Effects of tree size and organ age on variations in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry in Pinus koraiensis

Abstract

Carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) are of fundamental importance for growth and nutrient dynamics within plant organs and deserve more attention at regional to global scales. However, our knowledge of how these nutrients vary with tree size, organ age, or root order at the individual level remains limited. We determined C, N, and P contents and their stoichiometric ratios (i.e., nutrient traits) in needles, branches, and fine roots at different organ ages (0–3-year-old needles and branches) and root orders (1st–4th order roots) from 64 Pinus koraiensis of varying size (Diameter at breast height ranged from 0.3 to 100 cm) in northeast China. Soil factors were also measured. The results show that nutrient traits were regulated by tree size, organ age, or root order rather than soil factors. At a whole-plant level, nutrient traits decreased in needles and fine roots but increased in branches with tree size. At the organ level, age or root order had a negative effect on C, N, and P and a positive effect on stoichiometric ratios. Our results demonstrate that nutrient variations are closely related to organ-specific functions and ecophysiological processes at an individual level. It is suggested that the nutrient acquisition strategy by younger trees and organ fractions with higher nutrient content is for survival. Conversely, nutrient storage strategy in older trees and organ fractions are mainly for steady growth. Our results clarified the nutrient utilization strategies during tree and organ ontogeny and suggest that tree size and organ age or root order should be simultaneously considered to understand the complexities of nutrient variations.

Keywords

Tree size / Organ age (or root order) / Carbon (C) / Nitrogen (N) / Phosphorus (P) / Pinus koraiensis

References

[1]	?gren GI (2004) The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs-theory and observations. Ecol Lett 7(3):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00567.x
[2]	?gren GI (2008) Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39(1):153–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173515
[3]	Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Mcgarvey JC, Muller-Landau HC, Park JY, Gonzalez-Akre EB, Herrmann V, Bennett AC, So CV, Bourg NA, Thompson JR (2016) Size-related scaling of tree form and function in a mixed-age forest. Funct Ecol 29(12):1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12470
[4]	Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Basic use of the information-theoretic approach. Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York, pp 98–148
[5]	Cavaleri MA, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA, Ryan MG (2010) Height is more important than light in determining leaf morphology in a tropical forest. Ecology 91(6):1730–1739. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1326.1
[6]	Chatterjee S, Price B (1991) Regression diagnostics. John Wiley, New York
[7]	Eimil-Fraga C, Sánchez-Rodríguez F, álvarez-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2015) Relationships between needle traits, needle age and site and stand parameters in Pinus pinaster. Trees 29(4):1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1190-7
[8]	Fortunel C, Ruelle J, Beauchene J, Fine PV, Baraloto C (2014) Wood specific gravity and anatomy of branches and roots in 113 Amazonian rainforest tree species across environmental gradients. New Phytol 202(1):79–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12632
[9]	Han WX, Fang JY, Reich PB, Woodward FI, Wang ZH (2011) Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecol Lett 14(8):788–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01641.x
[10]	He D, Yan ER (2018) Size-dependent variations in individual traits and trait scaling relationships within a shade-tolerant evergreen tree species. Am J Bot 105(7):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1132
[11]	He MZ, Zhang K, Tan HJ, Hu R, Su JQ, Wang J, Huang L, Zhang YF, Li XR (2015) Nutrient levels within leaves, stems, and roots of the xeric species Reaumuria soongorica in relation to geographical, climatic, and soil conditions. Ecol Evol 5(7):1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1441
[12]	Kay AD, Ashton IW, Gorokhova E, Kerkhoff AJ, Liess A, Litchman E (2005) Toward a stoichiometric framework for evolutionary biology. Oikos 109(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.14048.x
[13]	Kuusk V, Niinemets ü, Valladares F (2018a) A major trade-off between structural and photosynthetic investments operative across plant and needle ages in three Mediterranean pines. Tree Physiol 38:543–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx139
[14]	Kuusk V, Niinemets ü, Valladares F, Tjoelker M (2018b) Structural controls on photosynthetic capacity through juvenile-to-adult transition and needle ageing in Mediterranean pines. Funct Ecol 32:1479–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13087
[15]	Li A, Guo DL, Wang ZQ, Liu HY (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in leaves, twigs, and fine roots across 49 temperate, subtropical and tropical tree species: a hierarchical pattern. Funct Ecol 24(1):224–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01603.x
[16]	Li Y, Tian DS, Yang H, Niu SL (2018) Size-dependent nutrient limitation of tree growth from subtropical to cold temperate forests. Funct Ecol 32(1):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12975
[17]	Liu C, Wang X, Wu X, Dai S, He JS, Yin WL (2013) Relative effects of phylogeny, biological characters and environments on leaf traits in shrub biomes across central Inner Mongolia. China J Plant Ecol 6(3):220–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rts028
[18]	Liu FD, Yang WJ, Wang ZS, Xu Z, Liu H, Zhang M, Liu YH, An SQ, Sun SC (2010) Plant size effects on the relationships among specific leaf area, leaf nutrient content, and photosynthetic capacity in tropical woody species. Acta Oecol 36(2):149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2009.11.004
[19]	Liu ZL, Jiang F, Li FR, Jin GZ (2019) Coordination of intra and inter-species leaf traits according to leaf phenology and plant age for three temperate broadleaf species with different shade tolerances. For Ecol Manage 434:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.008
[20]	Liu ZL, Hikosaka K, Li FR, Jin GZ, Ostertag R (2020) Variations in leaf economics spectrum traits for an evergreen coniferous species: tree size dominates over environment factors. Funct Ecol 34(2):458–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13498
[21]	Martin AR, Thomas SC (2013) Size-dependent changes in leaf and wood chemical traits in two Caribbean rainforest trees. Tree Physiol 33(12):1338–1353. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt085
[22]	Martínez-Vilalta J, Vanderklein D, Mencuccini M (2007) Tree height and age-related decline in growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L). Oecologia 150(4):529–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0552-7
[23]	McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo DL, Helmisaari HS, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppalammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207(3):505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13363
[24]	Minden V, Kleyer M (2014) Internal and external regulation of plant organ stoichiometry. Plant Biol 16(5):897–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12155
[25]	Niinemets ü, Lukjanova A (2003) Needle longevity, shoot growth and branching frequency in relation to site fertility and within-canopy light conditions in Pinus sylvestris. Ann for Sci 60:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003012
[26]	Pregitzer KS (2002) Fine roots of trees-a new perspective. New Phytol 154(2):267–273
[27]	R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria
[28]	Sendall KM, Reich PB (2013) Variation in leaf and twig CO2 flux as a function of plant size: a comparison of seedlings, saplings and trees. Tree Physiol 33(7):713–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt048
[29]	Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University, Press Princeton
[30]	Tang ZY, Xu WT, Zhou GY, Bai YF, Li JX, Tang XL, Chen DM, Liu Q, Ma WH, Xiong GM, He HL, He NP, Guo YP, Guo Q, Zhu JL, Han WX, Hu HF, Fang JY, Xie ZQ (2018) Patterns of plant carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration in relation to productivity in China's terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(16):4033–4038. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700295114
[31]	Wang AJ, Liu BY, Wang ZQ, Liu G (2016) Monitoring and predicting the soil water content in the deeper soil profile of Loess Plateau. China Int Soil Water Conse 4(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2016.02.001
[32]	Warton DI, Weber NC (2002) Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biom J 44(2):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4036(200203)44:2%3c161::AID-BIMJ161%3e3.0.CO;2-N
[33]	Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81(2):259–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793106007007
[34]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JH, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985):821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403
[35]	Xiong JL, Dong LW, Lu JL, Hu WG, Gong HY, Xie SB, Zhao DM, Zhang YH, Wang XT, Deng Y, Ran JZ, Niklas KJ, Degen A, Deng JM (2021) Variation in plant carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents across the drylands of China. Funct Ecol 36(1):174–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13937
[36]	Yan BG, Ji ZH, Fan B, Wang XM, He GX, Shi LT, Liu GC (2016) Plants adapted to nutrient limitation allocate less biomass into stems in an arid-hot grassland. New Phytol 211(4):1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13970
[37]	Yang DX, Song L, Jin GZ (2019) The soil C:N:P stoichiometry is more sensitive than the leaf C:N:P stoichiometry to nitrogen addition: a four-year nitrogen addition experiment in a Pinus koraiensis plantation. Plant Soil 442(5):183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04165-z
[38]	Yuan ZY, Chen HY, Reich PB (2011) Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus. Nat Commun 2:344. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1346
[39]	Zhang H, Yang XQ, Wang JY, Wang GG, Yu MK, Wu TG (2017) Leaf N and P stoichiometry in relation to leaf shape and plant size for Quercus acutissima provenances across China. Sci Rep 7:46133. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46133
[40]	Zhang JH, Zhao N, Liu CC, Yang H, Li ML, Yu GR, Wilcox K, Yu Q, He NP (2018) C:N:P stoichiometry in China’s forests: from organs to ecosystems. Funct Ecol 32(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12979
[41]	Zhang JH, He NP, Liu CC, Xu L, Chen Z, Li Y, Wang RM, Yu GR, Sun W, Xiao CW, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2019) Variation and evolution of C:N ratio among different organs enable plants to adapt to N-limited environments. Global Change Biol 26:2534–2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14973
[42]	Zhang JH, He NP, Liu CC, Xu L, Yu Q, Yu GR (2018) Allocation strategies for nitrogen and phosphorus in forest plants. Oikos 127(10):1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05517
[43]	Zhang J, Wang YZ, Cai CT (2020) Multielemental stoichiometry in plant organs: a case study with the Alpine Herb Gentiana rigescens across Southwest China. Front in Plant Sci 11:441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00441