A review on the effects of different microbial strains fermentation and synergistic interactions on polyphenols during winemaking

Yanan Dong , Yutong Wang , Wanxuan Li , Jiaqing Cao , Xiangrong Zhang

Journal of Polyphenols ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 41 -52.

PDF (8040KB)
Journal of Polyphenols ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :41 -52.
research-article
A review on the effects of different microbial strains fermentation and synergistic interactions on polyphenols during winemaking
Author information +
History +
PDF (8040KB)

Abstract

Polyphenols are key components in wine that contribute to its color, mouthfeel, antioxidant properties, and health benefits. Traditionally, the extraction and bioconversion of polyphenols depend on alcoholic fermentation mediated by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This review summarizes recent study on non-Saccharomyces yeasts, lactic acid bacteria, and their synergistic interactions that significantly modulate the composition, stability, and bioactivity of polyphenols. These microorganisms regulate the extraction, transformation, and stabilization of polyphenols through enzymatic reactions and interspecific interactions. Modern winemaking techniques, such as sequential inoculation, co-fermentation, and microbial immobilization, allow targeted control over the composition and concentration of polyphenols in wine. Potential future research should systematically elucidate polyphenol-microbe interaction mechanisms. In addition, functional microbial strains will be developed to enhance wine quality and health-promoting attributes. Progress in these areas will further promote the winemaking industry toward precision and functionalization.

Keywords

polyphenols / microbial fermentation / microbial regulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanan Dong, Yutong Wang, Wanxuan Li, Jiaqing Cao, Xiangrong Zhang. A review on the effects of different microbial strains fermentation and synergistic interactions on polyphenols during winemaking. Journal of Polyphenols, 2026, 8 (1) : 41-52 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zhao DQ, Kai JR, Wang CY, et al. Identification of Cabernet Sauvignon wine vintages based on polyphenol content. Food Ferment Ind, 2025, 51 (12): 158-66.

[2]

Chen XL, Zhang YY, Xu LB, et al. Modeling the taste quality of dry red wine using polyphenolic indicators. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2024, 40 (8): 281-9.

[3]

Yang Y. Terpene rearrangement during winemaking and the polyphenol matrix effect on its volatile aroma presentation. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2023.

[4]

Guan YJ, Cheng YF, Zhang Y, et al. Interactions of different yeast species in wine co-fermentation systems. Northern Horticulture, 2016 (2): 193-7.

[5]

Ramirez GM, Cerezo BA, Troncoso MA, et al. Identifying factors influencing hydroxytyrosol in wines: Varietal selection, organic management, and yeast strategies in rosé and white wine production. Food Chem, 2025, 502: 147690.

[6]

Wang J, Gu X, Fox G, et al. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts from fermented grains of Baijiu for low alcoholic beer brewing and their impacts on beer flavor. Food Res Int, 2026, 229: 118443.

[7]

Zhao N, Yue Y, Yin S, et al. Genetic modulation of ATF1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced acetate ester production and flavor profile in a sour meat model system. Foods, 2026, 15 (2): 378.

[8]

Delgado CM, Mayorga RA, Cardoce RM, et al. Genomic description of the first multidrug-resistant Nakaseomyces glabratus (Candida glabrata) strain detected in Costa Rica. Med Mycol, 2026, 64 (1): myag004.

[9]

Yu H, Shi L, Chen C, et al. Co-fermentation of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves flavor in low-alcohol peach beverages. Food Res Int, 2026, 225: 118040.

[10]

Asmus JJ, Blassoples NKR, Torrado PR, et al. Investigating the transcriptional fingerprints of cocultured Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans in a model wine environment. Front Microbiol, 2026, 16: 1720597.

[11]

Kostelnikova K, Prusova B, Licek J, et al. The effect of new inhibitors on malolactic fermentation of wines. Fermentation, 2025, 11 (11): 621.

[12]

Rey RJ, Balmaseda A, Bordons A, et al. Influence of nitrogen compounds from different yeast lees on malolactic fermentation. LWT, 2025, 229: 118169.

