Background: Reliable scientific information is crucial for assessing hip function and evaluating the success of hip surgery. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is the most widely used tool for measuring hip function and, in particular, the outcomes of hip surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the HHS for hip replacement treatment groups and to test whether there was a substantial difference between reporting only the postoperative HHS or the HHS difference (HHSdiff).
Methods: PubMed, CNKI, and Epistemonikos were searched until March 1, 2024. The risk of bias, level of evidence, and publication bias were assessed. As HHS is a continuous outcome, mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method and a common-effect/random-effects model. The same approach was used for both postoperative HHS and HHSdiff. The effect of the two treatment groups studied (minimally invasive vs. conventional approach) on postoperative HHS was then compared with the effect of the two groups studied on the difference in HHS.
Results: A total of 41 RCTs, involving 3572 patients, with a low to high risk of bias and a low to moderate publication bias were included. The measured outcome parameters showed a low to moderate level of evidence. There was no relevant difference in the reporting of HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs, measured at 0–0.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
Conclusion: The present study showed that there is no relevant difference between reporting of the HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs. Both methods of HHS reporting produced comparable results in an identical cohort of 3765 patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.
| [1] |
J. Kirschner, S. Michel, R. Becker, et al., “Determination of Relationships Between Symmetry-Based, Performance-Based, and Functional Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal Personalised Medicine 13, no. 7 (2023): 1046,
|
| [2] |
W. H. Harris, “Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip After Dislocation and Acetabular Fractures: Treatment by Mold Arthroplasty. An End-Result Study Using a New Method of Result Evaluation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 51, no. 4 (1969): 737–755.
|
| [3] |
P. Söderman and H. Malchau, “Is the Harris Hip Score System Useful to Study the Outcome of Total Hip Replacement?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 384 (2001): 189–197.
|
| [4] |
M. J. Bryant, J. R. Kernohan, J. R. Nixon, and R. A. B. Mollan, “A Statistical Analysis of Hip Scores,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 75 (1993): 705–709.
|
| [5] |
A. Laupacis, R. Bourne, C. Rorabeck, et al., “The Effect of Elective Total Hip Replacement on Health-Related Quality of Life,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 75 (1993): 1619–1626.
|
| [6] |
M. Sullivan, J. Karlsson, and J. R. Ware, “The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, Reliability and Construct Validity Across General Populations in Sweden,” Social Science & Medicine 41 (1995): 1349–1358.
|
| [7] |
P. Soderman and H. Malchau, “Is the Harris Hip Score System Useful to Study the Outcome of Total Hip Replacement?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 384 (2001): 189–197.
|
| [8] |
P. Soderman, H. Malchau, and P. Herberts, “Outcome of Total Hip Replacement: A Comparison of Different Measurement Methods,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 390 (2001): 163–172.
|
| [9] |
B. F. Kavanagh and R. H. Fitzgerald, Jr., “Clinical and Roentgenographic Assessment of Total Hip Arthroplasty. A New Hip Score,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 193 (1985): 133–140.
|
| [10] |
J. G. Wright and N. L. Young, “A Comparison of Different Indices of Responsiveness,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50, no. 3 (1997): 239–246.
|
| [11] |
R. K. Shields, L. J. Enloe, R. E. Evans, K. B. Smith, and S. D. Steckel, “Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Functional Tests in Patients With Total Joint Replacement,” Physical Therapy 75, no. 3 (1995): 169–176 discussion 176–9.
|
| [12] |
H. Y. Shi, J. K. Chang, C. Y. Wong, et al., “Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11 (2010): 261.
|
| [13] |
H. L. Hoeksma, C. H. Van Den Ende, H. K. Ronday, A. Heering, and F. C. Breedveld, “Comparison of the Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score With Generic Measures for Hip Function in Osteoarthritis of the Hip,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 62, no. 10 (2003): 935–938.
|
| [14] |
R. Prill, J. Karlsson, O. R. Ayeni, and R. Becker, “Author Guidelines for Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 29, no. 9 (2021): 2739–2744,
|
| [15] |
M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ(Clinical reasearch ed.) 372 (2021): n71,
|
| [16] |
J. A. C Sterne, J. Savović, M. J. Page, et al., “RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials,” BMJ(Clinical reasearch ed.) 366 (2019): l4898,
|
| [17] |
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, G. E. Vist, et al., “GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations,” BMJ(Clinical reasearch ed.) 336, no. 7650 (2008): 924–926,
|
| [18] |
J. P. Higgins and S. G. Thompson, “Quantifying Heterogeneity in a Meta-Analysis,” Statistics in Medicine 21, no. 11 (2002): 1539–1558,
|
| [19] |
A. Auffarth, H. Resch, S. Lederer, et al., “Does the Choice of Approach for Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Geriatric Patients Significantly Influence Early Postoperative Outcomes? A Randomized-Controlled Trial Comparing the Modified Smith-Petersen and Hardinge Approaches,” Journal of Trauma 70, no. 5 (2011): 1257–1262,
|
| [20] |
W. P. Barrett, S. E. Turner, and J. P. Leopold, “Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 28, no. 9 (2013): 1634–1638,
|
| [21] |
G. Bon, E. B. Kacem, P. M. Lepretre, et al., “Does the Direct Anterior Approach Allow Earlier Recovery of Walking Following Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Randomized Prospective Trial Using Accelerometry,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 105, no. 3 (2019): 445–452,
|
| [22] |
G. H. Dai, Y. Yin, Y. Y. Ji, and S. Q. Yi, “Effect of Artificial Femoral Head Replacement on Senile Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture,” J Trauma Surg 21, no. 10 (2019): 761–765,
|
| [23] |
C. D’Arrigo, A. Speranza, E. Monaco, A. Carcangiu, and A. Ferretti, “Learning Curve in Tissue Sparing Total Hip Replacement: Comparison Between Different Approaches,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 10, no. 1 (2009): 47–54,
|
| [24] |
B. De Anta-Díaz, J. Serralta-Gomis, A. Lizaur-Utrilla, E. Benavidez, and F. A. López-Prats, “No Differences Between Direct Anterior and Lateral Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Related to Muscle Damage or Functional Outcome,” International Orthopaedics 40, no. 10 (2016): 2025–2030,
|
| [25] |
T. Dienstknecht, C. Lüring, M. Tingart, J. Grifka, and E. Sendtner, “A Minimally Invasive Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Does Not Diminish Early Post-Operative Outcome in Obese Patients: A Prospective, Randomised Trial,” International Orthopaedics 37, no. 6 (2013): 1013–1018,
|
| [26] |
X. Ding, X. Li, and J. Luo, “Minimally Invasive SuperPath Approach and Traditional Approach in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures. Study on the Effect of Efficacy and Expression of Inflammatory Factors After Surgery,” Jiangxi Medical Journal 58, no. 5 (2023): 563–566,
|
| [27] |
P. Gao and X. Shi, “The Effect of Total Hip Replacement With Minimally Invasive SuperPATH Approach in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly,” Henan Med Res 29, no. 20 (2020): 3715–3717,
|
| [28] |
J. Z. Hou, H. Bao, and Y. Cheng, “Early Effect Observation of Total Hip Arthroplasty by Using SuperPATH Technique,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics 20 (2017): 50–53,
|
| [29] |
K. Huang, K. Xie, Y. Shi, et al., “Analysis of Early Clinical Efficacy of SuperPATH Approach and Lateral Approach for Initial Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Youjiang Med J 49, no. 9 (2021): 646–651,
|
| [30] |
J. Jia, B. Yu, L. Wu, Z. Zhi, and L. Pan, “Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Senile Femoral Neck Fractures: Minimally Invasive SuperPath Approach Versus Traditional Posterior Approach,” Chininese. Journal Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation 3, no. 4 (2017): 223–231,
|
| [31] |
L. Li, “SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacement Surgery Treatment: Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Aseptic Necrosis of Femoral Head,” Chin J Mod Drug Appl 14, no. 12 (2020): 84–86,
|
| [32] |
M. Li, “VAS Score of Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With SuperPATH Approach Hip Arthroplasty and Impact on Hip Joint Recovery,” Practical Clinical Integration of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 21, no. 13 (2021): 28–29,
|
| [33] |
Q. Q. Li, Z. Zhang, B. Liu, Y. Z. Wang, and X. Zhai, “Comparison of Two Approaches of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Head Necrosis,” Orthopedic Journal of China 31, no. 21 (2023): 1956–1960,
|
| [34] |
Z. Ling, P. Zhou, and Y. Fu, “Analysis of the Effect of Total Hip Replacement via SuperPATH Approach on the Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture,” Chin. J. Front. Med. Sci 12, no. 5 (2020): 66–70,
|
| [35] |
W. Liu, X. Liu, H. Gao, G. Wang, and J. Li, “Comparison of the Curative Effect, Pain Degree, and Hip Joint Function Between SuperPATH Hip Replacement and Total Hip Replacement,” Mod Chin Doc 60, no. 6 (2022): 78–84 (In Chinese).
|
| [36] |
Y. Liu, P. Hu, J. Zhu, H. She, and Y. Zhang, “Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Elderly Femoral Neck Fractures,” Prac. J. Med. Pharm 38, no. 3 (2021): 226–231,
|
| [37] |
R. Martin, P. E. Clayson, S. Troussel, B. P. Fraser, and P. L. Docquier, “Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study With a Follow-Up of 1 Year,” Journal of Arthroplasty 26, no. 8 (2011): 1362–1372,
|
| [38] |
W. Meng, Z. Huang, H. Wang, et al., “Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (SuperPath) Versus Posterolateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in Bilateral Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Pilot Clinical Trial,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, no. 1 (2019): 2,
|
| [39] |
K. Moerenhout, P. Derome, G. Y. Laflamme, S. Leduc, H. S. Gaspard, and B. Benoit, “Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial,” Canadian Journal of Surgery 63, no. 5 (2020): E412–E417,
|
| [40] |
M. Müller, S. Tohtz, I. Springer, M. Dewey, and C. Perka, “Randomized Controlled Trial of Abductor Muscle Damage in Relation to the Surgical Approach for Primary Total Hip Replacement: Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Versus Modified Direct Lateral Approach,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 131, no. 2 (2011): 179–189,
|
| [41] |
C. Ouyang, H. Wang, W. Meng, et al., “Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparison Between the SuperPATH and Posterolateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 32, no. 12 (2018): 1500–1506,
|
| [42] |
Y. Pan, J. Zhang, X. Yan, X. Chang, J. Li, and B. Tang, “Comparison of SuperPATH and Posterolateral Total Hip Replacement,” Orthop. J. China 28 (2020): 1176–1180 (In Chinese).
|
| [43] |
J. C. Reichert, E. von Rottkay, F. Roth, et al., “A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior and the Transgluteal Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 19, no. 1 (2018): 241,
|
| [44] |
D. Ren, G. Yang, H. Zhao, J. Zha, S. Lu, and Y. Xu, “Effect of SuperPath Minimally Invasive Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty on Femoral Head Necrosis and the Quality of Life,” Journal of Hebei Medical University 37, no. 12 (2016): 1416–1419,
|
| [45] |
C. Restrepo, J. Parvizi, A. E. Pour, and W. J. Hozack, “Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 25, no. 5 (2010): 671–679,
|
| [46] |
K. Rykov, I. H. F. Reininga, M. S. Sietsma, B. A. S. Knobben, and B. L. E. F. Ten Have, “Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers,” Journal of Arthroplasty 32, no. 12 (2017): 3652–3658.e1,
|
| [47] |
M. Schwarze, S. Budde, G. von Lewinski, et al., “No Effect of Conventional vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach on Clinical Outcome and Migration of a Short Stem Total Hip Prosthesis at 2-Year Follow-Up: A Randomized Controlled Study,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 51 (2018): 105–112,
|
| [48] |
M. J. Taunton, J. B. Mason, S. M. Odum, and B. D. Springer, “Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Yields More Rapid Voluntary Cessation of all Walking Aids: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 29 (2014): 169–172,
|
| [49] |
M. J. Taunton, R. T. Trousdale, R. J. Sierra, K. Kaufman, and M. W. Pagnano, “John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 476, no. 2 (2018): 216–229,
|
| [50] |
J. R. Varela Egocheaga, M. Á. Suárez-Suárez, M. Fernández-Villán, V. González-Sastre, J. Varela-Gómez, and A. Murcia-Mazón, “Abordaje Posterior mínimamente Invasivo en Artroplastia Total de Cadera. Estudio Prospectivo y Aleatorizado. Un año de Seguimiento [Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Prospective Randomised Trial],” Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra 33, no. 2 (2010): 133–143. (Spanish),
|
| [51] |
X. Wang and J. Tian, “Minimally Invasive Femoral Head Replacement for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly. Study on the Influence of Postoperative Hip Joint Mobility,” Guizou Medical Journal 45, no. 5 (2021): 780–782.
|
| [52] |
Z. Wang and W. Ge, “SuperPATH Approach Total Hip Replacement for Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture: Impact of Hip Function,” Clinical Medicine 41, no. 1 (2021): 27–29,
|
| [53] |
J. Xie, H. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Yao, Z. Pan, and Q. Jiang, “Comparison of Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Approach Total Hip Versus Conventional Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 12, no. 1 (2017): 138,
|
| [54] |
G. Xu, L. Hu, and S. Yang, “SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Approach to Artificial Femoral Head Replacement. A Short-Term Follow-Up Study on the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly,” Hainan Medical Journal (Hai Nan Yi Xue) 29, no. 17 (2018): 2400–2404,
|
| [55] |
T. Yan, S. Tian, Y. Wang, et al., “Comparison of Early Effectiveness Between SuperPATH Approach and Hardinge Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 31, no. 1 (2017): 17–24,
|
| [56] |
C. Yang, Q. Zhu, Y. Han, et al., “Minimally-Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty Will Improve Early Postoperative Outcomes: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial,” Irish Journal of Medical Science 179, no. 2 (2010): 285–290,
|
| [57] |
H. Yuan, J. Zhu, Z. Sun, and Z. Zhang, “Comparison of Effectiveness Between SuperPATH Approach and Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 32, no. 1 (2018): 14–19,
|
| [58] |
Z. L. Zhang, J. H. Lin, and B. Xia, “Clinical Research on Joint Function and Life Quality Through SuperPath Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” China J Integrated Trad Chin Western Med 25, no. 5 (2019): 709–714,
|
| [59] |
H. Y. Zhao, P. D. Kang, Y. Y. Xia, X. J. Shi, Y. Nie, and F. X. Pei, “Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 32, no. 11 (2017): 3421–3428,
|
| [60] |
M. Chang, X. Liu, Y. Feng, and Z. Liu, “Treatment of Bipolar Femoral Head Replacement With Modified SuperPATH Approach: Early and Mid-Term Curative Effect Analysis of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly,” Chin. J. Clin 50, no. 4 (2022): 465–468,
|
| [61] |
Y. Ding, “Minimally Invasive SuperPath Approach Artificial Femoral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly,” Shenzhen J. Int. Med 28, no. 16 (2018): 129–131,
|
| [62] |
Y. Li, Z. K. He, X. M. Guo, X. Sun, and Y. Yang, “Effects of Artificial Femoral Head Replacement Between SuperPath Approach and Small Incision Posterolateral Approach on Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures,” J. Rare Uncommon Dis 26, no. 5 (2019): 66–75,
|
| [63] |
M. Tian, Y. Gao, W. Wu, and J. Shu, “SuperPATH Approach for Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Effectiveness and Effect on Complication Rate,” Chin. J. Clin 48, no. 1 (2020): 82–84,
|
| [64] |
G. H. Wu, Y. Di, Y. H. Ma, J. L. Zhao, and Y. H. Liang, “Short-Term Efficacy of SuperPATH Approach for Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fracture,” Chin. J. Mult. Organ Dis. Elder 17, no. 7 (2018): 529–532,
|
| [65] |
H. Aiba, N. Watanabe, Y. Nishimori, et al., “Randomized Study of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach for Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip,” J Ortho Rheum 1, no. 2 (2015): 10.
