Do Age and Timing Influence the Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries? 5-10 Years Follow Up

Jinwen He, Bin Geng, Peng Xu, Yayi Xia

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 1308-1316. DOI: 10.1111/os.14067
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Do Age and Timing Influence the Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries? 5-10 Years Follow Up

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives: Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are disruptive injuries, however, there are controversies in the results of acute and delayed reconstruction. Also, clinical outcomes between patients older or younger than 40 have not been compared in MLKIs. This study was designed to investigate the influence of age and timing of reconstruction on the outcomes of single-stage reconstruction of MLKIs.

Methods: The patients who underwent reconstruction of multiple injured ligaments because of MLKIs between May 2013 and July 2019 were added to the cohort. The postoperative complications, knee range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 score, Tegner activity level, patient satisfaction, and SF-36 score were compared between young (≤ 40 years old, n = 41) and old patients (n = 61); acute (≤ 3 weeks after injury, n = 75) and delayed reconstruction (n = 27), using Mann–Whitney U test or χ2 test.

Results: A total of 102 MLKI patients managed by single-stage multi-ligament reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up after surgery for a mean of 7.3 years (5.2-10.7 years). At the last follow-up, no significant difference was found in knee ROM, functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes between patients older or younger than 40; acute and delayed reconstruction (p > 0.05). The rate of complications in the delayed reconstruction group was higher than that of the acute reconstruction group (22.2% vs 5.3%, p < 0.05). The IKDC objective scores reached grade A in 63.7%–80.4% of patients, and grade B in 11.8%–23.5% patients.

Conclusion: The single-stage reconstruction of MLKIs can obtain comparative long-term functional and objective outcomes regardless of patients older or younger than 40; acute and delayed reconstruction, however, delayed reconstruction is related to a high rate of postoperative complications.

Keywords

Age / Multiple ligament injuries / Reconstruction / Single-stage / Timing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jinwen He, Bin Geng, Peng Xu, Yayi Xia. Do Age and Timing Influence the Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries? 5-10 Years Follow Up. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(6): 1308‒1316 https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14067

References

[1]
PoploskiKM, LynchAD, BurnsTC, Harner CD, LevyBA, OwensBD, et al. Presentation and surgical Management of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: a multicenter study from the surgical timing and rehabilitation (STaR) trial for MLKIs network. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105:607–613.
[2]
MakaramNS, MurrayIR, GeeslinAG, Chahla J, MoatsheG, LaPradeRF. Diagnosis and treatment strategies of the multiligament injured knee: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:543–550.
[3]
LiC, LiuY, ZhengR, Sun J, PengW, DengXH, et al. One-stage arthroscopic multiple ligament reconstruction for Schenck IV knee dislocation. Orthop Surg. 2023;15:502–509.
[4]
FloydER, MonsonJK, LapradeRF. Multiple ligament knee reconstructions. Art Ther. 2021;37:1378–1380.
[5]
HughesJD, LynchAD, SmithCN, Musahl V, IrrgangJJ. External fixation increases complications following surgical treatment of multiple ligament knee injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:161–166.
[6]
KanakamedalaAC, SheeanAJ, AlaiaMJ, Irrgang JJ, MusahlV. Concomitant periarticular fractures predict worse patient-reported outcomes in multiligament knee injuries: a matched cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140:1633–1639.
[7]
LiT, XiongY, ZhangZ, Tang X, ChenG, LiQ, et al. Results of multiple ligament reconstruction after knee dislocation——a prospective study with 95 patients and minimum 2-year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:904.
[8]
SvantessonE, Hamrin Senorski E, KristianssonF, Alentorn-GeliE, WestinO, SamuelssonK. Comparison of concomitant injuries and patient-reported outcome in patients that have undergone both primary and revision ACL reconstruction-a national registry study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:9.
[9]
IshibashiY, KimuraY, SasakiE, Sasaki S, YamamotoY, TsudaE. Acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments and staged surgery in multiple ligament knee injuries. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21:18.
[10]
HuaX, TaoH, FangW, Tang J. Single-stage in situ suture repair of multiple-ligament knee injury: a retrospective study of 17 patients (18 knees). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:41.
[11]
BorqueKA, JonesM, BalendraG, Willinger L, PinheiroVH, AnandBS, et al. High return to play rate following treatment of multiple-ligament knee injuries in 136 elite athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:3393–3401.
[12]
LauBC, Varsheya K, MorrissN, WickmanJ, Kirkendall D, AbramsG. Single-stage surgical treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries results in lower cost and fewer complications and unplanned reoperations compared with staged treatment. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4:e1659–e1666.
[13]
LaPradeRF, ChahlaJ, DePhillipoNN, CramT, Kennedy MI, CinqueM, et al. Single-stage multiple-ligament knee reconstructions for sports-related injuries: outcomes in 194 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:2563–2571.
[14]
SandersTL, Johnson NR, PareekA, KrychAJ, MarxRG, StuartMJ, et al. Satisfactory knee function after single-stage posterolateral corner reconstruction in the multi-ligament injured/dislocated knee using the anatomic single-graft technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:1258–1265.
[15]
SchenckR. Classification of knee dislocations. Operat Techniq Sports Med. 2003;11:193–198.
[16]
SchechingerSJ, LevyBA, DajaniKA, Shah JP, HerreraDA, MarxRG. Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner. Art Ther. 2009;25:232–242.
[17]
WuCC, YeLM, LiXF, ShiLJ. Sequential damage assessment of the posterolateral complex of the knee joint: a finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:185.
[18]
LachmanJR, RehmanS, PipitonePS. Traumatic knee dislocations: evaluation, management, and surgical treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:479–493.
[19]
IbrahimSA, GhafarS, SalahM, Abo Alnas M, al MisferA, FaroukH, et al. Surgical management of traumatic knee dislocation with posterolateral corner injury. Art Ther. 2013;29:733–741.
[20]
SkvortsovD, Kaurkin S, GoncharovE, AkhpashevA. Knee joint function and walking biomechanics in patients in acute phase anterior cruciate ligament tear. Int Orthop. 2020;44:885–891.
[21]
DingenenB, Truijen J, BellemansJ, GokelerA. Test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of forward, medial and rotational single-leg hop tests. Knee. 2019;26:978–987.
[22]
FanelliGC. Multiple ligament injured knee: initial assessment and treatment. Clin Sports Med. 2019;38:193–198.
[23]
Fernández-PochN, Fillat-Gomà F, Martínez-Carreres L, Coderch-NavarroS, Yela-VerdúC, Carbó-Cedán S, et al. Three-dimensional-printed patient-specific instrumentation is an accurate tool to reproduce femoral bone tunnels in multiple-ligament knee injuries. Int Orthop. 2023;47:1213–1219.
[24]
HollowayC, RizziA, DickherberJ, Athiviraham A. Multiligamentous knee injuries: current concepts review. J Knee Surg. 2023;36:236–245.
[25]
PandeyV, KhannaV, MadiS, Tripathi A, AcharyaK. Clinical outcome of primary medial collateral ligament-posteromedial corner repair with or without staged anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Injury. 2017;48:1236–1242.
[26]
PizzaN, di Paolo S, GrassiA, PaganoA, ViottoM, Dal FabbroG, et al. Good long-term patients reported outcomes, return-to-work and return-to-sport rate and survivorship after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) with posteromedial corner tears as significant risk factor for failure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:5018–5024.
[27]
SundararajanSR, Ramakanth R, RajasekaranS. Concomitant patellar tendon tear (PTT) with cruciate and/ collateral ligament injury (multi- ligamentous knee injury -MLKI) and new pathoanatomical -ganga PTT classification aids to strategize treatment options. Injury. 2023;54:712–721.
[28]
MagnitskayaN, MoutonC, GokelerA, Nuehrenboerger C, PapeD, SeilR. Younger age and hamstring tendon graft are associated with higher IKDC 2000 and KOOS scores during the first year after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:823–832.
[29]
ConteducaF, Caperna L, FerrettiA, IorioR, Civitenga C, PonzoA. Knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than forty years: comparison between different age groups. Int Orthop. 2013;37:2265–2269.
[30]
LegnaniC, Terzaghi C, BorgoE, VenturaA. Management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years and older. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12:177–184.
[31]
SalmonLJ, HeathE, AkrawiH, Roe JP, LinklaterJ, PinczewskiLA. 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior Tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:531–543.
[32]
HohmannE, GlattV, TetsworthK. Early or delayed reconstruction in multi-ligament knee injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2017;24:909–916.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/