A Cadaveric Study of the Optimal Isometric Region on the Anterolateral Surface of the Knee in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

Gai Yao , Yang Liu , Zhiyou Zhou , Xuchao Zhang , Kang Liu , Xiawei Fu , Zikai Hua , Zimin Wang

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) : 157 -166.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) :157 -166. DOI: 10.1111/os.13938
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A Cadaveric Study of the Optimal Isometric Region on the Anterolateral Surface of the Knee in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective:: Isolated intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is not capable of restoring instability in many cases leading some to recommend concomitant anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. The satisfactory fixation site and graft length change are crucial in ligament reconstruction to restore the ALL function and avoid some unwanted graft behavior. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the optimal isometric region on the anterolateral aspect of the knee for ALL reconstruction using a three-dimensional optical instrument and a suture similar to an intraoperative isometric test.

Methods:: Six freshly frozen cadaveric human knees were used in this study. Data regarding the anterolateral surface were obtained using an optical measurement system to create a three-dimensional model. Nine points were selected on the femur (F1-F9) and tibia (Ta-Ti) respectively. The three-dimensional length change between each pair of tibial and femoral points was measured during passive knee flexion from 0° to 90° in 15° increments. Subsequently, five femoral points (A–E) were selected from the lateral femur, located in different areas relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle, and three tibial reference points (T1-T3) were selected in the isometric test. The changes in the length between each pair of reference points were measured using sutures. The 95% confidence interval for the rate of length change was estimated using the mean and standard deviation of the maximum rate of length change at different flexion angles, and the data were expressed as the mean (95% confidence interval) and compared with the maximum acceptable rate of change (10%).

Results:: The maximum acceptable change rate for ligament reconstruction is 10%, and the mean maximum rates and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of length change for the point combinations were calculated. Among all the combined points measured using the optical measurement system and the suture, the qualified point combination for reconstruction was F3 (8mm posterior and 8mm proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle)-Tb (8mm proximal to the midpoint between the center of Gerdy's tubercle and the fibula head), A (posterior and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle)-T2 (10mm below the joint line)and A-T3 (15 mm below the joint line). The position of F3-Tb and A-T2 are close to each other.

Conclusion:: The most isometric area of the femur for ALL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle. We recommend that the initial location of the femoral point be set at 8 mm posterior and 8 mm proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle and the tibial point at approximately 10 mm below the joint line, midway between Gerdy's tubercle and fibular head, and subsequently adjusted to the most satisfactory position according to the isometric test.

Keywords

3D optical knee model / Anterior cruciate ligament / Anterolateral ligament / Isometry / Reconstruction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gai Yao, Yang Liu, Zhiyou Zhou, Xuchao Zhang, Kang Liu, Xiawei Fu, Zikai Hua, Zimin Wang. A Cadaveric Study of the Optimal Isometric Region on the Anterolateral Surface of the Knee in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(1): 157-166 DOI:10.1111/os.13938

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Trojani C, Beaufils P, Burdin G, Bussière C, Chassaing V, Jian D, et al. Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1565–1570.

[2]

Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, et al. Anterolateral ligament expert group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament – deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18:91–106.

[3]

Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Presti ML, Giordano G, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1060–1069.

[4]

Partezani C, Helito PPV, Batista M, Bonadio FR, et al. Evaluation of the length and isometric pattern of the anterolateral ligament with serial computer tomography. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2:2325967114562205.

[5]

Zens M, Niemeyer P, Ruhhammer J, Bernstein A, Woias P, Mayr HO, et al. Length changes of the anterolateral ligament during passive knee motion: a human cadaveric study. Am J Sport Med. 2015;2545:2545–2552.

[6]

Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat. 2013;223:321–328.

[7]

Daggett M, Ockuly AC, Cullen M, Busch K, Lutz C, Imbert P, et al. Femoral origin of the anterolateral ligament: AnAnatomic analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:835–841.

[8]

Dodds AL, Halewood C, Gupte CM, Williams A, Amis AA. The anterolateral ligament: anatomy, length changes and association with the Segond fracture. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:325–331.

[9]

Kennedy MI, Claes S, Fuso F, Williams BT, Goldsmith MT, Turnbull TL, et al. The anterolateral ligament: an anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical analysis. Am J Sport Med. 2015;43:1606–1615.

[10]

Neri T, Palpacuer F, Testa R, Bergandi F, Boyer B, Farizon F, et al. The anterolateral ligament: anatomic implications for its reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24:1083–1089.

[11]

Patel RM, Brophy RH. Anterolateral ligament of the knee: anatomy, function, imaging, and treatment. Am J Sport Med. 2017;989074118:217–223.

[12]

Runer A, Birkmaier S, Pamminger M, Reider S, Herbst E, Künzel KH, et al. The anterolateral ligament of the knee: a dissection study. Knee. 2016;23:8–12.

[13]

Kernkamp WA, Velde SKVD, Tsai TY, Arkel ERAV, Li G. An in vivo simulation of isometry of the anterolateral aspect of the healthy knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1111–1118.

[14]

Daggett M, Ockuly AC, Cullen M, Busch K, Lutz C, Imbert P, et al. Femoral origin of the anterolateral ligament: an anatomic analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:835–841.

[15]

Dephillipo NN, Cinque ME, Chahla J, Geeslin AG, Laprade RF. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction techniques, biomechanics, and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1575–1583.

[16]

Forsythe B, Agarwalla A, Lansdown DA, Puzzitiello R, Inoue N. Proximal fixation anterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle optimizes isometry in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;27(3):875–884.

[17]

Helito CP, Demange MK, Bonadio MB, Tírico LE, Gobbi RG, Pécora JR, et al. Anatomy and histology of the knee anterolateral ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1:1804560970.

[18]

Ferreira MC, Zidan FF, Miduati FB, Fortuna CC, Mizutani BM, Abdalla RJ. Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament using interlinked hamstrings – technical note. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016;51:466–470.

[19]

Zhao J, Qiu J, Chen J, Xu J. Combined double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and anterior cruciate ligament-mimicking anterolateral structure reconstruction. Arthroscopy. Dent Tech. 2020;9:e1141–e1146.

[20]

Wagih AM, Elguindy A. Percutaneous reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee with a polyester tape. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e691–e697.

[21]

Krackow KA, Brooks RL. Optimization of knee ligament position for lateral extraarticular reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:293–302.

[22]

Kittl C, Halewood C, Stephen JM, Gupte CM, Weiler A, Williams A, et al. Length change patterns in the lateral extra-articular structures of the knee and related reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2014;43:354–362.

[23]

Nawabi DH, Tucker S, Schafer KA, Zuiderbaan HA, Nguyen JT, Wickiewicz TL, et al. ACL fibers near the lateral intercondylar ridge are the Most load bearing during stability examinations and isometric through passive flexion. Am J Sport Med. 2016;990117044:2563–2571.

[24]

Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL, Downey DJ, Matsen FA. Ligament length relationship in the moving knee. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:593–610.

[25]

Imbert P, Lutz C, Daggett M, Niglis L, Freychet B, Dalmay F, et al. Isometric characteristics of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a cadaveric navigation study. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(10):2017–2024.

[26]

Losee RE, Johnson TR, Southwick WO. Anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau. A diagnostic test and operative repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:1015–1030.

[27]

Segond P. Recherches cliniques et experimentales sur les epanchements sanguins du genou par entorse. Prog Med. 1879;7: 297–299, 319–321, 340–341.

[28]

Hughston JC, Andrews JR, Cross MJ, Moschi A. Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part II. The lateral compartment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(2):173–179.

[29]

Ferretti A, Guzzini M, Viglietta E. Anatomy of secondary restraints of ACL. In: Ferretti A, editor. Anterolateral rotatory instability in ACL deficient knee. Cham: Springer; 2022.

[30]

Werner M. The knee: form, function, and ligament reconstruction. Berlin: Springer; 1983.

[31]

Shea KG, Polousky JD, Jacobs JC, Yen YM, Ganley TJ. The anterolateral ligament of the knee: an inconsistent finding in pediatric cadaveric specimens. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:e51.

[32]

Stijak L, Bumbaširević M, Radonjić V, Kadija M, Puškaš L, Milovanović D, et al. Anatomic description of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2083–2088.

[33]

Watanabe J, Suzuki D, Mizoguchi S, Yoshida S, Fujimiya M. The anterolateral ligament in a Japanese population: study on prevalence and morphology. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21:647–651.

[34]

Kurosawa H, Yasuda K, Yamakoshi KI, Kamiya A, Kaneda K. An experimental evaluation of isometric placement for extraarticular reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:384–388.

[35]

Taneja AK, Miranda FC, Braga CA, Gill CM, Hartmann LG, Santos DC, et al. MRI features of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:403–410.

[36]

Draganich LF, Hsieh YF, Reider B. Iliotibial band tenodesis: a new strategy for attachment. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:186–195.

[37]

Katakura M, Koga H, Nakamura K, Sekiya I, Muneta T. Effects of different femoral tunnel positions on tension changes in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1272–1278.

[38]

Lutz C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Niglis L, Freychet B, Clavert P, Imbert P. Behavior of the anterolateral structures of the knee during internal rotation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101:523–528.

[39]

Lutz C. Role of anterolateral reconstruction in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;104(1S):S47–S53.

[40]

Sonnery-Cottet B, Barbosa NC, Tuteja S, Daggett M, Kajetanek C, Thaunat M. Minimally invasive anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e211–e215.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

396

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/