Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression: Impacts on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Behzat Can, Ezgi Roza Gül, Hüseyin Salih Semiz, Kemal Hansu, Volkan Karataşlı, Sevil Sayhan, Muzaffer Sancı

PDF(367 KB)
PDF(367 KB)
Malignancy Spectrum ›› 2024, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3) : 189-196. DOI: 10.1002/msp2.42
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression: Impacts on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the impact of patient-specific factors on the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Specifically, we investigated the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels and platinum sensitivity, and how this influenced treatment outcomes and prognosis. We conducted a survival analysis on patients who underwent surgical treatment for serous ovarian cancer and received platinum-based adjuvant therapies.

Methods: This study was a retrospective observational analysis of 171 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. We extracted and analyzed the patients’ clinical data, focusing on platinum sensitivity concerning hormone receptor expression. We also assessed survival outcomes based on receptor expression and platinum resistance.

Results: Our findings revealed that 78.4% (n = 134) of the patients were platinum-sensitive, while 21.6% (n = 37) were platinum-resistant. The expression of hormone receptors showed significant associations with platinum sensitivity, particularly among ER-positive patients (p<0.05). Age, disease stage, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels, and residual tumor size were identified as notable factors influencing both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In terms of PFS, 88.5% of patients remained free from disease progression after one year, but this percentage dropped to 21% after five years. The average duration of PFS was 35.3 months. As for OS, 93.5% of patients were still alive after one year, but this percentage decreased to 50.5% after five years. The average survival duration was 64 months. Furthermore, platinum resistance was found to be a significant risk factor for disease progression, with a more than fivefold increase in risk (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study identified disease stage progression, ER negativity, and platinum resistance as the primary factors influencing OS. We also found that ER and PR expression played a crucial role in determining the sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with serous ovarian cancer.

Keywords

chemotherapy / hormone receptor / platinum sensitivity / serous ovarian cancer

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Behzat Can, Ezgi Roza Gül, Hüseyin Salih Semiz, Kemal Hansu, Volkan Karataşlı, Sevil Sayhan, Muzaffer Sancı. Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression: Impacts on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Malignancy Spectrum, 2024, 1(3): 189‒196 https://doi.org/10.1002/msp2.42

References

[1]
Cathcart AM, Nezhat FR, Emerson J, Pejovic T, Nezhat CH, Nezhat CR. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):601-612.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Kurnit KC, Frumovitz M. Primary mucinous ovarian cancer: options for surgery and chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32:1455-1462.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Porter RL, Matulonis UA. Mirvetuximab soravtansine for platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023;23(8):783-796.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Li X, Feng Y, Lin JF, Billig H, Shao R. Endometrial progesterone resistance and PCOS. J Biomed Sci. 2014;21(1):2.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Mungenast F, Thalhammer T. Estrogen biosynthesis and action in ovarian cancer. Front Endocrinol. 2014;5:192.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Troisi R, Bjørge T, Gissler M, et al. The role of pregnancy, perinatal factors and hormones in maternal cancer risk: a review of the evidence. J Intern Med. 2018;283(5):430-445.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Vetter M, Stadlmann S, Bischof E, et al. Hormone receptor expression in primary and recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer and its implications in early maintenance treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):14242.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Tan J, Song C, Wang D, et al. Expression of hormone receptors predicts survival and platinum sensitivity of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(5):BSR20210478.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Demir L, Yigit S, Sadullahoglu C, et al. Hormone receptor, HER2/NEU and EGFR expression in ovarian carcinoma—is here a prognostic phenotype? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(22):9739-9745.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Feng Z, Wen H, Bi R, et al. A clinically applicable molecular classification for high-grade serous ovarian cancer based on hormone receptor expression. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25408.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Le Page C, Chung J, Rahimi K, Köbel M, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM. Exploring the clinical impact of predictive biomarkers in serous ovarian carcinomas. Curr Drug Targets. 2020;21(10):974-995.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
George A, McLachlan J, Tunariu N, et al. The role of hormonal therapy in patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective series of tamoxifen and letrozole. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):456.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
da Costa AABA, Baiocchi G. Genomic profiling of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: the road into druggable targets. Sem Cancer Biol. 2021;77:29-41.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Muggia F, Bonetti A. History of intraperitoneal platinum drug delivery for ovarian cancer and its future applications. Cancer Drug Resist. 2021;4(2):453-462.
[15]
Patel A, Kalachand R, Busschots S, et al. Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;7(7):CDd008766.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Cao J, Hacking S, Chavarria-Bernal HD, Bhuiya TA, Khutti S. Androgen receptor immunohistochemical expression in undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2022;41(1):28-34.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wilhite AM, Baca Y, Xiu J, et al. Molecular profiles of endometrial cancer tumors among Black patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;166(1):108-116.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Murali R, Balasubramaniam V, Srinivas S, et al. Deregulated metabolic pathways in ovarian cancer: cause and consequence. Metabolites. 2023;13(4):560.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Folsom SM, Berger J, Soong TR, Rangaswamy B. Comprehensive review of serous tumors of tubo-ovarian origin: clinical behavior, pathological correlation, current molecular updates, and imaging manifestations. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2023;52(5):425-438.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Hollis RL. Molecular characteristics and clinical behaviour of epithelial ovarian cancers. Cancer Lett. 2023;555:216057.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Hollis RL, Thomson JP, van Baal J, et al. Distinct histopathological features are associated with molecular subtypes and outcome in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):7681.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Petrillo M, Sozzi G, Dessole M, et al. The role of surgery in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a call to the scientific community. Sem Cancer Biol. 2021;77:194-202.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Shafrir AL, Rice MS, Gupta M, et al. The association between reproductive and hormonal factors and ovarian cancer by estrogen-α and progesterone receptor status. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(3):628-635.
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Author(s). Malignancy Spectrum published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Higher Education Press.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(367 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/