Experimental study on microscopic characteristics of liquid-cooled granite based on mercury injection method

Tu-bing Yin, Ju-zhen Su, Deng-deng Zhuang, Xi-bing Li

Journal of Central South University ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 169-181. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-023-5481-7
Article

Experimental study on microscopic characteristics of liquid-cooled granite based on mercury injection method

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To study the effect of liquid cooling, including acid cooling and water cooling, on the microscopic characteristics of high-temperature granite, scanning electron microscopy and energy spectroscopy analysis tests (SEM-EDS) as well as mercury injection experiments were carried out on liquid-cooled granite. The SEM-EDS results show that the elemental composition is barely affected by water cooling, while acid cooling causes reductions in O, Si, and metallic elements. The pores and cracks were observed in both cases. Moreover, a more non-flat, loose, and rough surface is created under acid cooling conditions compared to water cooling. Mercury injection tests show an increase in porosity, pore volume, and specific surface area in liquid-cooled granite samples, while their fractal dimensions show an opposite trend. Acid cooling leads to significantly greater property changes than water cooling, owing to the dissolution effects of mud acid. The results demonstrate that the acid cooling process results in greater capacity of pore generation and expansion, as well as lower pore structure complexity, compared to water cooling.

Keywords

pore structure / microstructure / liquid cooling / mud acid solution / mercury injection technology / granite / fractal theory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tu-bing Yin, Ju-zhen Su, Deng-deng Zhuang, Xi-bing Li. Experimental study on microscopic characteristics of liquid-cooled granite based on mercury injection method. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(1): 169‒181 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5481-7

References

[1]
Zhuang D-D, Yin T-B, Li Q, et al.. Effect of injection flow rate on fracture toughness during hydraulic fracturing of hot dry rock (HDR) [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2022, 260: 108207,
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Zhu J-L, Hu K-Y, Lu X-L, et al.. A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects [J]. Energy, 2015, 93: 466-483,
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen Y, Ma G-W, Wang H-D, et al.. Evaluation of geothermal development in fractured hot dry rock based on three dimensional unified pipe-network method [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 136: 219-228,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Wu X-H, Guo Q-F, Zhu Y, et al.. Pore structure and crack characteristics in high-temperature granite under water-cooling [J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 28: 101646,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Gu H-L, Lai X-P, Tao M, et al.. The role of porosity in the dynamic disturbance resistance of water-saturated coal [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2023, 166: 105388,
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Kim K, Kemeny J, Nickerson M. Effect of rapid thermal cooling on mechanical rock properties [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(6): 2005-2019,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Kumari W G P, Ranjith P G, Perera M S A, et al.. Temperature-dependent mechanical behaviour of Australian Strathbogie granite with different cooling treatments [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 229: 31-44,
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Isaka B, Gamage R, Rathnaweera T, et al.. An influence of thermally-induced micro-cracking under cooling treatments: Mechanical characteristics of Australian granite [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(6): 1338,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Jin P-H, Hu Y-Q, Shao J-X, et al.. Influence of different thermal cycling treatments on the physical, mechanical and transport properties of granite [J]. Geothermics, 2019, 78: 118-128,
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Gao H-M, Lan Y-W, Guo N. Pore structural features of granite under different temperatures [J]. Materials, 2021, 14(21): 6470,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yang L, Yang D, Zhao J, et al.. Changes of oil shale pore structure and permeability at different temperatures [J]. Oil Shale, 2016, 33(2): 101,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Liu Z-J, Yang D, Hu Y-Q, et al.. Influence of in situ pyrolysis on the evolution of pore structure of oil shale [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(4): 755,
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Bai F-T, Sun Y-H, Liu Y-M, et al.. Evaluation of the porous structure of Huadian oil shale during pyrolysis using multiple approaches [J]. Fuel, 2017, 187: 1-8,
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Geng Y-D, Liang W-G, Liu J, et al.. Evolution of pore and fracture structure of oil shale under high temperature and high pressure [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(10): 10404-10413,
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ekberg J, Ganvir A, Klement U, et al.. The influence of heat treatments on the porosity of suspension plasmasprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings [J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2018, 27(3): 391-401,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Farquharson J I, Kushnir A R L, Wild B, et al.. Physical property evolution of granite during experimental chemical stimulation [J]. Geothermal Energy, 2020, 8(1): 1-24,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Yin Q, Jing H-W, Liu R-C, et al.. Pore characteristics and nonlinear flow behaviors of granite exposed to high temperature [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79(3): 1239-1257,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Zhao Y-S, Feng Z-J, Xi B-P, et al.. Deformation and instability failure of borehole at high temperature and high pressure in hot dry rock exploitation [J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 77: 159-165,
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Caulk R A, Ghazanfari E, Perdrial J N, et al.. Experimental investigation of fracture aperture and permeability change within enhanced geothermal systems [J]. Geothermics, 2016, 62: 12-21,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Hou B, Zhang R-X, Chen M, et al.. Investigation on acid fracturing treatment in limestone formation based on true tri-axial experiment [J]. Fuel, 2019, 235: 473-484,
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Guo T-K, Li Y-C, Ding Y, et al.. Evaluation of acid fracturing treatments in shale formation [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(10): 10479-10489,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Xu J-N, Feng B, Cui Z-P, et al.. Comparative study of acid and alkaline stimulants with granite in an enhanced geothermal system [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2021, 95(6): 1926-1939,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Xu P, Sheng M, Lin T-Y, et al.. Influences of rock microstructure on acid dissolution at a dolomite surface [J]. Geothermics, 2022, 100: 102324,
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Tariq Z, Aljawad M S, Mahmoud M, et al.. Thermochemical acid fracturing of tight and unconventional rocks: Experimental and modeling investigations [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 83: 103606,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Han H, Guo C, Zhong N-N, et al.. A study on fractal characteristics of lacustrine shales of Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin, northeast China using nitrogen adsorption and mercury injection methods [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193: 107378,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Krohn C E, Thompson A H. Fractal sandstone pores: Automated measurements using scanning-electron-microscope images [J]. Physical Review B, 1986, 33(9): 6366-6374,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zeng Y-C, He B, Tang L-S, et al.. Numerical simulation of temperature field and pressure field of the fracture system at Zhangzhou geothermal field [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79(11): 262,
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhuang D-D, Yin T-B, Li Q, et al.. Fractal fracture toughness measurements of heat-treated granite using hydraulic fracturing under different injection flow rates [J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2022, 119: 103340,
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Portier S, Vuataz F D, Nami P, et al.. Chemical stimulation techniques for geothermal wells: Experiments on the three-well EGS system at Soultz-sous-Forêts, France [J]. Geothermics, 2009, 38(4): 349-359,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Li Q, Li X-B, Yin T-B. Factors affecting pore structure of granite under cyclic heating and cooling: A nuclear magnetic resonance investigation [J]. Geothermics, 2021, 96: 102198,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Cui H-B, Tang J-P, Jiang X-T. Effects of different conditions of water cooling at high temperature on the tensile strength and split surface roughness characteristics of hot dry rock [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1-23
[32]
Liu Z-L, Ma C-D, Wei X-A. Electron scanning characteristics of rock materials under different loading methods: A review [J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2022, 8(2): 80,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Washburn E W. The dynamics of capillary flow [J]. Physical Review, 1921, 17(3): 273-283,
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Schmitt Rahner M, Halisch M, Peres Fernandes C, et al.. Fractal dimensions of pore spaces in unconventional reservoir rocks using X-ray nano- and microcomputed tomography [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 55: 298-311,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Cheng Y-G, Zhang X-F, Lu Z-H, et al.. The effect of subcritical and supercritical CO2 on the pore structure of bituminous coals [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 94: 104132,
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wang B, Li B-B, Li J-H, et al.. Measurement and modeling of coal adsorption-permeability based on the fractal method [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 88: 103824,
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Lai J, Wang G-W. Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24: 185-196,
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Han W-B, Zhou G, Gao D-H, et al.. Experimental analysis of the pore structure and fractal characteristics of different metamorphic coal based on mercury intrusion-nitrogen adsorption porosimetry [J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 362: 386-398,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Liu K-Y, Zhong X-P, Zhu Y, et al.. Experimental study on the influence of acid-pressure compound effect on multi-scale pore evolution of oil shale [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022, 47(6): 7419-7432,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Yao Y-B, Liu D-M, Tang D-Z, et al.. Fractal characterization of seepage-pores of coals from China: An investigation on permeability of coals [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2009, 35(6): 1159-1166,
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Liu Z, Zhu D-L, Yang H, et al.. Experimental research on different metamorphic grades of coal bodies with macro-mesoscopic structure fractal characteristics [J]. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 2022, 32: 100337,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Wang F-Y, Yang K, You J-X, et al.. Analysis of pore size distribution and fractal dimension in tight sandstone with mercury intrusion porosimetry [J]. Results in Physics, 2019, 13: 102283,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhao F, Sun Q, Zhang W-Q. Fractal analysis of pore structure of granite after variable thermal cycles [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, 78(24): 1-11,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Feng B, Xu J-N, Xu T-F, et al.. Application and recent progresses of chemical stimulation on hot dry rock reservoir modification [J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(5): 577-591
[45]
Takahashi R, Wang J-J, Watanabe N. Process and optimum pH for permeability enhancement of fractured granite through selective mineral dissolution by chelating agent flooding [J]. Geothermics, 2023, 109: 102646,
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Watanabe N, Takahashi K, Takahashi R, et al.. Novel chemical stimulation for geothermal reservoirs by chelating agent driven selective mineral dissolution in fractured rocks [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 19994,
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/