Effects of frothers on bubbles size and flotation performance of hydrophobic minerals

Gülşah Güven, Berivan Tunç, Ş. Beste Aydin, Gülay Bulut

Journal of Central South University ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7) : 2280-2299. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-024-5685-5
Article

Effects of frothers on bubbles size and flotation performance of hydrophobic minerals

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Frothers facilitate the reduction of bubbles size by preventing bubbles coalescence and produce more stable froths. The collision probability of the bubbles and particles substantially increases by decreasing bubble size. For the same volume system, fewer bubbles result from a distribution of large-sized bubbles, and more bubbles result from a distribution of small-sized bubbles. In this research, fundamental two-phase frother characterization parameters were aimed to link with three-phase coal and talc flotation behavior. For this purpose, the effect of single and dual frother systems on inhibiting bubble coalescence was investigated with methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), isooctanol (2 ethyl hexanol), pine oil, and Dowfroth 250. Based on the results of single frothers, isooctanol at the lowest critical coalescence concentration (CCC) value of 6×10−6 achieved the smallest bubbles with Sauter mean diameter of 0.80 mm. By blending Dowfroth 250 and pine oil, the bubbles size decreased significantly, reaching 0.45 mm. While the highest recoveries in coal flotation were obtained in single and frother blends where the bubbles size was measured as the smallest in two-phase system, and such a relationship was not found for talc flotation.

Keywords

flotation / frother blends / bubble size / coal and talc flotation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gülşah Güven, Berivan Tunç, Ş. Beste Aydin, Gülay Bulut. Effects of frothers on bubbles size and flotation performance of hydrophobic minerals. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(7): 2280‒2299 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5685-5

