Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the advantages of robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA) over conventional manual TKA (cmTKA) by comprehensively comparing patients who received raTKA and cmTKA in terms of postoperative pain, function, imaging assessment, and trauma to the body. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of raTKA in patients using the YUANHUA-TKA system.

Methods: In a prospective, randomized single-blind trial, 60 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA from October 2020 to December 2020 were randomly assigned to either raTKA or cmTKA. Clinical evaluation, including the time of osteotomy and prosthesis model testing, the total operation time, the visual analogue scale at rest, VAS in motion, opioid consumption, white blood cell count, neutrophil ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), passive and active range of motion (pROM, aROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC [stiffness, pain, and function]) score, gait analysis, keen society score (KSS), adverse events, and blood loss were collected by the project nurse, as well as the imaging evaluation, including the lateral tibia component angle (LTC), frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibia component angle (FTC), lateral femoral component angl, and hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA). The student t-test (or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and the χ²-test (or the Fisher exact test) were used to determine differences in categorical variables.

Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups in pain throughout the whole follow-up period. On the third day postoperatively, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the cmTKA group was significantly higher (p = 0.02), as well as the CRP (p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in the WOMAC stiffnes score or pROM. However, the aROM and the flexion range when walking (FRW) were significantly better in the raTKA group throughout the trial (p < 0.05). The KSS at the 1-month follow-up and the WOMAC function score at the 1-year follow-up were both significantly better in the raTKA group (p < 0.05). The HKA and the LTC in the raTKA group closer to the ideal angle, and the difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.05). The total operation time of the raTKA group was significantly longer (p = 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss had no significant difference in the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared with cmTKA, raTKA with the YUANHUA robot not only avoids extra pain and trauma in patients but promises better functional recovery and improves the accuracy of the prosthesis position and axial alignment reconstruction.

Keywords

Asian / efficacy / Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty / safety / YUANHUA-TKA system

References

[1] GohGS, LiowMHL, Bin Abd RazakHR, TayDK, LoNN, YeoSJ. Patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction rates in young patients aged 50 years or younger after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):419–425.

[2] YiZ, QiW, ChenS, Zhang Y, LiuB. A novel mini-invasive technique of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and robot-assisted fixation for trans-scaphoid Perilunate fracture dislocations. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(4):1203–1209.

[3] ZhangT, JiaZ, HanW, WangJ, LiJ, GongM, et al. Effectiveness and accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation system for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(3):878–887.

[4] HuangZ, MaJ, ShenB, Pei F. Combination of intravenous and topical application of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(12):2342–2346.

[5] XieJ, MaJ, YaoH, YueC, PeiF. Multiple boluses of intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce hidden blood loss after primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(11):2458–2464.

[6] DingZC, XuB, LiangZM, Wang HY, LuoZY, ZhouZK. Limited influence of comorbidities on length of stay after Total hip arthroplasty: experience of enhanced recovery after surgery. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):153–161.

[7] XuZ, ZhangH, LuoJ, ZhouA, ZhangJ. Preemptive analgesia by using celecoxib combined with tramadol/APAP alleviates post-operative pain of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Phys Sportsmed. 2017;45(3):316–322.

[8] GrossJB. Estimating allowable blood loss: corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology. 1983;58(3):277–280.

[9] NadlerSB, Hidalgo JH, BlochT. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery. 1962;51(2):224–232.

[10] KortN, Stirling P, PilotP, MüllerJH. Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment, but results are inconclusive on whether it improves clinical scores or reduces complications and revisions: a systematic overview of meta-analyses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;30:2639–2653.

[11] OnggoJR, OnggoJD, De SteigerR, Hau R. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(10):1533–1549.

[12] ParviziJ, MillerAG, GandhiK. Multimodal pain management after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(11):1075–1084.

[13] JenkinsD, Rodriguez J, RanawatA, AlexiadesM, Deshmukh A, FukunagaT, et al. A randomized, controlled, prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(10):851–858.

[14] ReidMJ, BoothG, KhanRJ, Janes G. Patellar eversion during total knee replacement: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(3):207–213.

[15] ZanP, SunW, YangY, Cai X, MaX, LiG. No difference in clinical outcome between patella eversion and lateral retraction in total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(6):1791–1798.

[16] YuanM, WangY, WangH, Ding Z, XiaoQ, ZhouZ. Optimal handling of the patella in tourniquet-free total knee arthroplasty: eversion or lateral retraction? Orthop Surg. 2020;12(6):1870–1881.

[17] Varela-EgocheagaJR, Suárez-Suárez MA, Fernández-Villán M, González-SastreV, Varela-GómezJR, Rodríguez-MerchánC. Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(5):1200–1208.

[18] DongJ, MinS, HeKH, PengLH, CaoJ, RanW. Effects of the nontourniquet combined with controlled hypotension technique on pain and long-term prognosis in elderly patients after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth. 2019;33(5):587–593.

[19] KimYH, ParkJW, KimJS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):379–385.

[20] MarchandRC, SodhiN, KhlopasA, Sultan AA, HigueraCA, StearnsKL, et al. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(1):2–5.

[21] MarchandKB, Ehiorobo J, MathewKK, MarchandRC, MontMA. Learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for a high-volume surgeon. J Knee Surg. 2022;35(4):409–415.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.