Minimally invasive contact X-ray brachytherapy as an alternative option in patients with rectal cancer not suitable for bespoke surgical resection

Arthur Sun Myint , Jean Pierre Gerard

Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2018, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 34

PDF
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2018, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) :34 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2018.52
Review
Review
Minimally invasive contact X-ray brachytherapy as an alternative option in patients with rectal cancer not suitable for bespoke surgical resection
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Surgery remains the gold standard treatment for rectal cancer. All published guidelines and most protocols recommend surgery as the standard of care. However, non-surgical management of rectal cancer is increasingly gaining acceptance as it avoids extirpative surgery and a stoma. In patients who are not suitable for surgery because of advancing age or medical comorbidities, and also in a small number of patients who are stoma phobic and refuse surgery, we need to consider an alternative treatment option to bespoke surgery. External beam radiotherapy is usually offered as an alternative. However, local regrowth rate is high and contact X-ray brachytherapy (Papillon treatment) boost can be added to reduce the risk of local regrowth after external beam radiotherapy. Case selection is important to achieve the best results.

Keywords

Contact X-ray brachytherapy / watch and wait / papillon / rectal cancer patients not suitable for surgery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Arthur Sun Myint, Jean Pierre Gerard. Minimally invasive contact X-ray brachytherapy as an alternative option in patients with rectal cancer not suitable for bespoke surgical resection. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2018, 2(1): 34 DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2018.52

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Glynne-Jones R,Tiret E,Rödel C,Arnold D.Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann Oncol2017;28:iv22-40

[2]

Moran B,Geh I.Association of coloproctology of great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): guidelines for the management of cancer of the colon, rectum and anus (2017) - introduction.Colorectal Dis2017;19:6-8

[3]

Renehan AG,Emsley R,Maw A,Rooney PS,Blower A,Wilson MS,O'Dwyer ST.Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis.Lancet Oncol2016;17:174-83

[4]

Sun Myint A,Gollins SW,Rao C,Sripadam R,Hershman MJ,Perkins K.Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy (Papillon) for rectal cancer: does it improve the chance of organ preservation?.B J Radiol2017;90:20170175

[5]

Habr-Gama A,São Julião GP,Sabbagh C,Perez RO.Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2014;88:822-8

[6]

Duldulao MP,Streja L,Li W,Kim J.Distribution of residual cancer cells in the bowel wall after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum2013;56:142-9 PMCID:PMC4674069

[7]

Sun Myint A,Gollins S,Rao C,Sripadam R,Hershman M.Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy as nonsurgical treatment option for rectal cancer: outcomes from a single-center experience.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2018;100:565-73

[8]

van der Valk MJM,Bastiaannet E,Beets GL,Habr-Gama A,Renehan AG.Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study.Lancet2018;391:2537-45

[9]

NICE. Low energy contact X-ray brachytherapy (the Papillon technique) for early-stage rectal cancer. Available from: http://www.contactpapillon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/NICE-Papillon-guidance-Sept-2015.pdf. [Last accessed on 17 Sep 2018]

[10]

Smith FM,Sheahan K,O'Connell PR.The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Br J Surg2012;99:993-1001

[11]

Hershman MJ.Salvage surgery after inadequate combined local treatment for early rectal cancer..Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)2007;19:720-3

[12]

Dhadda AS,Killeen S.Organ preservation using contact radiotherapy for early rectal cancer: outcomes of patients treated at a single centre in the UK..Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)2017;29:198-204

[13]

Frin AC,Gal J,François E,Benizri E,Marcié S,Gérard JP.Organ or sphincter preservation for rectal cancer..The role of contact X-ray brachytherapy in a monocentric series of 112 patients. Eur J Cancer2017;72:124-36

[14]

NICE. Colorectal cancer: diagnosis and management. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg131.[Last accessed on 17 Sep 2018]

[15]

General Medical Council. Ethical guidance for doctors. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors.[Last accessed on 17 Sep 2018]

[16]

BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. When surgeons unwittingly don't obtain informed consent. Available from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/10/06/fraser-smith-and-david-locke-when-surgeons-unwittingly-dont-obtain-informed-consent/.[Last accessed on 17 Sep 2018]

[17]

U.S. National Library of Medicine. European phase III study comparing, in association with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a radiation dose escalation using 2 different approaches: external beam radiation therapy versus endocavitary radiation therapy with contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma cT2-T3 a,b < 5cm in diameter in distal and middle rectum. Organ preservation for early rectal adenocarcinoma. Available from:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.[Last accessed on 17 Sep 2018]

PDF

151

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/