New indices to balance α-diversity against tree size inequality

Abstract

The number and composition of species in a community can be quantified with α-diversity indices, including species richness (R), Simpson’s index (D), and the Shannon–Wiener index ($H^\prime$). In forest communities, there are large variations in tree size among species and individuals of the same species, which result in differences in ecological processes and ecosystem functions. However, tree size inequality (TSI) has been largely neglected in studies using the available diversity indices. The TSI in the diameter at breast height (DBH) data for each of 999 20 m × 20 m forest census quadrats was quantified using the Gini index (GI), a measure of the inequality of size distribution. The generalized performance equation was used to describe the rotated and right-shifted Lorenz curve of the cumulative proportion of DBH and the cumulative proportion of number of trees per quadrat. We also examined the relationships of α-diversity indices with the GI using correlation tests. The generalized performance equation effectively described the rotated and right-shifted Lorenz curve of DBH distributions, with most root-mean-square errors (990 out of 999 quadrats) being < 0.0030. There were significant positive correlations between each of three α-diversity indices (i.e., R, D, and $H^\prime$) and the GI. Nevertheless, the total abundance of trees in each quadrat did not significantly influence the GI. This means that the TSI increased with increasing species diversity. Thus, two new indices are proposed that can balance α-diversity against the extent of TSI in the community: (1 − GI) ×  D, and $(1 − GI) \times H^\prime$. These new indices were significantly correlated with the original D and $H^\prime$, and did not increase the extent of variation within each group of indices. This study presents a useful tool for quantifying both species diversity and the variation in tree sizes in forest communities, especially in the face of cumulative species loss under global climate change.

Keywords

Diameter at breast height (DBH) / Gini index / Shannon–Wiener index / Simpson’s index / Quadrat / Tree size

References

[1]	Ahongshangbam J, R?ll A, Ells??er F, Hendrayanto HD (2020) Airborne tree crown detection for predicting spatial heterogeneity of canopy transpiration in a tropical rainforest. Remote Sens 12:651
[2]	Chen BJW, During HJ, Vermeulen PJ, Anten NPR (2014) The presence of a below-ground neighbour alters within-plant seed size distribution in Phaseolus vulgaris. Ann Bot 114:937–943
[3]	Chotikapanich D, Griffiths WE (2002) Estimating Lorenz curves using a Dirichlet distribution. J Bus Econ Stat 20:290–295
[4]	Cohen JE, Lai JS, Coomes DA, Allen RB (2016) Taylor’s law and related allometric power laws in New Zealand mountain beech forests: the roles of space, time and environment. Oikos 125:1342–1357
[5]	Des Roches S, Post DM, Turley NE, Bailey JK, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT, Schweitzer JA, Palkovacs EP (2017) The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat Ecol Evol 2:57–64
[6]	Fleck S, M?lder I, Jacob M, Gebauer T, Jungkunst HF, Leuschner C (2011) Comparison of conventional eight-point crown projections with LiDAR-based virtual crown projections in a temperate old-growth forest. Ann for Sci 68:1173–1185
[7]	Gastwirth JL (1972) The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev Econ Stat 54:306–316
[8]	Huang LC, Ratkowsky DA, Hui C, Gielis J, Lian M, Yao WH, Li QY, Zhang LY, Shi PJ (2023) Inequality measure of leaf area distribution for a drought-tolerant landscape plant. Plants 12:3143
[9]	Huey RB, Stevenson RD (1979) Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Am Zool 19:357–366
[10]	Lai JS, Coomes DA, Du XJ, Hsieh CF, Sun IF, Chao WC, Mi XC, Ren HB, Wang XG, Hao ZQ, Ma KP (2013) A general combined model to describe tree-diameter distributions within subtropical and temperate forest communities. Oikos 122:1636–1642
[11]	Landi P, Minoarivelo HO, Br?nnstr?m ?, Hui C, Dieckmann U (2018) Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory. Popul Ecol 60:319–345
[12]	Lehman CL, Tilman D (2000) Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities. Am Nat 156:534–552
[13]	Lian M, Shi PJ, Zhang LY, Yao WH, Gielis J, Niklas KJ (2023) A generalized performance equation and its application in measuring the Gini index of leaf size inequality. Trees Struct Funct 37:1555–1565
[14]	Liu GH, Hui C, Chen M, Pile LS, Wang GG, Wang FS, Shi PJ (2020) Variation in individual biomass decreases faster than mean of biomass with density increasing density of bamboo stands. J for Res 31:981–987
[15]	Liu GH, Shi PJ, Xu Q, Dong XB, Wang FS, Wang GG, Hui C (2016) Does the size–density relationship developed for bamboo species conform to the self-thinning rule? For Ecol Manage 361:339–345
[16]	Lorenz MO (1905) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Am Stat Assoc 9:209–219
[17]	McDonald JB (1984) Some generalized functions for the size distribution of income. Econometrica 52:647–665
[18]	McDonald JB, Xu YJ (1995) A generalization of the beta distribution with applications. J Econ 66:133–152
[19]	Metsaranta JM, Lieffers VJ (2008) Inequality of size and size increment in Pinus banksiana in relation to stand dynamics and annual growth rate. Ann Bot 101:561–571
[20]	Moore JR, Zhu K, Huntingford C, Cox PM (2018) Equilibrium forest demography explains the distribution of tree sizes across North America. Environ Res Lett 13:084019
[21]	Muller-Landau HC, Condit RS, Harms KE, Marks CO, Thomas SC, Bunyavejchewin S, Chuyong G, Co L, Davies S, Foster R, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hart T, Hubbell SP, Itoh A, Kassim AR, Kenfack D, LaFrankie JV, Lagunzad D, Lee HS, Losos E, Makana JR, Ohkubo T, Samper C, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Supardi NMN, Tan S, Thomas D, Thompson J, Valencia R, Vallejo MI, Mu?oz GV, Yamakura T, Zimmerman JK, Dattaraja HS, Esufali S, Hall P, He FL, Hernandez C, Kiratiprayoon S, Suresh HS, Wills C, Ashton P (2006) Comparing tropical forest tree size distributions with the predictions of metabolic ecology and equilibrium models. Ecol Lett 9:589–602
[22]	Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
[23]	Piponiot C, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Davies SJ, Allen D, Bourg NA, Burslem DFRP, Cárdenas D, Chang-Yang CH, Chuyong G, Cordell S, Dattaraja HS, Duque A, Ediriweera S, Ewango C, Ezedin Z, Filip J, Giardina CP, Howe R, Hsieh CF, Hubbell SP, Inman-Narahari FM, Itoh A, Janík D, Kenfack D, Král K, Lutz JA, Makana JR, McMahon SM, McShea W, Mi XC, Mohamad M, Novotny V, O’Brien MJ, Ostertag R, Parker G, Pérez R, Ren HB, Reynolds G, Sabri MD, Sack L, Shringi A, Su SH, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Suresh HS, Thomas DW, Thompson J, Uriarte M, Vandermeer J, Wang YQ, Ware IM, Weiblen GD, Whitfeld TJS, Wolf A, Yao TL, Yu MJ, Yuan ZQ, Zimmerman JK, Zuleta D, Muller-Landau HC (2022) Distribution of biomass dynamics in relation to tree size in forests across the world. New Phytol 234:1664–1677
[24]	R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed on 01.06.2022]
[25]	Schrader J, Shi PJ, Royer DL, Peppe DJ, Gallagher RV, Li YR, Wang R, Wright IJ (2021) Leaf size estimation based on leaf length, width and shape. Ann Bot 128:395–406
[26]	Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(379–423):623–656
[27]	Shi PJ, Gao J, Song ZP, Liu YH, Hui C (2018) Spatial segregation facilitates the coexistence of tree species in temperate forests. Forests 9:768
[28]	Shi PJ, Ge F, Sun YC, Chen CL (2011) A simple model for describing the effect of temperature on insect developmental rate. J Asia-Pac Entomol 14:15–20
[29]	Shi PJ, Liu MD, Ratkowsky DA, Gielis J, Su JL, Yu XJ, Wang P, Zhang LF, Lin ZY, Schrader J (2019) Leaf area-length allometry and its implications in leaf shape evolution. Trees Struct Funct 33:1073–1085
[30]	Shi PJ, Quinn BK, Chen L, Gao J, Schrader J (2023) Forest survey data of a landscape in Pine Mountain, Dryad. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h9w0vt4np[accessedon10.04.2023]
[31]	Shi PJ, Ridland PM, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y (2022) IPEC: root mean square curvature calculation. R package version 1.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=IPEC [accessed on 01.06.2022]
[32]	Silva CA, Hudak AT, Vierling LA, Loudermilk EL, O’Brien JJ, Hiers JK, Jack SB, Gonzalez-Benecke C, Lee H, Falkowski MJ, Khosravipour A (2016) Imputation of individual longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) tree attributes from field and LiDAR data. Can J Remote Sens 42:554–573
[33]	Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688
[34]	Singh A, Singh JS (2001) Comparative growth behaviour and leaf nutrient status of native trees planted on mine spoil with and without nutrient amendment. Ann Bot 87:777–787
[35]	Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H (2013) Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol 33:106–118
[36]	Taylor KM, Aarssen LW (1989) Neighbor effects in mast year seedlings of Acer saccharum. Am J Bot 76:546–554
[37]	Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM (2014) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:471–493
[38]	Wang LF, Shi PJ, Chen C, Xue FS (2013) Effect of temperature on the development of Laodelphax striatellus (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J Econ Entomol 106:107–114
[39]	Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
[40]	Wyckoff PH, Clark JS (2005) Tree growth prediction using size and exposed crown area. Can J for Res 35:13–20
[41]	Yu XJ, Shi PJ, Schrader J, Niklas KJ (2020) Nondestructive estimation of leaf area for 15 species of vines with different leaf shapes. Am J Bot 107:1481–1490
[42]	Zhang LJ (1997) Cross-validation of non-linear growth functions for modelling tree height–diameter relationships. Ann Bot 79:251–257