One-stage Neurorrhaphy and Posterior Transposition with Gastrocnemius Fascial Flap for Common Peroneal Nerve Injury: Preliminary Results
Hui Chen, Jie Chen, Shulin Li, Qian Zhao, Lei Xu, Li Li
One-stage Neurorrhaphy and Posterior Transposition with Gastrocnemius Fascial Flap for Common Peroneal Nerve Injury: Preliminary Results
Objective: Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury is a frequently encountered lower extremity injury. Furthermore, several previous studies have demonstrated that patients who underwent direct suturing of the CPN following rupture experienced unfavorable postoperative prognoses. Therefore, we aimed to present a novel modified surgical approach for CPN rupture and assess the effectiveness of this technique in restoring lower limb functionality.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients with CPN rupture who underwent one-stage neurorrhaphy and posterior transposition combined with nerve wrapping using a gastrocnemius fascial flap for CPN rupture between January 2016 and December 2020. Lower limb function was evaluated using the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system. We also assessed the influence of age, sex, duration of symptoms, mechanism of injury, and surgical modality on the postoperative recovery of lower extremity function using subgroup and regression analyses.
Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age = 35.76 ± 13.01 years) with at least 2 years of follow-up were included in the final analysis. The LEFS scores significantly improved after surgery at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Moreover, 67.57% of the patients achieved good or excellent postoperative outcomes (BMRC: M3 or above). Results of the subgroup analysis and regression models suggested that patients who underwent direct suturing showed better recovery of lower extremity function than those who underwent nerve grafting.
Conclusion: One-stage neurorrhaphy and posterior transposition combined with nerve wrapping using a gastrocnemius fascial flap exhibited encouraging outcomes in restoring lower-limb function among patients with CPN rupture. This novel surgical technique is expected to be an effective method for treating CPN ruptures in the future.
Fascial flap / Foot drop / Limb / Nerve repair / Peroneal nerve
[1] |
PoageC, RothC, ScottB. Peroneal nerve palsy: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:1–10.
|
[2] |
BowleyMP. Doughty, CT entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103:371–382.
|
[3] |
GeorgeSC, BoyceDE. An evidence-based structured review to assess the results of common peroneal nerve repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:302e–311e.
|
[4] |
EmamhadiM, Bakhshayesh B, AndalibS. Surgical outcome of foot drop caused by common peroneal nerve injuries; is the glass half full or half empty? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158:1133–1138.
|
[5] |
KimDH, Murovic JA, TielRL, KlineDG. Management and outcomes in 318 operative common peroneal nerve lesions at the Louisiana State University health sciences center. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1421–1429.
|
[6] |
MatejcikV, StenoJ, BenetinJ, Kuchar M. Surgical treatment of injuries of nervus fibularis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102:361–364.
|
[7] |
SeidelJA, KoenigR, AntoniadisG, Richter HP, KretschmerT. Surgical treatment of traumatic peroneal nerve lesions. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:664–673.
|
[8] |
DemuynckM, ZukerRM. The peroneal nerve: is repair worthwhile? J Reconstr Microsurg. 1987;3:193–199.
|
[9] |
GarozzoD, Ferraresi S, BuffattiP. Common peroneal nerve injuries in knee dislocations: results with one-stage nerve repair and tibialis posterior tendon transfer. J Orthop Traumatol. 2002;2:135–137.
|
[10] |
SenesFM, CampusR, BecchettiF, Catena N. Lower limb nerve injuries in children. Microsurgery. 2007;27:32–36.
|
[11] |
OhtaS, Ikeguchi R, NoguchiT, KaizawaY, OdaH, MatsudaS. A proximally based sural fasciocutaneous flap for the treatment of recurrent peroneal neuropathy: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e815.
|
[12] |
BinkleyJM, Stratford PW, LottSA, RiddleDL. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic rehabilitation research network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371–383.
|
[13] |
MehlingI, LanzU, PrommersbergerKJ, FuhrmannRA, van Schoonhoven J. Transfer of the posterior tibialis tendon to restore an active dorsiflexion of the foot. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2012;44:29–34.
|
[14] |
ZhangQ, ChenH, LiuG, ZongH, LinH, HouC. Comparison of healing results between tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve after sciatic nerve injury repair in rhesus monkey. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016;30:608–611.
|
[15] |
RoganovicZ, Pavlicevic G. Difference in recovery potential of peripheral nerves after graft repairs. Neurosurgery. 2016;59:621–633.
|
[16] |
LinYF, XieZ, ZhouJ, Yin G, LinHD. Differential gene and protein expression between rat tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve during Wallerian degeneration. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:2183–2191.
|
[17] |
MurovicJA. Lower-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a Louisiana State University health sciences center literature review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 806 Louisiana State University health sciences center sciatic, common peroneal, and tibial nerve lesions. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A18–A23.
|
[18] |
KitamuraT, KimK, MorimotoD, Kokubo R, IwamotoN, IsuT, et al. Dynamic factors involved in common peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159:1777–1781.
|
[19] |
MehtaSP, FultonA, QuachC, Thistle M, ToledoC, EvansNA. Measurement properties of the lower extremity functional scale: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46:200–216.
|
[20] |
HorteurC, ForliA, CorcellaD, Pailhé R, LateurG, SaragagliaD. Short-and long-term results of common peroneal nerve injuries treated by neurolysis, direct suture or nerve graft. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:893–898.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |