Can urban forests provide acoustic refuges for birds? Investigating the influence of vegetation structure and anthropogenic noise on bird sound diversity

Abstract

As a crucial component of terrestrial ecosystems, urban forests play a pivotal role in protecting urban biodiversity by providing suitable habitats for acoustic spaces. Previous studies note that vegetation structure is a key factor influencing bird sounds in urban forests; hence, adjusting the frequency composition may be a strategy for birds to avoid anthropogenic noise to mask their songs. However, it is unknown whether the response mechanisms of bird vocalizations to vegetation structure remain consistent despite being impacted by anthropogenic noise. It was hypothesized that anthropogenic noise in urban forests occupies the low-frequency space of bird songs, leading to a possible reshaping of the acoustic niches of forests, and the vegetation structure of urban forests is the critical factor that shapes the acoustic space for bird vocalization. Passive acoustic monitoring in various urban forests was used to monitor natural and anthropogenic noises, and sounds were classified into three acoustic scenes (bird sounds, human sounds, and bird-human sounds) to determine interconnections between bird sounds, anthropogenic noise, and vegetation structure. Anthropogenic noise altered the acoustic niche of urban forests by intruding into the low-frequency space used by birds, and vegetation structures related to volume (trunk volume and branch volume) and density (number of branches and leaf area index) significantly impact the diversity of bird sounds. Our findings indicate that the response to low and high frequency signals to vegetation structure is distinct. By clarifying this relationship, our results contribute to understanding of how vegetation structure influences bird sounds in urban forests impacted by anthropogenic noise.