[13]

Joseph F, Abioye PO, Atiribom YR, et al. Production of vinegar by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and acetic acid bacteria for the preservation of tomato fruits. Vegetos, 2025: 1-11.

[14]

Cao PX, Ma T, Yang KD, et al. Detection and identification of Brettanomyces bruxellensis in Chinese wines. Food Science, 2015, 36 (23): 172-7.

[15]

Nai GY. Analysis of noble rot characteristics and process optimization of Petit Manseng wine in Ningxia region. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2024.

[16]

Zhou J, Wang L, Li YM, et al. Screening, identification of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and its tetracycline degradation performance in water. Chin J Environ Eng, 2025, 19 (3): 847-56.

[17]

Grieco F, Carluccio AM, Giovinazzo G. Autochthonous Saccharomyces cerevisiae starter cultures enhance polyphenols content, antioxidant activity, and anti- inflammatory response of Apulian red wines. Foods, 2019, 8 (10): 453.

[18]

Lima A, Oliveira C, Santos C, et al. Phenolic composition of monovarietal red wines regarding volatile phenols and its precursors. Eur Food Res Technol, 2018, 244: 1985-94.

[19]

Studies from CONICET in the area of food science reported (proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the effects of red wine polyphenols on oxidative stress). Food Weekly News, 2019.

[20]

Mardones SL, Troncoso RN, Bordeu C, et al. Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the effects of red wine polyphenols on oxidative stress. J Food Sci Technol, 2019, 56 (9): 4129-38.

[21]

Ge Q. Mechanism analysis of aroma production by non- Saccharomyces yeasts during Vidal icewine fermentation. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021.

[22]

Lin J, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. Examining the impact of mannoproteins on the thermal stability of phenolic compounds in icewine environment: a mechanistic exploration of the interaction preference. J Food Sci Technol, 2025, 322 (Part 4): 147086.

[23]

Mekoue Nguela J, Teuf O, Assuncao Bicca S, et al. Impact of mannoprotein N-glycosyl phosphorylation and branching on the sorption of wine polyphenols by yeasts and yeast cell walls. Food Chem, 2023, 403: 134326.

[24]

Li S, Bi P, Sun N, et al. Effect of sequential fermentation with four non-Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the nutritional characteristics and flavor of kiwifruit wine. J Food Compos Anal, 2022, 109: 104480.

[25]

Liu PT, Lu L, Duan CQ, et al. The contribution of indigenous non-Saccharomyces wine yeast to improved aromatic quality of Cabernet Sauvignon wines by spontaneous fermentation. LWT - Food Sci Tech, 2016, 71: 210-7.

[26]

Nzoyisaba D, Yu YJ, Liu J, et al. Enhancing flavor and quality of Chardonnay wine through co-fermentation with non-Saccharomyces yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 41: 408.

[27]

Rompkovski C, Agustini BC, Deffert F, et al. Microbial dynamics in industrial-scale wine fermentation employing Hanseniaspora uvarum β-glucosidase-producer strain. J Food Sci Technol, 2021, 58: 4663-72.

[28]

Rakhmatulloh S, Wirawan KS, Widodo W. Bacterial viability and metabolic profiles of Lacticaseibacillus casei AP and Pediococcus acidilactici BE under various thermal treatment conditions. Front Food Sci Technol, 2026, 5: 1736362.

[29]

Kahraman AH, Deveci M, Gürsel NE, et al. Assessment of antimicrobial activity and selected safety attributes of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus strains for potential probiotic use. Eur Food Res Technol, 2026, 252 (2): 51.

[30]

Tian H, Yu B, Ai L, et al. A high-throughput system for screening high diacetyl-producing lactic acid bacteria in fermented milk in 96-well microplates. J Food Meas Charact, 2020, 14 (1): 548-56.

[31]

Cifuentes V, Marinas CI, Marinescu CG, et al. Metabolomic profiling of indigenous lactic acid bacteria reveals functional traits shaping the flavor and bioactivity of Ecuadorian coffee. Front Microbiol, 2025, 16: 1697280.

