Objective: Distal tibial deformities can significantly impact patients if left uncorrected, often leading to pain, alterations in gait, and the eventual development of post-traumatic arthritis. The criteria for surgical correction in these patients continues to be a subject of debate, while supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is an effective method for correcting distal tibial deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical results of SMO using internal fixation or using computer-assisted hexapod external fixator in the treatment of distal tibial deformity.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 290 patients who underwent SMO between June 2015 and January 2023. Forty-four patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the participants, 19 underwent SMO combined with a computer-assisted hexapod external fixator, while 25 received SMO with plate and screw internal fixation. The tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle, the tibiotalar (TT) angle and the talocrural (TC) angle were assessed on weight-bearing X-ray films. Functional assessments were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score.
Results: The study followed patients for an average duration of 31.7 ± 15.3 months, with a range from 12 to 67 months. Successful bone union was achieved in all cases. For patients treated with the computer-assisted hexapod external fixator, significant improvements were observed: the mean deviation in sagittal plane deformity parameters decreased from 14.3 ± 10.4 degrees preoperatively to 2.8 ± 3.8 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). Similarly, coronal plane deformity parameters showed a reduction from 25.9 ± 22.5 degrees preoperatively to 5.9 ± 11.0 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score improved markedly from 66.0 ± 14.9 to 86.1 ± 11.7 points (p < 0.05). For patients undergoing internal fixation, the absolute difference in coronal plane parameters improved from 15.4 ± 12.6 degrees preoperatively to 3.7 ± 3.4 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). A significant enhancement in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was also noted, increasing from 68.3 ± 14.3 points to 79.4 ± 13.5 points (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in gender, side, follow-up time, postoperative deviation of deformity, pre- or postoperative AOFAS between the two groups.
Conclusion: In conclusion, comprehensive preoperative planning of SMO combined with either internal fixation or a hexapod external fixator for treating distal tibial deformities can achieve satisfactory outcomes. The utilization of a computer-assisted hexapod external fixator facilitates a gradual and precise correction process, which proved to be an effective and relatively safe method.
| [1] |
Çınar BM, Güler ÜÖ. Supramalleolar osteotomy with a hexapod type external fixator for the treatment of ankle joint three planar deformity: case report. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020; 31: 372–376.
|
| [2] |
Patel I, Young J, Washington A, Vaidya R. Malunion of the tibia: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58: 389.
|
| [3] |
Santoro D, Tantavisut S, Aloj D, Karam MD. Diaphyseal osteotomy after post-traumatic malalignment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014; 7: 312–322.
|
| [4] |
Horn DM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Supramalleolar osteotomy using circular external fixation with six-axis deformity correction of the distal tibia. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 986–993.
|
| [5] |
Beijk I, Burgerhof J, de Vries AJ, van Raaij TM. Is there an optimal degree of correction for ankle varus deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy? A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022; 28: 1139–1149.
|
| [6] |
Haraguchi N, Ota K, Tsunoda N, Seike K, Kanetake Y, Tsutaya A. Weight-bearing-line analysis in supramalleolar osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 333–339.
|
| [7] |
Butler JJ, Azam MT, Weiss MB, Kennedy JG, Walls RJ. Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis leads to favourable outcomes and low complication rates at mid-term follow-up: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31: 701–715.
|
| [8] |
Li B, Wang S, Li Q, Zhang Z, Li J, Yang H, et al. Effectiveness of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of end-stage Varus ankle osteoarthritis: a retrospective study. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 937–945.
|
| [9] |
Li J, Wang W, Yang H, Li B, Liu L. Management of Elderly Traumatic Ankle Arthritis with Ilizarov external fixation. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 2447–2454.
|
| [10] |
Du H, He X-T, Yin X-H, Gu J-M, Zhou Y-X, Yang J, et al. The gradual correction of adult severe rigid Equinus deformity using minimal invasive U-osteotomy with Taylor spatial frame. Foot Ankle Int. 2023; 44: 62–70.
|
| [11] |
Keshet D, Eidelman M. Clinical utility of the Taylor spatial frame for limb deformities. Orthop Res Rev. 2017; 9: 51–61.
|
| [12] |
Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 238: 249–281.
|
| [13] |
Widanage KND, De Silva MJ, Dulantha Lalitharatne T, Bull AMJ, Gopura RRC. Developments in circular external fixators: a review. Injury. 2023; 54: 111157.
|
| [14] |
Xie K, Han X, Jiang X, Ai S, Dai K, Yu Z, et al. The effect of varus knee deformities on the ankle alignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14: 134.
|
| [15] |
Rammelt S, Zwipp H. Intra-articular osteotomy for correction of Malunions and nonunions of the Tibial Pilon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2016; 21: 63–76.
|
| [16] |
Weinberg DS, Park PJ, Liu RW. Association between Tibial Malunion deformity parameters and degenerative hip and knee disease. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30: 510–515.
|
| [17] |
Wagner E, Wagner P. Correction of sagittal plane deformity of the distal tibia. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022; 27: 129–144.
|
| [18] |
Shazadeh Safavi P, Janney C, Jupiter D, Kunzler D, Bui R, Panchbhavi VK. A systematic review of the outcome evaluation tools for the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019; 12: 461–470.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
