Dieback of managed spruce stands in western Germany promotes beetle diversity

Eva Plath, Chantal Trauth, Jan Gerhards, Laura Griebel, Klaus Fischer

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 48.

Journal of Forestry Research All Journals
PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 48. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01695-w
Original Paper

Dieback of managed spruce stands in western Germany promotes beetle diversity

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a significant problem at a global scale and may be amplified by climate change. In recent years, coniferous forests have had substantial dieback across Europe due to drought and subsequent bark-beetle outbreaks. As many studies on the consequences of disturbance and subsequent management have focused on natural stands, management implications for managed spruce stands are not well understood, even though such stands are widespread throughout Europe. In this study, beetle taxonomy, conservation value, and community composition are compared among spruce plantations and four post-disturbance management approaches: standing deadwood, lying deadwood, clear cuts, and long-term succession. Diversity and community composition differed significantly among management categories, while different beetle families responded similarly. Intact spruce stands harbored the lowest beetle diversity while the highest taxonomic diversity and conservation value was on clear cuts and stands with lying or standing deadwood. The proportion of forest specialists was highest in successional forests. In summary, different forest management categories harbored distinct beetle communities at the family-, species-, and ecological guild levels. Therefore, post-disturbance management should consider the landscape scale and include different management types. This enhances landscape heterogeneity and thus overall biodiversity but could also mitigate negative impacts of natural disturbances on ecosystem services.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Eva Plath, Chantal Trauth, Jan Gerhards, Laura Griebel, Klaus Fischer. Dieback of managed spruce stands in western Germany promotes beetle diversity. Journal of Forestry Research, 2024, 35(1): 48 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01695-w
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[]
BarnoskyAD, MatzkeN, TomiyaS, WoganGO, SwartzB, QuentalTB, MarshallC, McGuireJL, LindseyEL, MaguireKC, MerseyB, FerrerEA. Has the earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature, 2011, 471(7336): 51-57
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
BellardC, BertelsmeierC, LeadleyP, ThullierW, CourchampF. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett, 2012, 15(4): 365-377
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
BeudertB, BässlerC, ThornS, NossR, SchröderB, Dieffenbach-FriesH, FoulloisN, MüllerJ. Bark beetles increase biodiversity while maintaining drinking water quality. Conserv Lett, 2015, 8(4): 272-281
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
BivandRS, WongDWS. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST, 2018, 27(3): 716-748
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
BMEL (2021) [Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft] Ergebnisse der Waldzustandserhebung 2021, 1–76 (in German)
[]
BrodribbTJ, PowersJ, CochardH, ChoatB. Hanging by a thread?. For Drought Sci, 2020, 368(6488): 261-266
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
BruunHH, Heilmann-ClausenJ. What is unmanaged forest and how does it sustain biodiversity in landscapes with a long history of intensive forestry?. J Appl Ecol, 2021, 58(9): 1813-1816
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
CardinaleBJ, DuffyJE, GonzalezA, HooperD, PerringsC, VenailP, NarwaniA, MacEG, TimanD, WardleD, KinzigA, DailyG, LoreauM, GraceJ, LarigauderieA, SrivastavaD, NaeemS. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 59-67
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
CobbTP, MorissetteJL, JacobsJM, KoivulaMJ, SpenceJR, LangorDW. Effects of postfire salvage logging on deadwood-associated beetles. Conserv Biol, 2011, 25(1): 94-104
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ConnerRN, RudolphDC, KulhavyD, SnowA. Causes of mortality of red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees. J Wildl Manage, 1991, 55(1): 531-537
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
De WarnaffeGDB, LebrunP. Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv, 2004, 118(2): 219-234
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
DirzoR, YoungHS, GalettiM, CeballosG, IsaacNJB, CollenB. Defaunation in the anthropocene. Science, 2014, 345(6195): 401-406
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
DoerflerI, GossnerMM, MüllerJ, SeiboldS, WeiserWW. Deadwood enrichment combining integrative and segregative conservation elements enhances biodiversity of multiple taxa in managed forests. Biol Conserv, 2018, 228: 70-78
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
DormannCF, McPhersonJM, AraújoMB, BivandR, BolligerJ, CarlG, DaviesRG, HirzelA, JetzW, KisslingD, KühnI, OhlemüllerR, Peres-NetoPR, ReinekingB, SchröderB, SchurrFM, WilsonR. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography, 2007, 30: 609-628
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
FahrigL. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2003, 34: 487-515
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
FAO (2020) [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations] Global forest resources assessment. https://fra-data.fao.org/WO/fra2020/home/ Accessed 15 Jun 2022
[]
Freude H, Harde KW, Lohse GA (1983) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Vol. 1–11. Goecke & Evers Verlag, Krefeld, 3761 pages (in German)
[]
García-TejeroS, SpenceJR, O’HalloranJ, BourassaS, OxbroughA. Natural succession and clearcutting as drivers of environmental heterogeneity and beta diversity in North American boreal forests. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(11): e0206931
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Geiser R (1998) Rote Liste der Käfer (Coleoptera). In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Hrsg): Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Schriftenr Landschaftspflege Naturschutz 55: 178–179 (in German).
[]
GeorgievKB, BässlerC, FeldhaarH, HeiblC, KaraschP, MüllerJ, PerlikM, WeissI, ThornS. Windthrow and salvage logging alter β-diversity of multiple species groups in a mountain spruce forest. For Ecol Manage, 2022, 520: 120401
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GerlachJ, SamwaysM, PrykeJ. Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv, 2013, 17: 831-850
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
GörnS, FischerK. Niedermoore Nordostdeutschland bewerten. Nat Landsch, 2011, 43(7): 211-217 (in German)
[]
GroveSJ. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 2002, 33: 1-23
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HaggeJ, LeiblF, MüllerJ, PlechingerM, SoutinhoJG, ThornS. Reconciling pest control, nature conservation, and recreation in coniferous forests. Conserv Lett, 2019
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HaggeJ, MüllerJ, BässlerC, BieblSS, BrandlR, DrexlerM, GruppeA, HotesS, HothornT, LanghammerP, StarkH, WirtzR, ZimmererV, MysterudA. Deadwood retention in forests lowers short-term browsing pressure on silver fir saplings by overabundant deer. For Ecol Manag, 2019
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HaggeJ, MüllerJ, BirkemoeT, BuseJ, Bojesen ChristensenRH, GossnerMM, GruppeA, HeiblC, Jarzabek-MüllerA, SeiboldS, SiitonenJ, SoutinhoJG, Sverdrup-ThygesonA, ThornS, DragL. What does a threatened saproxylic beetle look like? Modelling extinction risk using a new morphological trait database. J Anim Ecol, 2021, 90(8): 1934-1947
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HallmannCA, SorgM, JongejansE, SiepelH, HoflandN, SchwanH, StenmansW, MüllerA, SumserH, HörrenT, GoulsonD, de KroonH. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE, 2017
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HlásnyT, KrokeneP, LiebholdA, Montagné-HuckC, MüllerJ, QinH, RaffaKJ, SchelhaasMJ, SeidlR, SvobodaM, ViiriH. Living with bark beetles: impacts, outlook and management options. From Sci Policy, 2017, 8: 1-52
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HlásnyT, KönigL, KrokeneP, LindnerM, Montagné-HuckC, MüllerJ, QinH, RaffaKF, SchelhaasM-J, SvobodaM, ViiriH, SeidlR. Bark beetle outbreaks in Europe: state of knowledge and ways forward for management. Curr for Rep, 2021, 7(3): 138-165
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HomburgK, DreesC, BoutaudE, NolteD, SchuettW, ZumsteinP, von RuschkowskiE, AssmannT. Where have all the beetles gone? Long-term study reveals carabid species decline in a nature reserve in Northern Germany. Insect Conserv Divers, 2019, 12: 268-277
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
HorákJ, BrestovanskáT, MladenovićS, KoutJ, BoguschP, HaldaJP, ZasadilP. Green desert?: Biodiversity patterns in forest plantations. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 433: 343-348
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50(3):346–363. (package = "multcomp")
[]
Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: An R package vor interpolation and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7:1451–1456
[]
IPCC (2018) [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
[]
IPCC (2022) [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
[]
JostL. Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 2006, 113(2): 363-375
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KausrudK, ØklandB, SkarpaasO, GrégoireJ-C, ErbilginN, StensethNC. Population dynamics in changing environments: the case of an eruptive forest pest species. Biol Rev, 2012, 87(1): 34-51
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Koch K (1996) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas - Ökologie, Vol. 1–3. Goecke & Evers Verlag, Krefeld, 1211 pages (in German)
[]
KoivulaM, SpenceJR. Effects of post-fire salvage logging on boreal mixed-wood ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae). For Ecol Manag, 2006, 236(1): 102-112
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KoivulaM, KukkonenJ, NiemelaJ. Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers Conserv, 2002, 11: 1269-1288
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KoprowskiJL, AlanenMI, LynchAM. Nowhere to run and nowhere to hide: response of endemic Mt. Graham red squirrels to catastrophic forest damage. Biol Conserv, 2005, 126(4): 491-498
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KortmannM, MüllerJC, BaierR, BässlerC, BuseJ, CholewińskaO, FörschlerMI, GeorgievKB, HilszczańskiJ, JaroszewiczB, JaworskiT, KaufmannS, KuijperD, LorzJ, LotzA, ŁubekA, MayerM, MayerhoferS, MeyerS, MorinièreJ, PopaF, ReithH, RothN, SeiboldS, SeidlR, StengelE, WolskiGJ, ThornS. Ecology versus society: impacts of bark beetle infestations on biodiversity and restorativeness in protected areas of Central Europe. Biol Conserv, 2021
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
KortmannM, RothN, BuseJ, HilszczańskiJ, JaworskiT, MorinièreJ, SeidlR, ThornS, MüllerJ. Arthropod dark taxa provide new insights into diversity responses to bark beetle infestations. Ecol Appl, 2022
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LacasellaF, GrattonC, De FeliciS, IsaiaM, ZapparoliM, MartaS, SbordoniV. Asymmetrical responses of forest and “beyond edge” arthropod communities across a forest–grassland ecotone. Biodivers Conserv, 2015, 24: 447-465
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-Pfalz (2013a) Kartenviewer - Fachanwendungen und Fachthemen: Boden - BFD 50 - Bodenformengesellschaft. https://mapclient.lgb-rlp.de/?app=lgb&view_id=19. Accessed 28 Jun 2022 (in German)
[]
Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-Pfalz (2013b) Kartenviewer - Fachanwendungen und Fachthemen: Geologie: Geologische Übersichtskarte 1:300,000. https://mapclient.lgb-rlp.de/?app=lgb&view_id=19. Accessed 28 Jun 2022] (in German)
[]
LangeM, TürkeM, PašalićE, BochS, HessenmöllerD, MüllerJ, PratiD, SocherSA, FischerM, WeisserWW, GossnerMM. Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 329: 166-176
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LeatherSR. Insect sampling in forest ecosystems, 2005 Oxford Blackwell Publishing 303
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LehnertLW, BässlerC, BrandlR, BurtonPJ, MüllerJ. Conservation value of forests attacked by bark beetles: highest number of indicator species is found in early successional stages. J Nat Conserv, 2013, 21(2): 97-104
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LeverkusAB, LindenmayerDB, ThornS, GustafssonL. Salvage logging in the world’s forests: interactions between natural disturbance and logging need recognition. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2018, 27(10): 1140-1154
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Lompe A (2002) Die Käfer Europas - ein Bestimmungswerk im Internet. http://coleonet.de/coleo/index.htm. Accessed 12 Jan 2022 (in German)
[]
López-BedoyaPA, MaguraT, EdwardsFA, EdwardsDP, Rey-BenayasJM, LöveiGL, NoriegaJA. What level of native beetle diversity can be supported by forestry plantations?. Glob Synth Insect Conserv Divers, 2021, 14(16): 736-747
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
LVermGeo (2021) [Landesamt für Vermessung und Geobasisinformation Rheinland-Pfalz]. Luftbilder Rheinland-Pfalz DOP40. In: Open Data - Digitale Orthophotos (DOP), Bodenauflösung 40cm. https://www.geoportal.rlp.de/mapbender/php/mod_inspireDownloadFeed.php?id=2b009ae4-aa3e-ff21-870b-49846d9561b2&type=SERVICE&generateFrom=wmslayer&layerid=61676. Accessed 27 Nov 2022] (in German)
[]
MaguraT. Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manag, 2002, 157: 23-37
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MaguraT, TóthmérészB, BordánZ. Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation. Biol Conserv, 2000, 93: 95-102
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MaguraT, TóthmérészB, ElekZ. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages as Norway spruce plantations age. Community Ecol, 2006, 7(1): 1-12
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Ministerium für Umwelt Energie Ernährung und Forsten Rheinland-Pfalz (2020) WALDZUSTANDS-BERICHT 2020 (in German)
[]
Ministerium für Umwelt Energie Ernährung und Forsten Rheinland-Pfalz (2021) WALDZUSTANDS-BERICHT 2021 (in German)
[]