|
| [66] |
B. H. Brismar, O. Hallert, A. Tedhamre, and J. U. Lindgren, “Early Gain in Pain Reduction and Hip Function, but More Complications Following the Direct Anterior Minimally Invasive Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial of 100 Patients With 5 Years of Follow Up,” Acta Orthopaedica 89, no. 5 (2018): 484–489,
|
| [67] |
O. L. Brun, H. N. Sund, L. Nordsletten, S. M. Röhrl, and K. E. Mjaaland, “Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 34, no. 8 (2019): 1718–1722,
|
| [68] |
G. Bűcs, Á. Dandé, B. Patczai, et al., “Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures With Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Elderly,” Injury 52, no. Suppl 1 (2021): S37–S43,
|
| [69] |
T. E. Cheng, J. A. Wallis, N. F. Taylor, et al., “A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Total Hip Arthroplasty-Comparing Early Results Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach,” Journal of Arthroplasty 32 (2017): 883–890,
|
| [70] |
C. P. Christensen and C. A. Jacobs, “Comparison of Patient Function During the First Six Weeks After Direct Anterior or Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Randomized Study,” Journal of Arthroplasty 30, no. 9 Suppl (2015): 94–97,
|
| [71] |
H. J. Cooper, W. M. Santos, A. L. Neuwirth, et al., “Randomized Controlled Trial of Incisional Negative Pressure Following High-Risk Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 37, no. 8S (2022): S931–S936,
|
| [72] |
B. Ding, F. Bao, X. Chen, et al., “Minimally Invasive SuperPath Approach Versus Conventional Approach in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture,” J J Traumatic 23, no. 3 (2018): 471–472,
|
| [73] |
A. M. Fahs, D. M. Koueiter, M. D. Kurdziel, K. A. Huynh, C. R. Perry, and J. J. Verner, “Psoas Compartment Block vs Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Pain Management After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study,” J Arthroplasty 33, no. 7 (2018): 2192–2196,
|
| [74] |
A. Fraval, P. Effeney, L. Fiddelaers, B. Smith, B. Towell, and P. Tran, “OBTAIN A: Outcome Benefits of Tranexamic Acid in Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 32, no. 5 (2017): 1516–1519,
|
| [75] |
A. Fraval, S. Duncan, T. Murray, J. Duggan, O. Tirosh, and P. Tran, “OBTAIN E: Outcome Benefits of Tranexamic Acid in Hip Arthroplasty With Enoxaparin: A Randomised Double-Blinded Controlled Trial,” Hip International 29, no. 3 (2019): 239–244,
|
| [76] |
Q. Gong, W. Gong, G. Zhou, et al., “SuperPATH Approach Artificial Femoral Head Replacement Combined With Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Elderly Femoral Neck,” Pract Int Trad Chin West Med 18, no. 8 (2018): 36–38,
|
| [77] |
R. Iorio, E. Viglietta, D. Mazza, et al., “Do Serum Markers Correlate With Invasiveness of the Procedure in THA? A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 107, no. 8 (2021): 102937.
