Early Outcomes of Bone Autografting in the Bilateral Atlantoaxial Joints Applied in Posterior Fusion Surgery

Abstract

Objective: Cable-dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation can provide promising results in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation or instability. However, bilateral atlantoaxial joints bone autografting has not been conducted in this technique. We aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bilateral atlantoaxial joints bone autografting in posterior cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 14 patients with a minimum 24-month follow-up from December 2019 to September 2020. The granular bone harvested from the iliac crest was packed into the bilateral atlantoaxial joints of 14 patients in posterior cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation. X-ray imaging and cervical computed tomography (CT) were performed during follow-up. The time required for bone fusion was recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the JOA scores, NDI, and VAS scores. Mann–Whitney U test, the chi-squared test, or the Fisher exact test were used to compare the two groups regarding patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, bone fusion rates, and cervical sagittal alignment.

Results: The operations were successfully performed in all patients without any intraoperative complications. The mean operation time was (169.64 ± 20.91) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was (130.71 ± 33.62) mL. All patients received satisfactory reductions and firm bony fusion at the final follow-up. The fusion rates were 64.29% in the atlantoaxial joints and 21.43% in post bone graft area at 3 months postoperatively, and a significant difference was observed (p = 0.022). Besides, the cervical sagittal alignment in all patients was well maintained in the last follow-up compared to preoperatively. Importantly, a complete bony fusion in the atlantoaxial joints was observed in all patients. Moreover, the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores had improved significantly at the last follow-up.

Conclusion: Bone autografting of the bilateral atlantoaxial joints is a safe and effective technique to increase bone fusion rates, shorten bone fusion time, and reduce complication rates when the cable-dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation approach is used. Therefore, it is a cost-effective surgical procedure for treating patients with atlantoaxial dislocation or instability.

Keywords

Atlantoaxial Fusion / Atlantoaxial Joints / Bone Graft / Cable / Cantilever Beam

References

[1] Yang JS, Chen H, Chu L, Liu P, Yan L, Liu TJ, et al. Does additional bone grafting of atlantoaxial joint increase bone fusion rate of iliac crest autograft in posterior occipitocervical fusion? Retrospective, controlled study with 2-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e29–e34.

[2] Zhou X, Li S, Liu H, Guo Q, Guo X, Chen F, et al. Comparison of two bone grafting techniques applied during posterior C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. World Neurosurg. 2020;143:e253–e260.

[3] Zhang L, Wang H. Biomechanical effects of lateral inclination C(1) and C(2) pedicle screws on atlantoaxial fixation. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(7):2027–2033.

[4] Liu X, Liu H, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Treatment of irreducible old atlantoaxial subluxation with cable-dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation. Spine. 2011;36(15):E983–E992.

[5] Shen Q, Xia Y, Xu T. Clinical outcomes of atlantoaxial dislocation combined with osteoporosis using posterior atlantoaxial rod, screw fixation, and posterior interfacet fusion: a retrospective study of 21 cases. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e925187.

[6] Li C, Li L, Li Z, Mei Y, Huang S. Surgical management for posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture and atlantoaxial dynamic test to confirm the integrity of the transverse ligament: a case report. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(2):451–455.

[7] Wang HW, Yin YH, Li T, Yu XG, Qiao GY. Effects of transverse connector on reduction and fixation of atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination using posterior C1-C2 screw-rod technique. Spine J. 2019;19(12):1995–2002.

[8] Ghaith AK, Yolcu YU, Alvi MA, Bhandarkar AR, Sebastian AS, Freedman BA, et al. Rate and characteristics of vertebral artery injury following C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021;148:118–126.

[9] Lall R, Patel NJ, Resnick DK. A review of complications associated with craniocervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(5):1396–1403.

[10] Rajinda P, Towiwat S, Chirappapha P. Comparison of outcomes after atlantoaxial fusion with C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screws and C1-C2 transarticular screws. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):1064–1072.

[11] Zhang YH, Shen L, Shao J, Chou D, Song J, Zhang J. Structural allograft versus autograft for instrumented atlantoaxial fusions in pediatric patients: radiologic and clinical outcomes in series of 32 patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:549–556.

[12] Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir. 1994;129(1–2):47–53.

[13] Li S, Ni B, Xie N, Wang M, Guo X, Zhang F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion cage with C1-C2 pedicle fixation. Spine. 2010;35(14):E624–E632.

[14] Wang YL, Wang XY. Improved bone graft method for upper cervical surgery with posterior approach: technical description and report of 52 cases. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e66–e69.

[15] Wang LN, Li T, Yang X, Wang L, Liu LM, Liu H, et al. Comparison of two temporary fixation techniques for the treatment of type II odontoid fracture. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84(1):108–115.

[16] Zhu C, Wang L, Liu H, Song Y, Liu L, Li T, et al. Treatment of type II odontoid fracture with a novel technique: titanium cable-dragged reduction and cantilever-beam internal fixation. Medicine. 2017;96(44):e8521.

[17] Stemper BD, Marawar SV, Yoganandan N, Shender BS, Rao RD. Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques. Spine. 2008;33(8):893–897.

[18] Eck KR, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Gilula LA, Lashgari CJ, Riew KD. Radiographic assessment of anterior titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(6):501–509.

[19] Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Boah A, Morsi A, Ma T, Smith ML, et al. Atlantoaxial fusion with screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(2):411–421.

[20] Guo X, Ni B, Xie N, Lu X, Guo Q, Lu M. Bilateral C1-C2 transarticular screw and C1 laminar hook fixation and bone graft fusion for reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a seven-year analysis of outcome. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87676.

[21] Huang DG, Zhang XL, Hao DJ, Yu CC, Mi BB, Yuan QL, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fusion with a screw-rod system: allograft versus iliac crest autograft. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;162:95–100.

[22] Ishida W, Ramhmdani S, Xia Y, Kosztowski TA, Xu R, Choi J, et al. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 at the C1-C2 lateral articulation without posterior structural bone graft in posterior atlantoaxial fusion in adult patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e69–e76.

[23] Goel A. Atlantoaxial joint jamming as a treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary report. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(1):90–94.

[24] Martin MD, Bruner HJ, Maiman DJ. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations of the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3):2–6.

[25] Ghostine SS, Kaloostian PE, Ordookhanian C, Kaloostian S, Zarrini P, Kim T, et al. Improving C1-C2 complex fusion rates: an alternate approach. Cureus. 2017;9(11):e1887.

[26] Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clinical Biomechanics. Volume 15. Bristol, Avon: Elsevier; 2000. p. 633–648.

[27] Frost HM. Wolff's law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175–188.

[28] He B, Yan L, Xu Z, Chang Z, Hao D. The causes and treatment strategies for the postoperative complications of occipitocervical fusion: a 316 cases retrospective analysis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(8):1720–1724.

[29] de Carvalho PS, Vasconcellos LW, Pi J. Influence of bed preparation on the incorporation of autogenous bone grafts: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(4):565–570.

[30] He X, Meng Y, Zhang J, Hang Y, Yang J, Wu Q, et al. Bone grafting of atlantoaxial joints and occipitocervical or atlantoaxial fusion for the reduction and fixation of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation by a posterior approach: a preliminary study. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:230–235.

[31] Kaufman HH, Jones E. The principles of bony spinal fusion. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(2):264–270.

[32] Huang DG, Hao DJ, He BR, Wu QN, Liu TJ, Wang XD, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2271–2281.

[33] Tang C, Li GZ, Liao YH, Tang Q, Ma F, Wang Q, et al. Importance of the occipitoaxial angle and posterior occipitocervical angle in occipitocervical fusion. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(6):1054–1063.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.