MorettiM, ObristMK, DuelliP. Arthropod biodiversity after forest fires: winners and losers in the winter fire regime of the southern Alps. Ecography, 2004, 27: 173-186
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MorrisJL, CottrellS, FettigCJ, HansenWD, SherriffRL, CarterVA, ClearJL, ClementJ, DeRoseRJ, HickeJA, HigueraPE, MattorKM, SeddonAWR, SeppaHT, StednickJD, SeyboldSJ. Managing bark beetle impacts on ecosystems and society: priority questions to motivate future research. J Appl Ecol, 2016, 54(3): 750-760
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MullenK, O’HalloranJ, BreenJ, GillerP, PithonJ, KellyT. Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle—implications for management. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 256(4): 624-632
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MüllerJ, BußlerH, GoßnerM, RettelbachT, DuelliP. The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species. Biodivers Conserv, 2008, 17(12): 2979-3001
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MüllerJ, NossRF, ThornS, BässlerC, LeverkusAB, LindenmayerD. Increasing disturbance demands new policies to conserve intact forest 2019 Conserv Lett
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
MuysB, AngelstamP, BauhusJ, BouriaudL, JactelH, KraigherH, MüllerJ, PettorelliN, PötzelsbergerE, PrimmerE, SvobodaM, ThorsenBJ, Van MeerbeekK. Forest biodiversity in Europe. From Sci Policy, 2022, 13: 1-80
[]
NewboldT, HudsonLN, HillSLL, ContuS, LysenkoI, SeniorRA, BörgerL, BennettDJ, ChoimesA, CollenB, DayJ, De PalmaA, DíazS, Echeverria-LondoñoS, EdgarMJ, FeldmanA, GaronM, HarrisonMLK, AlhusseiniT, IngramDJ, ItescuY, KattgeJ, KempV, KirkpatrickL, KleyerM, Laginha Pinto CorreiaD, MartinCD, MeiriS, NovosolovM, PanY, PhillipsHRP, PurvesDW, RobinsonA, SimpsonJ, TuckSL, WeiherE, WhiteHJ, EwersRM, MaceGM, ScharlemannJPW, PurvisA. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 2015, 520(7545): 45-50
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2020) Vegan: community ecology package. R-package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
[]
OverbeckM, SchmidtM. Modelling infestation risk of Norway spruce by Ips typographus (L.) in the Lower Saxon Harz Mountains (Germany). For Ecol Manag, 2012, 266: 115-125
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ParadisE, SchliepK. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35(3): 526-528
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
PearceJL, VenierLA. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: a review. Ecol Indic, 2006, 6(4): 780-793
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Pinheiro J, Bates D (2020) Linear and nonlinear mixed effect models (nlme-package). R-package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
[]
PrestemonJP, WearDN, StewartFJ, HolmesTP. Wildfire, timber salvage, and the economics of expediency. For Policy Econ, 2006, 8(3): 312-322
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
PukkalaT. Effect of species composition on ecosystem services in European boreal forest. J for Res, 2018, 29(2): 261-272
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
PurchartL, TufIH, HulaV, SuchomelJ. Arthropod assemblages in Norway spruce monocultures during a forest cycle—a multi-taxa approach. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 306: 42-51
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
QGIS (2002) QGIS Development Team: QGIS Geographic Information System. Version 3.4.7—Madeira. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
[]
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2020 Vienna R Foundation for statistical computing
[]
Agrarmeteorologie Rheinland-Pfalz (2022a) Langjährige Mittelwerte Wetterstation Isert. https://www.dlr.rlp.de/Internet/AM/NotesAM.nsf/cc619a07ed6c4634c1257800003dca56/07804c9e9e2baf08c1257171002e8a40?OpenDocument&TableRow=2.1.1,2.6#2.1. Accessed 1 Feb 2022 (in German)
[]
Agrarmeteorologie Rheinland-Pfalz (2022b) Langjährige Mittelwerte Hydrometeorologische Station Hachenburg. https://www.dlr.rlp.de/Internet/AM/NotesAM.nsf/cc619a07ed6c4634c1257800003dca56/ce8964b69eb243f7c12573ef002f58b1?OpenDocument&TableRow=2.4#2. Accessed 1 Feb 2022 (in German)
[]
