Clinical Analysis of Microwave Ablation Combined with Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

Abstract

Objectives: There is still controversy over the choice of treatment for end-stage spinal metastases. With the continuous development of microwave technology in spinal tumors, related studies have reported that microwave combined with techniques such as pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty can achieve the purpose of tumor ablation, relieving spinal cord compression, enhancing spinal stability, effectively relieving pain, and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation in the palliative management of spinal metastases with pathological fractures.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with spinal metastases and pathological fractures treated between January 2016 and July 2020, with 44 patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation along with laminectomy (fixation group) and the remaining 38 receiving microwave ablation in addition to the treatment provided to group fixation (MWA group). Before surgery, all patients underwent pain assessment using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and evaluation of spinal cord injury using the Frankel classification. After surgery, the patients' prognoses were assessed using the Tomita score, modified Tokuhashi score system, and progression-free survival. Additionally, we compared operative time and blood loss between the two groups. Survival analysis utilized the Kaplan–Meier method with a log-rank test for group comparisons. Paired t-tests and the Mann–Whitney U test were applied to metric and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Neurological function improvement across groups was evaluated using the χ² test.

Results: All patients were followed up for a median duration of 18 and 20 months in the fixation and MWA groups, respectively, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 36 months. Statistically significant reductions in postoperative VAS scores were observed in all patients compared with their preoperative scores. The MWA group exhibited reduced blood loss (t = 2.74, p = 0.01), lower VAS scores at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups (t = 2.34, P = 0.02; t = 2.83, p = 0.006), and longer progression-free survival than the fixation group (p = 0.03). Although the operation times in the MWA group were longer than those in the fixation group, this difference was not statistically significant (t = 6.06, p = 0.12). No statistically significant differences were found regarding improvements in spinal cord function between the two groups (p = 0.77).

Conclusion: Compared with decompression and pedicle screw fixation for treating spinal metastases with pathological fractures, microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation showed better outcomes in terms of pain control, longer progression-free survival, and lower blood loss without increasing operative time, which has favorable implications for clinical practice.

Keywords

Microwave ablation / Pathological fractures / Screw fixation / Spinal metastases

References

[1] QiuYY, ZhangKX, YeX, ZhangXS, XingC, Wu QS, et al. Combination of microwave ablation and percutaneous Osteoplasty for treatment of painful Extraspinal bone metastasis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(12):1934–1940.

[2] BollenL, Dijkstra S, BartelsR, de GraeffA, PoelmaD, BrouwerT, et al. Clinical management of spinal metastases-the Dutch national guideline. Eur J Cancer. 2018;104:81–90.

[3] LiuB, YuanZ, WeiCY. Combined microwave ablation and minimally invasive open decompression for the management of thoracic metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1397–1401.

[4] KastlerA, Krainik A, SakhriL, MousseauM, Kastler B. Feasibility of real-time Intraprocedural temperature control during bone metastasis thermal microwave ablation: a Bicentric retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(3):366–371.

[5] SimonCJ, DupuyDE, Mayo-SmithWW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S69–S83.

[6] TomitaK, Kawahara N, KobayashiT, YoshidaA, Murakami H, AkamaruT. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(3):298–306.

[7] TokuhashiY, Matsuzaki H, OdaH, OshimaM, RyuJ. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(19):2186–2191.

[8] Van CutsemE, Cervantes A, AdamR, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–13422.

[9] MarreroJA, KulikLM, SirlinCB, Zhu AX, FinnRS, AbecassisMM, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68:723–750.

[10] FarinaL, WeissN, NissenbaumY, Cavagnaro M, LoprestoV, PintoR, et al. Characterisation of tissue shrinkage during microwave thermal ablation. Int J Hyperth. 2014;30:419–428.

[11] WrightAS, LeeFT, MahviDM. Hepatic microwave ablation with multiple antennae results in synergistically larger zones of coagulation necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(3):275–283.

[12] ZhangX, YeX, ZhangK, Qiu Y, FanW, YuanQ, et al. Computed tomography–guided microwave ablation combined with Osteoplasty for the treatment of bone metastases: a multicenter clinical study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(6):861–868.

[13] FanJ, ZhangX, LiP, WuL, YuanQ, Bai Y, et al. Microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation under real-time temperature monitoring for the treatment of painful spinal osteogenic metastases. BMC Neurol. 2023;23(1):219.

[14] ChenL, HouG, ZhangK, Li Z, YangS, QiuY, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation for treatment of painful spinal metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(3):501–506.

[15] RedmondKJ, LoSS, FisherC, Sahgal A. Postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases: a critical review to guide practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(5):1414–1428.

[16] BakarD, Tanenbaum JE, PhanK, AlentadoVJ, Steinmetz MP, BenzelEC, et al. Decompression surgery for spinal metastases: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(2):E2.

[17] TaalW, van der Togt-van Leeuwen AC. New Dutch guideline on spinal metastasis: extended to include spinal localisations of haematological malignancies. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9101.

[18] ZhongG, ZengL, HeY, ZengX, HuangW, Yang T, et al. The effects of combined microwave ablation and open surgery for the treatment of lung cancer-derived thoracolumbar metastases. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(7):1300–1308.

[19] LeeBH, ParkJO, KimHS, Park YC, LeeHM, MoonSH. Perioperative complication and surgical outcome in patients with spine metastases: retrospective 200-case series in a single institute. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;122:80–86.

[20] SmirniotopoulosJ, Cheng W, KrohmerS, KeeS, PuaB. Interventional oncology: keeping out of trouble in ablation techniques. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;21(4):223–227.

[21] PfannenstielA, Iannuccilli J, CornelisFH, DupuyDE, BeardWL, PrakashP. Shaping the future of microwave tumor ablation: a new direction in precision and control of device performance. Int J Hyperth. 2022;39(1):664–674.

[22] McWilliamsBT, Schnell EE, CurtoS, et al. A directional interstitial antenna for microwave tissue ablation: theoretical and experimental investigation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(9):2144–2150.

[23] MohtashamiY, Hagness SC, BehdadN. A hybrid slot/monopole antenna with directional heating patterns for microwave ablation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2017;65(8):3889–3896.

[24] PatelPA, IngramL, WilsonIDC, Breen DJ. No-touch wedge ablation technique of microwave ablation for the treatment of subcapsular tumors in the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(8):1257–1262.

[25] PetitA, Hocquelet A, N'kontchouG, VarinE, Sellier N, SerorO, et al. No-touch multi-bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm not Puncturable via the non-tumorous liver parenchyma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(2):273–283.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.