Ecoregional height–diameter models for Scots pine in Turkiye

Fadime Sağlam1(), Oytun Emre Sakici1

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 103. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01757-z
Original Paper

Ecoregional height–diameter models for Scots pine in Turkiye

  • Fadime Sağlam1(), Oytun Emre Sakici1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Ecoregion-based height-diameter models were developed in the present study for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Turkiye and included several ecological factors derived from a pre-existing ecoregional classification system. The data were obtained from 2831 sample trees in 292 sample plots. Ten generalized height–diameter models were developed, and the best model (HD10) was selected according to statistical criteria. Then, nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was applied to the best model. The R2 for the generalized height‒diameter model (Richards function) modified by Sharma and Parton is 0.951, and the final model included number of trees, dominant height, and diameter at breast height, with a random parameter associated with each ecoregion attached to the inverse of the mean basal area. The full model predictions using the nonlinear mixed-effects model and the reduced model (HD10) predictions were compared using the nonlinear sum of extra squares test, which revealed significant differences between ecoregions; ecoregion-based height–diameter models were thus found to be suitable to use. In addition, using these models in appropriate ecoregions was very important for achieving reliable predictions with low prediction errors.

Keywords

Tree height / Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling / Nonlinear sum of extra squares method / Ecoregion / Scots pine

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fadime Sağlam, Oytun Emre Sakici. Ecoregional height–diameter models for Scots pine in Turkiye. Journal of Forestry Research, 2024, 35(1): 103 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01757-z

References

[1]
Adame P, del Río M, Ca?ellas I (2008) A mixed nonlinear height–diameter model for Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.). For Ecol Manag 256(1–2):88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.006
[2]
álvarez González JG, Ruíz González AD, Rodríguez Soalleiro R, Barrio Anta M (2005) Ecoregional site index models for Pinus pinaster in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). Ann for Sci 62(2):115–127. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005003
[3]
Atalay ? (2014) Ecoregions of Turkey. Meta Press, ?zmir
[4]
Brooks JR, Wiant Jr HV (2005) Evaluating ecoregion-based heightdiameter relationships of five economically important Appalachian hardwood species in West Virginia. In: The Seventh Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, 237–242, Washington. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265026188
[5]
Burkhart HE, Strub MR (1974) A model for simulation of planted loblolly pine stands. In: Fries J (ed) Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm
[6]
Calama R, Montero G (2004) Interregional nonlinear height–diameter model with random coefficients for stone pine in Spain. Can J for Res 34(1):150–163. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-199
[7]
Canadas N, Garcia C, Montero G (1999) Height-diameter relationship for Pinus pinea L. in the central system. Proc Congr Adm Manage Sustain for 1:139–154
[8]
Castedo Dorado F, Barrio Anta M, Parresol BR, álvarez González JG (2005) A stochastic height-diameter model for maritime pine ecoregions in Galicia (northwestern Spain). Ann for Sci 62(5):455–465. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005042
[9]
Castedo Dorado F, Diéguez-Aranda U, Barrio Anta M, Sánchez Rodríguez M, von Gadow K (2006) A generalized height–diameter model including random components for radiata pine plantations in northwestern Spain. For Ecol Manag 229(1–3):202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.028
[10]
Chenge IB (2021) Height–diameter relationship of trees in Omo strict nature forest reserve Nigeria. Trees for People 3:100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100051
[11]
Ciceu A, Garcia-Duro J, Seceleanu I, Badea O (2020) A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height–diameter model for Norway spruce in mixed-uneven aged stands. For Ecol Manag 477:118507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118507
[12]
Corral-Rivas S, álvarez-González J, Crecente-Campo F, Corral-Rivas J (2014) Local and generalized height-diameter models with random parameters for mixed, uneven-aged forests in Northwestern Durango. Mexico for Ecosyst 1(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-5620-1-6
[13]
Curtis RO (1967) Height-diameter and height-diameter-age equations for second-growth Douglas-fir. For Sci 13(4):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/13.4.365
[14]
Curtis RO, Clendenan GW, Demars DJ (1981) A new stand simulator for coast 341 Douglas-Fir: DFSIM Users Guide. U. S. Forest Service General Technical Report 342 PNW-1128
[15]
Ercanli I (2015) Nonlinear mixed effect models for predicting relationships between total height and diameter of oriental beech trees in Kestel Turkey. Rchscfa XXI. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.02.006
[16]
Ercanli I, Eyuboglu D (2019) Comparing mixed effect nonlinear regression and autoregressive nonlinear regression models to resolve the problem of autocorrelation in the relationships between total tree height and diameter at breast height. Anatol J for Res 5(1):17–27 ((in Turkish))
[17]
Fu LY, Zeng WS, Tang SZ, Sharma RP, Li HK (2012) Using linear mixed model and dummy variable model approaches to construct compatible single-tree biomass equations at different scales—a case study for Masson pine in Southern China. J for Sci 58(3):101–115. https://doi.org/10.17221/69/2011-jfs
[18]
Huang S (1999) Ecoregion-based individual tree height-diameter models for lodgepole pine in Alberta. West J Appl for 14(4):186–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/14.4.186
[19]
Huang S, Price D, Titus SJ (2000) Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for white spruce in boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 129(1–3):125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00151-6
[20]
Kearsley E, Moonen PC, Hufkens K, Doetterl S, Lisingo J, Boyemba Bosela F, Boeckx P, Beeckman H, Verbeeck H (2017) Model performance of tree height-diameter relationships in the central Congo Basin. Ann for Sci 74(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0611-0
[21]
Klos RJ, Wang GG, Dang QL, East EW (2007) Taper equations for five major commercial tree species in Manitoba. Canada West J Appl for 22(3):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/22.3.163
[22]
Krumland BE, Wensel LC (1988) A generalized height-diameter equation for coastal California species. West J Appl for 3(4):113–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/3.4.113
[23]
Lappi J (1997) A longitudinal analysis of height/diameter curves. For Sci 43(4):555–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/43.4.555
[24]
Lei YC, Parresol BR (2001) Remarks on height-diameter modelling. Research Note SRS 10. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville NC
[25]
Lin F, Xie L, Hao Y, Miao Z, Dong L (2022) Comparison of modeling approaches for the Height–diameter relationship: an example with planted Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) trees in Northeast China. Forests 13(8):1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081168
[26]
Lindstrom ML, Bates DM (1990) Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 46(3):673–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532087
[27]
López-Sánchez CA, Gorgoso Varela J, Castedo Dorado F, Rojo Alboreca A, Soalleiro RR, álvarez González JG, Sánchez Rodríguez F (2003) A height-diameter model for Pinus radiata D. Don in Galicia (Northwest Spain). Ann for Sci 60(3):237–245. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003015
[28]
Magalh?es TM (2017) Site-specific height-diameter and stem volume equations for Lebombo-ironwood. Ann for Res 60(2):297–312. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2017.838
[29]
Meht?talo L (2013) Forest biometrics with examples in R. University of Eastern Finland School of Computing, Joensuu
[30]
Meyer HA (1940) A mathematical expression for height curves. J for 38(5):415–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/38.5.415
[31]
Mirkovich JL (1958) Normale visinske krive za chrast kitnak I bukvu v NR Srbiji. Zagreb Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta 13:43–56
[32]
M?s?r N (2010) Generalized height-diameter models for Populus tremula L. stands. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4348–4355. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.342
[33]
Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc, Chicago
[34]
?z?el?k R, Yavuz H, Karatepe Y, Gürlev?k N, Kiri? R (2014) Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for 3 economically important tree species of southern Turkey. Turk J Agric for 38:399–412. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1304-115
[35]
?z?elik R, ?apar C (2014) Antalya y?resi do?al k?z?l?am me?cereleri i?in genelle?tirilmi? ?ap-boy modellerinin geli?tirilmesi. Turk J for 15(1):44. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.01926
[36]
Parresol BR (1992) Baldcypress height–diameter equations and their prediction confidence intervals. Can J for Res 22(9):1429–1434. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-191
[37]
Peng CH, Zhang LJ, Zhou XL, Dang QL, Huang SM (2004) Developing and evaluating tree height-diameter models at three geographic scales for black spruce in Ontario. North J Appl for 21(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/21.2.83
[38]
Pienaar LV, Harrison WM, Rheney JW (1991) PMRC yield prediction system for slash pine plantations in the Atlantic coast flatwoods. Plantation Management Research Cooperative Technical Report, Athens
[39]
Pillsbury NH, McDonald PM, Simon V (1995) Reliability of tanoak volume equations when applied to different areas. West J Appl for 10(2):72–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/10.2.72
[40]
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (1998) Model building for nonlinear mixed effects model. Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
[41]
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in sand S-PLUS. Springer, New York
[42]
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2021) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed efects models. R package version 3.1–152. https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme
[43]
Poudel KP, Cao QV (2013) Evaluation of methods to predict weibull parameters for characterizing diameter distributions. For Sci 59(2):243–252. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-001
[44]
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
[45]
Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10(29):290–301
[46]
Saunders MR, Wagner RG (2008) Height-diameter models with random coefficients and site variables for tree species of central Maine. Ann for Sci 65(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007086
[47]
Schnute J (1981) A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38(9):1128–1140. https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-153
[48]
Seki M, Sakici OE (2022) Ecoregion-based height-diameter models for Crimean pine. J for Res 27(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2021.1972511
[49]
Sharma M, Parton J (2007) Height–diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach. For Ecol Manag 249(3):187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.006
[50]
Sharma M, Zhang SY (2004) Height-Diameter models using stand characteristics for Pinus banksiana and Picea mariana. Scand J for Res 19(5):442–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580410030163
[51]
Temesgen H, Gadow K (2004) Generalized height–diameter models—an application for major tree species in complex stands of interior British Columbia. Eur J for Res 123:45–51
[52]
Timilsina N, Staudhammer CL (2013) Individual tree-based diameter growth model of slash pine in Florida using nonlinear mixed modeling. For Sci 59(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.10-028
[53]
Van Laar A, Ak?a A (1997) Forest mensuration. Cuvillier, Gtlttingen
[54]
VanderSchaaf CL (2014) Mixed-effects height–diameter models for ten conifers in the inland Northwest, USA. South for J for Sci 76(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2013.870396
[55]
Von Gadow K, Hui G (1999) Modelling forest development. Springer Netherlands
[56]
Wang ML, Borders BE, Zhao DH (2008) An empirical comparison of two subject-specific approaches to dominant heights modeling: the dummy variable method and the mixed model method. For Ecol Manag 255(7):2659–2669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.030
[57]
Yang SI, Burkhart HE (2020) Evaluation of total tree height subsampling strategies for estimating volume in loblolly pine plantations. For Ecol Manag 461:117878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117878
[58]
Zeide B, Vanderschaaf C (2002) The effect of density on the height-diameter relationship. In: Outcalt KW (eds) Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. 2001 March 20–22. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48, Asheville, NC, Knoxville, TN, pp 463–466
[59]
Zeng WS (2015) Using nonlinear mixed model and dummy variable model approaches to develop origin-based individual tree biomass equations. Trees 29(1):275–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1112-0
[60]
Zhang LJ, Peng CH, Huang SM, Zhou XL (2002) Development and evaluation of ecoregion-based jack pine height-diameter models for Ontario. For Chron 78(4):530–538. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc78530-4
Funding
Kastamonu University
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/