3D-Printed Personalized Lattice Implant as an Innovative Strategy to Reconstruct Geographic Defects in Load-Bearing Bones

Abstract

Objective: Geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones presents formidable challenges for orthopaedic surgeon. The use of 3D-printed personalized implants presents a compelling opportunity to address this issue. This study aims to design, manufacture, and evaluate 3D-printed personalized implants with irregular lattice porous structures for geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones, focusing on feasibility, osseointegration, and patient outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective study involved seven patients who received 3D-printed personalized lattice implants for the reconstruction of geographic defects in load-bearing bones. Personalized implants were customized for each patient. Randomized dodecahedron unit cells were incorporated within the implants to create the porous structure. The pore size and porosity were analyzed. Patient outcomes were assessed through a combination of clinical and radiological evaluations. Tomosynthesis-Shimadzu metal artifact reduction technology (T-SMART) was utilized to evaluate osseointegration. Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 score.

Results: Multiple pore sizes were observed in porous structures of the implant, with a wide distribution range (approximately 300–900 um). The porosity analysis results showed that the average porosity of irregular porous structures was around 75.03%. The average follow-up time was 38.4 months, ranging from 25 to 50 months. Postoperative X-rays showed that the implants matched the geographic bone defect well. Osseointegration assessments according to T-SMART images indicated a high degree of bone-to-implant contact, along with favorable bone density around the implants. Patient outcomes assessments revealed significant improvements in functional outcomes, with the average MSTS score of 27.3 (range, 26–29). There was no implant-related complication, such as aseptic loosening or structure failure.

Conclusion: 3D-printed personalized lattice implants offer an innovative and promising strategy for geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones. This approach has the potential to match the unique contours and geometry of the geographic bone defect and facilitate osteointegration.

Keywords

3D-Printed Personalized Implant / Geographic Defect / Lattice Structure / Load-Bearing Bone / Osteointegration

References

[1] NomikosGC, Murphey MD, KransdorfMJ, BancroftLW, Peterson JJ. Primary bone tumors of the lower extremities. Radiol Clin. 2002;40(5):971–990.

[2] LiuQ, HeH, DuanZ, Zeng H, YuanY, WangZ, et al. Intercalary allograft to reconstruct large-segment diaphysis defects after resection of lower extremity malignant bone tumor. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:4299–4308.

[3] SandersP, Spierings J, AlbergoJ, BusMPA, FioccoM, FarfalliGL, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of intercalary allograft reconstruction for lower-extremity bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(12):1042–1049.

[4] WongKC, SzeLKY, KumtaSM. Complex joint-preserving bone tumor resection and reconstruction using computer navigation and 3D-printed patient-specific guides: a technical note of three cases. J Orthopaedic Transl. 2021;29:152–162.

[5] AgarwalM, PuriA, AnchanC, Shah M, JambhekarN. Hemicortical excision for low-grade selected surface sarcomas of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:161–166.

[6] AvedianRS, HaydonRC, PeabodyTD. Multiplanar osteotomy with limited wide margins: a tissue preserving surgical technique for high-grade bone sarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2754–2764.

[7] DeijkersR, BloemR, HogendoornP, Verlaan JJ, KroonHM, TaminiauAHM. Hemicortical allograft reconstruction after resection of low-grade malignant bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(7):1009–1014.

[8] BenadyA, MeyerJS, RanY, MorY, GurelR, Rumack N, et al. Intercalary and geographic lower limb tumor resections with the use of 3D printed patient specific instruments-when less is more. J Orthop. 2022;32:36–42.

[9] AlemayehuDG, ZhangZ, TahirE, et al. Preoperative planning using 3D printing technology in orthopedic surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1–9.

[10] MalikHH, Darwood AR, ShaunakS, KulatilakeP, el-Hilly AA, MulkiO, et al. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res. 2015;199(2):512–522.

[11] Kumar GuptaD, AliMH, AliA, et al. 3D printing technology in healthcare: applications, regulatory understanding, IP repository and clinical trial status. J Drug Target. 2022;30(2):131–150.

[12] BozkurtY, Karayel E. 3D printing technology; methods, biomedical applications, future opportunities and trends. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;14:1430–1450.

[13] BhushanJ, GroverV. Additive manufacturing: current concepts, methods, and applications in oral health care. Biomanufacturing. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 103–122.

[14] WongK, KumtaS, GeelN, Demol J. One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Comput Aided Surg. 2015;20(1):14–23.

[15] ZhaoD, TangF, MinL, LuM, WangJ, Zhang Y, et al. Intercalary reconstruction of the “ultra-critical sized bone defect” by 3D-printed porous prosthesis after resection of tibial malignant tumor. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:2503–2512.

[16] XuL, QinH, TanJ, ChengZ, LuoX, TanH, et al. Clinical study of 3D printed personalized prosthesis in the treatment of bone defect after pelvic tumor resection. J Orthopaedic Transl. 2021;29:163–169.

[17] ZhangB, PeiX, ZhouC, Fan Y, JiangQ, RoncaA, et al. The biomimetic design and 3D printing of customized mechanical properties porous Ti6Al4V scaffold for load-bearing bone reconstruction. Mater Des. 2018;152:30–39.

[18] PeiX, WuL, ZhouC, Fan H, GouM, LiZ, et al. 3D printed titanium scaffolds with homogeneous diamond-like structures mimicking that of the osteocyte microenvironment and its bone regeneration study. Biofabrication. 2020;13(1):015008.

[19] KumawatS, Deshmukh SR, GhorpadeR. Fabrication of Ti-6Al-4v cellular lattice structure using selective laser melting for orthopedic use: a review. Mater Today Proc. 2023;8:53-70.

[20] ChaoL, JiaoC, LiangH, Xie D, ShenL, LiuZ. Analysis of mechanical properties and permeability of trabecular-like porous scaffold by additive manufacturing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:779854.

[21] PeiX, WangL, ZhouC, Wu L, LeiH, FanS, et al. Ti6Al4V orthopedic implant with biomimetic heterogeneous structure via 3D printing for improving osteogenesis. Mater Des. 2022;221:110964.

[22] PeiX, WuL, LeiH, ZhouC, FanH, LiZ, et al. Fabrication of customized Ti6AI4V heterogeneous scaffolds with selective laser melting: optimization of the architecture for orthopedic implant applications. Acta Biomater. 2021;126:485–495.

[23] EnnekingWF, DunhamW, GebhardtMC, Malawar M, PritchardDJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007). 1993;286:241–246.

[24] MobbsRJ, Coughlan M, ThompsonR, SutterlinCE, PhanK. The utility of 3D printing for surgical planning and patient-specific implant design for complex spinal pathologies: case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(4):513–518.

[25] ArabnejadS, Johnston B, TanzerM, PasiniD. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(8):1774–1783.

[26] AbarB, Alonso-Calleja A, KellyA, KellyC, GallK, WestJL. 3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2021;109(1):54–63.

[27] WangZ, ZhangM, LiuZ, WangY, DongW, Zhao S, et al. Biomimetic design strategy of complex porous structure based on 3D printing Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration. Mater Des. 2022;218:110721.

[28] RenB, WanY, LiuC, WangH, YuM, ZhangX, et al. Improved osseointegration of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V implant with a hierarchical micro/nano surface topography: an in vitro and in vivo study. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;118:111505.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.