Advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE): techniques, outcomes, and future directions
Evelyn V. Alexander , Ahmed Elkamel , Stephanie G. Worrell
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 22
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has become a preferred surgical approach for treating esophageal cancer, offering significant advantages over traditional open surgery, such as reduced recovery times, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. This review highlights advancements in MIE techniques, with a focus on the growing role of robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) in enhancing surgical precision and patient outcomes. Recent trials, such as REVATE and ROBOT-2, highlight RAMIE’s advantages in lymph node resection and reduction in nerve injury rates, suggesting its potential to improve both short- and long-term outcomes. Further innovations, including artificial intelligence (AI) and telementoring, are enhancing surgical navigation and procedural safety, making MIE more accessible globally. Despite these advances, challenges remain, particularly regarding the steep learning curve. This review examines the evolution of MIE techniques, their clinical outcomes, and the future role of emerging technologies in optimizing esophageal cancer surgery.
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) / robotic assisted MIE (RAMIE) / esophageal cancer
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Groot EM, Goense L, Kingma BF, van den Berg JW, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.Surg Endosc2023;37:1357-65 PMCID:PMC9945034 |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, Goense L, van Hillegersberg R. Learning curve for robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy: results from 312 cases.Ann Thorac Surg2018;106:264-71 |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Boxel GI, Kingma BF, Voskens FJ, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: past, present and future.J Thorac Dis2020;12:54-62 PMCID:PMC7061186 |
| [60] |
der Sluis PC, van Hillegersberg R. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol2018;36-37:81-3 |
| [61] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |