Distal Junctional Failures in Degenerative Thoracolumbar Hyperkyphosis

Abstract

Objective: Degenerative thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis (DTH) is a disease that negatively affects individual health and requires surgical intervention, yet the ideal surgical approach and complications, especially distal junctional failures (DJF), remain poorly understood. This study aims to investigate DJF in DTH and to identify the risk factors for DJF so that we can improve surgical decision-making, and advance our knowledge in the field of spinal surgery to enhance patient outcomes.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 78 cases (late osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture [OVCF], 51; Scheuermann's kyphosis [SK], 17; and degenerative disc diseases [DDD], 10) who underwent corrective surgery in our institute from 2008 to 2019. Clinical outcomes were assessed using health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, including the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Multiple radiographic parameters, such as global kyphosis (GK) and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), were assessed to determine radiographic outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors associated with DJF.

Results: HRQOL improved, and GK, TLK decreased at the final follow-up, with a correction rate of 67.7% and 68.5%, respectively. DJF was found in 13 of 78 cases (16.7%), two cases had wedging in the disc (L3-4) below the instrumentation, one case had a fracture of the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV), one case had osteoporotic fracture below the fixation, nine cases had pull-out or loosening of the screws at the LIV and three cases (23.1%) required revision surgery. The DJF group had older age, lower computed tomography Hounsfield unit (CT HU), longer follow-up, more blood loss, greater preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and poorer postoperative JOA and VAS scores (back). The change in TLK level was larger in the non-DJF group. Post-sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV) moved cranially compared with pre-SSV.

Conclusion: Age, CT HU, length of follow-up, estimated blood loss, and preoperative SVA were independent risk factors for DJF. We recommend fixation of the two vertebrae below the apex vertebrae for DTH to minimize surgical trauma.

Keywords

Degenerative thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis / Distal junctional failures / Fusion range / Risk factor / Sagittal stable vertebra

References

[1] RoghaniT, ZaviehMK, ManshadiFD, King N, KatzmanW. Age-related hyperkyphosis: update of its potential causes and clinical impacts-narrative review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(4):567–577.

[2] AilonT, Shaffrey CI, LenkeLG, HarropJS, SmithJS. Progressive spinal kyphosis in the aging population. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S164–S172.

[3] KoeléMC, LemsWF, WillemsHC. The clinical relevance of Hyperkyphosis: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;24(11):5.

[4] AilonT, SmithJS, ShaffreyCI, Lenke LG, BrodkeD, HarropJS, et al. Degenerative spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S75–S91.

[5] WangY, ZhuW, SunK, KongC, WangW, Lu S. Selecting proper distal fusion level in severe thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to late osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture to limit distal complications. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(6):1177–1184.

[6] CecchinatoR, Berjano P, DamilanoM, LamartinaC. Spinal osteotomies to treat post-traumatic thoracolumbar deformity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(Suppl 1):S31–S37.

[7] FloccariLV, SuAW, McIntoshAL, Rathjen K, ShaughnessyWJ, LarsonAN. Distal junctional failure following pediatric spinal fusion. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(4):202–208.

[8] BerjanoP, Damilano M, PejronaM, LangellaF, Lamartina C. Revision surgery in distal junctional kyphosis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(Suppl 1):86–102.

[9] ArletV, AebiM. Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S276–S295.

[10] YanikHS, Ketenci IE, CoskunT, UlusoyA, ErdemS. Selection of distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion of Scheuermann kyphosis: is fusion to sagittal stable vertebra necessary? Eur Spine J. 2016;25(2):583–589.

[11] ChoKJ, LenkeLG, BridwellKH, Kamiya M, SidesB. Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(8):765–770.

[12] GhasemiA, StubigT, NastoLA, Ahmed M, MehdianH. Distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Scheuermann's disease: a retrospective radiographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):913–920.

[13] GongY, YuanL, HeM, YuM, ZengY, Liu X, et al. Comparison between stable sagittal vertebra and first Lordotic vertebra instrumentation for prevention of distal junctional kyphosis in Scheuermann disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(8):330–336.

[14] GenantHK, WuCY, VankuijkC, Nevitt MC. vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137–1148.

[15] SebaalyA, Farjallah S, KharratK, KreichatiG, DaherM. Scheuermann's kyphosis: update on pathophysiology and surgical treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(11):782–791.

[16] BraithwaiteI, WhiteJ, SaifuddinA, Renton P, TaylorBA. Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(5):363–368.

[17] SardarZM, AmesRJ, LenkeL. Scheuermann's kyphosis: diagnosis, management, and selecting fusion levels. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(10):e462–e472.

[18] LiuFY, ZhaoZQ, RenL, GuZF, LiF, DingWY, et al. Modified grade 4 osteotomy for kyphosis due to old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(52):e13846.

[19] LiuFY, GuZF, ZhaoZQ, Ren L, WangLM, YuJH, et al. Modified grade 4 osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis: a retrospective study of 42 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(37):e22204.

[20] ZouD, LiW, DengC, Du G, XuN. The use of CT Hounsfield unit values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(8):1758–1766.

[21] ProtopsaltisT, SchwabF, BronsardN, Smith JS, KlinebergE, MundisG, et al. TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(19):1631–1640.

[22] MatsumotoK, Hoshino M, OmoriK, IgarashiH, Tsuruta T, YamasakiK, et al. Compensatory mechanism of the spine after corrective surgery without lumbar-sacral fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar kyphotic spine deformity. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(2):253–257.

[23] YangJ, AndrasLM, BroomAM, Gonsalves NR, BarrettKK, GeorgiadisAG, et al. Preventing distal junctional kyphosis by applying the stable sagittal vertebra concept to selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2018;6(1):38–42.

[24] DenisF, SunEC, WinterRB. Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):E729–E734.

[25] ChoKJ, SukSI, ParkSR, Kim JH, KangSB, KimHS, et al. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(17):1595–1601.

[26] KwonBK, ElgafyH, KeynanO, Fisher CG, BoydMC, PaquetteSJ, et al. Progressive junctional kyphosis at the caudal end of lumbar instrumented fusion: etiology, predictors, and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17):1943–1951.

[27] YasudaT, Hasegawa T, YamatoY, KobayashiS, TogawaD, BannoT, et al. Lumbosacral junctional failures after long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity-which vertebra is the preferred distal instrumented vertebra? Spine Deform. 2016;4(5):378–384.

[28] TezerenG, KuruI. Posterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fixation versus long-segment instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(6):485–488.

[29] YilgorC, Sogunmez N, BoissiereL, YavuzY, ObeidI, KleinstückF, et al. Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(19):1661–1672.

[30] KwanKYH, LenkeLG, ShaffreyCI, Carreon LY, DahlBT, FehlingsMG, et al. Are higher global alignment and proportion scores associated with increased risks of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery? An external validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(2):312–320.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.