A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Morphological Parameters of Lower Limbs in Chinese Non-knee Osteoarthritis Populations

Xu Jiang, Kai Xie, Hongyu Chen, Kai Zhang, Yuqi Hu, Tianyou Kan, Lin Sun, Songtao Ai, Xianping Zhu, Lichi Zhang, Mengning Yan, Liao Wang

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 452-461. DOI: 10.1111/os.13952
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Morphological Parameters of Lower Limbs in Chinese Non-knee Osteoarthritis Populations

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives:: Analyzing the lower limb coronal morphological parameters in populations without knee osteoarthritis (KOA) holds significant value in predicting, diagnosing, and formulating surgical strategies for KOA. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variability in these parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations, employing a substantial sample size.

Methods:: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was performed on the Chinese non-KOA populations (n = 407; 49.9% females). The study employed an in-house developed artificial intelligence software to meticulously assess the coronal morphological parameters of all 814 lower limbs. The parameters evaluated included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral-proximal-femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral-distal-femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial-proximal-tibial angle (mMPTA), and mechanical lateral-distal-tibial angle (mLDTA). Differences in these parameters were compared between left and right limbs, different genders, and different age groups (with 50 years as the cut-off point).

Results:: HKAA and JLCA exhibited left–right differences (left vs. right: 178.2° ± 3.0° vs. 178.6° ± 2.9° for HKAA, p = 0.001; and 1.8° ± 1.5° vs. 1.4° ± 1.6° for JLCA, p < 0.001); except for the mLPFA, all other parameters show gender-related differences (male vs. female: 177.9° ± 2.8° vs. 179.0° ± 3.0° for HKAA, p < 0.001; 1.5° ± 1.5° vs. 1.8° ± 1.7° for JLCA, p = 0.003; 87.1° ± 2.1° vs. 88.1° ± 2.1° for mMPTA, p < 0.001; 90.2° ± 4.0° vs. 91.1° ± 3.2° for mLDTA, p < 0.001; 38.7% ± 12.9% vs. 43.6% ± 14.1% for WBLR, p < 0.001; and 87.7° ± 2.3° vs. 87.4° ± 2.7° for mLDTA, p = 0.045); mLPFA increase with age (younger vs. older: 90.1° ± 7.2° vs. 93.4° ± 4.9° for mLPFA, p < 0.001), while no statistical difference exists for other parameters.

Conclusions:: There were differences in lower limb coronal morphological parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations between left and right sides, different genders, and age.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence / Chinese Populations / Knee Osteoarthritis / Lower Limb Morphological Parameters

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xu Jiang, Kai Xie, Hongyu Chen, Kai Zhang, Yuqi Hu, Tianyou Kan, Lin Sun, Songtao Ai, Xianping Zhu, Lichi Zhang, Mengning Yan, Liao Wang. A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Morphological Parameters of Lower Limbs in Chinese Non-knee Osteoarthritis Populations. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(2): 452‒461 https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13952

References

[1]
Sharma L, Chmiel JS, Almagor O, Felson D, Guermazi A, Roemer F, et al. The role of varus and valgus alignment in the initial development of knee cartilage damage by MRI: the MOST study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:235–240.
[2]
Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001;286:188–195.
[3]
Han X, Cui J, Xie K, Jiang X, He Z, du J, et al. Association between knee alignment, osteoarthritis disease severity, and subchondral trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:203.
[4]
Han X, Cui J, Chu L, Zhang W, Xie K, Jiang X, et al. Abnormal subchondral trabecular bone remodeling in knee osteoarthritis under the influence of knee alignment. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022;30:100–109.
[5]
Xie K, Jiang X, Han X, Ai S, Qu X, Yan M. Association between knee malalignment and ankle degeneration in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3694–3698.e1.
[6]
Abdulrahim H, Jiao Q, Swain S, Sehat K, Sarmanova A, Muir K, et al. Constitutional morphological features and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study using standard radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:494–501.
[7]
Du X, Liu Z-Y, Tao X-X, et al. Research progress on the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2023;15:2213–2224.
[8]
Boissonneault A, Lynch JA, Wise BL, Segal NA, Gross KD, Murray DW, et al. Association of hip and pelvic geometry with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: multicenter osteoarthritis study (MOST). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22:1129–1135.
[9]
Matsumoto T, Hashimura M, Takayama K, Ishida K, Kawakami Y, Matsuzaki T, et al. A radiographic analysis of alignment of the lower extremities – initiation and progression of varus-type knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23:217–223.
[10]
Springer B, Bechler U, Waldstein W, Rueckl K, Boettner CS, Boettner F. The influence of femoral and tibial bony anatomy on valgus OA of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:2998–3006.
[11]
Chang J, Zhu Z, Han W, Zhao Y, Kwoh CK, Lynch JA, et al. The morphology of proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) predicts incident radiographic osteoarthritis: data from osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28:208–214.
[12]
Vandekerckhove P-JTK, Matlovich N, Teeter MG, MacDonald SJ, Howard JL, Lanting BA. The relationship between constitutional alignment and varus osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2873–2879.
[13]
Victor JMK, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AAM, Verdonk PCM. Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:98–104.
[14]
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML. Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:98–104.
[15]
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1000–1007.
[16]
Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857–863.
[17]
Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2008;90:1121–1127.
[18]
Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Jt J. 2014;96:857–862.
[19]
Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2325–2330.
[20]
Gao Z-X, Long N-J, Zhang S-Y, Yu W, Dai Y-X, Xiao C. Comparison of kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:1567–1578.
[21]
Mullaji AB, Shah S, Shetty GM. Mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores limb alignment comparable to that of the unaffected contralateral limb. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:70–74.
[22]
Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function? J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:398–406.
[23]
Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1987;69:745–749.
[24]
Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:215–227.
[25]
Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P. Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1997;5:39–47.
[26]
Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY. Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000;82:1603–1608.
[27]
Mullaji AB, Marawar SV, Mittal V. A comparison of coronal plane axial femoral relationships in Asian patients with varus osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:861–867.
[28]
Khattak MJ, Umer M, Davis ET, Habib M, Ahmed M. Lower-limb alignment and posterior tibial slope in Pakistanis: a radiographic study. J Orthop Surg. 2010;18:22–25.
[29]
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:45–53.
[30]
Than P, Szuper K, Somoskeöy S, Warta V, Illés T. Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1291–1297.
[31]
Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Nha KW, Oh HK. Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination. Knee. 2014;21:544–548.
[32]
Song M-H, Yoo S-H, Kang S-W, Kim Y-J, Park G-T, Pyeun Y-S. Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in korean females. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27:49–55.
[33]
Jabalameli M, Moghimi J, Yeganeh A, Nojomi M. Parameters of lower extremities alignment view in Iranian adult population. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53:293–296.
[34]
Hodel S, Flury A, Hoch A, Zingg PO, Vlachopoulos L, Fucentese SF. The relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects. J Orthop Sci. 2022. Online ahead of print.
[35]
Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB. Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:1378–1384.
[36]
Siboni R, Vialla T, Joseph E, LiArno S, Faizan A, Martz P, et al. Coronal and sagittal alignment of the lower limb in Caucasians: analysis of a 3D CT database. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108:103251.
[37]
Tanaka T, Takayama K, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Hayashi S, Kuroda R, et al. Radiographic analysis of the lower limbs using the hip-calcaneus line in healthy individuals and in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2017;24:1146–1152.
[38]
Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Hashimura M, Takayama K, Ishida K, Araki D, et al. Coronal lower limb alignment in normal knees—a radiographic analysis of 797 normal knee subjects. Knee. 2016;23:209–213.
[39]
Pei Y, Yang W, Wei S, Cai R, Li J, Guo S, et al. Automated measurement of hip-knee-ankle angle on the unilateral lower limb X-rays using deep learning. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021;44:53–62.
[40]
Tack A, Preim B, Zachow S. Fully automated assessment of knee alignment from full-leg X-rays employing a “YOLOv4 and resnet landmark regression algorithm” (YARLA): data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;205:106080.
[41]
Nguyen TP, Chae D-S, Park S-J, Kang K-Y, Lee W-S, Yoon J. Intelligent analysis of coronal alignment in lower limbs based on radiographic image with convolutional neural network. Comput Biol Med. 2020;120:103732.
[42]
Schock J, Truhn D, Abrar DB, Merhof D, Conrad S, Post M, et al. Automated analysis of alignment in long-leg radiographs by using a fully automated support system based on artificial intelligence. Radiology. 2021;3:e200198.
[43]
Simon S, Schwarz GM, Aichmair A, Frank BJH, Hummer A, DiFranco MD, et al. Fully automated deep learning for knee alignment assessment in lower extremity radiographs: a cross-sectional diagnostic study. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51:1249–1259.
[44]
Jiang X, Zhang D, Li B, et al. Pre-surgery hip-knee-ankle angle and Weightbearing line percentage are nearly perfectly correlated to the Miniaci angle when planning open wedge high Tibial osteotomies. Arthroscopy. 2023;39:1222–1231.e1.
[45]
Jiang X, Li B, Xie K, Ai S, Hu X, Gao L, et al. Lateral tibial intercondylar eminence is a reliable reference for alignment correction in high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:1515–1523.
[46]
Dargel J, Feiser J, Gotter M, Pennig D, Koebke J. Side differences in the anatomy of human knee joints. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1368–1376.
[47]
Eckhoff DG, Jacofsky DJ, Springer BD, Dunbar M, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, et al. Bilateral symmetrical comparison of femoral and Tibial anatomic features. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1083–1090.
[48]
Jacquet C, Laumonerie P, LiArno S, Faizan A, Sharma A, Dagneaux L, et al. Contralateral preoperative templating of lower limbs' mechanical angles is a reasonable option. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:1445–1451.
[49]
Eckstein F, Müller S, Faber SC, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Putz R. Side differences of knee joint cartilage volume, thickness, and surface area, and correlation with lower limb dominance—an MRI-based study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10:914–921.
[50]
Beckers L, Colyn W, Bellemans J, Victor J, Vandekerckhove P-J. The contralateral limb is no reliable reference to restore coronal alignment in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:477–487.
[51]
Li M, Zeng Y, Nie Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, Wu L, et al. Varus-valgus knee laxity is related to a higher risk of knee osteoarthritis incidence and structural progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:1013–1021.
[52]
Wang J, Hu Q, Wu C, Li S, Deng Q, Tang R, et al. Gait asymmetry variation in kinematics, kinetics, and muscle force along with the severity levels of knee osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2023;15:1384–1391.
[53]
Paley D, Pfeil J. Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Orthopade. 2000;29:18–38.
[54]
Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25:425–465.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/