Evaluation of the Anatomical Reference Point in Posterior Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study
Peirong Lian, Hu Chen, Wanshun Wang, Changrong Zhu, Qiang Tu, Xiangyang Ma, Hong Xia, Honglei Yi
Evaluation of the Anatomical Reference Point in Posterior Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study
Objective: Minimally invasive atlantoaxial surgery offers the benefits of reduced trauma and quicker recovery. Previous studies have focused on feasibility and technical aspects, but the lack of comprehensive safety information has limited its availability and widespread use. This study proposes to define the feasibility and range of surgical safety using the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique as a reference point.
Methods: Dissection was performed on 10 fresh cadavers to define the anatomical reference point as the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle. The study aimed to analyze the safety range of minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion surgery by measuring the distance between the anatomical reference point and the transverse foramen of the axis, the distance between the anatomical reference point and the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas, and the distance between the anatomical reference point and the spinal canal. Measurements were compared using Student's t test.
Results: The point where the occipital greater nerve intersects with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle was defined as the anatomical marker for minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery. The distance between this anatomical marker and the transverse foramen of the axis was measured to be 9.32 ± 2.04 mm. Additionally, the distance to the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas was found to be 21.29 ± 1.93 mm, and the distance to the spinal canal was measured to be 11.53 ± 2.18 mm. These measurement results can aid surgeons in protecting the vertebral artery and dura mater during minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery.
Conclusions: The intersection of the greater occipital nerve with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle is a safe and reliable anatomical landmark in minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery.
Atlantoaxial Surgery / Minimally Invasive / Posterior / Reference Points
[1] |
WangM, LuoXJ, DengQX, Li JH, WangN. Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):2302–2310.
|
[2] |
FujibayashiS, NeoM, YoshidaM, Miyata M, TakemotoM, NakamuraT. Neck muscle strength before and after cervical laminoplasty: relation to axial symptoms. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(3):197–202.
|
[3] |
KatoM, Nakamura H, KonishiS, DohzonoS, ToyodaH, FukushimaW, et al. Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2008;33(14):E455–E459.
|
[4] |
LinW, SongJ, ZhangY, Yao S, YiM, YaoM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of modified laminoplasty with preservation of muscle group inserted into C2 and C7 spinous processes versus conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Int J Surg. 2023;109(4):905–912.
|
[5] |
WangSL, KanlinGL, XuNF, TianYL, JinJY, Li WW. Efficacy comparison of minimally invasive atlantoaxial mass fusion and open atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;102(33):2583–2589. Chinese.
|
[6] |
GelinneA, Abumoussa AL, BhowmickDA. Case report: minimally invasive modification of the Goel-Harms atlantoaxial fusion utilizing percutaneous screws and intra-articular cage is feasible and results in decreased blood loss. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022;13(2):198–200.
|
[7] |
GelinneA, PiazzaM, BhowmickDA. Minimally invasive modification of the Goel-Harms atlantoaxial fusion technique: a case series and illustrative guide. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(3):E14.
|
[8] |
JosefferSS, PostN, CooperPR, Frempong-Boadu AK. Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fixation with a polyaxial screw-rod construct: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(4 Suppl 2):ONS–E375; discussion ONS-E375.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
HollyLT, IsaacsRE, Frempong-BoaduAK. Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3):193–197.
|
[10] |
DíazR, BerbeoME, VillalobosLM, VergaraMF, OsorioE. Minimally invasive posterior trans-muscular C1-C2 screw fixation through an anatomical corridor to preserve occipitocervical tension band: surgical anatomy and clinical experience. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2014;40:261–271.
|
[11] |
SrikanthaU, Khanapure KS, JagannathaAT, JoshiKC, VarmaRG, HegdeAS. Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion: cadaveric study and report of 5 clinical cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(6):675–680.
|
[12] |
SpiessbergerA, Stauffer A, BaumannF, MarbacherS, Kothbauer K, FandinoJ, et al. Splitting of the semispinalis capitis muscle as a less invasive approach for atlantoaxial fusion—a technical note. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;62:260–263.
