Does Proximal Adductor Canal Block Provide Better Analgesic Efficacy than Distal Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

To compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse events of proximal versus distal ACB for adults undergoing knee arthroplasty, we searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to identify all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Heterogeneity among studies was examined by Cochrane Q test. Our primary outcomes were pain intensity at rest/during movement and morphine consumption. Statistical analyses were conducted by RevMan Software. Seven eligible studies involving 400 subjects were included in this meta-analysis with 202 participants in the proximal ACB group and 198 participants in the distal ACB group. The results demonstrated that proximal ACB provided significantly better pain relief at rest at 2 h (SMD −0.27, 95% CI −0.54 to −0.01, four trials, 222 participants, I² = 0, p = 0.04) and 24 h (SMD −0.28, 95% CI −0.48 to −0.08, seven trials, 400 participants, I² = 0, p = 0.006) following the surgery. We found no evidence of a difference in postoperative pain intensity at other timepoints. Furthermore, we noted no evidence of a difference in cumulative morphine consumption and occurrence of adverse events. Proximal ACB provides better pain relief and comparable adverse effects profile compared with distal ACB. The analgesic benefit offered by proximal ACB, however, did not appear to extend beyond the first 24 h. The overall evidence level was mostly low or very low, which requires more well-organized multicenter randomized trials in the future.

Keywords

Adductor Canal Block / Knee Arthroplasty / Pain / Randomized Controlled Trial / Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

[1] Steinhaus ME, Christ AB, Cross MB. Total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: support for a foregone conclusion? HSS J. 2017;13(2):207–210.

[2] Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. JBJS. 2007;89(4):780–785.

[3] Weinstein EJ, Levene JL, Cohen MS, Andreae DA, Chao JY, Johnson M, et al. Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4:CD007105.

[4] Chan EY, Fransen M, Parker DA, Assam PN, Chua N, Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD009941.

[5] Kelley TC, Adams MJ, Mulliken BD, Dalury DF. Efficacy of multimodal perioperative analgesia protocol with periarticular medication injection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(8):1274–1277.

[6] Bailey L, Griffin J, Elliott M, Wu J, Papavasiliou T, Harner C, et al. Adductor canal nerve versus femoral nerve blockade for pain control and quadriceps function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):921–929.

[7] Fan Chiang Y-H, Wang MT, Chan SM, Chen SY, Wang ML, Hou JD, et al. Motor-sparing effect of Adductor Canal block for knee analgesia: an updated review and a subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials based on a corrected classification system. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:210.

[8] Biswas A, Perlas A, Ghosh M, Chin K, Niazi A, Pandher B, et al. Relative contributions of adductor canal block and intrathecal morphine to analgesia and functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):154–160.

[9] Elkassabany N, Cai LF, Badiola I, Kase B, Liu J, Hughes C, et al. A prospective randomized open-label study of single injection versus continuous adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(3):340–347.

[10] Ishiguro S, Yokochi A, Yoshioka K, Asano N, Deguchi A, Iwasaki Y, et al. Anatomy and clinical implications of ultrasound-guided selective femoral nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(6):1467–1470.

[11] Charous MT, Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NPS, Loland VJ, et al. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versusBasal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2011;115(4):774–781.

[12] Abdallah FW, Whelan DB, Chan VW, Prasad GA, Endersby RV, Theodoropolous J, et al. Adductor canal block provides noninferior analgesia and superior quadriceps strength compared with femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(5):1053–1064.

[13] Goffin P, Lecoq JP, Ninane V, Brichant JF, Sala-Blanch X, Gautier PE, et al. Interfascial spread of injectate after adductor canal injection in fresh human cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(2):501–503.

[14] Andersen HL, Gyrn J, Møller L, Christensen B, Zaric D. Continuous saphenous nerve block as supplement to single-dose local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(2):106–111.

[15] Laurant DB-S, Laurant DB-S, Peng P, Arango LG, Niazi AU, Chan VWS, et al. The nerves of the adductor canal and the innervation of the knee: an anatomic study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(3):321–327.

[16] Grevstad U, Jæger P, Sørensen JK, Gottschau B, Ilfeld B, Ballegaard M, et al. The effect of local anesthetic volume within the adductor canal on quadriceps femoris function evaluated by electromyography: a randomized, observer-and subject-blinded, placebo-controlled study in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(2):493–500.

[17] Sztain JF, Khatibi B, Monahan AM, Said ET, Abramson WB, Gabriel RA, et al. Proximal versus distal continuous adductor canal blocks: does varying perineural catheter location influence analgesia? A randomized, subject-masked, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):240–246.

[18] Greenky MR, McGrath ME, Levicoff EA, Good RP, Nguyen J, Makhdom AM, et al. Intraoperative surgeon administered adductor canal blockade is not inferior to anesthesiologist administered adductor canal blockade: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(5):1228–1232.

[19] Lee B, Park SJ, Park KK, Kim HJ, Lee YS, Choi YS. Optimal location for continuous catheter analgesia among the femoral triangle, proximal, or distal adductor canal after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022;47(6):353–358.

[20] Chaiperm C, Tanavalee C, Kampitak W, Amarase C, Ngarmukos S, Tanavalee A. Intraoperative surgeon-performed versus conventional anesthesiologist-performed continuous Adductor Canal block in Total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Knee Surg. 2024;37(4):282–290.

[21] Fei Y, Cui X, Chen S, Peng H, Feng B, Qian W, et al. Continuous block at the proximal end of the adductor canal provides better analgesia compared to that at the middle of the canal after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:260.

[22] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105906.

[23] Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13.

[24] Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785–1805.

[25] Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

[26] Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. 2011.

[27] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.

[28] Romano C, Lloyd A, Nair S, Wang JY, Viswanathan S, Vydyanathan A, et al. A randomized comparison of pain control and functional mobility between proximal and distal adductor canal blocks for total knee replacement. Anesth Essays Res. 2018;12(2):452–458.

[29] Mariano ER, Kim TE, Wagner MJ, Funck N, Harrison TK, Walters T, et al. A randomized comparison of proximal and distal ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal catheter insertion sites for knee arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(9):1653–1662.

[30] Swenson JD, Pollard JE, Peters CL, Anderson MB, Pace NL. Randomized controlled trial of a simplified adductor canal block performed for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44(3):348–353.

[31] Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O, Danninger T, Ma Y, Poultsides L, et al. Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2015;39:673–680.

[32] Wang Q, Zhang Y, du J, Lin X. Proximal versus distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for randomized controlled trial. Medicine. 2020;99(22):e19995.

[33] Sahin L, Eken ML, Isik M, Cavus O. Comparison of infracondylar versus subsartorial approach to saphenous nerve block: a randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(3):287.

[34] Chuan A, Lansdown A, Brick KL, Bourgeois AJG, Pencheva LB, Hue B, et al. Adductor canal versus femoral triangle anatomical locations for continuous catheter analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(3):360–367.

[35] Song L, Li Y, Xu Z, Geng ZY, Wang DX. Comparison of the ultrasound-guided single-injection femoral triangle block versus adductor canal block for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Anesth. 2020;34:702–711.

[36] Lyngeraa T, Jaeger P, Gottschau B, Graungaard B, Rossen-Jørgensen AM, Toftegaard I, et al. Comparison of the analgesic effect of an adductor canal block using a new suture-method catheter vs. standard perineural catheter vs. single-injection: a randomised, blinded, controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(11):1397–1405.

[37] Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, Madison SJ, Abramson WB, Monahan AM, et al. Discharge readiness after tricompartment knee arthroplasty: adductor canal versus femoral continuous nerve blocks—a dual-center, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):444–456.

[38] Kent ML, Hackworth RJ, Riffenburgh RH, Kaesberg JL, Asseff DC, Lujan E, et al. A comparison of ultrasound-guided and landmark-based approaches to saphenous nerve blockade: a prospective, controlled, blinded, crossover trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(1):265–270.

[39] Fujino T, Yoshida T, Kawagoe I, Hinotsume A, Hiratsuka T, Nakamoto T. Migration rate of proximal adductor canal block catheters placed parallel versus perpendicular to the nerve after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023;48:420–424.

[40] Wang C-G, Ding YL, Wang YY, Liu JY, Zhang Q. Comparison of adductor canal block and femoral triangle block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin J Pain. 2020;36(7):558–561.

[41] Meier AW, Auyong DB, Yuan SC, Lin SE, Flaherty JM, Hanson NA. Comparison of continuous proximal versus distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(1):36–42.

[42] Panagiotou OA, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JP. Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment. BMJ. 2013;346:f707.

[43] Zhang L-k, Chen C, Du W-b, Zhou H-t, Quan R-f, Liu J-s. Is the proximal adductor canal block a better choice than the distal adductor canal block for primary total knee arthroplasty?: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(43):e22667.

[44] Kavolus JJ, Sia D, Potter HG, Attarian DE, Lachiewicz PF. Saphenous nerve block from within the knee is feasible for TKA: MRI and cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(1):30–36.

[45] Pepper AM, North TW, Sunderland AM, Davis JJ. Intraoperative adductor canal block for augmentation of periarticular injection in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(9):2072–2076.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.