RothacherJ, HaggeJ, BässlerC, BrandlR, GruppeA, MüllerJ. Logging operations creating snags, logs, and stumps under open and closed canopies promote stand-scale beetle diversity. For Ecol Manag, 2023
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Sánchez-BayoF, WyckhuysKAG. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol Conserv, 2019, 232: 8-27
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SchallP, GossnerMM, HeinrichsS, FischerM, BochS, PratiD, JungK, BaumgartnerV, BlaserS, BöhmS, BuscotF, DanielR, GoldmannK, KaiserK, KahlT, LangeM, MüllerJ, OvermannJ, RennerSC, SchulzeE-D, SikorskiJ, TschapkaM, TürkeM, WeisserWW, WemheuerB, WubetT, AmmerC. The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. J Appl Ecol, 2018, 55(1): 267-278
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SchallP, HeinrichsS, AmmerC, AyasseM, BochS, BuscotF, FischerM, GoldmannK, OvermannJ, SchulzeE-D, SikorskiJ, WeisserWW, WubetT, GossnerMM. Among stand heterogeneity is key for biodiversity in managed beech forests but does not question the value of unmanaged forests: response to Bruun and Heilmann-Clausen (2021). J Appl Ecol, 2021, 58(9): 1817-1826
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Schmidl J (2005) Entomologiebedarf-Eklektoren / FIT’s Rahn/Mini. In: Bioform-entomology & equipment. https://www.bioform.de/shop.php?wg=1&action=wgstart. Accessed 12 Apr 2023 (in German)
[]
SeiboldS, BrandlR, BuseJ, HothornT, SchmidlJ, ThornS, MüllerJ. Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forests in Europe. Conserv Biol, 2015, 29(2): 382-390
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SeiboldS, BässlerC, BaldrianP, ReinhardL, ThornS, UlyshenMD, WeißI, MüllerJ. Dead-wood addition promotes non-saproxylic epigeal arthropods but effects are mediated by canopy openness. Biol Conserv, 2016, 204: 181-188
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SeiboldS, BässlerC, BrandlR, BücheB, SzalliesA, ThornS, UlyshenMD, MüllerJ. Microclimate and habitat heterogeneity as the major drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood. J Appl Ecol, 2016, 53(3): 934-943
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SeiboldS, GossnerMM, SimonsNK, BlüthgenN, MüllerJ, AmbarliD, AmmerC, BauhusJ, FischerM, HabelJC, LinsenmairKE, NaussT, PenoneC, PratiD, SchallP, SchulzeE-D, VogtJ, WöllauerS, WeisserWW. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature, 2019, 574(7780): 671-674
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Seibold S (2015) Biodiversity of dead-wood dependent insects–effects of forest management and prospects of conservation. Dissertation, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Technical University of Munich, 1–55
[]
SeidlR, SchelhaasMJ, RammerW, VerkerkPJ. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nat Clim Chang, 2014, 4(9): 806-810
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SeidlR, ThomD, KautzM, Martin-BenitoD, PeltoniemiM, VacchianoG, WildJ, AscoliD, PetrM, HonkaniemiJ, LexerMJ, TrotsiukV, MairotaP, SvobodaM, FabrikaM, NagelTA, ReyerCPO. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat Clim Chang, 2017, 7(6): 395-402
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SenfC, MoriAS, MüllerJ, SeidlR. The response of canopy height diversity to natural disturbances in two temperate forest landscapes. Landsc Ecol, 2020, 35(9): 2101-2112
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SessionsJ, BettingerP, BuckmanR, NewtonM, HamannJ. Hastening the return of complex forests following fire: the consequences of delay. J for, 2004, 102(3): 38-45
[]
SommerfeldA, RammerW, HeurichM, HilmersT, MüllerJ, SeidlR. Do bark beetle outbreaks amplify or dampen future bark beetle disturbances in Central Europe?. J Ecol, 2021, 109(2): 737-749
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Statistisches Landesamt Rheinland-Pfalz (2020) Flächennutzung Verbandsgemeinde Hachenburg. http://infothek.statistik.rlp.de/MeineHeimat/content.aspx?id=103&l=2&g=0714302&tp=1025. Accessed 1 Feb 2022 (in German)
[]
StephensSS, WagnerMR. Forest plantations and biodiversity: a fresh perspective. J for, 2007, 105(6): 307-313
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
