Impacts of forest plantation programs on sectoral CO₂ emissions regionally in New Zealand

Abstract

Investing in projects that support environmental benefits, such as tree harvesting, has the potential to reduce air pollution levels in the atmosphere in the future. However, this kind of investment may increase the current level of emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate how much the policy affects the current level of CO₂ emissions. This makes sure the policy doesn’t increase the level of CO₂ emissions. This study aims to analyze the effect of the One Billion Trees program on CO₂ emissions in New Zealand by employing the 2020 input–output table analysis. This investigation examines the direct and indirect effects of policy on both the demand and supply sides across six regions of New Zealand. The results of this study for the first year of plantation suggest that the policy increases the level of CO₂ emissions in all regions, especially in the Waikato region. The direct and indirect impact of the policy leads to 64 kt of CO₂ emissions on the demand side and 270 kt of CO₂ emissions on the supply side. These lead to 0.19 and 0.74% of total CO₂ emissions being attributed to investment shocks. Continuing the policy is recommended, as it has a low effect on CO₂ emissions. However, it is crucial to prioritize the use of low-carbon machinery that uses fossil fuels during the plantation process.

References

[] AssisTO, de AguiarAPD, von RandowC, de Paula GomesDM, KuryJN, OmettoJPHB, NobreCA. CO₂ emissions from forest degradation in Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res Lett, 2020, 15

[] BegumRA, RaihanA, SaidMNM. Dynamic impacts of economic growth and forested area on carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 9375

[] BeidariM, LinSG, LewisC. Multiplier effects of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions by input-output analysis in South Africa. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 2017, 17: 1666-1678

[] CelluraM, LongoS, MistrettaM. The energy and environmental impacts of Italian households consumptions: an input–output approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2011, 15: 3897-3908

[] CherubiniF, StrømmanAH, HertwichE. Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO₂ emissions from bioenergy. Ecol Model, 2011, 223(1): 59-66

[] DuarteR, MainarA, Sánchez-ChólizJ. The impact of household consumption patterns on emissions in Spain. Energy Econ, 2010, 32: 176-185

[] Forest Enterprises (2016) What is the emissions trading scheme (ETS)? Forest Enterprises, Masterton, New Zealand. Available at (April 2024): What is the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)? | Forestenterprises.co.nz

[] FedericiS, TubielloFN, SalvatoreM, JacobsH, SchmidhuberJ. New estimates of CO₂ forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015. For Ecol Manage, 2015, 352: 89-98

[] Fidel AR, Mendoza M, Antonio M (2013) The demand driven and the supply-sided input-output models. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61132/

[] Garrett-PeltierH. Green versus brown: Comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model. Econ Model, 2017, 61: 439-447

[] GundersenP, ThybringEE, Nord-LarsenT, VesterdalL, NadelhofferKJ, JohannsenVK. Old-growth forest carbon sinks overestimated. Nature, 2021, 591: E21-E23

[] HaddenD, GrelleA. Net CO₂ emissions from a primary boreo-nemoral forest over a 10year period. For Ecol Manage, 2017, 398: 164-173

[] HendricksonCT, LaveLB, MatthewsHS. Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach, 2006 1 London, New York Routledge

[] Iordan CM, Hu X, Arvesen A, Kauppi P, Cherubini F (2018) Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Carbon Balanc Manage. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0101-9

[] JiaY, FangY, JingZ, LinF. Price connectedness and input–output linkages: evidence from China. Econ Model, 2022, 116

[] KeS, ZhangZ, WangY. China’s forest carbon sinks and mitigation potential from carbon sequestration trading perspective. Ecol Ind, 2023, 148

[] Keller M, Kaplan WA, Wofsy SC (1986). Emissions of N₂O, CH₄ and CO₂ from tropical forest soils. 91(D11): 11791−11802. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD11p11791

[] KokR, BendersR, MollH. Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input–output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(17): 2744-2761

[] KruidS, MacedoMN, GorelikSR, WalkerW, MoutinhoP, BrandoPM, CastanhoA, AlencarA, BacciniA, CoeMT. Beyond deforestation: carbon emissions from land grabbing and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Front for Glob Change, 2021, 4

[] LiJS, ChenGQ, HayatT, AlsaediA. Mercury emissions by Beijing’s fossil energy consumption: based on environmentally extended input–output analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 41: 1167-1175

[] LinB, GeJ. To harvest or not to harvest? Forest management as a trade-off between bioenergy production and carbon sink. J Clean Prod, 2020, 268

[] Ministry of Primary Industry (MPI) (2023) About New Zealand’s Forests. Ministry of Primary Industry, Wellington. Available at (April 2024): About New Zealand's forests|NZ Government (mpi.govt.nz)