|
| [78] |
R. Krassnig, W. Prager, R. Wildburger, and G. M. Hohenberger, “Direct Anterior Versus Antero-Lateral Approach in Hip Joint Hemiarthroplasty,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 143, no. 7 (2023): 4141–4148,
|
| [79] |
S. Landgraeber, H. Quitmann, S. Güth, et al., “A Prospective Randomized Peri-and Post-Operative Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Approach Versus the Lateral Approach,” Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5, no. 3 (2013): e19,
|
| [80] |
Y. Luo, Y. Releken, D. Yang, Y. Yue, Z. Liu, and P. Kang, “Effects of Carbazochrome Sodium Sulfonate Combined With Tranexamic Acid on Hemostasis and Inflammation During Perioperative Period of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 108, no. 1 (2022): 103092,
|
| [81] |
K. E. Mjaaland, K. Kivle, S. Svenningsen, A. H. Pripp, and L. Nordsletten, “Comparison of Markers for Muscle Damage, Inflammation, and Pain Using Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Versus Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 33, no. 9 (2015): 1305–1310,
|
| [82] |
K. E. Mjaaland, K. Kivle, S. Svenningsen, and L. Nordsletten, “Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 477, no. 1 (2019): 145–155,
|
| [83] |
K. Moerenhout, B. Benoit, H. S. Gaspard, D. M. Rouleau, and G. Y. Laflamme, “Greater Trochanteric Pain After Primary Total Hip Replacement, Comparing the Anterior and Posterior Approach: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 107, no. 8 (2021): 102709,
|
| [84] |
S. M. J Mortazavi, M. Razzaghof, E. Ghadimi, S. M. M. Seyedtabaei, M. Vahedian Ardakani, and A. Moharrami, “The Efficacy of Bone Wax in Reduction of Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 104, no. 20 (2022): 1805–1813,
|
| [85] |
M. Nambiar, T. E. Cheng, J. R. Onggo, et al., “No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 479, no. 12 (2021): 2621–2629,
|
| [86] |
D. V. Nistor, S. Caterev, S. D. Bolboacă, D. Cosma, D. O. G. Lucaciu, and A. Todor, “Transitioning to the Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Is It a True Muscle Sparing Approach When Performed by a Low Volume Hip Replacement Surgeon?,” International Orthopaedics 41, no. 11 (2017): 2245–2252,
|
| [87] |
J. Parvizi, C. Restrepo, and M. G. Maltenfort, “Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through Direct Anterior Approach Provides Superior Early Outcome: Results of a Randomized, Prospective Study,” Orthop Clin North Am 47, no. 3 (2016): 497–504,
|
| [88] |
C. R. Perry, Jr., A. M. Fahs, M. D. Kurdziel, D. M. Koueiter, R. J. Fayne, and J. J. Verner, “Intraoperative Psoas Compartment Block vs Preoperative Fascia Iliaca Block for Pain Control After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 33, no. 6 (2018): 1770–1774,
|
| [89] |
I. H. Reininga, M. Stevens, R. Wagenmakers, et al., “Comparison of Gait in Patients Following a Computer-Navigated Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach and a Conventional Posterolateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 31, no. 2 (2013): 288–294,
|
| [90] |
F. Renken, S. Renken, A. Paech, M. Wenzl, A. Unger, and A. P. Schulz, “Early Functional Results After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: A Randomized Comparison Between a Minimal Invasive and a Conventional Approach,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 8, no. 13 (2012): 141,
|
| [91] |
M. Sancheti and M. Ghagre, “Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of Hip Joint: Prospective Randomised Comparative Study of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach,” International Journal of Research Orthopaedics 7, no. 2 (2021): 381–385,
|
| [92] |
W. Sang, S. Xue, Y. Xu, Y. Liu, L. Zhu, and J. Ma, “Bikini Incision Increases the Incidence of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury in Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Ultrasonic, Electrophysiological, and Clinical Study,” Journal of Arthroplasty 36, no. 10 (2021): 3463–3470,
|
| [93] |
F. Saxer, P. Studer, M. Jakob, et al., “Minimally Invasive Anterior Muscle-Sparing Versus a Transgluteal Approach for Hemiarthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures-a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Including 190 Elderly Patients,” BMC Geriatrics 18, no. 1 (2018): 222,
|
| [94] |
A. M. Schwartz, R. K. Goel, A. P. Sweeney, and T. L. Bradbury, Jr., “Capsular Management in Direct Anterior Total hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial,” J Arthroplasty 36, no. 8 (2021): 2836–2842,
|
| [95] |
J. C. Suarez, E. M. Slotkin, C. R. Szubski, W. K. Barsoum, and P. D. Patel, “Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 30, no. 11 (2015): 1953–1958,
|
| [96] |
W. Sun, “The Comparison Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty via Two Kind of Approaches for Femoral Neck Fracture,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics 27, no. 1 (2023): 35–39,
|
| [97] |
R. Takada, T. Jinno, K. Miyatake, et al., “Direct Anterior Versus Anterolateral Approach in One-Stage Supine Total Hip Arthroplasty. Focused on Nerve Injury: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 23, no. 5 (2018): 783–787,
|
| [98] |
M. Thaler, R. Lechner, D. Putzer, et al., “Two-Year Gait Analysis Controls of the Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 58 (2018): 34–38,
|
| [99] |
S. Verzellotti, C. Candrian, M. Molina, G. Filardo, R. Alberio, and F. A. Grassi, “Direct Anterior Versus Posterolateral Approach for Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures: A Prospective Randomised Study,” Hip International 30, no. 6 (2020): 810–817,
|
| [100] |
G. F. Vles, K. Corten, R. Driesen, C. van Elst, and S. G. Ghijselings, “Hidden Blood Loss in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial on Topical Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid,” Musculoskeletal Surgery 105, no. 3 (2021): 267–273,
|
| [101] |
Q. Wang, Y. Yue, Z. Yang, L. Chen, Q. Li, and P. Kang, “Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Traditional Longitudinal Incision and Bikini Incision in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Arthroplasty 36, no. 1 (2021): 222–230,
|
| [102] |
N. Watanabe, H. Aiba, and G. Sagara, “Prospective Randomised Study of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach for Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip,” Orthopeadic Proceedings 98 (2016): 123.
|
| [103] |
L. Z. Xia, S. H. Li, Z. S. Yuan, et al., “Common Bipolar Femoral Head by SuperPATH Approach for Senile Femoral Neck Fractures,” Chin J Tiss Eng Res 22, no. 19 (2018): 2953–2960,
|
| [104] |
C. Xiao, Z. Gao, S. Zhang, et al., “Comparative Prospective Randomized Study of Minimally Invasive Transpiriformis Approach Versus Conventional Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty as Measured by Biology Markers,” International Orthopaedics 45, no. 7 (2021): 1707–1717,
|
| [105] |
Z. Yang, S. Feng, K. J. Guo, and G. C. Zha, “Patient-Reported Results of Simultaneous Direct Anterior Approach and Posterolateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed in the Same Patients,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 22, no. 1 (2021): 46,
|
| [106] |
H. Y. Zhao, M. Xiang, Y. Xia, X. Shi, F. X. Pei, and P. Kang, “Efficacy of Oral Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” International Orthopaedics 42, no. 11 (2018): 2535–2542,
|
| [107] |
L. Zhao, Q. Li, and B. Xu, “Treatment of Hemiarthroplasty With SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Approach: Clinical Curative Effect Analysis of Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients,” Contemp Med 25, no. 34 (2019): 144–146,
|
| [108] |
S. Zhao, “Minimally Invasive SuperPATH Approach for Hip Replacement in Elderly Patients. Analysis of Clinical Efficacy in Patients With Bone Neck Fractures,” Mod Diagn Treat 32, no. 22 (2021): 3593–3594.
|
| [109] |
J. Zhang, “Minimally Invasive SuperPATH Approach Total Hip Replacement for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly,” Discussion on the Short-Term Efficacy and Safety 36, no. 1 (2023): 58–59,
|
| [110] |
B. U. Nwachukwu, B. Chang, B. Z. Rotter, B. T. Kelly, A. S. Ranawat, and D. H. Nawabi, “Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Revision Hip Arthroscopy,” Arthroscopy 34, no. 6 (2018): 1862–1868,
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
