Background: The intestinal mucus layer is comprised of heavily glycosylated mucins, including mucin 2 (MUC2), that serve as a nutrient source for certain bacterial members of the gut microbiota. Only a subset of gut commensals encode the glycoside hydrolases required to degrade mucin glycans. However, mucin-degrading microbes can release glycans and generate compounds that can cross-fed non-mucin degrading microbes, creating complex microbial networks. While pairwise studies have shown that mucin degradation drives cross-feeding and metabolite exchange, the broader impact of mucins on community structure and metabolic output remains poorly understood.
Objective: In this study, we sought to identify how a defined microbial consortium of human commensals with varied mucin-degrading capacities responds to MUC2 to shape community composition and metabolic output.
Methods: A defined consortium of human gut commensals with varied mucin-degrading capacities was cultivated in anaerobic bioreactors in the presence or absence of porcine MUC2. Community composition was assessed, and extracellular metabolites were quantified using targeted and untargeted metabolomic profiling.
Results: MUC2 supplementation significantly altered community structure, promoting the expansion of Akkermansia muciniphila while reducing Prevotella. MUC2 also reshaped microbial metabolism, decreasing acetate levels while increasing propionate, butyrate, and formate. In addition, MUC2 supplementation altered amino acid utilization and vitamin metabolism and reduced several neuroactive compounds, including glutamate, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and anthranilic acid, while increasing tryptamine levels.
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that mucins exert broad effects on microbial community structure and metabolic output. Collectively, this work highlights the central role of bacterial cross-feeding in shaping gut ecosystem function.
Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy, have improved cancer treatment outcomes, yet durable benefit is achieved in only a subset of patients. Growing evidence implicates the gut microbiome as a modulator of ICI responsiveness, but defined and experimentally validated microbial strategies remain limited. This study aimed to identify responder-associated gut microbes and to evaluate a defined bacterial consortium for enhancing PD-1 blockade efficacy.
Methods: Publicly available shotgun metagenomic datasets from anti-PD-1-treated cancer patients were re-analyzed to compare gut microbiome profiles between responders and non-responders. Bacterial taxa reproducibly enriched in responders were selected based on consistency across analytical criteria and cultivability and assembled into a four-strain consortium (UJ-04). The immune-adjuvant potential of UJ-04, alone or combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, was evaluated in a B16-F10 melanoma mouse model, with tumor growth and immune responses assessed by flow cytometry.
Results: Metagenomic re-analysis identified four commensal bacterial taxa consistently enriched in responder patients, forming the defined UJ-04 consortium. While UJ-04 alone showed minimal antitumor activity, combination treatment with anti-PD-1 significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. This effect was accompanied by increased intratumoral CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, with concordant immune trends in peripheral compartments.
Conclusion: A responder-informed, defined microbial consortium functionally translates clinical microbiome associations into in vivo validation and enhances PD-1 blockade efficacy by modulating host antitumor immunity. These findings support defined bacterial consortia as microbiome-based immunomodulatory adjuncts for immunotherapy.