[] Ministry for the Environment (MfE) (2022) New Zealand’s gross and net emissions. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington. Available at (April 2024): New Zealand's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2021 snapshot|Ministry for the Environment

[] NwachukwuCM, WangC, WetterlundE. Exploring the role of forest biomass in abating fossil CO2 emissions in the iron and steel industry—the case of Sweden. Appl Energy, 2021, 288

[] ParajuliR, JoshiO, MaraseniT. Incorporating forests, agriculture, and energy consumption in the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve: a dynamic panel data approach. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 2688

[] RaihanA, BegumRA, NizamM, SaidM, PereiraJJ. Dynamic impacts of energy use, agricultural land expansion, and deforestation on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environ Ecol Stat, 2022, 29: 477-507

[] RehmanA, MaH, AhmadM, IrfanM, TraoreO, ChandioAA. Towards environmental sustainability: devolving the influence of carbon dioxide emission to population growth, climate change, Forestry, livestock and crops production in Pakistan. Ecol Ind, 2021, 125

[] RenZ, ZhengH, HeX, ZhangD, ShenG, ZhaiC. Changes in spatio-temporal patterns of urban forest and its above-ground carbon storage: implication for urban CO₂ emissions mitigation under China's rapid urban expansion and greening. Environ Int, 2019, 129: 438-450

[] RinaldiL, RoccoMV, ColomboE. Assessing critical materials demand in global energy transition scenarios based on the Dynamic Extraction and Recycling Input-Output framework (DYNERIO). Resour Conserv Recycl, 2023, 191

[] RuddimanWF, EllisEC. Effect of per-capita land use changes on Holocene forest clearance and CO₂ emissions. Quatern Sci Rev, 2009, 28(27–28): 3011-3015

[] SchlamadingerB, MarlandG. Net effect of forest harvest on CO₂ emissions to the atmosphere: a sensitivity analysis on the influence of time. Tellus B, 2002, 51(2): 314-325

[] SolaymaniS. Biodiesel and its potential to mitigate transport-related CO₂ emissions. Carbon Res, 2023, 2: 38

[] SolaymaniS, VillamorG, DunninghamA, HallP. The relationship between energy and non-energy factors and CO₂ emissions in New Zealand. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2023, 30: 104270-104283

[] Stats NZ (2023) New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions. Stats NZ, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at (April 2024): New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions | Stats NZ

[] TaranconMA, RíoPD. Assessing energy-related CO₂ emissions with sensitivity analysis and input-output techniques. Energy, 2012, 37(1): 161-170

[] TianX, BaiF, JiaJ, LiuY, ShiF. Realizing low-carbon development in a developing and industrializing region: impacts of industrial structure change on CO₂ emissions in southwest China. J Environ Manage, 2019, 233: 728-738

[] TubielloFN, ConcheddaG, WannerN, FedericiS, RossiS, GrassiG. Carbon emissions and removals from forests: new estimates, 1990–2020. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2021, 13(4): 1681-1691

[] TubielloFN, ConcheddaG, WannerN, FedericiS, RossiS, GrassiG. Carbon emissions and removals from forests: new estimates, 1990–2020. ESSD, 2021, 13(4): 1681-1691

[] WaheedR, ChangD, SarwarS, ChenW. Forest, agriculture, renewable energy, and CO₂ emission. J Clean Prod, 2018, 172: 4231-4238

[] WangJ, DongX, DongK. How digital industries affect China’s carbon emissions? Analysis of the direct and indirect structural effects. Technol Soc, 2022, 68

[] WeiJ, HuangK, YangS, LiY, HuT, ZhangY. Driving forces analysis of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions in Beijing: an input-output structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod, 2017, 163: 58-68

[] XuG, SchwarzP, ShiX, DumaN. Scenario paths of developing forest carbon sinks for China to achieve carbon neutrality. Land, 2023, 12(7): 1325

[] YuanB, RenS, ChenX. The effects of urbanization, consumption ratio and consumption structure on residential indirect CO₂ emissions in China: a regional comparative analysis. Appl Energy, 2015, 140: 94-106

[] ZhangY. Supply-side structural effect on carbon emissions in China. Energ Econ, 2010, 32(1): 186-193

[] ZhaoN, WangK, YuanY. Toward the carbon neutrality: Forest carbon sinks and its spatial spillover effect in China. Ecol Econ, 2023, 209

[] ZhongS, WangH. The effect of total factor productivity of forestry industry on CO₂ emissions: a spatial econometric analysis of China. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 14200

Funding

New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited