Preparation of Ag@3D-TiO₂ Scaffolds and Determination of its Antimicrobial Properties and Osteogenesis-promoting Ability

Abstract

Objectives: The micro-nano structure of 3D-printed porous titanium (Ti) alloy with excellent performance in avoiding stress shielding and promoting bone tissue differentiation provides a new opportunity for the development of bone implants, but it necessitates higher requirements for bone tissue differentiation and the antibacterial properties of bone implants in clinical practice.

Methods: This study investigated the preparation, antimicrobial properties, and osteogenesis-promoting ability of the 3D printed porous Ti alloy anodic oxidized Ag-carrying (Ag@3D-TiO₂) scaffolds. The 3D printed porous Ti alloy (3D-Ti), anodized 3D printed porous Ti alloy (3D-TiO₂), and Ag@3D-TiO₂ scaffolds were synthesized using electron beam melting. The antimicrobial properties of the scaffolds were examined using antibacterial tests and their cytocompatibility was assessed using a cell proliferation assay and acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining. In vitro cellular assays were used to investigate the effects of the scaffold microstructural features on cell activity, proliferation, and osteogenesis-related genes and proteins. In vivo animal experiments were used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and osteogenesis-promoting abilities of the scaffolds.

Results: The Ag@3D-TiO₂ scaffolds exhibited sustained anti-microbial activity over time, enhanced cell proliferation, facilitated osteogenic differentiation, and increased extracellular matrix mineralization. In addition, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen type I (COL-I), and osteocalcin (OCN)-related genes and proteins were upregulated. In vivo animal implantation experiments, the anti-inflammatory effect of the Ag@3D-TiO₂ scaffolds were observed using histology, and a large amount of fibrous connective tissue was present around it; the Ag@3D-TiO₂ scaffolds were more bio-compatible with the surrounding tissues compared with 3D-Ti and 3D-TiO₂; a large amount of uniformly distributed neoplastic bone tissue existed in their pores, and the chronic systemic toxicity test showed that the 3D-Ti, 3D-TiO₂, and Ag@3D-TiO₂ scaffolds are biologically safe.

Conclusion: The goal of this study was to create a scaffold that exhibits antimicrobial properties and can aid bone growth, making it highly suitable for use in bone tissue engineering.

Keywords

Antimicrobial properties / Biocompatible / Osteogenesis-promoting ability / Silver

References

[1] KurtzSM. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(Suppl 3):144–151.

[2] IannottiF, PratiP, FidanzaA, Iorio R, FerrettiA, Pèrez PrietoD, et al. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a clinical practice protocol in high-risk patients. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(4):186.

[3] AhmedSS, BegumF, KayaniB, Haddad FS. Risk factors, diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(12):1063–1070.

[4] PremkumarA, KolinDA, FarleyKX, Wilson JM, McLawhornAS, CrossMB, et al. Projected economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(5):1484–1489.e3.

[5] ChenQZ, ThouasGA. Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep. 2015;87:1–57.

[6] AnselmeK, Davidson P, PopaAM, GiazzonM, LileyM, PlouxL. The interactions of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3824–3846.

[7] EnghCA, BobynJD, GlassmanAH. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg-Br. 1987;69(1):45–55.

[8] ChenJB, Paetzell E, ZhouJ, et al. Osteoblast-like cell ingrowth, adhesion and proliferation on porous Ti-6Al-4V with particulate and fiber scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2010;30(5):647–656.

[9] WangF, LiuJ, LiuJ, ZhangS, YangM, Kang K. Comparison of the effects of 3D printing bioactive porous titanium alloy scaffolds and nano-biology for direct treatment of bone defects. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand). 2022;68(3):86–95.

[10] HuangH, WuZ, YangZ, Fan X, BaiS, LuoJ, et al. In vitro application of drug-loaded hydrogel combined with 3D-printed porous scaffolds. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(6):ac9943.

[11] ThijsL, Verhaeghe F, CraeghsT, et al. A study of the micro structural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater. 2010;58(9):3303–3312.

[12] LiB, ZhangM, LuQ, ZhangB, MiaoZ, Li L, et al. Application and development of modern 3D printing technology in the field of orthopedics. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:8759060.

[13] MaherS, Linklater D, RastinH, LiaoST, Martins de Sousa K, Lima-MarquesL, et al. Advancing of 3D-printed titanium implants with combined antibacterial protection using ultrasharp nanostructured surface and gallium-releasing agents. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8:314–327.

[14] GeX, RenC, DingY, Chen G, LuX, WangK, et al. Micro/nano-structured TiO2 surface with dual-functional antibacterial effects for biomedical applications. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:346–357.

[15] YangG, LiuH, LiA, LiuT, LuQ, HeF. Antibacterial structure design of porous Ti6Al4V by 3D printing and anodic oxidation. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(15):5206.

[16] KaurS, Ghadirinejad K, OskoueiHR. An overview on the tribological performance of titanium alloys with surface modifications for biomedical applications. Lubricants. 2019;7:65.

[17] ParkJ, BauerS, MarkKV, et al. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 NT diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1686–1691.

[18] Le GuehennecL, Soueidan A, LayrolleP, AmouriqY. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater. 2007;23:844–854.

[19] EtoS, Miyamoto H, ShobuikeT, NodaI, Akiyama T, TsukamotoM, et al. Silver oxide-containing hydroxyapatite coating supports osteoblast function and enhances implant anchorage strength in rat femur. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(9):1391–1397.

[20] WangY, DingXL, ChenY, Guo MQ, ZhangY, GuoXK, et al. Antibiotic-loaded, silver core-embedded mesoporous silica nanovehicles as a synergistic antibacterial agent for the treatment of drug-resistant infections. Biomaterials. 2016;101:207–216.

[21] YuanZ, LiuP, HaoY, DingY, CaiK. Construction of Ag-incorporated coating on Ti substrates for inhibited bacterial growth and enhanced osteoblast response. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;171:597–605.

[22] ZhengY, LiJ, LiuX, SunJ. Antimicrobial and osteogenic effect of Ag-implanted titanium with a nanostructured surface. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:875–884.

[23] HeF, LiL, ChenL, Li F, HuangY. Self-organizing evolution of anodized oxide films on Ti-25Nb-3Mo-2Sn-3Zr alloy and hydrophilicity. Trans Tianjin Univ. 2014;20:97–102.

[24] LiuW, SuP, ChenS, Wang N, WangJ, LiuY, et al. Antibacterial and osteogenic stem cell differentiation properties of photoinduced TiO2 nanoparticle decorated TiO2 CNTs. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015;10:713–723.

[25] ChengS, ZhangD, LiM, LiuX, ZhangY, Qian S, et al. Osteogenesis, angiogenesis and immune response of Mg-Al layered double hydroxide coating on pure Mg. Bioact Mater. 2020;6(1):91–105.

[26] LiuK, LiuPC, LiuR, WuX. Dual AO/EB staining to detect apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells compared with flow cytometry. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015;21:15–20.

[27] WuY, ZhouL, LiY, LouX. Osteoblast-derived extracellular matrix coated PLLA/silk fibroin composite nanofibers promote osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(3):525–534.

[28] JinQY, ZhuQH, DengW, Hou CX, SunNN, HanW, et al. Follistatin-like 1 suppresses osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal cells during inflammation. Arch Oral Biol. 2022;135:105345.

[29] JingD, LuoE, CaiJ, TongS, ZhaiM, Shen G, et al. Mechanical vibration mitigates the decrease of bone quantity and bone quality of leptin receptor-deficient Db/Db mice by promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(9):1713–1724.

[30] GotmanI. Characteristics of metals used in implants. J Endourol. 1997;11(6):383–389.

[31] CzekanskaEM, Stoddart MJ, RichardsRG, HayesJS. In search of an osteoblast cell model for in vitro research. Eur Cell Mater. 2012;24:1–17.

[32] SivarajD, Vijayalakshmi K. Enhanced antibacterial and corrosion resistance properties of Ag substituted hydroxyapatite/functionalized multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposite coating on 316L stainless steel for biomedical application. Ultrason Sonochem. 2019;59:104730.

[33] LiW, ZhangS, LiuJ, LiuY, LiangQ. Vitamin K2 stimulates MC3T3-E1 osteoblast differentiation and mineralization through autophagy induction. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(5):3676–3684.

[34] AlfordAI, Kozloff KM, HankensonKD. Extracellular matrix networks in bone remodeling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;65:20–31.

[35] WortonLE, ShiYC, SmithEJ, Barry SC, GondaTJ, WhiteheadJP, et al. Ectodermal-neural cortex 1 isoforms have contrasting effects on MC3T3-E1 osteoblast mineralization and gene expression. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(8):2141–2150.

[36] LiuZ, XuZ, WangX, Zhang Y, WuY, JiangD, et al. Construction and osteogenic effects of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy loaded with VEGF/BMP-2 shell-core microspheres in a sustained-release system. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;21(10):1028278.

[37] ZhaoD, WangT, NahanK, Guo X, ZhangZ, DongZ, et al. In vivo characterization of magnesium alloy biodegradation using electrochemical H2 monitoring, ICP-MS, and XPS. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:556–565.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.