Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Decompression and Fusion, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, and Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis
Qingjie Kong, Fudong Li, Chen Yan, Jingchuan Sun, Peidong Sun, Jun Ou-Yang, Shizhen Zhong, Yuan Wang, Jiangang Shi
Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Decompression and Fusion, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, and Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis
Purpose: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy poses significant challenges in selecting optimal surgical approaches, warranting a comprehensive understanding of their biomechanical impacts. Given the lack of consensus regarding the most effective technique, this study aims to fill this critical knowledge gap by rigorously assessing and comparing the biomechanical properties of three distinct surgical interventions, including anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion (ACCF), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The study offers pivotal insights to enhance treatment precision and patient outcomes.
Methods: The construction of the cervical spine model involved a detailed process using CT data, specialized software (Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and Hypermesh) and material properties obtained from prior studies. Surgical instruments were modeled (titanium mesh, anterior cervical plate, interbody cage, and self-tapping screws) to simulate three surgical approaches: ACAF, ACCF, and ACDF, each with specific procedures replicating clinical protocols. A 75-N follower load with 2 Nm was applied to simulate biomechanical effects.
Results: The range of motion decreased more after surgery for ACAF and ACDF than for ACCF, especially in flexion and lateral bending. ACCF have higher stress peaks in the fixation system than those of ACAF and ACDF, especially in flexion. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone–screw interfaces at C3 of ACCF were higher than those of ACAF and ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone–screw interfaces at C6 of ACDF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACCF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the grafts of ACCF and ACAF were much higher than those of ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the endplate of ACCF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACDF.
Conclusion: The ACAF and ACDF models demonstrated superior cervical reconstruction stability over the ACCF model. ACAF exhibited lower risks of internal fixation failure and cage subsidence compared to ACCF, making it a promising approach. However, while ACAF revealed improved stability over ACCF, higher rates of subsidence and internal fixation failure persisted compared to ACDF, suggesting the need for further exploration of ACAF's long-term efficacy and potential improvements in clinical outcomes.
Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion / Biomechanics / Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy / Finite Element Analysis / Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
[1] |
Jutzeler CR, Ulrich A, Huber B, Rosner J, Kramer J, Curt A. Improved diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with contact heat evoked potentials. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:2045–2053.
|
[2] |
Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Chapman JR, Brodke DS. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:S173–S182.
|
[3] |
McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC, Butler AJ, Donnally CJ. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a guide to diagnosis and management. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:303–313.
|
[4] |
Luo J, Cao K, Huang S, Li L, Yu T, Cao C, et al. Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1621–1630.
|
[5] |
Ouyang P, Li J, He X, Dong H, Zang Q, Li H, et al. Biomechanical comparison of 1-level corpectomy and 2-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a finite element analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919270.
|
[6] |
Lau D, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:280–289.
|
[7] |
Ji C, Yu S, Yan N, Wang J, Hou F, Hou T, et al. Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:32.
|
[8] |
Setzer M, Eleraky M, Johnson WM, Aghayev K, Tran ND, Vrionis FD. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:579–584.
|
[9] |
Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:654–660.
|
[10] |
Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H, Aiba A, Kadota R, Inada T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (−) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:2294–2301.
|
[11] |
Gore DR. The arthrodesis rate in multilevel anterior cervical fusions using autogenous fibula. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1259–1263.
|
[12] |
Sun J, Shi J, Xu X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Kong Q, et al. Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:1469–1478.
|
[13] |
Wang H, Sun J, Sun K, Li X, Wang Y, Xu X, et al. Anterior controllable Antedisplacement fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis: comparison with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e740–e747.
|
[14] |
Chen Y, Sun J, Yuan X, et al. Comparison of anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion with posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective, randomized, and control study with at least 1-year follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45:1091–1101.
|
[15] |
Kong QJ, Luo X, Tan Y, Sun JC, Wang Y, Tan L, et al. Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) vs posterior laminoplasty for multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: retrospective study based on a two-year follow-up. Orthop Surg. 2021;13:474–483.
|
[16] |
Li S, Peng J, Xu R, Zheng R, Huang M, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of the surgeries for the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-related cervical spondylosis: a PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e24900.
|
[17] |
Yang H, Sun J, Shi J, Guo Y, Zheng B, Wang Y, et al. Anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion as a choice for 28 patients of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with dura ossification: the risk of cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:370–379.
|
[18] |
Zhang B, Sun J, Xu X, Shi J, Guo Y, Sun K, et al. Skip corpectomy and fusion (SCF) versus anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF): which is better for patients with multilevel cervical OPLL. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:1533–1541.