|
[13] |
MathkourM, Iwanaga J, LoukasM, BuiCJ, DumontAS, TubbsRS. Muscle sparing C1-C2 laminoplasty: cadaveric feasibility study. World Neurosurg. 2021;147:e234–e238.
|
[14] |
SriamornrattanakulK, Akharathammachote N, ChonhenchobA, MongkolratnanA, Niljianskul N, PhoominaoninIS, et al. Course of the V3 segment of the vertebral artery relative to the suboccipital triangle as an anatomical marker for a safe far lateral approach: a retrospective clinical study. Surg Neurol Int. 2022;15(13):304.
|
[15] |
BalikV, Takizawa K. Safe and bloodless exposure of the third segment of the vertebral artery: a step-by-step overview based on over 50 personal cases. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(4):991–997.
|
[16] |
La RoccaG, Altieri R, RicciardiL, OliviA, Della Pepa GM. Anatomical study of occipital triangles: the ‘inferior’ suboccipital triangle, a useful vertebral artery landmark for safe postero-lateral skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(10):1887–1891.
|
[17] |
CesmebasiA, Muhleman MA, HulsbergP, GieleckiJ, MatuszP, TubbsRS, et al. Occipital neuralgia: anatomic considerations. Clin Anat. 2015;28(1):101–108.
|
[18] |
BovimG, Bonamico L, FredriksenTA, LindboeCF, Stolt-Nielsen A, SjaastadO. Topographic variations in the peripheral course of the greater occipital nerve. Autopsy study with clinical correlations. Spine. 1991;16(4):475–478.
|
[19] |
SchererSS, Schiraldi L, SapinoG, Cambiaso-DanielJ, Gualdi A, PeledZM, et al. The greater occipital nerve and obliquus capitis inferior muscle: anatomical interactions and implications for occipital pain syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(3):730–736.
|
[20] |
BodonG, Patonay L, BaksaG, OlerudC. Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1-C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(10):1063–1069.
|
[21] |
JiangWB, ZhangZH, YuSB, SunJX, DingSW, Ma GJ, et al. Scanning electron microscopic observation of Myodural bridge in the human suboccipital region. Spine. 2020;45(20):E1296–E1301.
|
[22] |
GreenbergAD. Atlanto-axial dislocations. Brain. 1968;91(4):655–684.
|
[23] |
WangS, WangC, YanM, ZhouH, DangG. Novel surgical classification and treatment strategy for atlantoaxial dislocations. Spine. 2013;38(21):E1348–E1356.
|
[24] |
MaXY, YinQS, WuZH, XiaH, ZhongSZ, Liu JF, et al. Anatomic evaluation the entry point of C2 pedicle screw. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44(8):562–564. Chinese.
|
[25] |
HarmsJ, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine. 2001;26(22):2467–2471.
|
[26] |
GoelA, DesaiKI, MuzumdarDP. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(6):1351–1357.
|
[27] |
NeoM, Fujibayashi S, MiyataM, TakemotoM, Nakamura T. Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations. Spine. 2008;33(7):779–785.
|
[28] |
LvovI, GrinA, TalypovA, Smirnov V, KordonskiyA, BarbakadzeZ, et al. Efficacy and safety of Goel-Harms technique in upper cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;167:e1169–e1184.
|
[29] |
PengCW, ChouBT, BendoJA, Spivak JM. Vertebral artery injury in cervical spine surgery: anatomical considerations, management, and preventive measures. Spine J. 2009;9:70–76.
|
[30] |
WoodroffeRW, Nourski KV, HellandLC, WalshB, Noeller J, KerezoudisP, et al. Management of iatrogenic spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: a cohort of 124 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;170:61–66.
|
[31] |
HuangS, LiangT, SunX, ChenL, JiangJ, Chen J, et al. Can the risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage Be predicted for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery? development and evaluation of a new predictive nomogram. World Neurosurg. 2022;159:e70–e78.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |