Carbon dioxide enrichment affected flower numbers transiently and increased successful post-pollination development stably but without altering final acorn production in mature pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.)

Abstract

Acorn production in oak (Quercus spp.) shows considerable inter-annual variation, known as masting, which provides a natural defence against seed predators but a highly-variable supply of acorns for uses such as in commercial tree planting each year. Anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases have been very widely reported to influence plant growth and seed or fruit size and quantity via the ‘fertilisation effect’ that leads to enhanced photosynthesis. To examine if acorn production in mature woodland communities will be affected by further increase in CO₂, the contents of litter traps from a Free Air Carbon Enrichment (FACE) experiment in deciduous woodland in central England were analysed for numbers of flowers and acorns of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) at different stages of development and their predation levels under ambient and elevated CO₂ concentrations. Inter-annual variation in acorn numbers was considerable and cyclical between 2015 and 2021, with the greatest numbers of mature acorns in 2015, 2017 and 2020 but almost none in 2018. The numbers of flowers, enlarged cups, immature acorns, empty acorn cups, and galls in the litter traps also varied amongst years; comparatively high numbers of enlarged cups were recorded in 2018, suggesting Q. robur at this site is a fruit maturation masting species (i.e., the extent of abortion of pollinated flowers during acorn development affects mature acorn numbers greatly). Raising the atmospheric CO₂ concentration by 150 μL L⁻¹, from early 2017, increased the numbers of immature acorns, and all acorn evidence (empty cups + immature acorns + mature acorns) detected in the litter traps compared to ambient controls by 2021, but did not consistently affect the numbers of flowers, enlarged cups, empty cups, or mature acorns. The number of flowers in the elevated CO₂ plots’ litter traps was greater in 2018 than 2017, one year after CO₂ enrichment began, whereas numbers declined in ambient plots. Enrichment with CO₂ also increased the number of oak knopper galls (Andricus quercuscalicis Burgsdorf). We conclude that elevated CO₂ increased the occurrence of acorns developing from flowers, but the putative benefit to mature acorn numbers may have been hidden by excessive pre- and/or post-dispersal predation. There was no evidence that elevated CO₂ altered masting behaviour.

Keywords

Quercus robur L. / Acorns / Masting / Pedunculate oak / Carbon dioxide

References

[1]	Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x
[2]	Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2021) 30 years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Global Change Biol 27:27–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15375
[3]	Akaike H (1998) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G (eds) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer, pp 199–213.
[4]	Alam SM (1999) Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. In: Pessaraki M (ed) Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 285–314
[5]	Allen RB, Millard P, Richardson SJ (2017) A Resource Centric View of Climate and Mast Seeding in Trees. In: Cánovas FM, Lüttge U, Matyssek R (eds.), Progress in Botany. Vol. 79. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/124_2017_8
[6]	Askeyev O, Tishin D, Sparks T, Askeyev I (2005) The effect of climate on the phenology, acorn crop and radial increment of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) in the middle Volga region, Tatarstan, Russia. Int J Biometeorol 49:262–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-004-0233-3
[7]	Boavida LC, Silva JP, Feijó JA (2001) Sexual reproduction in the cork oak (Quercus suber L.). II. Crossing intra-and interspecific barriers. Sex Plant Reprod 14:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004970100100
[8]	Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Fernandez-Martinez M, Penuelas J, Espelta JM (2019) The effects of local climate on the correlation between weather and seed production differ in two species with contrasting masting habit. Agric for Meteorol 268:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.016
[9]	Bogdziewicz M, Kelly D, Thomas PA, Lageard JG, Hacket-Pain A (2020) Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech. Nat Plants 6:88–94
[10]	Bole D (2022) Addressing the possible shortfall of oak for the 2022/23 planting season. URL https://forestrycommission.blog.gov.uk/2022/07/21/addressing-the-possible-shortfall-of-oak-for-the-2022-23-planting-season/ [accessed on 13 July 2023]
[11]	Bradwell AR (2022) Norbury Park: An estate tackling climate change. Norbury Park Estate. ISBN: 978-1-5272-9734-0. Available from [e-mail]
[12]	Brienen RJW, Caldwell L, Duchesne L, Voelker S, Barichivich J, Baliva M, Ceccantini G, Di Filippo A, Helama S, Locosselli GM, Lopez L, Piovesan G, Sc?ngart J, Villalba R, Gloor E (2020) Forest carbon sink neutralized by pervasive growth-lifespan trade-offs. Nat Commun 11:4241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17966-z
[13]	Büntgen U, Krusic PJ, Piermattei A, Coomes DA, Esper J, Myglan VS, Kirdyanov AV, Camarero JJ, Crivellaro A, K?rner C (2019) Limited capacity of tree growth to mitigate the global greenhouse effect under predicted warming. Nat Commun 10:2171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10174-4
[14]	Canelo T, Gaytán á, González-Bornay G, Bonal R (2018) Seed loss before seed predation: experimental evidence of the negative effects of leaf feeding insects on acorn production. Integr Zool 13:238–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12292
[15]	Darbah JNT, Kubiske ME, Nelson N, Oksanen E, Vapaavuori E, Karnosky DF (2008) Effects of decadal exposure to interacting elevated CO2 and/or O3 on paper birch (Betula papyrifera) reproduction. Environ Pollut 155:446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.01.033
[16]	De Graaff MA, Van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate B, van Kessel C (2006) Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol 12:2077–2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x
[17]	Dickson R, Tomlinson P (1996) Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Ann for Sci 53:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19960202
[18]	US DOE (2020) US Department of energy free-air CO2 enrichment experiments: FACE results, lessons, and legacy. DOE/SC–0202. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. https://doi.org/10.2172/1615612.
[19]	Drake BG, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Long SP (1997) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:609–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609
[20]	Espelta JM, Cortés P, Molowny-Horas R, Sánchez-Humanes B, Retana J (2008) Masting mediated by summer drought reduces acorn predation in mediterranean oak forests. Ecology 89:805–817. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0217.1
[21]	Flannigan MD, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM (2000) Climate change and forest fires. Sci Tot Environ 262:221–229
[22]	Fleurot E, Lobry JR, Boulanger V, Debias F, Mermet-Bouvier C, Caignard T, Delzon S, Bel-Venner MC, Venner S (2023) Oak masting drivers vary between populations depending on their climatic environments. Curr Biol 33:1117-1124.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.01.034
[23]	Gardner A, Ellsworth DS, Crous KY, Pritchard J, MacKenzie AR (2022a) Is photosynthetic enhancement sustained through three years of elevated CO2 exposure in 175-year-old Quercus robur? Tree Physiol 42:130–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpab090
[24]	Gardner A, Ellsworth DS, Pritchard J, MacKenzie AR (2022b) Are chlorophyll concentrations and nitrogen across the vertical canopy profile affected by elevated CO2 in mature Quercus trees? Trees 36:1797–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-022-02328-7
[25]	Gardner A, Jiang M, Ellsworth DS, MacKenzie AR, Pritchard J, Bader MKF, Barton C, Bernacchi C, Calfapietra C, Crous KY, Dusenge ME, Gimeno TE, Hall M, Lamba S, Leuzinger S, Uddling J, Warren J, Wallin G, Medlyn BE (2022c) Optimal stomatal theory predicts CO2 responses of stomatal conductance in both gymnosperm and angiosperm trees. New Phytol 237(4):1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18618
[26]	Gómez JM (2004) Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01574.x
[27]	Hacket-Pain A (2021) Masting. Curr Biol 31:R884–R885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.007
[28]	Hall MC, Stiling P, Moon DC, Drake BG, Hunter MD (2005) Effects of elevated CO2 on foliar quality and herbivore damage in a scrub oak ecosystem. J Chem Ecol 31:267–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-1340-2
[29]	Hart KM, Curioni G, Blaen P, Harper NJ, Miles P, Lewin K, Nagy J, Bannister EJ, Cai XM, Thomas RM, Krause S, Tausz M, MacKenzie AR (2019) Characteristics of free air carbon dioxide enrichment of a northern temperate mature forest. Global Change Biol 26:1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14786
[30]	Hendrey GR, Ellsworth DS, Lewin KF, Nagy J (1999) A free-air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biol 5:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00228.x
[31]	Hoch G, Siegwolf RT, Keel SG, K?rner C, Han Q (2013) Fruit production in three masting tree species does not rely on stored carbon reserves. Oecol 171:653–662
[32]	Ibá?ez I, Clark JS, Dietze MC, Feeley K, Hersh M, LaDeau S, McBride A, Welch NE, Wolosin MS (2006) Predicting biodiversity change: Outside the climate envelope, beyond the species–area curve. Ecology 87:1896–1906. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1896:PBCOTC]2.0.CO;2
[33]	IPCC (2023) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
[34]	Isagi Y, Sugimura K, Sumida A, Ito H (1997) How does masting happen and synchronize? J Theor Biol 187:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0442
[35]	Jablonski LM, Wang X, Curtis PS (2002) Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytol 156:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00494.x
[36]	Kampichler C, Teschner M, Klein S, K?rner C (2008) Effects of 4 years of CO2 enrichment on the abundance of leaf-galls and leaf-mines in mature oaks. Acta Oecol 34:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2008.05.006
[37]	Kelly D (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol 9:465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90310-7
[38]	Khaine I, Woo SY (2015) An overview of interrelationship between climate change and forests. For Sci Technol 11:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2014.932718
[39]	Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M (2002) Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Adv Agron 77:293–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77017-X
[40]	Koenig WD, Knops JMH (2005) The mystery of masting in trees: Some trees reproduce synchronously over large areas, with widespread ecological effects, but how and why? Am Sci 93:340–347. http://www.jstor.com/stable/27858609
[41]	Komatsu H, Katayama A, Hirose S, Kume A, Higashi N, Ogawa S, Otsuki K (2007) Reduction in soil water availability and tree transpiration in a forest with pedestrian trampling. AgricFor Meteorol 146:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.014
[42]	LaDeau SL, Clark JS (2001) Rising CO2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057547
[43]	Langsrud ? (2003) ANOVA for unbalanced data: Use Type II instead of Type III sums of square. Stat Comput 13:163–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023260610025
[44]	Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR (2004) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:591–628. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610
[45]	MacKenzie AR, Krause S, Hart KM, Thomas RM, Blaen PJ, Hamilton RL, Curioni G, Quick SE, Kourmouli A, Hannah DM, Comer-Warner SA, Brekenfeld N, Ullah S, Press MC (2021) BIFoR FACE: water–soil–vegetation–atmosphere data from a temperate deciduous forest catchment, including under elevated CO2. Hydrolo Process 35:e14096. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14096
[46]	Martínez-Baroja L, Pérez-Camacho L, Villar-Salvador P, Rebollo S, Quiles P, Gómez-Sánchez D, Molina-Morales M, Leverkus AB, Castro J, Rey-Benayas JM (2019) Massive and effective acorn dispersal into agroforestry systems by an overlooked vector, the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica). Ecosphere 10:e02989. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2989
[47]	Mayoral C, Ioni S, Luna E, Crowley L, Hayward S, Sadler JP, Mackenzie AR (2023) Elevated CO2 does not improve seedling performance in a naturally regenerated oak woodland exposed to biotic stressors. Front for Glob Change 6:1278409. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1278409
[48]	Obeso JR (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155:321–348. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
[49]	Palacio S, Hoch G, Sala A, K?rner C, Millard P (2014) Does carbon storage limit tree growth? New Phytol 201:1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12602
[50]	Pau S, Okamoto DK, Calderón O, Wright SJ (2018) Long-term increases in tropical flowering activity across growth forms in response to rising CO2 and climate change. Global Change Biol 24:2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14004
[51]	Pearse IS, Koenig WD, Kelly D (2016) Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection. New Phytol 212:546–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14114
[52]	Poorter H, Navas ML (2003) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol 157:175–198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00680.x
[53]	Pritchard SG, Rogers HH, Prior SA, Peterson CM (1999) Elevated CO2 and plant structure: a review. Global Change Biol 5:807–837. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x
[54]	R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
[55]	Roberts AJ, Crowley LM, Sadler JP, Nguyen TT, Gardner AM, Hayward SA, Metcalfe DB (2022) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on insect herbivory and nutrient fluxes in a mature temperate forest. Forests 13:998. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070998
[56]	Ruehr S, Keenan TF, Williams C, Zhou Y, Lu X, Bastos A, Canadell JG, Prentice IC, Sitch S, Terrer C (2023) Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4:518–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00456-3
[57]	Sever K, Bogdan S, ?kvorc ? (2023) Response of photosynthesis, growth, and acorn mass of pedunculate oak to different levels of nitrogen in wet and dry growing seasons. J for Res 34:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01505-1
[58]	Skopp J, Jawson MD, Doran JW (1990) Steady-state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060018x
[59]	Stiling P, Moon D, Hymus G, Drake B (2004) Differential effects of elevated CO2 on acorn density, weight, germination, and predation among three oak species in a scrub-oak forest. Global Change Biol 10:228–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00728.x
[60]	Sturrock RN, Frankel SJ, Brown AV, Hennon PE, Kliejunas JT, Lewis KJ, Worrall JJ, Woods AJ (2011) Climate change and forest diseases. Plant Pathol 60:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02406.x
[61]	Wand SJ, Midgley GF, Jones MH, Curtis PS (1999) Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biol 5:723–741. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00265.x
[62]	Way DA, Ladeau SL, McCarthy HR, Clark JS, Oren RAM, Finzi AC, Jackson RB (2010) Greater seed production in elevated CO2 is not accompanied by reduced seed quality in Pinus taeda L. Global Change Biol 16:1046–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02007.x
[63]	Weso?owski T, Rowiński P, Maziarz M (2015) Interannual variation in tree seed production in a primeval temperate forest: Does masting prevail? Eur J for Res 134:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0836-0
[64]	Wheeler TR, Daymond AJ, Morrison JIL, Ellis RH, Hadley P (2004) Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in onion (Allium cepa) grown at a range of temperatures. Ann App Biol 144:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00322.x
[65]	Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni R, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Arneth A, Cao C, Cheng L, Kato E, Koven C, Li Y, Lian X, Liu Y, Liu R, Mao J, Pan Y, Peng S, Pe?uelas J, Poulter B, Pugh TAM, Stocker BD, Viovy N, Wang X, Wang Y, Xiao Z, Yang H, Zaehle S, Zeng N (2016) Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat Clim Chang 6:791–795. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3004