SwansonME, FranklinJF, BeschtaRL, CrisafulliCM, DellaSalaDA, HuttoRL, LindenmayerDB, SwansonFJ. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ, 2011, 9(2): 117-125
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThomD, SeidlR. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev, 2016, 91(3): 760-781
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThomD, RammerW, SeidlR. The impact of future forest dynamics on climate: interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes. Ecol Monogr, 2017, 87(4): 665-684
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThornS, BässlerC, GottschalkT, HothornT, BusslerH, RaffaK, MüllerJ. New insights into the consequences of post-windthrow salvage logging revealed by functional structure of saproxylic beetles assemblages. PLoS ONE, 2014
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThornS, BässlerC, Bernhardt-RömermannM, CadotteM, HeiblC, SchäferH, SeiboldS, MüllerJ. Changes in the dominant assembly mechanism drive species loss caused by declining resources. Ecol Lett, 2015, 19(2): 163-170
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThornS, BässlerC, SvobodaM, MüllerJ. Effects of natural disturbances and salvage logging on biodiversity—lessons from the Bohemian Forest. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 388: 113-119
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThornS, BässlerC, BrandlR, BurtonPJ, CahallR, CampbellJL, CastroJ, ChoiC-Y, CobbT, DonatoDC, DurskaE, FontaineJB, GauthierS, HebertC, HothornT, HuttoRL, LeeE-J, LeverkusAB, LindenmayerDB, ObristMK, RostJ, SeiboldS, SeidlR, ThomD, WaldronK, WermelingerB, WinterM-B, ZmihorskiM, MüllerJ. Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol, 2018, 55(1): 279-289
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ThornS, SeiboldS, LeverkusAB, MichlerT, MüllerJ, NossRF, StorkN, VogelS, LindenmayerDB. The living dead: acknowledging life after tree death to stop forest degradation. Front Ecol Environ, 2020, 18(9): 505-512
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
Thorn S (2016) Effects of salvage logging on biodiversity—ecological evidence for conservation-oriented management of natural disturbances. Dissertation, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Technical University of Munich, 1–62
[]
UhlB, KrahFS, BaldrianP, BrandlR, HaggeJ, MüllerJ, ThornS, VojtechT, BässlerC. Snags, logs, stumps, and microclimate as tools optimizing deadwood enrichment for forest biodiversity. Biol Conserv, 2022
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
UhlB, PouskaV, ČervenkaJ, KaraschP, BässlerC. Response of moth communities (Lepidoptera) to forest management strategies after disturbance. Eur J Entomol, 2023, 120: 35-41
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
VeleA, HolusaJ, FrouzJ, KonvickaO. Local and landscape drivers of ant and carabid beetle communities during spruce forest succession. Eur J Soil Biol, 2011, 47(6): 349-356
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
VogelS, GossnerMM, MergnerU, MüllerJ, ThornS. Optimizing enrichment of deadwood for biodiversity by varying sun exposure and tree species: an experimental approach. J Appl Ecol, 2020, 57(10): 2075-2085
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
WermelingerB, FlückigerPF, ObristMK, DuelliP. Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. J Appl Entomol, 2007, 131(2): 104-114
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
WhiteSP, PickettST. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, 1985 New York Academic Press
[]
WinterMB, AmmerC, BaierR, DonatoDC, SeiboldS, MüllerJ. Multi-taxon alpha diversity following bark beetle disturbance: evaluating multi-decade persistence of a diverse early-seral phase. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 338: 32-45
CrossRef Google scholar
[]
ZumrV, RemešJ, PulkrabK. How to increase biodiversity of saproxylic beetles in commercial stands through integrated forest management in Central Europe. Forests, 2021
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
Universit?t Koblenz (6377)
PDF

82

Accesses

4

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/