Effects of frothers on bubbles size and flotation performance of hydrophobic minerals

Abstract

Frothers facilitate the reduction of bubbles size by preventing bubbles coalescence and produce more stable froths. The collision probability of the bubbles and particles substantially increases by decreasing bubble size. For the same volume system, fewer bubbles result from a distribution of large-sized bubbles, and more bubbles result from a distribution of small-sized bubbles. In this research, fundamental two-phase frother characterization parameters were aimed to link with three-phase coal and talc flotation behavior. For this purpose, the effect of single and dual frother systems on inhibiting bubble coalescence was investigated with methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), isooctanol (2 ethyl hexanol), pine oil, and Dowfroth 250. Based on the results of single frothers, isooctanol at the lowest critical coalescence concentration (CCC) value of 6×10⁻⁶ achieved the smallest bubbles with Sauter mean diameter of 0.80 mm. By blending Dowfroth 250 and pine oil, the bubbles size decreased significantly, reaching 0.45 mm. While the highest recoveries in coal flotation were obtained in single and frother blends where the bubbles size was measured as the smallest in two-phase system, and such a relationship was not found for talc flotation.

Keywords

flotation / frother blends / bubble size / coal and talc flotation

References

[1] GrauR A, LaskowskiJ S, HeiskanenK. Effect of frothers on bubble size. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 76(4): 225-233 J]

[2] GuptaA K, BanerjeeP K, MishraA, et al. . Effect of alcohol and polyglycol ether frothers on foam stability, bubble size and coal flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2007, 82(3): 126-137 J]

[3] SchwarzS, GranoS. Effect of particle hydrophobicity on particle and water transport across a flotation froth. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2005, 256(2–3): 157-164 J]

[4] FarrokhpayS. The significance of froth stability in mineral flotation: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 166(1–2): 1-7 J]

[5] FinchJ A, NessetJ E, AcuñaC. Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation. Minerals Engineering, 2008, 21(12–14): 949-957 J]

[6] KhoshdastH. Flotation frothers: Review of their classifications, properties and preparation. The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2011, 4(1): 25-44 J]

[7] DrzymalaJ, KowalczukP. Classification of flotation frothers. Minerals, 2018, 8(2): 53 J]

[8] KhoshdastH, HassanzadehA, KowalczukP B, et al. . Characterization techniques of flotation frothers—A review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2023, 44277-101 J]

[9] ZhangWei. The effects of frothers and particles on the characteristics of pulp and froth properties in flotation—A critical review. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2016, 4(4): 251-269 J]

[10] MorenoY S, BournivalG, AtaS. Classification of flotation frothers—A statistical approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 248: 117252 J]

[11] PughR JThe Physics and chemistry of frothers, froth flotation—A century of innovation [M], 2009259-281FUERSTENAU M C, JAMESON G, YOON R H. Society for Mining Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME)

[12] PughR J. Basic principles and concepts. Bubble and Foam Chemistry, 2016, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 153 M]

[13] BhondayiC. Flotation froth phase bubble size measurement. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2022, 43(2): 251-273 J]

[14] AtaS, AhmedN, JamesonG J. A study of bubble coalescence in flotation froths. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 255-266 J]

[15] ChoY S, LaskowskiJ S. Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 64(2–3): 69-80 J]

[16] KowalczukP B. Determination of critical coalescence concentration and bubble size for surfactants used as flotation frothers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(33): 11752-11757 J]

[17] PacekA W, ManC C, NienowA W. On the Sauter mean diameter and size distributions in turbulent liquid/liquid dispersions in a stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(11): 2005-2011 J]

[18] BatjargalK, GuvenO, OzdemirO, et al. . Adsorption kinetics of various frothers on rising bubbles of different sizes under flotation conditions. Minerals, 2021, 11(3): 304 J]

[19] KarakashevS I, GrozevN A, OzdemirO, et al. . On the frother’s strength and its performance. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 171: 107093 J]

[20] LiuD, SomasundaranP, VasudevanT V, et al. . Role of pH and dissolved mineral species in Pittsburgh No. 8 coal flotation system—I. Floatability of coal. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1994, 413–4201-214 J]

[21] LaskowskiJCoal flotation and fine coal utilization, 2001, Vancouver B. C., Canada, The University of British Columbia[M]

[22] NiuC-k, XiaW-c, PengY-li. Analysis of coal wettability by inverse gas chromatography and its guidance for coal flotation. Fuel, 2018, 228290-296 J]

[23] LiY-j, HuZ-w, XiaW-c, et al. . Application of compound reagent H511 in the flotation removal of unburned carbon from fly ash. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 595: 124699 J]

[24] CaoL, ChenX-m, PengY-jun. The interaction of frothers with hydrophobic and hydrophilic sites of coal particles in NaCl solution. Powder Technology, 2022, 396378-384 J]

[25] GrauR A, LaskowskiJ S. Role of frothers in bubble generation and coalescence in a mechanical flotation cell. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 84(2): 170-182 J]

[26] MälhammarG. Determination of some surface properties of talc. Colloids and Surfaces, 1990, 44: 61-69 J]

[27] MorrisG E, FornasieroD, RalstonJ. Polymer depressants at the talc-water interface: Adsorption isotherm, microflotation and electrokinetic studies. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 67(1–4): 211-227 J]

[28] JinS-z, ShiQ, LiQ, et al. . Effect of calcium ionic concentrations on the adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose onto talc surface: Flotation, adsorption and AFM imaging study. Power Technology, 2018, 331: 155-161 J]

[29] ZhangW, ZhuS-y, FinchJ A. Frother partitioning in dual-frother systems: Development of analytical technique. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 119: 75-82 J]

[30] NgoromaF, WieseJ, FranzidisJ P. The effect of frother blends on the flotation performance of selected PGM bearing ores. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 46–47: 76-82 J]

[31] DeyS, PaniS, SinghR. Study of interactions of frother blends and its effect on coal flotation. Powder Technology, 2014, 260: 78-83 J]

[32] XingY-w, GuiX-h, CaoY-j, et al. . Effect of compound collector and blending frother on froth stability and flotation performance of oxidized coal. Powder Technology, 2017, 305: 166-173 J]

[33] NuorivaaraT, Serna-GuerreroR. Amphiphilic cellulose and surfactant mixtures as green frothers in mineral flotation. 1. Characterization of interfacial and foam stabilization properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 604: 125297 J]

[34] XuM-d, GuoF-y, BaoX-c, et al. . Study on the strengthening mechanism of a MIBC-PEG mixed surfactant on foam stability. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(30): 27429-27438 J]

[35] McfadzeanB, MarozvaT, WieseJ. Flotation frother mixtures: Decoupling the sub-processes of froth stability, froth recovery and entrainment. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 8572-79 J]

[36] AnM-y, LiaoY-f, ZhaoY-f, et al. . Effect of frothers on removal of unburned carbon from coal-fired power plant fly ash by froth flotation. Separation Science and Technology, 2018, 53(3): 535-543 J]

[37] BayramS, YenialÜ, BulutGThe effect of frothers on pyrite flotation [M], 2018526530KUZU C, TUNÇDEMIR H, GÖKAŞAN N O. Istanbul Technical University, Mining Faculty Geosciences Student Graduation Design Projects Symposium. e-ISBN: 978-975-561-495-3

[38] UrbinaR H. Recent developments and advances in formulations and applications of chemical reagents used in froth flotation. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2003, 24(2): 139-182 J]

[39] MeloF, LaskowskiJ S. Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 766-773 J]

[40] KhoshdastH, AbbasiH, SamA, et al. . Frothability and surface behavior of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 60: 127-134 J]

[41] CrozierR DChemical properties of frothers: Flotation theory, reagent and ore testing, 1992, New York, NY, USA, Pergamon[M]

[42] SweetC, HoogstratenJ V, HarrisMFinchJ A, RaoS R, HolubecI. The effect of frothers on bubble size and frothability of aqueous solutions. Processing of Complex Ores, 2nd UBC-McGill Symposium Series on Fundamental in Mineral Processing, 1997235246

[43] MachonV, PacekA W, NienowA W. Bubble sizes in electrolyte and alcohol solutions in a turbulent stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1997, 75(3): 339-348 J]

[44] AldrichC, FengD. The effect of mothers on bubble size distributions in flotation pulp phases and surface froths. Minerals Engineering, 2000, 13(10–11): 1049-1057 J]

[45] PanY-y, BournivalG, AtaS. The role of non-frothing reagents on bubble size and bubble stability. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 161: 106652 J]

[46] ComleyB A, HarrisP J, BradshawD J, et al. . Frother characterisation using dynamic surface tension measurements. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 64(2–3): 81-100 J]

[47] AtaS. Phenomena in the froth phase of flotation—A review. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2012, 102–1031-12 J]

[48] MaldonadoM, QuinnJ J, GomezC O, et al. . An experimental study examining the relationship between bubble shape and rise velocity. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 98: 7-11 J]

[49] WangH-n, YangW-q, YanX-k, et al. . Regulation of bubble size in flotation: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(5): 104070 J]

[50] LaskowskiJ S, TlhoneT, WilliamsP, et al. . Fundamental properties of the polyoxypropylene alkyl ether flotation frothers. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 721–4289-299 J]

[51] WahyuniS, SupriyantoS, DjayusD. Estimasi Sebaran Kualitas Batubara (Ash Content) Menggunakan Metode Invers Distance Weighted (Idw) Dan Ordinary Kriging (Ok) Di Pt. Kayan Putra Utama Coal Site Separi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Geosains Kutai Basin, 2019, 2(1): 1-6[J]

[52] SugitoN T, AbidinH Z, SoemartoI, et al. . Integration of linear and non-linear regression for estimating land value. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, 1089(1): 012032[J]

[53] BrownA M. A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2001, 653191-200 J]

[54] BhondayiC, MoysM H, DanhaG. Effect of pulp chemistry and solids on a froth bubble size measurement method. Powder Technology, 2016, 297: 202-210 J]

[55] WangJ-y, ForbesG, ForbesE. Frother characterization using a novel bubble size measurement technique. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(2): 750 J]

[56] LefebvreA, MezuiY, ObligadoM, et al. . A new, optimized Doppler optical probe for phase detection, bubble velocity and size measurements: Investigation of a bubble column operated in the heterogeneous regime. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 250: 117359 J]

[57] JahedsaravaniA, MassinaeiM, ZarieM. Measurement of bubble size and froth velocity using convolutional neural networks. Minerals Engineering, 2023, 204108400 J]

[58] YangB, WangW-s, PingL, et al. . Measurement of bubble/slug velocity and size in vertical pipe based on optical cross-correlation method. Optik, 2023, 272170172 J]

[59] WheelerT A. Coal floats by itself—doesn’t it?. Reagents for Better Metallurgy, 1994, Littleton, SME: 131-145[M]

[60] WangS-w, XiaQ, XuFen. Investigation of collector mixtures on the flotation dynamics of low-rank coal. Fuel, 2022, 327125171 J]

[61] BennettA J R, ChapmanW R, DellC C. Studies in froth flotation of coal [C]. Third International Coal Preparation Congress, 1958Brussels-Liege

[62] XiongYuBubble size effects in coal flotation and phosphate reverse flotation using a pico-nano bubble generator [D], 2014 West Virginia University Libraries

[63] HuH-s, LiM, LiL-l, et al. . Improving bubble-particle attachment during the flotation of low rank coal by surface modification. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 30(2): 217-223 J]

[64] AhmedN, JamesonG J. The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1985, 14(3): 195-215 J]

[65] PolatM, PolatH, ChanderS. Physical and chemical interactions in coal flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 199-213 J]

[66] BeattieD A, HuynhL, KaggwaG B N, et al. . The effect of polysaccharides and polyacrylamides on the depression of talc and the flotation of sulphide minerals. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 598-608 J]

[67] OzkanA, DudnikV, EsmeliK. Hydrophobic flocculation of talc with kerosene and effects of anionic surfactants. Particulate Science and Technology, 2016, 34(2): 235-240 J]

[68] FengD-w, AldrichC. Effect of ultrasonication on the flotation of talc. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(15): 4422-4427 J]

[69] YehiaA, Al-WakeelM I. Talc separation from talc-carbonate ore to be suitable for different industrial applications. Minerals Engineering, 2000, 13(1): 111-116 J]

[70] LevitzP E. Adsorption of non ionic surfactants at the solid/water interface. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2002, 205(1–2): 31-38 J]

[71] CaoL, ChenX-m, PengY-jun. The adsorption and orientation of frother surfactants on heterogeneous wetting surfaces. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 548149225 J]

[72] LotterN O, KowalD L, TuzunM A, et al. . Sampling and flotation testing of Sudbury basin drill core for process mineralogy modelling. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16(9): 857-864 J]

[73] KuanS H, FinchJ A. Impact of talc on pulp and froth properties in F150 and 1-pentanol frother systems. Minerals Engineering, 2010, 23(11–13): 1003-1009 J]

[74] TanS N, FornasieroD, SedevR, et al. . The interfacial conformation of polypropylene glycols and their foam properties. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 703-712 J]

[75] FuerstenauD W, HuangP. Interfacial phenomena involved in talc flotation and depresion [C]. Proceedings of the 22nd International Mineral processing Congress, 20031034-1043LORENZE N et al.

[76] ZhangW, FinchJ A. Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(4): 1461-1469 J]

[77] WalshB J M. The use of talc as a talc adsorbent. J Chem Educ, 1967, 44: 294 J]

[78] RathR K, SubramanianS, LaskowskiJ S. Adsorption of dextrin and guar gum onto talc: A comparative study. Langmuir, 1997, 13(23): 6260-6266 J]

[79] LaskowskiJ S. Anisotropic minerals in flotation circuits. CIM Journal, 2012, 3203-213[J]

[80] Ann BazarJ, RahimiM, FathiniaS, et al. . Talc flotation—An overview. Minerals, 2021, 117662 J]