[32]

Kim JS, Lee SJ, Arachchige HJHV, et al. Metabolomic signatures of lactic acid bacteria: Their growth rates and roles in enhancing kimchi quality. Appl Biol Chem, 2025, 68 (1): 46.

[33]

Banicod SJR, Ntege W, Njiru NM, et al. Production and transformation of biogenic amines in different food products by the metabolic activity of the lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol, 2025, 428: 110996.

[34]

Rico RM, Salom SL, Fuentes A, et al. Inhibitory potential of natural antimicrobial compounds against histamine- forming lactic acid bacteria. Food Bioscience, 2024, 61: 104779.

[35]

Sui YM, Wang HP, Liu JQ, et al. Research progress on biogenic amine formation based on microbial diversity in traditional fermented foods. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2024, 45 (2): 356-63.

[36]

Zhao HJ. Acid production characteristics and acid stress response mechanism of Lactobacillus acetotolerans. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2022.

[37]

Ozma AM, Moaddab RS, Asgharzadeh M, et al. Proteomic alterations and antimicrobial effects of postbiotics from probiotic lactic acid bacteria and yeast against multidrug- resistant Salmonella Typhimurium. Curr Microbiol, 2025, 83 (2): 98.

[38]

Houjuan M, Dong XC, Nan F. Exploring the integrity of cellular membrane and resistance to digestive juices of dehydrated lactic acid bacteria as influenced by drying kinetics. Food Res Int, 2022, 157: 111395.

[39]

Wang H, Yao M, Geng M, et al. Grape seed meal- derived Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture extracts exert their probiotic properties by inhibiting quorum sensing and destroying the biofilm of enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. Food Bioscience, 2025, 71: 107234.

[40]

Wang CP, Liu FQ, Yan ZW, et al. Screening, identification and optimization of culture conditions for Botrytis cinerea. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2021 (5): 32-37.

[41]

Nie HF, Nan J, Hu HX, et al. Screening, identification and application of dominant acetic acid bacteria for grape vinegar fermentation in Inner Mongolia. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2025, 46 (18): 201-11.

[42]

Shaw AJ, Lam FH, Hamilton M. Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes. Science, 2016, 353 (6299): 583-6.

[43]

Zhang MQ, Jia QQ, Liang QS, et al. Correlation between microbial diversity and major volatile aroma compounds during spontaneous fermentation of Pinot Noir wine at industrial scale. Food Science, 2025, 46 (13): 94-104.

[44]

De Souza ERP, Braz MVC, Castro RN, et al. Influence of microbial fermentation on the antioxidant activity of phenolic substances in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol, 2023, 134 (8): lxad148.

[45]

Su Y, Dong Q, Chen Y, et al. Impact of sequential inoculation timing on the quality of wine fermented by indigenous Lachancea thermotolerans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT, 2024, 204: 116438.

[46]

Minnaar PP, du Plessis HW, Jolly NP, et al. Non-Saccharomyces yeast and lactic acid bacteria in co- inoculated fermentations with two Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains: A strategy to improve the phenolic content of Syrah wine. Food Chem X, 2019, 4: 100070.

[47]

Coppola F, Testa B, Cozzolino R, et al. Effects of inoculation timing and mixed fermentation with Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the aroma and sensory properties of Falanghina wine. Eur Food Res Technol, 2025, 251 (7): 1-19.

[48]

Pérez-Navarro J, García Romero E, Gómez-Alonso S, et al. Comparison between the phenolic composition of Petit Verdot wines elaborated at different maceration/ fermentation temperatures. Int J Food Prop, 2018, 21 (1): 1-13.

[49]

Zhang PZ, Zhang RG, Sirisena S, et al. Beta-glucosidase activity of wine yeasts and its impacts on wine volatiles and phenolics: A mini-review. Food Microbiology, 2021, 99: 103859.

[50]

Sumby KM, Bartle L, Grbin PR, et al. Measures to improve wine malolactic fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2019, 103 (4): 2033-51.

[51]

Zhang Z, Fan Z, Zhang G, et al. Application progress of microbial immobilization technology based on biomass materials. BioResources, 2021, 16 (4): 8509-24.

PDF (8040KB)

36

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/