Tall, large-diameter trees and dense shrub layer as key determinants of the abundance and composition of bird communities in oak-dominated forests

Abstract

Increasing human activity is altering the structure of forests, which affects the composition of communities, including birds. However, little is known about the key forest structure variables that determine the richness of bird communities in European temperate oak forests. We, therefore, aimed to identify key variables in these habitats that could contribute to the design of management strategies for forest conservation by surveying 11 oak-dominated forest sites throughout the mid-mountain range of Hungary at 86 survey points to reveal the role of different compositional and structural variables for forest stands that influence the breeding bird assemblages in the forests at the functional group and individual species levels. Based on decision tree modelling, our results showed that the density of trees larger than 30 cm DBH was an overall important variable, indicating that large-diameter trees were essential to provide diverse bird communities. The total abundance of birds, the foliage-gleaners, primary and secondary cavity nesters, residents, and five specific bird species were related to the density of high trunk diameter trees. The abundance of shrub nesters was negatively influenced by a high density of trees over 10 cm DBH. The density of the shrub layer positively affected total bird abundance and the abundance of foliage gleaners, secondary cavity nesters and residents. Analysis of the co-dominant tree species showed that the presence of linden, beech, and hornbeam was important in influencing the abundance of various bird species, e.g., Eurasian Treecreeper (Certhia familiaris), Marsh Tit (Poecile palustris) and Wood Warbler (Phylloscopus sibilatrix). Our results indicated that large trees, high tree diversity, and dense shrub layer were essential for forest bird communities and are critical targets for protection to maintain diverse and abundant bird communities in oak-dominated forest habitats.

Keywords

Conservation ecology / Forest birds / Forest structure / Functional avian guilds / Hungary / Temperate oak forests

References

[1]	Adrion L (2016) Effects of structural heterogeneity of floodplain forests and hydrological dynamic on bird assemblages: a case study from the Donau-Auen National Park (Eastern Austria) Master of Science Thesis University of Vienna
[2]	Aszalós R, B?l?ni J, Frank T (eds.) (2019) Life 4 Oak Forests (LIFE16NAT/IT/000245)-Monitoring protocol-Deliverable of A2 Action. Centre for Ecological Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót, Hungary, Available at: http://www.life4oakforests.eu/project-outputs/
[3]	Aszalós R, Szigeti V, Harmos K, Csernák S, Frank T, ónodi G (2020) Foraging activity of woodpeckers on various forms of artificially created deadwood. Acta Ornithol 55(1):63–76. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2020.55.1.007
[4]	Balestrieri R, Basile M, Posillico M, Altea T, De Cinti B, Matteucci G (2015) A guild-based approach to assessing the influence of beech forest structure on bird communities. Forest Ecol Manag 356:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.011
[5]	Bereczki K, ódor P, Csóka G, Mag Z, Báldi A (2014) Effects of forest heterogeneity on the efficiency of caterpillar control service provided by birds in temperate oak forests. Forest Ecol Manag 327:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.001
[6]	Blicharska M, Angelstam P (2010) Conservation at risk: conflict analysis in the Bia?owie?a Forest, a european biodiversity hotspot. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 6:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2010.520028
[7]	Bouvet A, Paillet Y, Archaux F, Tillon L, Denis P, Gilg O, Gosselin F (2016) Effects of forest structure, management and landscape on bird and bat communities. Environ Conserv 43(2):148–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000363
[8]	Broughton RK, Hill RA, Freeman SN, Bellamy PE, Hinsley SA (2012) Describing habitat occupation by woodland birds with territory mapping and remotely sensed data: an example using the Marsh Tit (Poecile palustris). Condor 114(4):812–822. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.110171
[9]	Broughton RK, Bubnicki JW, Maziarz M (2020) Multi-scale settlement patterns of a migratory songbird in a European primaeval forest. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74:128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02906-0
[10]	Canterbury GE, Martin TE, Petit DR, Petit LJ, Bradford DF (2000) Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conserv Biol 14(2):544–558. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98235.x
[11]	Clark JS, McLachlan JS (2003) Stability of forest biodiversity. Nature 423(6940):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01632
[12]	Cockle KL, Martin K, Weso?owski T (2011) Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide. Front Ecol Environ 9(7):377–382. https://doi.org/10.1890/110013
[13]	Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. John Wiley, Chichester, p 942. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515075
[14]	Czeszczewik D, Walankiewicz W, Mitrus C, Tumiel T, Stański T, Sahel M, Bednarczyk G (2013) Importance of dead wood resources for woodpeckers in coniferous stands of the Bia?owie?a Forest. Bird Conserv Int 23(4):414–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270912000354
[15]	Czeszczewik D, Zub K, Stanski T, Sahel M, Kapusta A, Walankiewicz W (2014) Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in the Bialowieza Forest. Poland Iforest 8(3):377–385. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1212-007
[16]	da Silva BF, Pena JC, Viana-Junior AB, Vergne M, Pizo MA (2021) Noise and tree species richness modulate the bird community inhabiting small public urban green spaces of a Neotropical city. Urban Ecosys 24(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01021-2
[17]	De’athFabricius GKE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2
[18]	Delahaye L, Monticelli D, Lehaire F, Rondeux J, Claessens H (2010) Fine-scale habitat selection by two specialist woodpeckers occurring in beech and oak-dominated forests in southern Belgium. Ardeola 57:339–352. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164510X551363
[19]	Domokos E, Cristea V (2014) Effects of managed forests structure on woodpeckers (Picidae) in the Niraj valley (Romania): woodpecker populations in managed forests. North-West J Zool 10(1):110–117
[20]	Domokos E, Domokos J (2016) Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania. Turk J Zool 40:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1510-64
[21]	Drever MC, Aitken KEH, Norris AR, Martin K (2008) Woodpeckers as reliable indicators of bird richness, forest health and harvest. Biol Conserv 141:624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.004
[22]	Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3(9):479–486. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0479:LOFSCF]2.0.CO;2
[23]	E?tv?s CB, Hirka A, Gimesi L, L?vei GL, Gáspár C, Csóka G (2021) No long-term decrease in caterpillar availability for invertivorous birds in deciduous forests in Hungary. Forests 12(8):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081070
[24]	Frank T, Szmorad F (2014) Védett erd?k természetességi állapotának fenntartása és fejlesztése. Rosalia kézik?nyvek 2. Duna–Ipoly Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, Budapest, p 160 (in Hungarian)
[25]	Fuller RJ (1995) Bird Life of Woodland and Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 260
[26]	Ghadiri Khanaposhtani M, Kaboli M, Karami M, Etemad V, Baniasadi S (2012) Effect of habitat complexity on richness, abundance and distributional pattern of forest birds. Environ Manage 50:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9877-7
[27]	Ghadiri Khanaposhtani M, Kaboli M, Karami M, Etemad V, Baniasadi S (2013) Effects of logged and unlogged forest patches on avifaunal diversity. Environ Manage 51:750–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9979-2
[28]	Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (Eds) (1991) Handbuch der V?gel Mitteleuropas 12./I. Passeriformes (3. Teil) Sylvidae. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden
[29]	Gregory RD, van Strien A (2010) Wild bird indicators: using composite population trends of birds as measures of environmental health. Ornithol Sci 9(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.2326/OSJ.9.3
[30]	Gutzat F, Dormann CF (2018) Decaying trees improve nesting opportunities for cavity-nesting birds in temperate and boreal forests: a meta-analysis and implications for retention forestry. Ecol Evol 8(16):8616–8626. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4245
[31]	Hanzelka J, Reif J (2016) Effects of vegetation structure on the diversity of breeding bird communities in forest stands of non-native black pine (Pinus nigra A.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in the Czech Republic. Forest Ecol Manag 379(1):102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.017
[32]	Haraszthy L (2019) Magyarország fészkel? madarainak k?ltésbiológiája. 2. k?tet. Sárgarigófélékt?l a sármányfélékig (Passeriformes). Pro Vértes Nonprofit Zrt., Csákvár, p 827 (in Hungarian)
[33]	Hardersen S (2004) Habitat usage of woodpeckers and nuthatch. In: Cerretti P, Hardersen S, Mason F, Nardi G, Tisato M, Zapparoli M (eds) Ricerche naturalistiche a Bosco della Fontana. Quaderni Conservazione Habitat 3. Cierre Grafica Editore, Verona, pp 49–59
[34]	Hebda G, Weso?owski T, Rowiński P (2016) Nest sites of middle spotted woodpeckers Leiopicus medius in a primeval forest. Ardea 104:119–128. https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v104i2.a5
[35]	Hebda G, Weso?owski T, Rowiński P (2017) Nest sites of a strong excavator, the great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major, in a primeval forest. Ardea 105:61–71. https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v105i1.a8
[36]	Hingston AB, Jordan GJ, Wardlaw TJ, Baker SC (2014) Bird assemblages in Tasmanian clearcuts are influenced by the age of eucalypt regeneration but not by distance from mature forest. Glob Ecol Conserv 2:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.003
[37]	Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I, Sparks TH (1996) Influences of population size and woodland area on bird species distributions in small woods. Oecol 105:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328797
[38]	Hinsley SA, Carpenter JE, Broughton RK, Bellamy PE, Rothery P, Amar A, Hewson CM, Gosler AG (2007) Habitat selection by Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in the UK. Ibis 149:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00691.x
[39]	Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
[40]	Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat 15:651–674. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933
[41]	Jackson JA (1979) Tree surfaces as foraging substrates for insectivorous birds. In: Dickson JG, Connor RN, Fleet RR, Jackson JA, Kroll JC (eds) The role of insectivorous birds in forest ecosystems. Academic Press, Nacogdoches, pp 69–93
[42]	James FC, Wamer NO (1982) Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63(1):159–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937041
[43]	Kaushik M, Tiwari S, Manisha K (2022) Habitat patch size and tree species richness shape the bird community in urban green spaces of rapidly urbanizing Himalayan foothill region of India. Urban Ecosyst 25(2):423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01165-9
[44]	Khosroshahi FB, Shabani AA, Kaboli M, Karami M, Najafabadi MS, Ahmadi-Mamaqani Y (2011) A probabilistic model for presence of Eurasian Nuthatch (Sitta europaea) in the Alborz Mountains. Northern Iran Wilson J Ornithol 123(4):741–747. https://doi.org/10.1676/10-101.1
[45]	Kilgo JC, Vukovich MA (2014) Can snag creation benefit a primary cavity nester: response to an experimental pulse in snag abundance. Biol Conserv 171:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.003
[46]	Komlós M, Botta-Dukát Z, Winkler D, ónodi G, Aszalós R (2021) Woodpecker foraging activity in oak-dominated hill forests in Hungary. Ornis Hung 29(1):82–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2021-0006
[47]	Krams I (2001) Perch selection by singing chaffinches: a better view of surroundings and the risk of predation. Behav Ecol 12(3):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.3.295
[48]	Kraus D, Bütler R, Krumm F, Lachat T, Larrieu L, Mergner U, Paillet Y, Rydkvist T, Schuck A, Winter S (2016) Catalogue of tree microhabitats—Reference field list Integrate Technical p 16. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1500.6483
[49]	Laiolo P, Dondero F, Ciliento E, Rolando A (2004) Consequences of pastoral abandonment for the structure and diversity of the alpine avifauna. J Appl Ecol 41:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00893.x
[50]	Le?o P, Kropil R (2015) Breeding bird assemblages of three West Carpathian oak-beech natural forests (eastern Slovakia). Sylvia 50:66–85
[51]	Mag Z, ódor P (2015) The effect of stand-level habitat characteristics on breeding bird assemblages in Hungarian temperate mixed forests. Community Ecol 16:156–166. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.3
[52]	Milne KA, Hejl SJ (1989) Nest-site characteristics of white-headed woodpeckers. J Wildlife Manage 53(1):50–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801305
[53]	ónodi G, Botta-Dukát Z, Winkler D, Rédei T (2022) Endangered lowland oak forest steppe remnants keep unique bird species richness in Central Hungary. J Forestry Res 33(1):343–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01317-9
[54]	ónodi G, Csiszár A, Botta-Dukát Z, Cs?rgo T, Winkler D (2021) Intersexual segregation in winter foraging of great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major in riparian forests infested with invasive tree species. Scand J for Res 36(5):354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2021.1943516
[55]	Porro Z, Chiatante G, Bogliani G (2020) Associations between forest specialist birds and composition of woodland habitats in a highly modified landscape. For Ecol Manage 458:117732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117732
[56]	Poulsen BO (2002) Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11:1551–1566. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016839518172
[57]	Proen?a VM, Pereira HM, Guilherme J, Vicente L (2010) Plant and bird diversity in natural forests and in native and exotic plantations in NW Portugal. Acta Oecol 36(2):219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.01.002
[58]	R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
[59]	Reif J, Skálová AJ, Vermouzek Z, Vo?í?ek P (2022) Long-term trends in forest bird populations reflect management changes in Central European forests. Ecol Indic 121:109137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2022.109137
[60]	Remm J, Lohmus A, Remm K (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: what determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? Forest Ecol Manag 221(1–3):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.015
[61]	Roberge JM, Mikusiński G, Svensson S (2008) The white-backed woodpecker: umbrella species for forest conservation planning? Biodivers Conserv 17:2479–2494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9394-4
[62]	Robles H, Ciudad C, Matthysen E (2011) Tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: the role of traditional management practices. Forest Ecol Manag 261(8):1428–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.029
[63]	Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37:317–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942327
[64]	Rosenvald R, L?hmus A, Kraut A, Remm L (2011) Bird communities in hemiboreal old-growth forests: the roles of food supply, stand structure, and site type. Forest Ecol Manag 262(8):1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.002
[65]	Sabatini F, Burrascano S, Lombardi F, Chirici G, Blasi C (2015) An index of structural complexity for Apennine beech forests. iFOREST 8:314–323. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1160-008
[66]	Sch?nfeld M (1983) Beitr?ge zur ?kologie und zum intraspezifischen Verhalten der Bauml?ufer Certhia familiaris und C. brachydactyla in Eichen Hainbuchen-Lindenw?ldern unter dem Aspekt der erh?hten Siedlungsdichte durch eingebrachte Nisth?hlen. Hercynia 20:290–311
[67]	Seavy NE, Burnett RD, Taille PJ (2012) Black-backed woodpecker nest-tree preference in burned forests of the Sierra Nevada. California Wildlife Soc B 36(4):722–728. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.210
[68]	St?hl G, Ringvall A, Fridman J (2001) Assessment of coarse woody debris: a methodological overview. Ecol Bull 49:57–70
[69]	Stański T, Czeszczewik D, Stańska M, Walankiewicz W (2020) Foraging behaviour of the great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major in relation to sex in primeval stands of the Bia?owie?a national park. Acta Ornithol 55(1):120–128. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2020.55.1.012
[70]	Stański T, Czeszczewik D, Stanska M, Walankiewicz W (2021) Anvils of the great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) in primeval oak-lime-hornbeam stands of the Bialowie(z) over dota national park. Eur Zool J 88(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2020.1844324
[71]	Székely T, Moskát C (1991) Guild structure and seasonal changes in foraging behaviour of birds in a Central-European oak forest. Ornis Hung 1:10–28
[72]	Walankiewicz W, Czeszczewik D, Tumiel T, Stański T (2011) Woodpeckers abundance in the Bia?owie?a Forest – a comparison between deciduous, strictly protected and managed stands. Ornis Pol 52:161–168
[73]	Wesolowski T, Rowiński P, Maziarz M (2009) Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix: a nomadic insectivore in search of safe breeding grounds? Bird Study 56(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650802681540
[74]	Wesolowski T, Czeszczewik D, Hebda G, Maziarz M, Mitrus C, Rowiński P (2015) 40 years of breeding bird community dynamics in a primeval temperate forest (Bia?owie?a National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithol 50:95–120. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2015.50.1.010
[75]	Winkler D (2005) Ecological succession of breeding bird communities in deciduous and coniferous forests in the Sopron Mountains, Hungary. Acta Silv Lign Hung 1:49–58. https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2005-0004

Funding

University of Sopron