Keywords

Anthropogenic noise / Bird sounds / Urban forests / Vegetation structure

References

[1]	Almeida DRA, Stark SC, Shao G, Schietti J, Nelson BW, Silva CA, Gorgens EB, Valbuena R, Papa DdA, Brancalion PHS (2019) Optimizing the remote detection of tropical rainforest structure with airborne lidar: leaf area profile sensitivity to pulse density and spatial sampling. Remote Sens 11:92
[2]	Antze B, Koper N (2018) Noisy anthropogenic infrastructure interferes with alarm responses in Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis). R Soc Open Sci 5:172168
[3]	Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189
[4]	Calders K, Newnham G, Burt A, Murphy S, Raumonen P, Herold M, Culvenor D, Avitabile V, Disney M, Armston J (2015) Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol Evol 6:198–208
[5]	Chen YF, Luo Y, Mammides C, Cao KF, Zhu S, Goodale E (2021) The relationship between acoustic indices, elevation, and vegetation, in a forest plot network of southern China. Ecol Indic 129:107942
[6]	Cooke SC, Balmford A, Donald PF, Newson SE, Johnston A (2020) Roads as a contributor to landscape-scale variation in bird communities. Nat Commun 11:1–10
[7]	Damsky J, Gall MD (2017) Anthropogenic noise reduces approach of Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) to Tufted Titmouse mobbing calls. Condor 119:26–33
[8]	Deppe JL, Rotenberry JT (2008) Scale-dependent habitat use by fall migratory birds: vegetation structure, floristics, and geography. Ecol Monogr 78:461–487
[9]	des Aunay GH, Slabbekoorn H, Nagle L, Passas F, Nicolas P, Draganoiu TI (2014) Urban noise undermines female sexual preferences for low-frequency songs in domestic canaries. Anim Behav 87:67–75
[10]	Du R, Santi P, Xiao M, Vasilakos AV, Fischione C (2019) The sensable city: a survey on the deployment and management for smart city monitoring. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21:1533–1560
[11]	Estabrook BJ, Ponirakis DW, Clark CW, Rice AN (2016) Widespread spatial and temporal extent of anthropogenic noise across the northeastern Gulf of Mexico shelf ecosystem. Endanger Species Res 30:267–282
[12]	Farina A, Ceraulo M, Bobryk C, Pieretti N, Quinci E, Lattanzi E (2015) Spatial and temporal variation of bird dawn chorus and successive acoustic morning activity in a Mediterranean landscape. Bioacoustics 24:269–288
[13]	Forstmeier W, Burger C, Temnow K, Derégnaucourt S (2009) The genetic basis of zebra finch vocalizations. Evolution 63:2114–2130
[14]	Francis CD, Kleist NJ, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2012) Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal. Proc R Soc B 279:2727–2735
[15]	Francomano D, Gottesman BL, Pijanowski BC (2021) Biogeographical and analytical implications of temporal variability in geographically diverse soundscapes. Ecol Indic 121:106794
[16]	Fuller S, Axel AC, Tucker D, Gage SH (2015) Connecting soundscape to landscape: which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? Ecol Indic 58:207–215
[17]	Gomes DGE, Toth CA, Cole HJ, Francis CD, Barber JR (2021) Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche. Nat Commun 12:1–8
[18]	Green M, Murphy D (2020) Environmental sound monitoring using machine learning on mobile devices. Appl Acoust 159:107041
[19]	Halfwerk W, Bot S, Buikx J, van der Velde M, Komdeur J, ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14549–14554
[20]	Hao ZZ, Wang C, Sun ZK, Zhao DX, Sun BQ, Wang HJ, van den Bosch CK (2021) Vegetation structure and temporality influence the dominance, diversity, and composition of forest acoustic communities. For Ecol Manag 482:118871
[21]	Hao ZZ, Zhan HS, Zhang CY, Pei NC, Sun B, He JH, Wu RC, Xu XH, Wang C (2022) Assessing the effect of human activities on biophony in urban forests using an automated acoustic scene classification model. Ecol Indic 144:109437
[22]	Henry CS, Wells MM (2010) Acoustic niche partitioning in two cryptic sibling species of Chrysoperla green lacewings that must duet before mating. Anim Behav 80:991–1003
[23]	Hong XC, Wang GY, Liu J, Song L, Wu ETY (2021) Modeling the impact of soundscape drivers on perceived birdsongs in urban forests. J Clean Prod 292:125315
[24]	Huisman WHT, Attenborough K (1991) Reverberation and attenuation in a pine forest. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2664–2677
[25]	Kang W, Minor ES, Park CR, Lee D (2015) Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18:857–870
[26]	Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform 12:50–67
[27]	Kern JM, Radford AN (2016) Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk. Environ Pollut 218:988–995
[28]	Kociolek A, Clevenger A, St Clair C, Proppe D (2011) Effects of road networks on bird populations. Conserv Biol 25:241–249
[29]	Kontsiotis VJ, Valsamidis E, Liordos V (2019) Organization and differentiation of breeding bird communities across a forested to urban landscape. Urban For Urban Gree 38:242–250
[30]	Krause BL (1993) The niche hypothesis: a virtual symphony of animal sounds, the origins of musical expression and the health of habitats. Soundsc Newsl 6:6–10
[31]	Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Magrath MJL (2021) A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring and conservation. BioScience 71:1038–1062
[32]	Lai JS, Zou Y, Zhang JL, Peres-Neto PR (2022) Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca.hp R package. Methods Ecol Evol 13:782–788
[33]	Martinez-Sala R, Rubio C, Garcia-Raffi LM, Sanchez-Perez JV, Sanchez-Perez EA, Llinares J (2006) Control of noise by trees arranged like sonic crystals. J Sound Vib 291:100–106
[34]	Mitchell SL, Bicknell JE, Edwards DP, Deere NJ, Bernard H, Davies ZG, Struebig MJ (2020) Spatial replication and habitat context matters for assessments of tropical biodiversity using acoustic indices. Ecol Indic 119:106717
[35]	Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34
[36]	Mullet TC, Farina A, Gage SH (2017) The acoustic habitat hypothesis: an ecoacoustics perspective on species habitat selection. Biosemiotics 10:319–336
[37]	Nemeth E, Brumm H (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive? Am Nat 176:465–475
[38]	Nemeth E, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB, Winkler H (2006) Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? J Acoust Soc Am 119:620–626
[39]	Nemeth E, Pieretti N, Zollinger SA, Geberzahn N, Partecke J, Miranda AC, Brumm H (2013) Bird song and anthropogenic noise: Vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280:20122798
[40]	Newnham GJ, Armston JD, Calders K, Disney MI, Lovell JL, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Danson FM (2015) Terrestrial laser scanning for plot-scale forest measurement. Curr For Rep 1:239–251
[41]	Ow LF, Ghosh S (2017) Urban cities and road traffic noise: Reduction through vegetation. Appl Acoust 120:15–20
[42]	Pekin BK, Jung J, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Ahumada JA (2012) Modeling acoustic diversity using soundscape recordings and LIDAR-derived metrics of vertical forest structure in a neotropical rainforest. Landsc Ecol 27:1513–1522
[43]	Proppe DS, Sturdy CB, St Clair CC (2013) Anthropogenic noise decreases urban songbird diversity and may contribute to homogenization. Glob Change Biol 19:1075–1084
[44]	Raumonen P, Kaasalainen M, ?kerblom M, Kaasalainen S, Kaartinen H, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M, Disney M, Lewis P (2013) Fast automatic precision tree models from terrestrial laser scanner data. Remote Sens 5:491–520
[45]	Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399
[46]	Roe P, Eichinski P, Fuller RA, McDonald PG, Schwarzkopf L, Towsey M, Truskinger A, Tucker D, Watson DM (2021) The australian acoustic observatory. Methods Ecol Evol 12:1802–1808
[47]	Senzaki M, Barber JR, Phillips JN, Carter NH, Cooper CB, Ditmer MA, Fristrup KM, McClure CJW, Mennitt DJ, Tyrrell LP, Vukomanovic J, Wilson AA, Francis CD (2020) Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature 587:605–609
[48]	Sethi SS, Jones NS, Fulcher B, Picinali L, Clink DJ, Klinck H, Orme CDL, Wrege PH, Ewers RM (2020) Characterizing soundscapes across diverse ecosystems using a universal acoustic feature set. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:17049–17055
[49]	Shannon G, McKenna MF, Angeloni LM, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM, Brown E, Warner KA, Nelson MD, White C, Briggs J (2016) A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol Rev 91:982–1005
[50]	Siemers BM, Schaub A (2011) Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:1646–1652
[51]	Slabbekoorn H (2013) Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Anim Behav 85:1089–1099
[52]	Slabbekoorn H, Ellers J, Smith TB (2002) Birdsong and sound transmission: The benefits of reverberations. Condor 104:564–573
[53]	Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EAP (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83
[54]	Slabbekoorn H, Yeh P, Hunt K (2007) Sound transmission and song divergence: a comparison of urban and forest acoustics. Condor 109:67–78
[55]	Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C (2008) Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18:213–226
[56]	Tarrero AI, Martin MA, Gonzalez J, Machimbarrena M, Jacobsen F (2008) Sound propagation in forests: A comparison of experimental results and values predicted by the Nord 2000 model. Appl Acoust 69:662–671
[57]	To AWY, Dingle C, Collins SA (2021) Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: Both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities. Behav Ecol 32:1042–1053
[58]	Ulloa JS, Haupert S, Latorre JF, Aubin T, Sueur J (2021) scikit-maad: an open-source and modular toolbox for quantitative soundscape analysis in Python. Methods Ecol Evol 12:2334–2340
[59]	van Renterghem T, Attenborough K, Maennel M, Defrance J, Horoshenkov K, Kang J, Bashir I, Taherzadeh S, Altreuther B, Khan A, Smyrnova Y, Yang HS (2014) Measured light vehicle noise reduction by hedges. Appl Acoust 78:19–27
[60]	Velez A, Gall MD, Fu JN, Lucas JR (2015) Song structure, not high-frequency song content, determines high-frequency auditory sensitivity in nine species of New World sparrows (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Funct Ecol 29:487–497
[61]	Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera MLJ (2018) Package ‘soundecology’. R package version 1:3