|
[19] |
Xie T, Qian J, Lu Y, Chen B, Jiang Y, Luo C. Biomechanical comparison of laminectomy, hemilaminectomy and a new minimally invasive approach in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical intradural tumour: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2719–2730.
|
[20] |
Wu TK, Meng Y, Wang BY, Rong X, Hong Y, Ding C, et al. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:49.
|
[21] |
Lee SH, Im YJ, Kim KT, Kim YH, Park WM, Kim K. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:700–708.
|
[22] |
Wu TK, Meng Y, Liu H, Wang BY, Hong Y, Rong X, et al. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis. Spine J. 2019;19:1254–1263.
|
[23] |
Wu W, Chen C, Ning J, Sun P, Zhang J, Wu C, et al. A novel anterior transpedicular screw artificial vertebral body system for lower cervical spine fixation: a finite element study. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139(6):061003.
|
[24] |
Zheng Y, Wang J, Liao S, Zhang D, Zhang J, Ma L, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel integrated artificial axis: a finite element study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8597.
|
[25] |
Su Y, Wang X, Ren D, Liu Y, Liu S, Wang P. A finite element study on posterior short segment fixation combined with unilateral fixation using pedicle screws for stable thoracolumbar fracture. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e12046.
|
[26] |
Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A, Oda T, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, et al. Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:2692–2700.
|
[27] |
Zhao L, Chen J, Liu J, Elsamaloty L, Liu X, Li J, et al. Biomechanical analysis on of anterior transpedicular screw-fixation after two-level cervical corpectomy using finite element method. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018;60:76–82.
|
[28] |
Liu Q, Guo Q, Yang J, Zhang P, Xu T, Cheng X, et al. Subaxial cervical intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following atlantoaxial fixation in different angles. World Neurosurg. 2016;87:521–528.
|
[29] |
Ying Z, Xinwei W, Jing Z, Shengming X, Bitao L, Tao Z, et al. Cervical corpectomy with preserved posterior vertebral wall for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a randomized control clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1482–1487.
|
[30] |
Hillard VH, Apfelbaum RI. Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for multilevel cervical discectomy. Spine J. 2006;6:242S–251S.
|
[31] |
Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:845–849.
|
[32] |
Kong QJ, Sun XF, Wang Y, Sun PD, Sun JC, Ouyang J, et al. New anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37:1–9.
|
[33] |
Ashkenazi E, Smorgick Y, Rand N, Millgram MA, Mirovsky Y, Floman Y. Anterior decompression combined with corpectomies and discectomies in the management of multilevel cervical myelopathy: a hybrid decompression and fixation technique. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:205–209.
|
[34] |
Zárate-Kalfopulos B, Araos-Silva W, Reyes-Sánchez A, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Melendez FL. Hybrid decompression and fixation technique for the treatment of multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:30.
|
[35] |
Smith GA, Pace J, Corriveau M, Lee S, Mroz TE, Nassr A, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute implant extrusion following anterior cervical spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2017;7:40S–45S.
|
[36] |
Pinder EM, Sharp DJ. Cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a cage alone or combined with anterior plate fixation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016;24:97–100.
|
[37] |
Wu J, Luo D, Ye X, Luo X, Yan L, Qian H. Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:7405–7411.
|
[38] |
DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Vossel KA, Rampersaud YR, Jansen TH. Anterior cervical plating reverses load transfer through multilevel strut-grafts. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:783–795.
|
[39] |
Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB. Corpectomy versus discectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology: a finite element model analysis. Spine J. 2012;12:401–408.
|
[40] |
Zhang KR, Yang Y, Ma LT, Qiu Y, Wang BY, Ding C, et al. Biomechanical effects of a novel anatomic titanium mesh cage for single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:881979.
|
[41] |
Lu T, Liang H, Liu C, Guo S, Zhang T, Yang B, et al. Effects of titanium mesh cage end structures on the compressive load at the endplate Interface: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:2863–2870.
|
[42] |
Lee DH, Riew KD, Choi SH, Im SB, Nam WD, Yoon YS, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel anterior decompression technique for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:332–341.
|
[43] |
Seng C, Tow BP, Siddiqui MA, et al. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J. 2013;13:723–731.
|
[44] |
Kagan R, Adams J, Schulman C, Laursen R, Espana K, Yoo J, et al. What factors are associated with failure of compressive osseointegration fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:698–704.
|
[45] |
Lee DH, Park S, Hong CG, Park KB, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, et al. Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2021;21:1089–1098.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |