How Does the Slump Sitting Radiograph Increase Proportion of Segmental Instability and Kyphotic Alignment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

Qingshuang Zhou , Xu Sun , Bin Wang , Zezhang Zhu , Yong Qiu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 551 -558.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) :551 -558. DOI: 10.1111/os.13962
CLINICAL ARTICLE
How Does the Slump Sitting Radiograph Increase Proportion of Segmental Instability and Kyphotic Alignment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification was proposed to differentiate homogenous lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) subgroups. The sitting radiograph exhibited lumbar malalignment with maximum lumbar kyphosis, intervertebral kyphosis, and spondylolisthesis.This study aimed to assess the sitting radiograph for distribution of clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis classification, and to elucidate its significance for exhibiting kyphotic alignment (CARDS type D) and segmental instability.

Methods: A cohort of 101 patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) between September 2018 and December 2020 were recruited. The distribution and relibility of CARDS classification with or without sitting radiograph was assessed. The translational and angular range of motion and segmental instability was also evaluated. Univariate analysis of variance was used for multiple groups, and the least significant difference for two groups. Kappa consistency test of intrarater and interrater was evaluated for CARDS classification with or without sitting radiograph. Chi-square test was used to compare paried categorical data.

Results: Utility of sitting radiographs for CARDS classification revealed higher percentage of type D than that without the sitting radiograph (p < 0.001). The sitting radiograph revealed a larger slip distance than the flexion radiograph (p = 0.003), as well as a lower slip angle than flexion radiograph (p < 0.001). The sitting-supine modality demonstrated the largest translational range of motion compared to the sitting-extension (p < 0.001) and flexion-extension modalities (p < 0.001). The sitting-supine modality showed larger angular range of motion than the flexion-extension modality (p < 0.001). The percentage of flexion, extension, upright, supine, and sitting radiograph to identify translational instability was higher than that without sitting radiograph (p < 0.001), as well as taking angular motion ≥10° as an additional criterion for segmental instability (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The CARDS classification was reliable for LDS. The sitting radiograph showed maximal slip distance and kyphotic slip angle. Application of the sitting radiograph was necessary for evaluating segmental instability and kyphotic alignment of LDS.

Keywords

CARDS Classification / Kyphotic Alignment / Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis / Range of Motion / Segmental Instability / Sitting Radiograph

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qingshuang Zhou, Xu Sun, Bin Wang, Zezhang Zhu, Yong Qiu. How Does the Slump Sitting Radiograph Increase Proportion of Segmental Instability and Kyphotic Alignment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(3): 551-558 DOI:10.1111/os.13962

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zhou Q, Sun X, Chen X, Xu L, Qian B, Zhu Z, et al. Utility of natural sitting lateral radiograph in the diagnosis of segmental instability for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res. 2021;479:817–825.

[2]

Simmonds AM, Rampersaud YR, Dvorak MF, Dea N, Melnyk AD, Fisher CG. Defining the inherent stability of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:178–189.

[3]

Tarpada SP, Cho W, Chen F, Amorosa LF. Utility of supine lateral radiographs for assessment of lumbar segmental instability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2018;43:1275–1280.

[4]

Zhou Q, Sun X, Qiu Y, Zhu Z, Xu L, Pu X, et al. Utility of the decubitus or the supine rather than the extension lateral radiograph in evaluating lumbar segmental instability. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:851–857.

[5]

Liu N, Wood KB, Schwab JH, Cha TD, Pedlow FX, Puhkan RD, et al. Utility of flexion-extension radiographs in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2015;40:E929–E935.

[6]

Hey HWD, Tan K, Kantharajanna SB, Teo AQA, Chan CX, Liu KG, et al. Using spinopelvic parameters to estimate residual lumbar lordosis assuming previous lumbosacral fusion—a study of normative values. Spine J. 2018;18:422–429.

[7]

Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S, et al. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:284–290.

[8]

Ghogawala ZDJBW. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1424–1434.

[9]

Landi A, Gregori F, Marotta N, Donnarumma P, Delfini R. Hidden spondylolisthesis: unrecognized cause of low back pain? Prospective study about the use of dynamic projections in standing and recumbent position for the individuation of lumbar instability. Neuroradiology. 2015;57:583–588.

[10]

Kepler CK, Hilibrand AS, Sayadipour A, Koerner JD, Rihn JA, Radcliff KE, et al. Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification. Spine J. 2015;15:1804–1811.

[11]

Sobol GL, Hilibrand A, Davis A, Millhouse P, Koerner J, Kepler C, et al. Reliability and clinical utility of the CARDS classification for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31:E69–E73.

[12]

Hey HWD, Lau ET, Lim J, Choong DA, Tan C, Liu GK, et al. Slump sitting x-ray of the lumbar spine is superior to the conventional flexion view in assessing lumbar spine instability. Spine J. 2017;17:360–368.

[13]

Hey HWD, Lau ET, Tan K, Lim JL, Choong D, Lau L, et al. Lumbar spine alignment in six common postures. Spine. 2017;42:1447–1455.

[14]

Chen X, Zhou Q, Xu L, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Li S, et al. Does kyphotic configuration on upright lateral radiograph correlate with instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis? Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2018;173:96–100.

[15]

Chen X, Xu L, Qiu Y, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Li S, et al. Higher improvement in patient-reported outcomes can Be achieved after Transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusion for clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis classification type D degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e293–e300.

[16]

Okuda S, Nagamoto Y, Matsumoto T, Sugiura T, Takahashi Y, Iwasaki M. Adjacent segment disease after single segment posterior lumbar Interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2018;43:E1384–E1388.

[17]

Pieper CC, Groetz SF, Nadal J, Schild HH, Niggemann PD. Radiographic evaluation of ventral instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis: do we need extension radiographs in routine exams? Eur Spine J. 2014;23:96–101.

[18]

Cho JH, Joo Y, Lim C, Hwang CJ, Lee D, Lee CS. Effect of one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion on global sagittal balance. Spine J. 2017;17:1794–1802.

[19]

Alzakri ALHHM. Restoration of normal pelvic balance from surgical reduction in highgrade spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:2087–2094.

[20]

Luk KDK, Chow DHK, Holmes A. Vertical instability in spondylolisthesis: a traction radiographic assessment technique and the principle of management. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976). 2003;28:819–827.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

321

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/