Robot-assisted Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) is a widely accepted procedure for treatment of osteoid osteomas. However, the application of CT-RFA was restricted as a result of some drawbacks, such as radiation exposure, and inconvenience in general anesthesia. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-operative TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 21 medical files of patients who were treated with percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas guided by the TiRobot system in our institution between March 2021 and April 2022. The three-dimensional images obtained by a 3D C-arm intra-operatively were sent to the TiRobot system. The puncture point and trajectory were designed. Then the guide pin was positioned to the lesion with the assistance of TiRobot and the biopsy sheath was inserted into the lesion through the guide pin. The tumor was biopsied for pathological examination. Then the RFA needle was inserted into the nidus through the biopsy sheath for thermal ablation. Data were extracted on the associated complications, the reduction in pain at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-operative and post-operative VAS scores.

Results: The patients included 17 males and four females with a mean age of 19.5 ± 10.4 years (range 3–45 years). Lesions were located on the femur in nine cases, on the tibia in nine cases, on the humerus in one case, on the calcaneus in one case, and on the acetabulum in one case. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA was successfully performed on all 21 patients. There was no intra-operative or post-operative complications observed. Pathological diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was obtained in 11 patients, but the other 10 cases were not pathologically diagnosed. The mean follow-up time was 18.8 months (range: 12–26 months).Post-operative VAS scores were reduced significantly in all cases. The mean VAS score decreased from 6.5 pre-operatively to 0.5 at 1 month post-operatively and to 0.1 at 1 year post-operatively.

Conclusion: As a reliable technique for localizing and resection of nidus, TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteoid osteomas.

Keywords

Osteoid osteoma / Radiofrequency ablation / Surgical robot

References

[1] GhanemI. The management of osteoid osteoma: updates and controversies. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(1):36–41.

[2] RosenthalDI, Hornicek FJ, WolfeMW, JenningsLC, Gebhardt MC, MankinHJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1998;80(6):815–821.

[3] AssounJ, Railhac JJ, BonnevialleP, PoeyC, Salles de Gauzy J, BauninC, et al. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous resection with CT guidance. Radiology. 1993;188(2):541–547.

[4] GangiA, Alizadeh H, WongL, BuyX, Dietemann JL, RoyC. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous laser ablation and follow-up in 114 patients. Radiology. 2007;242(1):293–301.

[5] RosenthalDI, Hornicek FJ, TorrianiM, GebhardtMC, MankinHJ. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous treatment with radiofrequency energy. Radiology. 2003;229(1):171–175.

[6] YuF, NiuXH, ZhangQ, Zhao HT, XuLH, DengZP. Radiofrequency ablation under 3D intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation for the treatment of osteoid osteomas. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1056):20140535.

[7] AnkoryR, KadarA, NetzerD, Schermannl H, GortzakY, DadiaS, et al. 3D imaging and stealth navigation instead of CT guidance for radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas: a series of 52 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):1–6.

[8] FujiwaraT, Kunisada T, TakedaK, HaseiJ, NakataE, MochizukiY, et al. Mini-open excision of osteoid osteoma using intraoperative O-arm/stealth navigation. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24(2):337–341.

[9] YiZ, LimRQR, ChenW, Zhu J, ChenS, LiuB. Arthroscopic bone grafting and robot-assisted fixation for scaphoid nonunion. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(1):254–262.

[10] ZhaoW, WangY, ZhangH, Guo J, HanJ, LinA, et al. Analysis of the screw accuracy and postoperative efficacy of screw placement in single position and bipedal position in robot-assisted oblique lumbar Interbody fusion: preliminary results of Mazor X stealth usage. Orthop Surg. 2023;16(2):401–411.

[11] TianW, JiaFS, ZhengJM, Jia J. Treatment of unstable sacral fractures with robotically-aided minimally invasive triangular fixation. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(12):3182–3192.

[12] KroesMW, BusserWM, HoogeveenYL, de Lange F, Schultze KoolLJ. Laser guidance in C-arm cone-beam CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma reduces fluoroscopy time. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(5):728–734.

[13] WangTL, LuoYP, ZhouZF, Liu JF, HouXD, JiaSH, et al. O-Arm-navigated, robot-assisted versus conventional CT guided radiofrequency ablation in treatment of osteoid osteoma: a retrospective cohort study. Front Surg. 2022;2(9):881852.

[14] CantwellCP, ObyrneJ, EustaceS. Current trends in treatment of osteoid osteoma with an emphasis on radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:607–617.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.