References

[[1]]
Grau R A, Laskowski J S, Heiskanen K. Effect of frothers on bubble size. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 76(4): 225-233, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[2]]
Gupta A K, Banerjee P K, Mishra A, et al.. Effect of alcohol and polyglycol ether frothers on foam stability, bubble size and coal flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2007, 82(3): 126-137, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[3]]
Schwarz S, Grano S. Effect of particle hydrophobicity on particle and water transport across a flotation froth. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2005, 256(2–3): 157-164, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[4]]
Farrokhpay S. The significance of froth stability in mineral flotation: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 166(1–2): 1-7, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[5]]
Finch J A, Nesset J E, Acuña C. Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation. Minerals Engineering, 2008, 21(12–14): 949-957, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[6]]
Khoshdast H. Flotation frothers: Review of their classifications, properties and preparation. The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2011, 4(1): 25-44, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[7]]
Drzymala J, Kowalczuk P. Classification of flotation frothers. Minerals, 2018, 8(2): 53, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[8]]
Khoshdast H, Hassanzadeh A, Kowalczuk P B, et al.. Characterization techniques of flotation frothers—A review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2023, 44(2): 77-101, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[9]]
Zhang Wei. The effects of frothers and particles on the characteristics of pulp and froth properties in flotation—A critical review. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2016, 4(4): 251-269, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[10]]
Moreno Y S, Bournival G, Ata S. Classification of flotation frothers—A statistical approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 248: 117252, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[11]]
Pugh R J. . The Physics and chemistry of frothers, froth flotation—A century of innovation [M], 2009 259-281 FUERSTENAU M C, JAMESON G, YOON R H. Society for Mining Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME)
[[12]]
Pugh R J. Basic principles and concepts. Bubble and Foam Chemistry, 2016 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1-53, M]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[13]]
Bhondayi C. Flotation froth phase bubble size measurement. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2022, 43(2): 251-273, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[14]]
Ata S, Ahmed N, Jameson G J. A study of bubble coalescence in flotation froths. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 255-266, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[15]]
Cho Y S, Laskowski J S. Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 64(2–3): 69-80, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[16]]
Kowalczuk P B. Determination of critical coalescence concentration and bubble size for surfactants used as flotation frothers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(33): 11752-11757, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[17]]
Pacek A W, Man C C, Nienow A W. On the Sauter mean diameter and size distributions in turbulent liquid/liquid dispersions in a stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(11): 2005-2011, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[18]]
Batjargal K, Guven O, Ozdemir O, et al.. Adsorption kinetics of various frothers on rising bubbles of different sizes under flotation conditions. Minerals, 2021, 11(3): 304, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[19]]
Karakashev S I, Grozev N A, Ozdemir O, et al.. On the frother’s strength and its performance. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 171: 107093, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[20]]
Liu D, Somasundaran P, Vasudevan T V, et al.. Role of pH and dissolved mineral species in Pittsburgh No. 8 coal flotation system—I. Floatability of coal. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1994, 41(3–4): 201-214, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[21]]
Laskowski J. . Coal flotation and fine coal utilization, 2001 Vancouver B. C., Canada The University of British Columbia [M]
[[22]]
Niu C-k, Xia W-c, Peng Y-li. Analysis of coal wettability by inverse gas chromatography and its guidance for coal flotation. Fuel, 2018, 228: 290-296, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[23]]
Li Y-j, Hu Z-w, Xia W-c, et al.. Application of compound reagent H511 in the flotation removal of unburned carbon from fly ash. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 595: 124699, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[24]]
Cao L, Chen X-m, Peng Y-jun. The interaction of frothers with hydrophobic and hydrophilic sites of coal particles in NaCl solution. Powder Technology, 2022, 396: 378-384, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[25]]
Grau R A, Laskowski J S. Role of frothers in bubble generation and coalescence in a mechanical flotation cell. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 84(2): 170-182, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[26]]
Mälhammar G. Determination of some surface properties of talc. Colloids and Surfaces, 1990, 44: 61-69, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[27]]
Morris G E, Fornasiero D, Ralston J. Polymer depressants at the talc-water interface: Adsorption isotherm, microflotation and electrokinetic studies. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 67(1–4): 211-227, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[28]]
Jin S-z, Shi Q, Li Q, et al.. Effect of calcium ionic concentrations on the adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose onto talc surface: Flotation, adsorption and AFM imaging study. Power Technology, 2018, 331: 155-161, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[29]]
Zhang W, Zhu S-y, Finch J A. Frother partitioning in dual-frother systems: Development of analytical technique. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 119: 75-82, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[30]]
Ngoroma F, Wiese J, Franzidis J P. The effect of frother blends on the flotation performance of selected PGM bearing ores. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 46–47: 76-82, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[31]]
Dey S, Pani S, Singh R. Study of interactions of frother blends and its effect on coal flotation. Powder Technology, 2014, 260: 78-83, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[32]]
Xing Y-w, Gui X-h, Cao Y-j, et al.. Effect of compound collector and blending frother on froth stability and flotation performance of oxidized coal. Powder Technology, 2017, 305: 166-173, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[33]]
Nuorivaara T, Serna-Guerrero R. Amphiphilic cellulose and surfactant mixtures as green frothers in mineral flotation. 1. Characterization of interfacial and foam stabilization properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 604: 125297, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[34]]
Xu M-d, Guo F-y, Bao X-c, et al.. Study on the strengthening mechanism of a MIBC-PEG mixed surfactant on foam stability. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(30): 27429-27438, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[35]]
Mcfadzean B, Marozva T, Wiese J. Flotation frother mixtures: Decoupling the sub-processes of froth stability, froth recovery and entrainment. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 85: 72-79, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[36]]
An M-y, Liao Y-f, Zhao Y-f, et al.. Effect of frothers on removal of unburned carbon from coal-fired power plant fly ash by froth flotation. Separation Science and Technology, 2018, 53(3): 535-543, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[37]]
Bayram S, Yenial Ü, Bulut G. . The effect of frothers on pyrite flotation [M], 2018 526-530 KUZU C, TUNÇDEMIR H, GÖKAŞAN N O. Istanbul Technical University, Mining Faculty Geosciences Student Graduation Design Projects Symposium. e-ISBN: 978-975-561-495-3
[[38]]
Urbina R H. Recent developments and advances in formulations and applications of chemical reagents used in froth flotation. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2003, 24(2): 139-182, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[39]]
Melo F, Laskowski J S. Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 766-773, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[40]]
Khoshdast H, Abbasi H, Sam A, et al.. Frothability and surface behavior of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 60: 127-134, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[41]]
Crozier R D. . Chemical properties of frothers: Flotation theory, reagent and ore testing, 1992 New York, NY, USA Pergamon [M]
[[42]]
Sweet C, Hoogstraten J V, Harris M. Finch J A, Rao S R, Holubec I. The effect of frothers on bubble size and frothability of aqueous solutions. Processing of Complex Ores, 2nd UBC-McGill Symposium Series on Fundamental in Mineral Processing, 1997 235-246
[[43]]
Machon V, Pacek A W, Nienow A W. Bubble sizes in electrolyte and alcohol solutions in a turbulent stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1997, 75(3): 339-348, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[44]]
Aldrich C, Feng D. The effect of mothers on bubble size distributions in flotation pulp phases and surface froths. Minerals Engineering, 2000, 13(10–11): 1049-1057, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[45]]
Pan Y-y, Bournival G, Ata S. The role of non-frothing reagents on bubble size and bubble stability. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 161: 106652, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[46]]
Comley B A, Harris P J, Bradshaw D J, et al.. Frother characterisation using dynamic surface tension measurements. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 64(2–3): 81-100, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[47]]
Ata S. Phenomena in the froth phase of flotation—A review. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2012, 102–103: 1-12, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[48]]
Maldonado M, Quinn J J, Gomez C O, et al.. An experimental study examining the relationship between bubble shape and rise velocity. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 98: 7-11, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[49]]
Wang H-n, Yang W-q, Yan X-k, et al.. Regulation of bubble size in flotation: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(5): 104070, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[50]]
Laskowski J S, Tlhone T, Williams P, et al.. Fundamental properties of the polyoxypropylene alkyl ether flotation frothers. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 289-299, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[51]]
Wahyuni S, Supriyanto S, Djayus D. Estimasi Sebaran Kualitas Batubara (Ash Content) Menggunakan Metode Invers Distance Weighted (Idw) Dan Ordinary Kriging (Ok) Di Pt. Kayan Putra Utama Coal Site Separi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Geosains Kutai Basin, 2019, 2(1): 1-6 [J]
[[52]]
Sugito N T, Abidin H Z, Soemarto I, et al.. Integration of linear and non-linear regression for estimating land value. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, 1089(1): 012032 [J]
[[53]]
Brown A M. A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2001, 65(3): 191-200, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[54]]
Bhondayi C, Moys M H, Danha G. Effect of pulp chemistry and solids on a froth bubble size measurement method. Powder Technology, 2016, 297: 202-210, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[55]]
Wang J-y, Forbes G, Forbes E. Frother characterization using a novel bubble size measurement technique. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(2): 750, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[56]]
Lefebvre A, Mezui Y, Obligado M, et al.. A new, optimized Doppler optical probe for phase detection, bubble velocity and size measurements: Investigation of a bubble column operated in the heterogeneous regime. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 250: 117359, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[57]]
Jahedsaravani A, Massinaei M, Zarie M. Measurement of bubble size and froth velocity using convolutional neural networks. Minerals Engineering, 2023, 204: 108400, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[58]]
Yang B, Wang W-s, Ping L, et al.. Measurement of bubble/slug velocity and size in vertical pipe based on optical cross-correlation method. Optik, 2023, 272: 170172, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[59]]
Wheeler T A. Coal floats by itself—doesn’t it?. Reagents for Better Metallurgy, 1994 Littleton SME 131-145 [M]
[[60]]
Wang S-w, Xia Q, Xu Fen. Investigation of collector mixtures on the flotation dynamics of low-rank coal. Fuel, 2022, 327: 125171, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[61]]
Bennett A J R, Chapman W R, Dell C C. Studies in froth flotation of coal [C]. Third International Coal Preparation Congress, 1958 Brussels-Liege
[[62]]
Xiong Yu. . Bubble size effects in coal flotation and phosphate reverse flotation using a pico-nano bubble generator [D], 2014, West Virginia University Libraries
CrossRef Google scholar
[[63]]
Hu H-s, Li M, Li L-l, et al.. Improving bubble-particle attachment during the flotation of low rank coal by surface modification. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 30(2): 217-223, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[64]]
Ahmed N, Jameson G J. The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1985, 14(3): 195-215, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[65]]
Polat M, Polat H, Chander S. Physical and chemical interactions in coal flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1–4): 199-213, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[66]]
Beattie D A, Huynh L, Kaggwa G B N, et al.. The effect of polysaccharides and polyacrylamides on the depression of talc and the flotation of sulphide minerals. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 598-608, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[67]]
Ozkan A, Dudnik V, Esmeli K. Hydrophobic flocculation of talc with kerosene and effects of anionic surfactants. Particulate Science and Technology, 2016, 34(2): 235-240, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[68]]
Feng D-w, Aldrich C. Effect of ultrasonication on the flotation of talc. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(15): 4422-4427, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[69]]
Yehia A, Al-Wakeel M I. Talc separation from talc-carbonate ore to be suitable for different industrial applications. Minerals Engineering, 2000, 13(1): 111-116, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[70]]
Levitz P E. Adsorption of non ionic surfactants at the solid/water interface. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2002, 205(1–2): 31-38, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[71]]
Cao L, Chen X-m, Peng Y-jun. The adsorption and orientation of frother surfactants on heterogeneous wetting surfaces. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 548: 149225, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[72]]
Lotter N O, Kowal D L, Tuzun M A, et al.. Sampling and flotation testing of Sudbury basin drill core for process mineralogy modelling. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16(9): 857-864, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[73]]
Kuan S H, Finch J A. Impact of talc on pulp and froth properties in F150 and 1-pentanol frother systems. Minerals Engineering, 2010, 23(11–13): 1003-1009, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[74]]
Tan S N, Fornasiero D, Sedev R, et al.. The interfacial conformation of polypropylene glycols and their foam properties. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6–8): 703-712, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[75]]
Fuerstenau D W, Huang P. Interfacial phenomena involved in talc flotation and depresion [C]. Proceedings of the 22nd International Mineral processing Congress, 2003 1034-1043 LORENZE N et al.
[[76]]
Zhang W, Finch J A. Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(4): 1461-1469, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[77]]
Walsh B J M. The use of talc as a talc adsorbent. J Chem Educ, 1967, 44: 294, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[78]]
Rath R K, Subramanian S, Laskowski J S. Adsorption of dextrin and guar gum onto talc: A comparative study. Langmuir, 1997, 13(23): 6260-6266, J]
CrossRef Google scholar
[[79]]
Laskowski J S. Anisotropic minerals in flotation circuits. CIM Journal, 2012, 3: 203-213 [J]
[[80]]
Ann Bazar J, Rahimi M, Fathinia S, et al.. Talc flotation—An overview. Minerals, 2021, 11(7): 662, J]
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/