follow-Up. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(2): 416-426 DOI:10.1111/os.14300

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

K. Saetia, D. Cho, S. Lee, D. H. Kim, and S. D. Kim, “Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Review,” Neurosurgical Focus 30 (2011): E1.

[2]

H. Chang, K. J. Song, H. Y. Kim, and B. W. Choi, “Factors Related to the Development of Myelopathy in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 94 (2012): 946–949.

[3]

S. Park, D. H. Lee, C. S. Lee, C. J. Hwang, J. J. Yang, and J. H. Cho, “Anterior Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Narrative Review,” Asian Spine Journal 17 (2023): 582–594.

[4]

S. Odate, J. Shikata, T. Soeda, S. Yamamura, and S. Kawaguchi, “Surgical Results and Complications of Anterior Decompression and Fusion as a Revision Surgery After Initial Posterior Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy due to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 26 (2017): 466–473.

[5]

K. Sakai, A. Okawa, M. Takahashi, et al., “Five-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression and Fusion With Floating Method Versus Laminoplasty,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 (2012): 367–376.

[6]

K. Chen, X. Dong, Y. Lu, et al., “Anterior Decompression and Posterior Total Laminectomy With Fusion for Ossification of the Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Bone & Joint Open 5 (2024): 768–775.

[7]

W. S. Cho, C. K. Chung, T. A. Jahng, and H. J. Kim, “Post-Laminectomy Kyphosis in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Does It Cause Neurological Deterioration?,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Association 43 (2008): 259–264.

[8]

M. Miyazaki, T. Ishihara, S. Kanezaki, et al., “Relationship Between K-Line Distance and Surgical Outcome in Cases of Laminoplasty for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Medicine (Baltimore) 101 (2022): e31605.

[9]

J. Sun, J. Shi, X. Xu, et al., “Anterior Controllable Antidisplacement and Fusion Surgery for the Treatment of Multilevel Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With Myelopathy: Preliminary Clinical Results of a Novel Technique,” European Spine Journal 27 (2018): 1469–1478.

[10]

H. Yang, J. Sun, J. Shi, et al., “Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement Fusion as a Choice for 28 Patients of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With Dura Ossification: The Risk of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage Compared With Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion,” European Spine Journal 28 (2019): 370–379.

[11]

J. Sun, K. Sun, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Xu, and J. Shi, “Anterior Cervical Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF): Improving Outcomes for Severe Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques 12 (2022): e20.00056.

[12]

L. Tetreault, B. Kopjar, A. Nouri, et al., “The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale: Establishing Criteria for Mild, Moderate and Severe Impairment in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” European Spine Journal 26 (2017): 78–84.

[13]

A. MacDowall, M. Skeppholm, Y. Robinson, and C. Olerud, “Validation of the Visual Analog Scale in the Cervical Spine,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 28 (2018): 227–235.

[14]

S. Wang, H. Song, X. Xu, et al., “The CT Classification of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament to Guide Hybrid Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion vs. Posterior Laminoplasty,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 1571–1580.

[15]

L. H. Han, K. Q. Sun, C. Yan, J. C. Sun, and J. G. Shi, “The Effect of K-Line Classification in Different Cervical Dynamic Position on Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (2022): 987622.

[16]

T. Fujimori, M. Iwasaki, S. Okuda, et al., “Long-Term Results of Cervical Myelopathy due to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With an Occupying Ratio of 60% or More,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 (2014): 58–67.

[17]

S. Kato, Y. Oshima, H. Oka, et al., “Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and Modified JOA (mJOA) Score for the Assessment of Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study,” PLoS One 10 (2015): e0123022.

[18]

Y. Oshima, K. Takeshita, S. Kato, et al., “Comparison Between the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and Patient-Reported JOA (PRO-JOA) Score to Evaluate Surgical Outcomes of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy,” Global Spine Journal 12 (2022): 795–800.

[19]

H. Nakashima, L. Tetreault, N. Nagoshi, et al., “Comparison of Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Versus Other Forms of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results From the Prospective, Multicenter AOSpine CSM-International Study of 479 Patients,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 98 (2016): 370–378.

[20]

Y. Hou, L. Liang, G. D. Shi, et al., “Comparing Effects of Cervical Anterior Approach and Laminoplasty in Surgical Management of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament by a Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Study,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 103 (2017): 733–740.

[21]

T. Yoshii, K. Sakai, T. Hirai, et al., “Anterior Decompression With Fusion Versus Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Massive Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With a ≥50% Canal Occupying Ratio: A Multicenter Retrospective Study,” Spine Journal 16 (2016): 1351–1357.

[22]

S. Li, J. Peng, R. Xu, et al., “Comparison of the Surgeries for the Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament-Related Cervical Spondylosis: A PRISMA-Compliant Network Meta-Analysis and Literature Review,” Medicine (Baltimore) 100 (2021): e24900.

[23]

S. Wang, Y. Xiang, X. Wang, et al., “Anterior Corpectomy Comparing to Posterior Decompression Surgery for the Treatment of Multi-Level Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis,” International Journal of Surgery 40 (2017): 91–96.

[24]

X. Liu, S. Min, H. Zhang, Z. Zhou, H. Wang, and A. Jin, “Anterior Corpectomy Versus Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” European Spine Journal 23 (2014): 362–372.

[25]

T. Lei, Y. Shen, L. F. Wang, J. M. Cao, W. Y. Ding, and Q. H. Ma, “Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage During Anterior Approach Cervical Spine Surgery for Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Prevention and Treatment,” Orthopaedic Surgery 4 (2012): 247–252.

[26]

N. J. Lee, V. Boddapati, J. Mathew, et al., “What Is the Impact of Surgical Approach in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in Patients With OPLL? A Propensity-Score Matched, Multi-Center Analysis on Inpatient and Post-Discharge 90-Day Outcomes,” Global Spine Journal 13 (2023): 324–333.

[27]

M. R. D Ramos, G. Liu, J. H. Tan, et al., “Risk Factors for Surgical Complications in the Management of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament,” Spine Journal 21 (2021): 1176–1184.

[28]

J. Zhang, Q. Liang, D. Qin, et al., “The Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 44 (2021): 340–349.

[29]

L. Ma, F. Y. Liu, L. S. Huo, et al., “Comparison of Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Medicine (Baltimore) 97 (2018): e11542.

[30]

Y. Zhang, Z. Huang, P. Xu, et al., “Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multisegment Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical,” World Neurosurgery 185 (2024): 193–206.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

393

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/