Does Focal Kyphotic Deformity at Non-responsible Levels Affect the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?
Jia Liu, Jian Tan, Haotian Wang, Yixuan Tan, Junqiang Qi, Rukun Chen, Jian Huang, Chao Zhu, Junming Tan, Wen Yuan, Changgui Shi, Guohua Xu
Does Focal Kyphotic Deformity at Non-responsible Levels Affect the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?
Objective: Focal cervical kyphotic deformity (FCK) without neurologic compression is not uncommon in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. It remains unclear whether FCK at non-responsible levels needs to be treated simultaneously. This study aims to investigate whether FCK at non-responsible levels is the prognostic factor for CSM and elucidate the surgical indication for FCK.
Methods: Patients with CSM who underwent ACDF between January 2016 and April 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of FCK and two classifications according to global cervical sagittal alignment. Clinical outcomes were compared using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rate (RR) of neurologic function. Univariate and multivariate analysis based on RR assessed the relationship between various possible prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the focal Cobb angle to predict poor clinical outcomes.
Results: A total of 94 patients were included, 41 with FCK and 53 without. Overall, the RR of neurologic function was significantly lower in the FCK than in the non-FCK group. Further analysis showed that the RR difference between the two groups was only observed in hypo-lordosis classification (kyphotic and sigmoid alignment), but not in the lordosis classification. Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative focal Cobb angle in the FCK level (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.97) was independently associated with clinical outcomes in the hypo-lordosis classification. The optimal cutoff point of the preoperative focal kyphotic Cobb angle was calculated at 4.05°.
Conclusion: For CSM with hypo-lordosis, FCK was a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes. Surgeons may consider treating the FCK simultaneously if the focal kyphotic Cobb angle of FCK is greater than 4.05° and is accompanied by cervical global kyphotic or sigmoid deformity.
Anterior Decompression and Fusion / Cervical Alignment / Cervical Myelopathy / Focal Kyphosis
[1] |
HuX, LiuH, WangB, Hong Y, RongX, PuD, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level disc degenerative disease with preoperative reversible kyphosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;202:106493.
|
[2] |
SunB, ShiC, WuH, XuZ, LinW, ShenX, et al. Application of zero-profile spacer in the treatment of three-level cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: 5-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(8):504–511.
|
[3] |
YangL, LiY, PangX, Li D, WuY, ChenX, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for cervical spondylosis with concomitant tinnitus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(1):133–140.
|
[4] |
GrossoMJ, HwangR, MrozT, Benzel E, SteinmetzMP. Relationship between degree of focal kyphosis correction and neurological outcomes for patients undergoing cervical deformity correction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(6):537–544.
|
[5] |
LiuT, TianS, ZhangJ, He M, DengL, DingW, et al. Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and patients with cervical Spondylotic radiculopathy and cervical Spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(2):329–336.
|
[6] |
ScheerJK, TangJA, SmithJS, Acosta FL, ProtopsaltisTS, BlondelB, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(2):141–159.
|
[7] |
ShimizuK, Nakamura M, NishikawaY, HijikataS, ChibaK, ToyamaY. Spinal kyphosis causes demyelination and neuronal loss in the spinal cord: a new model of kyphotic deformity using juvenile Japanese small game fowls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(21):2388–2392.
|
[8] |
SongQX, SuXJ, WangK, Zhu C, ChenZ, LiQ, et al. Is complete correction of cervical sagittal malalignment necessary during 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery in patients with kyphosis? Global Spine J. 2023;13(5):1311–1318.
|
[9] |
DruAB, Lockney DT, VaziriS, DeckerM, Polifka AJ, FoxWC, et al. Cervical spine deformity correction techniques. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):470–482.
|
[10] |
ZdeblickTA, Bohlman HH. Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy. Treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(2):170–182.
|
[11] |
WuB, LiuB, SangD, Cui W, WangD. The association between cervical focal kyphosis and myelopathy severity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy before surgery. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(6):1501–1508.
|
[12] |
OharaA, Miyamoto K, NaganawaT, MatsumotoK, Shimizu K. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(22):2585–2591. discussion 92.
|
[13] |
ChavanneA, Pettigrew DB, HoltzJR, DollinN, KuntzC IV. Spinal cord intramedullary pressure in cervical kyphotic deformity: a cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):1619–1626.
|
[14] |
HarrisonDE, Harrison DD, CaillietR, TroyanovichSJ, JanikTJ, HollandB. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(16):2072–2078.
|
[15] |
YanC, JiaHC, TanHY, Yu XW, LiM, ZhouXY, et al. How much space of the spinal canal should be restored by hoisting the vertebrae-OPLL complex for sufficient decompression in anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion? A multicenter clinical radiological study. Spine J. 2021;21(2):273–283.
|
[16] |
ChenG, LinC, ZhuZ, TongK, LiS, ChenH, et al. Increased blood flow of spinal cord lesion after decompression improves neurological recovery of degenerative cervical myelopathy: an intraoperative ultrasonography-based prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1149–1157.
|
[17] |
YuM, ZhaoWK, LiM, WangSB, SunY, JiangL, et al. Analysis of cervical and global spine alignment under Roussouly sagittal classification in Chinese cervical spondylotic patients and asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(6):1265–1273.
|
[18] |
ShinJJ. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration, cervical alignment, and clinical outcomes after one- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):589–600.
|
[19] |
FerchRD, ShadA, Cadoux-HudsonTA, et al. Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(1 Suppl Spine):13–19.
|
[20] |
WoiciechowskyC, Thomale UW, KroppenstedtSN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine—symptoms and surgical strategies depending on disease progress. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(8):680–684.
|
[21] |
VillavicencioAT, Babuska JM, AshtonA, BuschE, RoecaC, NelsonEL, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1309–1316. discussion 16, 1316.
|
[22] |
JagannathanJ, Shaffrey CI, OskouianRJ, DumontAS, Herrold C, SansurCA, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(5):420–428.
|
[23] |
BurkhardtBW, SimgenA, WagenpfeilG, Hendrix P, ReithW, OertelJM. Adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical fusion and the presence of surgery for lumbar disc herniation and surgery at the musculoskeletal joints: are they related? Spine J. 2020;20(12):1925–1933.
|
[24] |
NishidaN, MumtazM, TripathiS, Kelkar A, KumaranY, SakaiT, et al. Biomechanical analysis of laminectomy, laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for the kyphotic cervical spine. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17(9):1531–1541.
|
[25] |
SongKJ, ChoiBW, JeonTS, Lee KB, ChangH. Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(11):1940–1945.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |