Objective: The revision procedure for failure of internal fixation after thoracolumbar fracture is controversial. Combined anterior and posterior surgery is associated with higher risk more intraoperative bleeding and tissue damage. The success rate of simple anterior surgery needs further confirmation, and posterior surgery lacks stability of internal fixation. This study evaluates the feasibility and surgical effect of multi-rod constructs in the revision of thoracolumbar fractures.
Methods: Eleven patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent previous construct failure and were treated with revision and internal fixation with the multi-rod technique from March 2017 to September 2018 were analyzed. The original internal fixation was removed and replaced in the medial insertion of satellite rods and bone graft. The average follow-up time was 15.97 months. The intraoperation blood loss, the time of the operation, activation and discharge and the rate of rod fracture were calculated. The sagittal Cobb angle before revision, after revision and at the last follow-up were compared. The clinical effect was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI).
Results: The average operation time was 107 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 131.81 mL, the active time was 1.59 days, and the discharge time was 10.89 days. No rod fractured again during the follow-up period.
The paired t-test was used to compare the Cobb angle, VAS score, and ODI before and after surgery. There was significant difference in the sagittal Cobb angle between the pre-revision and the posterior sagittal position (p = 0.000), and no significant difference was found between post-revision and last follow-up (p = 0.551). VAS and ODI were greatly improved at the last follow-up.
Conclusion: The literature on revision of thoracolumbar fractures is insufficient and comprises varying opinions. This paper proposes a new treatment option. The application of the multi-rod constructs in the revision of thoracolumbar fractures is safe, simple, and effective and might provide guidance for future clinical work.
| [1] |
Waddell WH, Gupta R, Stephens BF 2nd. Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021; 52: 481–489.
|
| [2] |
Freslon M, Bouaka D, Coipeau P, Defossez G, Leclercq N, Nebout J, et al. Thoracolumbar fractures. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008; 94(4 Suppl): S22–S35.
|
| [3] |
Rajasekaran S, Kanna RM, Schnake KJ, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Sadiqi S, et al. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures-how are they different?-classification and treatment algorithm. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31(Suppl 4): S49–S56.
|
| [4] |
Xilong C, Junjun Z, Yuliang S, wanmei Y, Xiumei W, Xiuling H, et al. Biomechanical comparison of different treatment strategies for thoracolumbar burst fracture: a finite element study. World Neurosurg. 2023; 180: e429–e439.
|
| [5] |
Luca A, Lovi A, Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M. Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23(Suppl 6): 610–615.
|
| [6] |
Oswald K, Kälin J, Tinner C, et al. Anterior thoracolumbar column reconstruction with the vertebral body stent-safety and efficacy. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32: 934–949.
|
| [7] |
Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD. Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. A five to seven-year prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(5): 1033–1041.
|
| [8] |
Wang ST, Ma HL, Liu CL, Yu WK, Chang MC, Chen TH. Is fusion necessary for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine?: a prospective, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(23): 2646–2652. discussion 2653.
|
| [9] |
Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(11): E465–E470.
|
| [10] |
Hu Z, Liu D, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Liu Z. Using satellite rod technique in patients with severe Kyphoscoliosis undergoing three-column osteotomy: a minimum of 2 Years’ follow-up. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(1): 83–89.
|
| [11] |
Shen FH, Qureshi R, Tyger R, Lehman R, Singla A, Shimer A, et al. Use of the “dual construct” for the management of complex spinal reconstructions. Spine J. 2018; 18(3): 482–490.
|
| [12] |
Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM. Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(22): 1899–1904.
|
| [13] |
Godzik J, Hlubek RJ, Newcomb A, et al. Supplemental rods are needed to maximally reduce rod strain across the lumbosacral junction with TLIF but not ALIF in long constructs. Spine J. 2019; 19(6): 1121–1131.
|
| [14] |
Prajapati HP, Kumar R. Thoracolumbar fracture classification: evolution, merits, demerits, updates, and concept of stability. Br J Neurosurg. 2021; 35: 92–97.
|
| [15] |
Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79(2): 231–252.
|
| [16] |
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(22): 2940–2952. discussion 2952.
|
| [17] |
Shen FH, Harper M, Foster WC, Marks I, Arlet V. A novel “four-rod technique” for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction: theory and technical considerations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(12): 1395–1401.
|
| [18] |
Seyed Vosoughi A, Joukar A, Kiapour A. Optimal satellite rod constructs to mitigate rod failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study. Spine J. 2019; 19: 931–941.
|
| [19] |
Hallager DW, Gehrchen M, Dahl B, Harris JA, Gudipally M, Jenkins S, et al. Use of supplemental short pre-contoured accessory rods and cobalt chrome alloy posterior rods reduces primary rod strain and range of motion across the pedicle subtraction osteotomy level: an in vitro biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(7): E388–E395.
|
| [20] |
Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, et al. Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(3): 764–770.
|
| [21] |
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu KM, Keshavarzi S, et al. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(4): 862–867.
|
| [22] |
Kweh B, Tan T, Lee HQ, Hunn M, Liew S, Tee JW. Implant removal versus implant retention following posterior surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2022; 12: 700–718.
|
| [23] |
Spiegl UJ, Osterhoff G, Bula P, Hartmann F, Scheyerer MJ, Schnake KJ, et al. Biomechanics and clinical outcome after posterior stabilization of mid-thoracic vertebral body fractures: a systematic literature review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; 47: 1389–1398.
|
| [24] |
McDonnell M, Shah KN, Paller DJ, Thakur NA, Koruprolu S, Palumbo MA, et al. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3): e514–e518.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF
